2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* linux/mm/swap.c
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 Linus Torvalds
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2007-10-20 07:27:18 +08:00
|
|
|
* This file contains the default values for the operation of the
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
* Linux VM subsystem. Fine-tuning documentation can be found in
|
|
|
|
* Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt.
|
|
|
|
* Started 18.12.91
|
|
|
|
* Swap aging added 23.2.95, Stephen Tweedie.
|
|
|
|
* Buffermem limits added 12.3.98, Rik van Riel.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/mm.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/sched.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/swap.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/mman.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/pagemap.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/pagevec.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/init.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/module.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/mm_inline.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/buffer_head.h> /* for try_to_release_page() */
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/percpu_counter.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/percpu.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/cpu.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/notifier.h>
|
2007-10-17 14:25:46 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/backing-dev.h>
|
2008-02-07 16:13:56 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/memcontrol.h>
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-10-19 11:26:52 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "internal.h"
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
/* How many pages do we try to swap or page in/out together? */
|
|
|
|
int page_cluster;
|
|
|
|
|
2008-10-19 11:26:19 +08:00
|
|
|
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec[NR_LRU_LISTS], lru_add_pvecs);
|
2008-07-24 12:28:14 +08:00
|
|
|
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, lru_rotate_pvecs);
|
mm: use pagevec to rotate reclaimable page
While running some memory intensive load, system response deteriorated just
after swap-out started.
The cause of this problem is that when a PG_reclaim page is moved to the tail
of the inactive LRU list in rotate_reclaimable_page(), lru_lock spin lock is
acquired every page writeback . This deteriorates system performance and
makes interrupt hold off time longer when swap-out started.
Following patch solves this problem. I use pagevec in rotating reclaimable
pages to mitigate LRU spin lock contention and reduce interrupt hold off time.
I did a test that allocating and touching pages in multiple processes, and
pinging to the test machine in flooding mode to measure response under memory
intensive load.
The test result is:
-2.6.23-rc5
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53222ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.652/172.228/7.176 ms, pipe 11, ipg/ewma
17.746/0.092 ms
-2.6.23-rc5-patched
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma
17.314/0.091 ms
Max round-trip-time was improved.
The test machine spec is that 4CPU(3.16GHz, Hyper-threading enabled)
8GB memory , 8GB swap.
I did ping test again to observe performance deterioration caused by taking
a ref.
-2.6.23-rc6-with-modifiedpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53386ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.110/4.716/0.147 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.801/0.129 ms
The result for my original patch is as follows.
-2.6.23-rc5-with-originalpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.314/0.091 ms
The influence to response was small.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix uninitalised var warning]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix locking]
[randy.dunlap@oracle.com: fix function declaration]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix BUG at include/linux/mm.h:220!]
[hugh@veritas.com: kill redundancy in rotate_reclaimable_page]
[hugh@veritas.com: move_tail_pages into lru_add_drain]
Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-16 16:24:52 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-09-26 14:31:02 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* This path almost never happens for VM activity - pages are normally
|
|
|
|
* freed via pagevecs. But it gets used by networking.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2008-02-05 14:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
static void __page_cache_release(struct page *page)
|
2006-09-26 14:31:02 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (PageLRU(page)) {
|
|
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
|
|
struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
VM_BUG_ON(!PageLRU(page));
|
|
|
|
__ClearPageLRU(page);
|
|
|
|
del_page_from_lru(zone, page);
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
free_hot_page(page);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-02-08 04:58:52 +08:00
|
|
|
static void put_compound_page(struct page *page)
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2007-05-07 05:49:39 +08:00
|
|
|
page = compound_head(page);
|
2006-02-08 04:58:52 +08:00
|
|
|
if (put_page_testzero(page)) {
|
2006-12-07 12:33:32 +08:00
|
|
|
compound_page_dtor *dtor;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-07 12:33:32 +08:00
|
|
|
dtor = get_compound_page_dtor(page);
|
2006-02-08 04:58:52 +08:00
|
|
|
(*dtor)(page);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2006-02-08 04:58:52 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void put_page(struct page *page)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (unlikely(PageCompound(page)))
|
|
|
|
put_compound_page(page);
|
|
|
|
else if (put_page_testzero(page))
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
__page_cache_release(page);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_page);
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-14 14:24:27 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
2008-03-20 08:00:40 +08:00
|
|
|
* put_pages_list() - release a list of pages
|
|
|
|
* @pages: list of pages threaded on page->lru
|
2006-08-14 14:24:27 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Release a list of pages which are strung together on page.lru. Currently
|
|
|
|
* used by read_cache_pages() and related error recovery code.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void put_pages_list(struct list_head *pages)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
while (!list_empty(pages)) {
|
|
|
|
struct page *victim;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
victim = list_entry(pages->prev, struct page, lru);
|
|
|
|
list_del(&victim->lru);
|
|
|
|
page_cache_release(victim);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_pages_list);
|
|
|
|
|
mm: use pagevec to rotate reclaimable page
While running some memory intensive load, system response deteriorated just
after swap-out started.
The cause of this problem is that when a PG_reclaim page is moved to the tail
of the inactive LRU list in rotate_reclaimable_page(), lru_lock spin lock is
acquired every page writeback . This deteriorates system performance and
makes interrupt hold off time longer when swap-out started.
Following patch solves this problem. I use pagevec in rotating reclaimable
pages to mitigate LRU spin lock contention and reduce interrupt hold off time.
I did a test that allocating and touching pages in multiple processes, and
pinging to the test machine in flooding mode to measure response under memory
intensive load.
The test result is:
-2.6.23-rc5
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53222ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.652/172.228/7.176 ms, pipe 11, ipg/ewma
17.746/0.092 ms
-2.6.23-rc5-patched
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma
17.314/0.091 ms
Max round-trip-time was improved.
The test machine spec is that 4CPU(3.16GHz, Hyper-threading enabled)
8GB memory , 8GB swap.
I did ping test again to observe performance deterioration caused by taking
a ref.
-2.6.23-rc6-with-modifiedpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53386ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.110/4.716/0.147 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.801/0.129 ms
The result for my original patch is as follows.
-2.6.23-rc5-with-originalpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.314/0.091 ms
The influence to response was small.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix uninitalised var warning]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix locking]
[randy.dunlap@oracle.com: fix function declaration]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix BUG at include/linux/mm.h:220!]
[hugh@veritas.com: kill redundancy in rotate_reclaimable_page]
[hugh@veritas.com: move_tail_pages into lru_add_drain]
Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-16 16:24:52 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* pagevec_move_tail() must be called with IRQ disabled.
|
|
|
|
* Otherwise this may cause nasty races.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static void pagevec_move_tail(struct pagevec *pvec)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
int pgmoved = 0;
|
|
|
|
struct zone *zone = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < pagevec_count(pvec); i++) {
|
|
|
|
struct page *page = pvec->pages[i];
|
|
|
|
struct zone *pagezone = page_zone(page);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (pagezone != zone) {
|
|
|
|
if (zone)
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&zone->lru_lock);
|
|
|
|
zone = pagezone;
|
|
|
|
spin_lock(&zone->lru_lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
Unevictable LRU Infrastructure
When the system contains lots of mlocked or otherwise unevictable pages,
the pageout code (kswapd) can spend lots of time scanning over these
pages. Worse still, the presence of lots of unevictable pages can confuse
kswapd into thinking that more aggressive pageout modes are required,
resulting in all kinds of bad behaviour.
Infrastructure to manage pages excluded from reclaim--i.e., hidden from
vmscan. Based on a patch by Larry Woodman of Red Hat. Reworked to
maintain "unevictable" pages on a separate per-zone LRU list, to "hide"
them from vmscan.
Kosaki Motohiro added the support for the memory controller unevictable
lru list.
Pages on the unevictable list have both PG_unevictable and PG_lru set.
Thus, PG_unevictable is analogous to and mutually exclusive with
PG_active--it specifies which LRU list the page is on.
The unevictable infrastructure is enabled by a new mm Kconfig option
[CONFIG_]UNEVICTABLE_LRU.
A new function 'page_evictable(page, vma)' in vmscan.c tests whether or
not a page may be evictable. Subsequent patches will add the various
!evictable tests. We'll want to keep these tests light-weight for use in
shrink_active_list() and, possibly, the fault path.
To avoid races between tasks putting pages [back] onto an LRU list and
tasks that might be moving the page from non-evictable to evictable state,
the new function 'putback_lru_page()' -- inverse to 'isolate_lru_page()'
-- tests the "evictability" of a page after placing it on the LRU, before
dropping the reference. If the page has become unevictable,
putback_lru_page() will redo the 'putback', thus moving the page to the
unevictable list. This way, we avoid "stranding" evictable pages on the
unevictable list.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fallout from out-of-order merge]
[riel@redhat.com: fix UNEVICTABLE_LRU and !PROC_PAGE_MONITOR build]
[nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp: remove redundant mapping check]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: unevictable-lru-infrastructure: putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling rework]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: kill unnecessary lock_page() in vmscan.c]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert migration change of unevictable lru infrastructure]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert to unevictable-lru-infrastructure-kconfig-fix.patch]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: restore patch failure of vmstat-unevictable-and-mlocked-pages-vm-events.patch]
Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Debugged-by: Benjamin Kidwell <benjkidwell@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 11:26:39 +08:00
|
|
|
if (PageLRU(page) && !PageActive(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
|
2008-10-19 11:26:32 +08:00
|
|
|
int lru = page_is_file_cache(page);
|
|
|
|
list_move_tail(&page->lru, &zone->lru[lru].list);
|
mm: use pagevec to rotate reclaimable page
While running some memory intensive load, system response deteriorated just
after swap-out started.
The cause of this problem is that when a PG_reclaim page is moved to the tail
of the inactive LRU list in rotate_reclaimable_page(), lru_lock spin lock is
acquired every page writeback . This deteriorates system performance and
makes interrupt hold off time longer when swap-out started.
Following patch solves this problem. I use pagevec in rotating reclaimable
pages to mitigate LRU spin lock contention and reduce interrupt hold off time.
I did a test that allocating and touching pages in multiple processes, and
pinging to the test machine in flooding mode to measure response under memory
intensive load.
The test result is:
-2.6.23-rc5
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53222ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.652/172.228/7.176 ms, pipe 11, ipg/ewma
17.746/0.092 ms
-2.6.23-rc5-patched
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma
17.314/0.091 ms
Max round-trip-time was improved.
The test machine spec is that 4CPU(3.16GHz, Hyper-threading enabled)
8GB memory , 8GB swap.
I did ping test again to observe performance deterioration caused by taking
a ref.
-2.6.23-rc6-with-modifiedpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53386ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.110/4.716/0.147 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.801/0.129 ms
The result for my original patch is as follows.
-2.6.23-rc5-with-originalpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.314/0.091 ms
The influence to response was small.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix uninitalised var warning]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix locking]
[randy.dunlap@oracle.com: fix function declaration]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix BUG at include/linux/mm.h:220!]
[hugh@veritas.com: kill redundancy in rotate_reclaimable_page]
[hugh@veritas.com: move_tail_pages into lru_add_drain]
Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-16 16:24:52 +08:00
|
|
|
pgmoved++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (zone)
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&zone->lru_lock);
|
|
|
|
__count_vm_events(PGROTATED, pgmoved);
|
|
|
|
release_pages(pvec->pages, pvec->nr, pvec->cold);
|
|
|
|
pagevec_reinit(pvec);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Writeback is about to end against a page which has been marked for immediate
|
|
|
|
* reclaim. If it still appears to be reclaimable, move it to the tail of the
|
mm: use pagevec to rotate reclaimable page
While running some memory intensive load, system response deteriorated just
after swap-out started.
The cause of this problem is that when a PG_reclaim page is moved to the tail
of the inactive LRU list in rotate_reclaimable_page(), lru_lock spin lock is
acquired every page writeback . This deteriorates system performance and
makes interrupt hold off time longer when swap-out started.
Following patch solves this problem. I use pagevec in rotating reclaimable
pages to mitigate LRU spin lock contention and reduce interrupt hold off time.
I did a test that allocating and touching pages in multiple processes, and
pinging to the test machine in flooding mode to measure response under memory
intensive load.
The test result is:
-2.6.23-rc5
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53222ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.652/172.228/7.176 ms, pipe 11, ipg/ewma
17.746/0.092 ms
-2.6.23-rc5-patched
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma
17.314/0.091 ms
Max round-trip-time was improved.
The test machine spec is that 4CPU(3.16GHz, Hyper-threading enabled)
8GB memory , 8GB swap.
I did ping test again to observe performance deterioration caused by taking
a ref.
-2.6.23-rc6-with-modifiedpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53386ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.110/4.716/0.147 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.801/0.129 ms
The result for my original patch is as follows.
-2.6.23-rc5-with-originalpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.314/0.091 ms
The influence to response was small.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix uninitalised var warning]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix locking]
[randy.dunlap@oracle.com: fix function declaration]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix BUG at include/linux/mm.h:220!]
[hugh@veritas.com: kill redundancy in rotate_reclaimable_page]
[hugh@veritas.com: move_tail_pages into lru_add_drain]
Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-16 16:24:52 +08:00
|
|
|
* inactive list.
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2008-04-28 17:12:38 +08:00
|
|
|
void rotate_reclaimable_page(struct page *page)
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2008-04-28 17:12:38 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!PageLocked(page) && !PageDirty(page) && !PageActive(page) &&
|
Unevictable LRU Infrastructure
When the system contains lots of mlocked or otherwise unevictable pages,
the pageout code (kswapd) can spend lots of time scanning over these
pages. Worse still, the presence of lots of unevictable pages can confuse
kswapd into thinking that more aggressive pageout modes are required,
resulting in all kinds of bad behaviour.
Infrastructure to manage pages excluded from reclaim--i.e., hidden from
vmscan. Based on a patch by Larry Woodman of Red Hat. Reworked to
maintain "unevictable" pages on a separate per-zone LRU list, to "hide"
them from vmscan.
Kosaki Motohiro added the support for the memory controller unevictable
lru list.
Pages on the unevictable list have both PG_unevictable and PG_lru set.
Thus, PG_unevictable is analogous to and mutually exclusive with
PG_active--it specifies which LRU list the page is on.
The unevictable infrastructure is enabled by a new mm Kconfig option
[CONFIG_]UNEVICTABLE_LRU.
A new function 'page_evictable(page, vma)' in vmscan.c tests whether or
not a page may be evictable. Subsequent patches will add the various
!evictable tests. We'll want to keep these tests light-weight for use in
shrink_active_list() and, possibly, the fault path.
To avoid races between tasks putting pages [back] onto an LRU list and
tasks that might be moving the page from non-evictable to evictable state,
the new function 'putback_lru_page()' -- inverse to 'isolate_lru_page()'
-- tests the "evictability" of a page after placing it on the LRU, before
dropping the reference. If the page has become unevictable,
putback_lru_page() will redo the 'putback', thus moving the page to the
unevictable list. This way, we avoid "stranding" evictable pages on the
unevictable list.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fallout from out-of-order merge]
[riel@redhat.com: fix UNEVICTABLE_LRU and !PROC_PAGE_MONITOR build]
[nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp: remove redundant mapping check]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: unevictable-lru-infrastructure: putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling rework]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: kill unnecessary lock_page() in vmscan.c]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert migration change of unevictable lru infrastructure]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert to unevictable-lru-infrastructure-kconfig-fix.patch]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: restore patch failure of vmstat-unevictable-and-mlocked-pages-vm-events.patch]
Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Debugged-by: Benjamin Kidwell <benjkidwell@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 11:26:39 +08:00
|
|
|
!PageUnevictable(page) && PageLRU(page)) {
|
2008-04-28 17:12:38 +08:00
|
|
|
struct pagevec *pvec;
|
|
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
page_cache_get(page);
|
|
|
|
local_irq_save(flags);
|
|
|
|
pvec = &__get_cpu_var(lru_rotate_pvecs);
|
|
|
|
if (!pagevec_add(pvec, page))
|
|
|
|
pagevec_move_tail(pvec);
|
|
|
|
local_irq_restore(flags);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2009-01-08 10:08:20 +08:00
|
|
|
static void update_page_reclaim_stat(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
|
|
|
|
int file, int rotated)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = &zone->reclaim_stat;
|
|
|
|
struct zone_reclaim_stat *memcg_reclaim_stat;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
memcg_reclaim_stat = mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_from_page(page);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[file]++;
|
|
|
|
if (rotated)
|
|
|
|
reclaim_stat->recent_rotated[file]++;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!memcg_reclaim_stat)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
memcg_reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[file]++;
|
|
|
|
if (rotated)
|
|
|
|
memcg_reclaim_stat->recent_rotated[file]++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* FIXME: speed this up?
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2008-02-05 14:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
void activate_page(struct page *page)
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
|
Unevictable LRU Infrastructure
When the system contains lots of mlocked or otherwise unevictable pages,
the pageout code (kswapd) can spend lots of time scanning over these
pages. Worse still, the presence of lots of unevictable pages can confuse
kswapd into thinking that more aggressive pageout modes are required,
resulting in all kinds of bad behaviour.
Infrastructure to manage pages excluded from reclaim--i.e., hidden from
vmscan. Based on a patch by Larry Woodman of Red Hat. Reworked to
maintain "unevictable" pages on a separate per-zone LRU list, to "hide"
them from vmscan.
Kosaki Motohiro added the support for the memory controller unevictable
lru list.
Pages on the unevictable list have both PG_unevictable and PG_lru set.
Thus, PG_unevictable is analogous to and mutually exclusive with
PG_active--it specifies which LRU list the page is on.
The unevictable infrastructure is enabled by a new mm Kconfig option
[CONFIG_]UNEVICTABLE_LRU.
A new function 'page_evictable(page, vma)' in vmscan.c tests whether or
not a page may be evictable. Subsequent patches will add the various
!evictable tests. We'll want to keep these tests light-weight for use in
shrink_active_list() and, possibly, the fault path.
To avoid races between tasks putting pages [back] onto an LRU list and
tasks that might be moving the page from non-evictable to evictable state,
the new function 'putback_lru_page()' -- inverse to 'isolate_lru_page()'
-- tests the "evictability" of a page after placing it on the LRU, before
dropping the reference. If the page has become unevictable,
putback_lru_page() will redo the 'putback', thus moving the page to the
unevictable list. This way, we avoid "stranding" evictable pages on the
unevictable list.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fallout from out-of-order merge]
[riel@redhat.com: fix UNEVICTABLE_LRU and !PROC_PAGE_MONITOR build]
[nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp: remove redundant mapping check]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: unevictable-lru-infrastructure: putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling rework]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: kill unnecessary lock_page() in vmscan.c]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert migration change of unevictable lru infrastructure]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert to unevictable-lru-infrastructure-kconfig-fix.patch]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: restore patch failure of vmstat-unevictable-and-mlocked-pages-vm-events.patch]
Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Debugged-by: Benjamin Kidwell <benjkidwell@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 11:26:39 +08:00
|
|
|
if (PageLRU(page) && !PageActive(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
|
2008-10-19 11:26:32 +08:00
|
|
|
int file = page_is_file_cache(page);
|
|
|
|
int lru = LRU_BASE + file;
|
|
|
|
del_page_from_lru_list(zone, page, lru);
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
SetPageActive(page);
|
2008-10-19 11:26:32 +08:00
|
|
|
lru += LRU_ACTIVE;
|
|
|
|
add_page_to_lru_list(zone, page, lru);
|
2006-06-30 16:55:45 +08:00
|
|
|
__count_vm_event(PGACTIVATE);
|
2008-10-19 11:26:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-01-08 10:08:20 +08:00
|
|
|
update_page_reclaim_stat(zone, page, !!file, 1);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Mark a page as having seen activity.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* inactive,unreferenced -> inactive,referenced
|
|
|
|
* inactive,referenced -> active,unreferenced
|
|
|
|
* active,unreferenced -> active,referenced
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2008-02-05 14:29:26 +08:00
|
|
|
void mark_page_accessed(struct page *page)
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
Unevictable LRU Infrastructure
When the system contains lots of mlocked or otherwise unevictable pages,
the pageout code (kswapd) can spend lots of time scanning over these
pages. Worse still, the presence of lots of unevictable pages can confuse
kswapd into thinking that more aggressive pageout modes are required,
resulting in all kinds of bad behaviour.
Infrastructure to manage pages excluded from reclaim--i.e., hidden from
vmscan. Based on a patch by Larry Woodman of Red Hat. Reworked to
maintain "unevictable" pages on a separate per-zone LRU list, to "hide"
them from vmscan.
Kosaki Motohiro added the support for the memory controller unevictable
lru list.
Pages on the unevictable list have both PG_unevictable and PG_lru set.
Thus, PG_unevictable is analogous to and mutually exclusive with
PG_active--it specifies which LRU list the page is on.
The unevictable infrastructure is enabled by a new mm Kconfig option
[CONFIG_]UNEVICTABLE_LRU.
A new function 'page_evictable(page, vma)' in vmscan.c tests whether or
not a page may be evictable. Subsequent patches will add the various
!evictable tests. We'll want to keep these tests light-weight for use in
shrink_active_list() and, possibly, the fault path.
To avoid races between tasks putting pages [back] onto an LRU list and
tasks that might be moving the page from non-evictable to evictable state,
the new function 'putback_lru_page()' -- inverse to 'isolate_lru_page()'
-- tests the "evictability" of a page after placing it on the LRU, before
dropping the reference. If the page has become unevictable,
putback_lru_page() will redo the 'putback', thus moving the page to the
unevictable list. This way, we avoid "stranding" evictable pages on the
unevictable list.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fallout from out-of-order merge]
[riel@redhat.com: fix UNEVICTABLE_LRU and !PROC_PAGE_MONITOR build]
[nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp: remove redundant mapping check]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: unevictable-lru-infrastructure: putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling rework]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: kill unnecessary lock_page() in vmscan.c]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert migration change of unevictable lru infrastructure]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert to unevictable-lru-infrastructure-kconfig-fix.patch]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: restore patch failure of vmstat-unevictable-and-mlocked-pages-vm-events.patch]
Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Debugged-by: Benjamin Kidwell <benjkidwell@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 11:26:39 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!PageActive(page) && !PageUnevictable(page) &&
|
|
|
|
PageReferenced(page) && PageLRU(page)) {
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
activate_page(page);
|
|
|
|
ClearPageReferenced(page);
|
|
|
|
} else if (!PageReferenced(page)) {
|
|
|
|
SetPageReferenced(page);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mark_page_accessed);
|
|
|
|
|
2008-10-19 11:26:19 +08:00
|
|
|
void __lru_cache_add(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru)
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2008-10-19 11:26:19 +08:00
|
|
|
struct pagevec *pvec = &get_cpu_var(lru_add_pvecs)[lru];
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
page_cache_get(page);
|
|
|
|
if (!pagevec_add(pvec, page))
|
2008-10-19 11:26:19 +08:00
|
|
|
____pagevec_lru_add(pvec, lru);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
put_cpu_var(lru_add_pvecs);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2008-10-19 11:26:19 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* lru_cache_add_lru - add a page to a page list
|
|
|
|
* @page: the page to be added to the LRU.
|
|
|
|
* @lru: the LRU list to which the page is added.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void lru_cache_add_lru(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru)
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2008-10-19 11:26:19 +08:00
|
|
|
if (PageActive(page)) {
|
Unevictable LRU Infrastructure
When the system contains lots of mlocked or otherwise unevictable pages,
the pageout code (kswapd) can spend lots of time scanning over these
pages. Worse still, the presence of lots of unevictable pages can confuse
kswapd into thinking that more aggressive pageout modes are required,
resulting in all kinds of bad behaviour.
Infrastructure to manage pages excluded from reclaim--i.e., hidden from
vmscan. Based on a patch by Larry Woodman of Red Hat. Reworked to
maintain "unevictable" pages on a separate per-zone LRU list, to "hide"
them from vmscan.
Kosaki Motohiro added the support for the memory controller unevictable
lru list.
Pages on the unevictable list have both PG_unevictable and PG_lru set.
Thus, PG_unevictable is analogous to and mutually exclusive with
PG_active--it specifies which LRU list the page is on.
The unevictable infrastructure is enabled by a new mm Kconfig option
[CONFIG_]UNEVICTABLE_LRU.
A new function 'page_evictable(page, vma)' in vmscan.c tests whether or
not a page may be evictable. Subsequent patches will add the various
!evictable tests. We'll want to keep these tests light-weight for use in
shrink_active_list() and, possibly, the fault path.
To avoid races between tasks putting pages [back] onto an LRU list and
tasks that might be moving the page from non-evictable to evictable state,
the new function 'putback_lru_page()' -- inverse to 'isolate_lru_page()'
-- tests the "evictability" of a page after placing it on the LRU, before
dropping the reference. If the page has become unevictable,
putback_lru_page() will redo the 'putback', thus moving the page to the
unevictable list. This way, we avoid "stranding" evictable pages on the
unevictable list.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fallout from out-of-order merge]
[riel@redhat.com: fix UNEVICTABLE_LRU and !PROC_PAGE_MONITOR build]
[nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp: remove redundant mapping check]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: unevictable-lru-infrastructure: putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling rework]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: kill unnecessary lock_page() in vmscan.c]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert migration change of unevictable lru infrastructure]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert to unevictable-lru-infrastructure-kconfig-fix.patch]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: restore patch failure of vmstat-unevictable-and-mlocked-pages-vm-events.patch]
Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Debugged-by: Benjamin Kidwell <benjkidwell@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 11:26:39 +08:00
|
|
|
VM_BUG_ON(PageUnevictable(page));
|
2008-10-19 11:26:19 +08:00
|
|
|
ClearPageActive(page);
|
Unevictable LRU Infrastructure
When the system contains lots of mlocked or otherwise unevictable pages,
the pageout code (kswapd) can spend lots of time scanning over these
pages. Worse still, the presence of lots of unevictable pages can confuse
kswapd into thinking that more aggressive pageout modes are required,
resulting in all kinds of bad behaviour.
Infrastructure to manage pages excluded from reclaim--i.e., hidden from
vmscan. Based on a patch by Larry Woodman of Red Hat. Reworked to
maintain "unevictable" pages on a separate per-zone LRU list, to "hide"
them from vmscan.
Kosaki Motohiro added the support for the memory controller unevictable
lru list.
Pages on the unevictable list have both PG_unevictable and PG_lru set.
Thus, PG_unevictable is analogous to and mutually exclusive with
PG_active--it specifies which LRU list the page is on.
The unevictable infrastructure is enabled by a new mm Kconfig option
[CONFIG_]UNEVICTABLE_LRU.
A new function 'page_evictable(page, vma)' in vmscan.c tests whether or
not a page may be evictable. Subsequent patches will add the various
!evictable tests. We'll want to keep these tests light-weight for use in
shrink_active_list() and, possibly, the fault path.
To avoid races between tasks putting pages [back] onto an LRU list and
tasks that might be moving the page from non-evictable to evictable state,
the new function 'putback_lru_page()' -- inverse to 'isolate_lru_page()'
-- tests the "evictability" of a page after placing it on the LRU, before
dropping the reference. If the page has become unevictable,
putback_lru_page() will redo the 'putback', thus moving the page to the
unevictable list. This way, we avoid "stranding" evictable pages on the
unevictable list.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fallout from out-of-order merge]
[riel@redhat.com: fix UNEVICTABLE_LRU and !PROC_PAGE_MONITOR build]
[nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp: remove redundant mapping check]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: unevictable-lru-infrastructure: putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling rework]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: kill unnecessary lock_page() in vmscan.c]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert migration change of unevictable lru infrastructure]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert to unevictable-lru-infrastructure-kconfig-fix.patch]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: restore patch failure of vmstat-unevictable-and-mlocked-pages-vm-events.patch]
Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Debugged-by: Benjamin Kidwell <benjkidwell@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 11:26:39 +08:00
|
|
|
} else if (PageUnevictable(page)) {
|
|
|
|
VM_BUG_ON(PageActive(page));
|
|
|
|
ClearPageUnevictable(page);
|
2008-10-19 11:26:19 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Unevictable LRU Infrastructure
When the system contains lots of mlocked or otherwise unevictable pages,
the pageout code (kswapd) can spend lots of time scanning over these
pages. Worse still, the presence of lots of unevictable pages can confuse
kswapd into thinking that more aggressive pageout modes are required,
resulting in all kinds of bad behaviour.
Infrastructure to manage pages excluded from reclaim--i.e., hidden from
vmscan. Based on a patch by Larry Woodman of Red Hat. Reworked to
maintain "unevictable" pages on a separate per-zone LRU list, to "hide"
them from vmscan.
Kosaki Motohiro added the support for the memory controller unevictable
lru list.
Pages on the unevictable list have both PG_unevictable and PG_lru set.
Thus, PG_unevictable is analogous to and mutually exclusive with
PG_active--it specifies which LRU list the page is on.
The unevictable infrastructure is enabled by a new mm Kconfig option
[CONFIG_]UNEVICTABLE_LRU.
A new function 'page_evictable(page, vma)' in vmscan.c tests whether or
not a page may be evictable. Subsequent patches will add the various
!evictable tests. We'll want to keep these tests light-weight for use in
shrink_active_list() and, possibly, the fault path.
To avoid races between tasks putting pages [back] onto an LRU list and
tasks that might be moving the page from non-evictable to evictable state,
the new function 'putback_lru_page()' -- inverse to 'isolate_lru_page()'
-- tests the "evictability" of a page after placing it on the LRU, before
dropping the reference. If the page has become unevictable,
putback_lru_page() will redo the 'putback', thus moving the page to the
unevictable list. This way, we avoid "stranding" evictable pages on the
unevictable list.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fallout from out-of-order merge]
[riel@redhat.com: fix UNEVICTABLE_LRU and !PROC_PAGE_MONITOR build]
[nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp: remove redundant mapping check]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: unevictable-lru-infrastructure: putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling rework]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: kill unnecessary lock_page() in vmscan.c]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert migration change of unevictable lru infrastructure]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert to unevictable-lru-infrastructure-kconfig-fix.patch]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: restore patch failure of vmstat-unevictable-and-mlocked-pages-vm-events.patch]
Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Debugged-by: Benjamin Kidwell <benjkidwell@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 11:26:39 +08:00
|
|
|
VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(page) || PageActive(page) || PageUnevictable(page));
|
2008-10-19 11:26:19 +08:00
|
|
|
__lru_cache_add(page, lru);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Unevictable LRU Infrastructure
When the system contains lots of mlocked or otherwise unevictable pages,
the pageout code (kswapd) can spend lots of time scanning over these
pages. Worse still, the presence of lots of unevictable pages can confuse
kswapd into thinking that more aggressive pageout modes are required,
resulting in all kinds of bad behaviour.
Infrastructure to manage pages excluded from reclaim--i.e., hidden from
vmscan. Based on a patch by Larry Woodman of Red Hat. Reworked to
maintain "unevictable" pages on a separate per-zone LRU list, to "hide"
them from vmscan.
Kosaki Motohiro added the support for the memory controller unevictable
lru list.
Pages on the unevictable list have both PG_unevictable and PG_lru set.
Thus, PG_unevictable is analogous to and mutually exclusive with
PG_active--it specifies which LRU list the page is on.
The unevictable infrastructure is enabled by a new mm Kconfig option
[CONFIG_]UNEVICTABLE_LRU.
A new function 'page_evictable(page, vma)' in vmscan.c tests whether or
not a page may be evictable. Subsequent patches will add the various
!evictable tests. We'll want to keep these tests light-weight for use in
shrink_active_list() and, possibly, the fault path.
To avoid races between tasks putting pages [back] onto an LRU list and
tasks that might be moving the page from non-evictable to evictable state,
the new function 'putback_lru_page()' -- inverse to 'isolate_lru_page()'
-- tests the "evictability" of a page after placing it on the LRU, before
dropping the reference. If the page has become unevictable,
putback_lru_page() will redo the 'putback', thus moving the page to the
unevictable list. This way, we avoid "stranding" evictable pages on the
unevictable list.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fallout from out-of-order merge]
[riel@redhat.com: fix UNEVICTABLE_LRU and !PROC_PAGE_MONITOR build]
[nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp: remove redundant mapping check]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: unevictable-lru-infrastructure: putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling rework]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: kill unnecessary lock_page() in vmscan.c]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert migration change of unevictable lru infrastructure]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert to unevictable-lru-infrastructure-kconfig-fix.patch]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: restore patch failure of vmstat-unevictable-and-mlocked-pages-vm-events.patch]
Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Debugged-by: Benjamin Kidwell <benjkidwell@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 11:26:39 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* add_page_to_unevictable_list - add a page to the unevictable list
|
|
|
|
* @page: the page to be added to the unevictable list
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Add page directly to its zone's unevictable list. To avoid races with
|
|
|
|
* tasks that might be making the page evictable, through eg. munlock,
|
|
|
|
* munmap or exit, while it's not on the lru, we want to add the page
|
|
|
|
* while it's locked or otherwise "invisible" to other tasks. This is
|
|
|
|
* difficult to do when using the pagevec cache, so bypass that.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void add_page_to_unevictable_list(struct page *page)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
|
|
|
|
SetPageUnevictable(page);
|
|
|
|
SetPageLRU(page);
|
|
|
|
add_page_to_lru_list(zone, page, LRU_UNEVICTABLE);
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
mm: use pagevec to rotate reclaimable page
While running some memory intensive load, system response deteriorated just
after swap-out started.
The cause of this problem is that when a PG_reclaim page is moved to the tail
of the inactive LRU list in rotate_reclaimable_page(), lru_lock spin lock is
acquired every page writeback . This deteriorates system performance and
makes interrupt hold off time longer when swap-out started.
Following patch solves this problem. I use pagevec in rotating reclaimable
pages to mitigate LRU spin lock contention and reduce interrupt hold off time.
I did a test that allocating and touching pages in multiple processes, and
pinging to the test machine in flooding mode to measure response under memory
intensive load.
The test result is:
-2.6.23-rc5
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53222ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.652/172.228/7.176 ms, pipe 11, ipg/ewma
17.746/0.092 ms
-2.6.23-rc5-patched
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma
17.314/0.091 ms
Max round-trip-time was improved.
The test machine spec is that 4CPU(3.16GHz, Hyper-threading enabled)
8GB memory , 8GB swap.
I did ping test again to observe performance deterioration caused by taking
a ref.
-2.6.23-rc6-with-modifiedpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53386ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.110/4.716/0.147 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.801/0.129 ms
The result for my original patch is as follows.
-2.6.23-rc5-with-originalpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.314/0.091 ms
The influence to response was small.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix uninitalised var warning]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix locking]
[randy.dunlap@oracle.com: fix function declaration]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix BUG at include/linux/mm.h:220!]
[hugh@veritas.com: kill redundancy in rotate_reclaimable_page]
[hugh@veritas.com: move_tail_pages into lru_add_drain]
Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-16 16:24:52 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Drain pages out of the cpu's pagevecs.
|
|
|
|
* Either "cpu" is the current CPU, and preemption has already been
|
|
|
|
* disabled; or "cpu" is being hot-unplugged, and is already dead.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static void drain_cpu_pagevecs(int cpu)
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2008-10-19 11:26:19 +08:00
|
|
|
struct pagevec *pvecs = per_cpu(lru_add_pvecs, cpu);
|
mm: use pagevec to rotate reclaimable page
While running some memory intensive load, system response deteriorated just
after swap-out started.
The cause of this problem is that when a PG_reclaim page is moved to the tail
of the inactive LRU list in rotate_reclaimable_page(), lru_lock spin lock is
acquired every page writeback . This deteriorates system performance and
makes interrupt hold off time longer when swap-out started.
Following patch solves this problem. I use pagevec in rotating reclaimable
pages to mitigate LRU spin lock contention and reduce interrupt hold off time.
I did a test that allocating and touching pages in multiple processes, and
pinging to the test machine in flooding mode to measure response under memory
intensive load.
The test result is:
-2.6.23-rc5
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53222ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.652/172.228/7.176 ms, pipe 11, ipg/ewma
17.746/0.092 ms
-2.6.23-rc5-patched
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma
17.314/0.091 ms
Max round-trip-time was improved.
The test machine spec is that 4CPU(3.16GHz, Hyper-threading enabled)
8GB memory , 8GB swap.
I did ping test again to observe performance deterioration caused by taking
a ref.
-2.6.23-rc6-with-modifiedpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53386ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.110/4.716/0.147 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.801/0.129 ms
The result for my original patch is as follows.
-2.6.23-rc5-with-originalpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.314/0.091 ms
The influence to response was small.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix uninitalised var warning]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix locking]
[randy.dunlap@oracle.com: fix function declaration]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix BUG at include/linux/mm.h:220!]
[hugh@veritas.com: kill redundancy in rotate_reclaimable_page]
[hugh@veritas.com: move_tail_pages into lru_add_drain]
Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-16 16:24:52 +08:00
|
|
|
struct pagevec *pvec;
|
2008-10-19 11:26:19 +08:00
|
|
|
int lru;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-10-19 11:26:19 +08:00
|
|
|
for_each_lru(lru) {
|
|
|
|
pvec = &pvecs[lru - LRU_BASE];
|
|
|
|
if (pagevec_count(pvec))
|
|
|
|
____pagevec_lru_add(pvec, lru);
|
|
|
|
}
|
mm: use pagevec to rotate reclaimable page
While running some memory intensive load, system response deteriorated just
after swap-out started.
The cause of this problem is that when a PG_reclaim page is moved to the tail
of the inactive LRU list in rotate_reclaimable_page(), lru_lock spin lock is
acquired every page writeback . This deteriorates system performance and
makes interrupt hold off time longer when swap-out started.
Following patch solves this problem. I use pagevec in rotating reclaimable
pages to mitigate LRU spin lock contention and reduce interrupt hold off time.
I did a test that allocating and touching pages in multiple processes, and
pinging to the test machine in flooding mode to measure response under memory
intensive load.
The test result is:
-2.6.23-rc5
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53222ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.652/172.228/7.176 ms, pipe 11, ipg/ewma
17.746/0.092 ms
-2.6.23-rc5-patched
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma
17.314/0.091 ms
Max round-trip-time was improved.
The test machine spec is that 4CPU(3.16GHz, Hyper-threading enabled)
8GB memory , 8GB swap.
I did ping test again to observe performance deterioration caused by taking
a ref.
-2.6.23-rc6-with-modifiedpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53386ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.110/4.716/0.147 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.801/0.129 ms
The result for my original patch is as follows.
-2.6.23-rc5-with-originalpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.314/0.091 ms
The influence to response was small.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix uninitalised var warning]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix locking]
[randy.dunlap@oracle.com: fix function declaration]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix BUG at include/linux/mm.h:220!]
[hugh@veritas.com: kill redundancy in rotate_reclaimable_page]
[hugh@veritas.com: move_tail_pages into lru_add_drain]
Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-16 16:24:52 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pvec = &per_cpu(lru_rotate_pvecs, cpu);
|
|
|
|
if (pagevec_count(pvec)) {
|
|
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* No harm done if a racing interrupt already did this */
|
|
|
|
local_irq_save(flags);
|
|
|
|
pagevec_move_tail(pvec);
|
|
|
|
local_irq_restore(flags);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2006-01-06 16:11:14 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void lru_add_drain(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
mm: use pagevec to rotate reclaimable page
While running some memory intensive load, system response deteriorated just
after swap-out started.
The cause of this problem is that when a PG_reclaim page is moved to the tail
of the inactive LRU list in rotate_reclaimable_page(), lru_lock spin lock is
acquired every page writeback . This deteriorates system performance and
makes interrupt hold off time longer when swap-out started.
Following patch solves this problem. I use pagevec in rotating reclaimable
pages to mitigate LRU spin lock contention and reduce interrupt hold off time.
I did a test that allocating and touching pages in multiple processes, and
pinging to the test machine in flooding mode to measure response under memory
intensive load.
The test result is:
-2.6.23-rc5
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53222ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.652/172.228/7.176 ms, pipe 11, ipg/ewma
17.746/0.092 ms
-2.6.23-rc5-patched
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma
17.314/0.091 ms
Max round-trip-time was improved.
The test machine spec is that 4CPU(3.16GHz, Hyper-threading enabled)
8GB memory , 8GB swap.
I did ping test again to observe performance deterioration caused by taking
a ref.
-2.6.23-rc6-with-modifiedpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53386ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.110/4.716/0.147 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.801/0.129 ms
The result for my original patch is as follows.
-2.6.23-rc5-with-originalpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.314/0.091 ms
The influence to response was small.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix uninitalised var warning]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix locking]
[randy.dunlap@oracle.com: fix function declaration]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix BUG at include/linux/mm.h:220!]
[hugh@veritas.com: kill redundancy in rotate_reclaimable_page]
[hugh@veritas.com: move_tail_pages into lru_add_drain]
Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-16 16:24:52 +08:00
|
|
|
drain_cpu_pagevecs(get_cpu());
|
2006-01-06 16:11:14 +08:00
|
|
|
put_cpu();
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-11-22 22:57:56 +08:00
|
|
|
static void lru_add_drain_per_cpu(struct work_struct *dummy)
|
2006-01-19 09:42:27 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
lru_add_drain();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Returns 0 for success
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
int lru_add_drain_all(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2006-11-22 22:57:56 +08:00
|
|
|
return schedule_on_each_cpu(lru_add_drain_per_cpu);
|
2006-01-19 09:42:27 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Batched page_cache_release(). Decrement the reference count on all the
|
|
|
|
* passed pages. If it fell to zero then remove the page from the LRU and
|
|
|
|
* free it.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Avoid taking zone->lru_lock if possible, but if it is taken, retain it
|
|
|
|
* for the remainder of the operation.
|
|
|
|
*
|
2008-07-30 13:33:40 +08:00
|
|
|
* The locking in this function is against shrink_inactive_list(): we recheck
|
|
|
|
* the page count inside the lock to see whether shrink_inactive_list()
|
|
|
|
* grabbed the page via the LRU. If it did, give up: shrink_inactive_list()
|
|
|
|
* will free it.
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void release_pages(struct page **pages, int nr, int cold)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
struct pagevec pages_to_free;
|
|
|
|
struct zone *zone = NULL;
|
mm: use pagevec to rotate reclaimable page
While running some memory intensive load, system response deteriorated just
after swap-out started.
The cause of this problem is that when a PG_reclaim page is moved to the tail
of the inactive LRU list in rotate_reclaimable_page(), lru_lock spin lock is
acquired every page writeback . This deteriorates system performance and
makes interrupt hold off time longer when swap-out started.
Following patch solves this problem. I use pagevec in rotating reclaimable
pages to mitigate LRU spin lock contention and reduce interrupt hold off time.
I did a test that allocating and touching pages in multiple processes, and
pinging to the test machine in flooding mode to measure response under memory
intensive load.
The test result is:
-2.6.23-rc5
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53222ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.652/172.228/7.176 ms, pipe 11, ipg/ewma
17.746/0.092 ms
-2.6.23-rc5-patched
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma
17.314/0.091 ms
Max round-trip-time was improved.
The test machine spec is that 4CPU(3.16GHz, Hyper-threading enabled)
8GB memory , 8GB swap.
I did ping test again to observe performance deterioration caused by taking
a ref.
-2.6.23-rc6-with-modifiedpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53386ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.110/4.716/0.147 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.801/0.129 ms
The result for my original patch is as follows.
-2.6.23-rc5-with-originalpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.314/0.091 ms
The influence to response was small.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix uninitalised var warning]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix locking]
[randy.dunlap@oracle.com: fix function declaration]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix BUG at include/linux/mm.h:220!]
[hugh@veritas.com: kill redundancy in rotate_reclaimable_page]
[hugh@veritas.com: move_tail_pages into lru_add_drain]
Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-16 16:24:52 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long uninitialized_var(flags);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pagevec_init(&pages_to_free, cold);
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
|
|
|
|
struct page *page = pages[i];
|
|
|
|
|
2006-02-08 04:58:52 +08:00
|
|
|
if (unlikely(PageCompound(page))) {
|
|
|
|
if (zone) {
|
mm: use pagevec to rotate reclaimable page
While running some memory intensive load, system response deteriorated just
after swap-out started.
The cause of this problem is that when a PG_reclaim page is moved to the tail
of the inactive LRU list in rotate_reclaimable_page(), lru_lock spin lock is
acquired every page writeback . This deteriorates system performance and
makes interrupt hold off time longer when swap-out started.
Following patch solves this problem. I use pagevec in rotating reclaimable
pages to mitigate LRU spin lock contention and reduce interrupt hold off time.
I did a test that allocating and touching pages in multiple processes, and
pinging to the test machine in flooding mode to measure response under memory
intensive load.
The test result is:
-2.6.23-rc5
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53222ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.652/172.228/7.176 ms, pipe 11, ipg/ewma
17.746/0.092 ms
-2.6.23-rc5-patched
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma
17.314/0.091 ms
Max round-trip-time was improved.
The test machine spec is that 4CPU(3.16GHz, Hyper-threading enabled)
8GB memory , 8GB swap.
I did ping test again to observe performance deterioration caused by taking
a ref.
-2.6.23-rc6-with-modifiedpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53386ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.110/4.716/0.147 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.801/0.129 ms
The result for my original patch is as follows.
-2.6.23-rc5-with-originalpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.314/0.091 ms
The influence to response was small.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix uninitalised var warning]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix locking]
[randy.dunlap@oracle.com: fix function declaration]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix BUG at include/linux/mm.h:220!]
[hugh@veritas.com: kill redundancy in rotate_reclaimable_page]
[hugh@veritas.com: move_tail_pages into lru_add_drain]
Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-16 16:24:52 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
|
2006-02-08 04:58:52 +08:00
|
|
|
zone = NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
put_compound_page(page);
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 09:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!put_page_testzero(page))
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-22 16:07:58 +08:00
|
|
|
if (PageLRU(page)) {
|
|
|
|
struct zone *pagezone = page_zone(page);
|
Unevictable LRU Infrastructure
When the system contains lots of mlocked or otherwise unevictable pages,
the pageout code (kswapd) can spend lots of time scanning over these
pages. Worse still, the presence of lots of unevictable pages can confuse
kswapd into thinking that more aggressive pageout modes are required,
resulting in all kinds of bad behaviour.
Infrastructure to manage pages excluded from reclaim--i.e., hidden from
vmscan. Based on a patch by Larry Woodman of Red Hat. Reworked to
maintain "unevictable" pages on a separate per-zone LRU list, to "hide"
them from vmscan.
Kosaki Motohiro added the support for the memory controller unevictable
lru list.
Pages on the unevictable list have both PG_unevictable and PG_lru set.
Thus, PG_unevictable is analogous to and mutually exclusive with
PG_active--it specifies which LRU list the page is on.
The unevictable infrastructure is enabled by a new mm Kconfig option
[CONFIG_]UNEVICTABLE_LRU.
A new function 'page_evictable(page, vma)' in vmscan.c tests whether or
not a page may be evictable. Subsequent patches will add the various
!evictable tests. We'll want to keep these tests light-weight for use in
shrink_active_list() and, possibly, the fault path.
To avoid races between tasks putting pages [back] onto an LRU list and
tasks that might be moving the page from non-evictable to evictable state,
the new function 'putback_lru_page()' -- inverse to 'isolate_lru_page()'
-- tests the "evictability" of a page after placing it on the LRU, before
dropping the reference. If the page has become unevictable,
putback_lru_page() will redo the 'putback', thus moving the page to the
unevictable list. This way, we avoid "stranding" evictable pages on the
unevictable list.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fallout from out-of-order merge]
[riel@redhat.com: fix UNEVICTABLE_LRU and !PROC_PAGE_MONITOR build]
[nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp: remove redundant mapping check]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: unevictable-lru-infrastructure: putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling rework]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: kill unnecessary lock_page() in vmscan.c]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert migration change of unevictable lru infrastructure]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert to unevictable-lru-infrastructure-kconfig-fix.patch]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: restore patch failure of vmstat-unevictable-and-mlocked-pages-vm-events.patch]
Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Debugged-by: Benjamin Kidwell <benjkidwell@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 11:26:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-22 16:07:58 +08:00
|
|
|
if (pagezone != zone) {
|
|
|
|
if (zone)
|
mm: use pagevec to rotate reclaimable page
While running some memory intensive load, system response deteriorated just
after swap-out started.
The cause of this problem is that when a PG_reclaim page is moved to the tail
of the inactive LRU list in rotate_reclaimable_page(), lru_lock spin lock is
acquired every page writeback . This deteriorates system performance and
makes interrupt hold off time longer when swap-out started.
Following patch solves this problem. I use pagevec in rotating reclaimable
pages to mitigate LRU spin lock contention and reduce interrupt hold off time.
I did a test that allocating and touching pages in multiple processes, and
pinging to the test machine in flooding mode to measure response under memory
intensive load.
The test result is:
-2.6.23-rc5
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53222ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.652/172.228/7.176 ms, pipe 11, ipg/ewma
17.746/0.092 ms
-2.6.23-rc5-patched
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma
17.314/0.091 ms
Max round-trip-time was improved.
The test machine spec is that 4CPU(3.16GHz, Hyper-threading enabled)
8GB memory , 8GB swap.
I did ping test again to observe performance deterioration caused by taking
a ref.
-2.6.23-rc6-with-modifiedpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53386ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.110/4.716/0.147 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.801/0.129 ms
The result for my original patch is as follows.
-2.6.23-rc5-with-originalpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.314/0.091 ms
The influence to response was small.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix uninitalised var warning]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix locking]
[randy.dunlap@oracle.com: fix function declaration]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix BUG at include/linux/mm.h:220!]
[hugh@veritas.com: kill redundancy in rotate_reclaimable_page]
[hugh@veritas.com: move_tail_pages into lru_add_drain]
Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-16 16:24:52 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock,
|
|
|
|
flags);
|
2006-03-22 16:07:58 +08:00
|
|
|
zone = pagezone;
|
mm: use pagevec to rotate reclaimable page
While running some memory intensive load, system response deteriorated just
after swap-out started.
The cause of this problem is that when a PG_reclaim page is moved to the tail
of the inactive LRU list in rotate_reclaimable_page(), lru_lock spin lock is
acquired every page writeback . This deteriorates system performance and
makes interrupt hold off time longer when swap-out started.
Following patch solves this problem. I use pagevec in rotating reclaimable
pages to mitigate LRU spin lock contention and reduce interrupt hold off time.
I did a test that allocating and touching pages in multiple processes, and
pinging to the test machine in flooding mode to measure response under memory
intensive load.
The test result is:
-2.6.23-rc5
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53222ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.652/172.228/7.176 ms, pipe 11, ipg/ewma
17.746/0.092 ms
-2.6.23-rc5-patched
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma
17.314/0.091 ms
Max round-trip-time was improved.
The test machine spec is that 4CPU(3.16GHz, Hyper-threading enabled)
8GB memory , 8GB swap.
I did ping test again to observe performance deterioration caused by taking
a ref.
-2.6.23-rc6-with-modifiedpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53386ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.110/4.716/0.147 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.801/0.129 ms
The result for my original patch is as follows.
-2.6.23-rc5-with-originalpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.314/0.091 ms
The influence to response was small.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix uninitalised var warning]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix locking]
[randy.dunlap@oracle.com: fix function declaration]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix BUG at include/linux/mm.h:220!]
[hugh@veritas.com: kill redundancy in rotate_reclaimable_page]
[hugh@veritas.com: move_tail_pages into lru_add_drain]
Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-16 16:24:52 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
|
2006-03-22 16:07:58 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2006-09-26 14:30:55 +08:00
|
|
|
VM_BUG_ON(!PageLRU(page));
|
2006-03-22 16:08:00 +08:00
|
|
|
__ClearPageLRU(page);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
del_page_from_lru(zone, page);
|
2006-03-22 16:07:58 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!pagevec_add(&pages_to_free, page)) {
|
|
|
|
if (zone) {
|
mm: use pagevec to rotate reclaimable page
While running some memory intensive load, system response deteriorated just
after swap-out started.
The cause of this problem is that when a PG_reclaim page is moved to the tail
of the inactive LRU list in rotate_reclaimable_page(), lru_lock spin lock is
acquired every page writeback . This deteriorates system performance and
makes interrupt hold off time longer when swap-out started.
Following patch solves this problem. I use pagevec in rotating reclaimable
pages to mitigate LRU spin lock contention and reduce interrupt hold off time.
I did a test that allocating and touching pages in multiple processes, and
pinging to the test machine in flooding mode to measure response under memory
intensive load.
The test result is:
-2.6.23-rc5
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53222ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.652/172.228/7.176 ms, pipe 11, ipg/ewma
17.746/0.092 ms
-2.6.23-rc5-patched
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma
17.314/0.091 ms
Max round-trip-time was improved.
The test machine spec is that 4CPU(3.16GHz, Hyper-threading enabled)
8GB memory , 8GB swap.
I did ping test again to observe performance deterioration caused by taking
a ref.
-2.6.23-rc6-with-modifiedpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53386ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.110/4.716/0.147 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.801/0.129 ms
The result for my original patch is as follows.
-2.6.23-rc5-with-originalpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.314/0.091 ms
The influence to response was small.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix uninitalised var warning]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix locking]
[randy.dunlap@oracle.com: fix function declaration]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix BUG at include/linux/mm.h:220!]
[hugh@veritas.com: kill redundancy in rotate_reclaimable_page]
[hugh@veritas.com: move_tail_pages into lru_add_drain]
Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-16 16:24:52 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
|
2006-03-22 16:07:58 +08:00
|
|
|
zone = NULL;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2006-03-22 16:07:58 +08:00
|
|
|
__pagevec_free(&pages_to_free);
|
|
|
|
pagevec_reinit(&pages_to_free);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (zone)
|
mm: use pagevec to rotate reclaimable page
While running some memory intensive load, system response deteriorated just
after swap-out started.
The cause of this problem is that when a PG_reclaim page is moved to the tail
of the inactive LRU list in rotate_reclaimable_page(), lru_lock spin lock is
acquired every page writeback . This deteriorates system performance and
makes interrupt hold off time longer when swap-out started.
Following patch solves this problem. I use pagevec in rotating reclaimable
pages to mitigate LRU spin lock contention and reduce interrupt hold off time.
I did a test that allocating and touching pages in multiple processes, and
pinging to the test machine in flooding mode to measure response under memory
intensive load.
The test result is:
-2.6.23-rc5
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53222ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.652/172.228/7.176 ms, pipe 11, ipg/ewma
17.746/0.092 ms
-2.6.23-rc5-patched
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma
17.314/0.091 ms
Max round-trip-time was improved.
The test machine spec is that 4CPU(3.16GHz, Hyper-threading enabled)
8GB memory , 8GB swap.
I did ping test again to observe performance deterioration caused by taking
a ref.
-2.6.23-rc6-with-modifiedpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53386ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.110/4.716/0.147 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.801/0.129 ms
The result for my original patch is as follows.
-2.6.23-rc5-with-originalpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.314/0.091 ms
The influence to response was small.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix uninitalised var warning]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix locking]
[randy.dunlap@oracle.com: fix function declaration]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix BUG at include/linux/mm.h:220!]
[hugh@veritas.com: kill redundancy in rotate_reclaimable_page]
[hugh@veritas.com: move_tail_pages into lru_add_drain]
Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-16 16:24:52 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pagevec_free(&pages_to_free);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* The pages which we're about to release may be in the deferred lru-addition
|
|
|
|
* queues. That would prevent them from really being freed right now. That's
|
|
|
|
* OK from a correctness point of view but is inefficient - those pages may be
|
|
|
|
* cache-warm and we want to give them back to the page allocator ASAP.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* So __pagevec_release() will drain those queues here. __pagevec_lru_add()
|
|
|
|
* and __pagevec_lru_add_active() call release_pages() directly to avoid
|
|
|
|
* mutual recursion.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void __pagevec_release(struct pagevec *pvec)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
lru_add_drain();
|
|
|
|
release_pages(pvec->pages, pagevec_count(pvec), pvec->cold);
|
|
|
|
pagevec_reinit(pvec);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-11-02 02:22:55 +08:00
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__pagevec_release);
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Add the passed pages to the LRU, then drop the caller's refcount
|
|
|
|
* on them. Reinitialises the caller's pagevec.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2008-10-19 11:26:19 +08:00
|
|
|
void ____pagevec_lru_add(struct pagevec *pvec, enum lru_list lru)
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
struct zone *zone = NULL;
|
2009-01-08 10:08:15 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Unevictable LRU Infrastructure
When the system contains lots of mlocked or otherwise unevictable pages,
the pageout code (kswapd) can spend lots of time scanning over these
pages. Worse still, the presence of lots of unevictable pages can confuse
kswapd into thinking that more aggressive pageout modes are required,
resulting in all kinds of bad behaviour.
Infrastructure to manage pages excluded from reclaim--i.e., hidden from
vmscan. Based on a patch by Larry Woodman of Red Hat. Reworked to
maintain "unevictable" pages on a separate per-zone LRU list, to "hide"
them from vmscan.
Kosaki Motohiro added the support for the memory controller unevictable
lru list.
Pages on the unevictable list have both PG_unevictable and PG_lru set.
Thus, PG_unevictable is analogous to and mutually exclusive with
PG_active--it specifies which LRU list the page is on.
The unevictable infrastructure is enabled by a new mm Kconfig option
[CONFIG_]UNEVICTABLE_LRU.
A new function 'page_evictable(page, vma)' in vmscan.c tests whether or
not a page may be evictable. Subsequent patches will add the various
!evictable tests. We'll want to keep these tests light-weight for use in
shrink_active_list() and, possibly, the fault path.
To avoid races between tasks putting pages [back] onto an LRU list and
tasks that might be moving the page from non-evictable to evictable state,
the new function 'putback_lru_page()' -- inverse to 'isolate_lru_page()'
-- tests the "evictability" of a page after placing it on the LRU, before
dropping the reference. If the page has become unevictable,
putback_lru_page() will redo the 'putback', thus moving the page to the
unevictable list. This way, we avoid "stranding" evictable pages on the
unevictable list.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fallout from out-of-order merge]
[riel@redhat.com: fix UNEVICTABLE_LRU and !PROC_PAGE_MONITOR build]
[nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp: remove redundant mapping check]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: unevictable-lru-infrastructure: putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling rework]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: kill unnecessary lock_page() in vmscan.c]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert migration change of unevictable lru infrastructure]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert to unevictable-lru-infrastructure-kconfig-fix.patch]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: restore patch failure of vmstat-unevictable-and-mlocked-pages-vm-events.patch]
Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Debugged-by: Benjamin Kidwell <benjkidwell@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 11:26:39 +08:00
|
|
|
VM_BUG_ON(is_unevictable_lru(lru));
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < pagevec_count(pvec); i++) {
|
|
|
|
struct page *page = pvec->pages[i];
|
|
|
|
struct zone *pagezone = page_zone(page);
|
2008-12-03 02:31:52 +08:00
|
|
|
int file;
|
2009-01-08 10:08:20 +08:00
|
|
|
int active;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (pagezone != zone) {
|
|
|
|
if (zone)
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
|
|
|
|
zone = pagezone;
|
|
|
|
spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
Unevictable LRU Infrastructure
When the system contains lots of mlocked or otherwise unevictable pages,
the pageout code (kswapd) can spend lots of time scanning over these
pages. Worse still, the presence of lots of unevictable pages can confuse
kswapd into thinking that more aggressive pageout modes are required,
resulting in all kinds of bad behaviour.
Infrastructure to manage pages excluded from reclaim--i.e., hidden from
vmscan. Based on a patch by Larry Woodman of Red Hat. Reworked to
maintain "unevictable" pages on a separate per-zone LRU list, to "hide"
them from vmscan.
Kosaki Motohiro added the support for the memory controller unevictable
lru list.
Pages on the unevictable list have both PG_unevictable and PG_lru set.
Thus, PG_unevictable is analogous to and mutually exclusive with
PG_active--it specifies which LRU list the page is on.
The unevictable infrastructure is enabled by a new mm Kconfig option
[CONFIG_]UNEVICTABLE_LRU.
A new function 'page_evictable(page, vma)' in vmscan.c tests whether or
not a page may be evictable. Subsequent patches will add the various
!evictable tests. We'll want to keep these tests light-weight for use in
shrink_active_list() and, possibly, the fault path.
To avoid races between tasks putting pages [back] onto an LRU list and
tasks that might be moving the page from non-evictable to evictable state,
the new function 'putback_lru_page()' -- inverse to 'isolate_lru_page()'
-- tests the "evictability" of a page after placing it on the LRU, before
dropping the reference. If the page has become unevictable,
putback_lru_page() will redo the 'putback', thus moving the page to the
unevictable list. This way, we avoid "stranding" evictable pages on the
unevictable list.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fallout from out-of-order merge]
[riel@redhat.com: fix UNEVICTABLE_LRU and !PROC_PAGE_MONITOR build]
[nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp: remove redundant mapping check]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: unevictable-lru-infrastructure: putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling rework]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: kill unnecessary lock_page() in vmscan.c]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert migration change of unevictable lru infrastructure]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: revert to unevictable-lru-infrastructure-kconfig-fix.patch]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: restore patch failure of vmstat-unevictable-and-mlocked-pages-vm-events.patch]
Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Debugged-by: Benjamin Kidwell <benjkidwell@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 11:26:39 +08:00
|
|
|
VM_BUG_ON(PageActive(page));
|
|
|
|
VM_BUG_ON(PageUnevictable(page));
|
2006-09-26 14:30:55 +08:00
|
|
|
VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(page));
|
2006-03-22 16:07:59 +08:00
|
|
|
SetPageLRU(page);
|
2009-01-08 10:08:20 +08:00
|
|
|
active = is_active_lru(lru);
|
2008-12-03 02:31:52 +08:00
|
|
|
file = is_file_lru(lru);
|
2009-01-08 10:08:20 +08:00
|
|
|
if (active)
|
2008-10-19 11:26:19 +08:00
|
|
|
SetPageActive(page);
|
2009-01-08 10:08:20 +08:00
|
|
|
update_page_reclaim_stat(zone, page, file, active);
|
2008-10-19 11:26:19 +08:00
|
|
|
add_page_to_lru_list(zone, page, lru);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (zone)
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
|
|
|
|
release_pages(pvec->pages, pvec->nr, pvec->cold);
|
|
|
|
pagevec_reinit(pvec);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2008-10-19 11:26:19 +08:00
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL(____pagevec_lru_add);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Try to drop buffers from the pages in a pagevec
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void pagevec_strip(struct pagevec *pvec)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < pagevec_count(pvec); i++) {
|
|
|
|
struct page *page = pvec->pages[i];
|
|
|
|
|
2009-04-03 23:42:36 +08:00
|
|
|
if (page_has_private(page) && trylock_page(page)) {
|
|
|
|
if (page_has_private(page))
|
2006-03-17 15:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
try_to_release_page(page, 0);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
unlock_page(page);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* pagevec_lookup - gang pagecache lookup
|
|
|
|
* @pvec: Where the resulting pages are placed
|
|
|
|
* @mapping: The address_space to search
|
|
|
|
* @start: The starting page index
|
|
|
|
* @nr_pages: The maximum number of pages
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* pagevec_lookup() will search for and return a group of up to @nr_pages pages
|
|
|
|
* in the mapping. The pages are placed in @pvec. pagevec_lookup() takes a
|
|
|
|
* reference against the pages in @pvec.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* The search returns a group of mapping-contiguous pages with ascending
|
|
|
|
* indexes. There may be holes in the indices due to not-present pages.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* pagevec_lookup() returns the number of pages which were found.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
unsigned pagevec_lookup(struct pagevec *pvec, struct address_space *mapping,
|
|
|
|
pgoff_t start, unsigned nr_pages)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
pvec->nr = find_get_pages(mapping, start, nr_pages, pvec->pages);
|
|
|
|
return pagevec_count(pvec);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-11 17:47:41 +08:00
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pagevec_lookup);
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned pagevec_lookup_tag(struct pagevec *pvec, struct address_space *mapping,
|
|
|
|
pgoff_t *index, int tag, unsigned nr_pages)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
pvec->nr = find_get_pages_tag(mapping, index, tag,
|
|
|
|
nr_pages, pvec->pages);
|
|
|
|
return pagevec_count(pvec);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-11-02 02:22:55 +08:00
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pagevec_lookup_tag);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* We tolerate a little inaccuracy to avoid ping-ponging the counter between
|
|
|
|
* CPUs
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#define ACCT_THRESHOLD max(16, NR_CPUS * 2)
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-24 12:28:14 +08:00
|
|
|
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, committed_space);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void vm_acct_memory(long pages)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
long *local;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
preempt_disable();
|
|
|
|
local = &__get_cpu_var(committed_space);
|
|
|
|
*local += pages;
|
|
|
|
if (*local > ACCT_THRESHOLD || *local < -ACCT_THRESHOLD) {
|
2008-05-24 04:04:31 +08:00
|
|
|
atomic_long_add(*local, &vm_committed_space);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
*local = 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
preempt_enable();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Drop the CPU's cached committed space back into the central pool. */
|
|
|
|
static int cpu_swap_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
|
|
|
|
unsigned long action,
|
|
|
|
void *hcpu)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
long *committed;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
committed = &per_cpu(committed_space, (long)hcpu);
|
2007-05-09 17:35:10 +08:00
|
|
|
if (action == CPU_DEAD || action == CPU_DEAD_FROZEN) {
|
2008-05-24 04:04:31 +08:00
|
|
|
atomic_long_add(*committed, &vm_committed_space);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
*committed = 0;
|
mm: use pagevec to rotate reclaimable page
While running some memory intensive load, system response deteriorated just
after swap-out started.
The cause of this problem is that when a PG_reclaim page is moved to the tail
of the inactive LRU list in rotate_reclaimable_page(), lru_lock spin lock is
acquired every page writeback . This deteriorates system performance and
makes interrupt hold off time longer when swap-out started.
Following patch solves this problem. I use pagevec in rotating reclaimable
pages to mitigate LRU spin lock contention and reduce interrupt hold off time.
I did a test that allocating and touching pages in multiple processes, and
pinging to the test machine in flooding mode to measure response under memory
intensive load.
The test result is:
-2.6.23-rc5
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53222ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.652/172.228/7.176 ms, pipe 11, ipg/ewma
17.746/0.092 ms
-2.6.23-rc5-patched
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma
17.314/0.091 ms
Max round-trip-time was improved.
The test machine spec is that 4CPU(3.16GHz, Hyper-threading enabled)
8GB memory , 8GB swap.
I did ping test again to observe performance deterioration caused by taking
a ref.
-2.6.23-rc6-with-modifiedpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 53386ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.074/0.110/4.716/0.147 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.801/0.129 ms
The result for my original patch is as follows.
-2.6.23-rc5-with-originalpatch
--- testmachine ping statistics ---
3000 packets transmitted, 3000 received, 0% packet loss, time 51924ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.072/0.108/3.884/0.114 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 17.314/0.091 ms
The influence to response was small.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix uninitalised var warning]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix locking]
[randy.dunlap@oracle.com: fix function declaration]
[hugh@veritas.com: fix BUG at include/linux/mm.h:220!]
[hugh@veritas.com: kill redundancy in rotate_reclaimable_page]
[hugh@veritas.com: move_tail_pages into lru_add_drain]
Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-16 16:24:52 +08:00
|
|
|
drain_cpu_pagevecs((long)hcpu);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return NOTIFY_OK;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif /* CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
|
|
|
|
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Perform any setup for the swap system
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void __init swap_setup(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned long megs = num_physpages >> (20 - PAGE_SHIFT);
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-17 14:25:46 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
|
|
|
|
bdi_init(swapper_space.backing_dev_info);
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Use a smaller cluster for small-memory machines */
|
|
|
|
if (megs < 16)
|
|
|
|
page_cluster = 2;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
page_cluster = 3;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Right now other parts of the system means that we
|
|
|
|
* _really_ don't want to cluster much more
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2006-12-07 12:38:17 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
hotcpu_notifier(cpu_swap_callback, 0);
|
2006-12-07 12:38:17 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|