2006-01-10 07:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Mutexes: blocking mutual exclusion locks
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* started by Ingo Molnar:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2004, 2005, 2006 Red Hat, Inc., Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This file contains the main data structure and API definitions.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#ifndef __LINUX_MUTEX_H
|
|
|
|
#define __LINUX_MUTEX_H
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-24 16:30:04 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <asm/current.h>
|
2006-01-10 07:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/list.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/spinlock_types.h>
|
2006-01-11 16:15:16 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/linkage.h>
|
2006-07-03 15:24:55 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/lockdep.h>
|
2011-07-27 07:09:06 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/atomic.h>
|
2013-09-28 17:23:59 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <asm/processor.h>
|
2014-07-15 01:27:49 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/osq_lock.h>
|
2016-08-23 19:36:04 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/debug_locks.h>
|
2006-01-10 07:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Simple, straightforward mutexes with strict semantics:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* - only one task can hold the mutex at a time
|
|
|
|
* - only the owner can unlock the mutex
|
|
|
|
* - multiple unlocks are not permitted
|
|
|
|
* - recursive locking is not permitted
|
|
|
|
* - a mutex object must be initialized via the API
|
|
|
|
* - a mutex object must not be initialized via memset or copying
|
|
|
|
* - task may not exit with mutex held
|
|
|
|
* - memory areas where held locks reside must not be freed
|
|
|
|
* - held mutexes must not be reinitialized
|
2007-10-17 14:29:41 +08:00
|
|
|
* - mutexes may not be used in hardware or software interrupt
|
|
|
|
* contexts such as tasklets and timers
|
2006-01-10 07:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* These semantics are fully enforced when DEBUG_MUTEXES is
|
|
|
|
* enabled. Furthermore, besides enforcing the above rules, the mutex
|
|
|
|
* debugging code also implements a number of additional features
|
|
|
|
* that make lock debugging easier and faster:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* - uses symbolic names of mutexes, whenever they are printed in debug output
|
|
|
|
* - point-of-acquire tracking, symbolic lookup of function names
|
|
|
|
* - list of all locks held in the system, printout of them
|
|
|
|
* - owner tracking
|
|
|
|
* - detects self-recursing locks and prints out all relevant info
|
|
|
|
* - detects multi-task circular deadlocks and prints out all affected
|
|
|
|
* locks and tasks (and only those tasks)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
struct mutex {
|
2016-08-23 19:36:04 +08:00
|
|
|
atomic_long_t owner;
|
2006-01-10 07:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
spinlock_t wait_lock;
|
mutex: Queue mutex spinners with MCS lock to reduce cacheline contention
The current mutex spinning code (with MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER option
turned on) allow multiple tasks to spin on a single mutex
concurrently. A potential problem with the current approach is
that when the mutex becomes available, all the spinning tasks
will try to acquire the mutex more or less simultaneously. As a
result, there will be a lot of cacheline bouncing especially on
systems with a large number of CPUs.
This patch tries to reduce this kind of contention by putting
the mutex spinners into a queue so that only the first one in
the queue will try to acquire the mutex. This will reduce
contention and allow all the tasks to move forward faster.
The queuing of mutex spinners is done using an MCS lock based
implementation which will further reduce contention on the mutex
cacheline than a similar ticket spinlock based implementation.
This patch will add a new field into the mutex data structure
for holding the MCS lock. This expands the mutex size by 8 bytes
for 64-bit system and 4 bytes for 32-bit system. This overhead
will be avoid if the MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER option is turned off.
The following table shows the jobs per minute (JPM) scalability
data on an 8-node 80-core Westmere box with a 3.7.10 kernel. The
numactl command is used to restrict the running of the fserver
workloads to 1/2/4/8 nodes with hyperthreading off.
+-----------------+-----------+-----------+-------------+----------+
| Configuration | Mean JPM | Mean JPM | Mean JPM | % Change |
| | w/o patch | patch 1 | patches 1&2 | 1->1&2 |
+-----------------+------------------------------------------------+
| | User Range 1100 - 2000 |
+-----------------+------------------------------------------------+
| 8 nodes, HT off | 227972 | 227237 | 305043 | +34.2% |
| 4 nodes, HT off | 393503 | 381558 | 394650 | +3.4% |
| 2 nodes, HT off | 334957 | 325240 | 338853 | +4.2% |
| 1 node , HT off | 198141 | 197972 | 198075 | +0.1% |
+-----------------+------------------------------------------------+
| | User Range 200 - 1000 |
+-----------------+------------------------------------------------+
| 8 nodes, HT off | 282325 | 312870 | 332185 | +6.2% |
| 4 nodes, HT off | 390698 | 378279 | 393419 | +4.0% |
| 2 nodes, HT off | 336986 | 326543 | 340260 | +4.2% |
| 1 node , HT off | 197588 | 197622 | 197582 | 0.0% |
+-----------------+-----------+-----------+-------------+----------+
At low user range 10-100, the JPM differences were within +/-1%.
So they are not that interesting.
The fserver workload uses mutex spinning extensively. With just
the mutex change in the first patch, there is no noticeable
change in performance. Rather, there is a slight drop in
performance. This mutex spinning patch more than recovers the
lost performance and show a significant increase of +30% at high
user load with the full 8 nodes. Similar improvements were also
seen in a 3.8 kernel.
The table below shows the %time spent by different kernel
functions as reported by perf when running the fserver workload
at 1500 users with all 8 nodes.
+-----------------------+-----------+---------+-------------+
| Function | % time | % time | % time |
| | w/o patch | patch 1 | patches 1&2 |
+-----------------------+-----------+---------+-------------+
| __read_lock_failed | 34.96% | 34.91% | 29.14% |
| __write_lock_failed | 10.14% | 10.68% | 7.51% |
| mutex_spin_on_owner | 3.62% | 3.42% | 2.33% |
| mspin_lock | N/A | N/A | 9.90% |
| __mutex_lock_slowpath | 1.46% | 0.81% | 0.14% |
| _raw_spin_lock | 2.25% | 2.50% | 1.10% |
+-----------------------+-----------+---------+-------------+
The fserver workload for an 8-node system is dominated by the
contention in the read/write lock. Mutex contention also plays a
role. With the first patch only, mutex contention is down (as
shown by the __mutex_lock_slowpath figure) which help a little
bit. We saw only a few percents improvement with that.
By applying patch 2 as well, the single mutex_spin_on_owner
figure is now split out into an additional mspin_lock figure.
The time increases from 3.42% to 11.23%. It shows a great
reduction in contention among the spinners leading to a 30%
improvement. The time ratio 9.9/2.33=4.3 indicates that there
are on average 4+ spinners waiting in the spin_lock loop for
each spinner in the mutex_spin_on_owner loop. Contention in
other locking functions also go down by quite a lot.
The table below shows the performance change of both patches 1 &
2 over patch 1 alone in other AIM7 workloads (at 8 nodes,
hyperthreading off).
+--------------+---------------+----------------+-----------------+
| Workload | mean % change | mean % change | mean % change |
| | 10-100 users | 200-1000 users | 1100-2000 users |
+--------------+---------------+----------------+-----------------+
| alltests | 0.0% | -0.8% | +0.6% |
| five_sec | -0.3% | +0.8% | +0.8% |
| high_systime | +0.4% | +2.4% | +2.1% |
| new_fserver | +0.1% | +14.1% | +34.2% |
| shared | -0.5% | -0.3% | -0.4% |
| short | -1.7% | -9.8% | -8.3% |
+--------------+---------------+----------------+-----------------+
The short workload is the only one that shows a decline in
performance probably due to the spinner locking and queuing
overhead.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Chandramouleeswaran Aswin <aswin@hp.com>
Cc: Norton Scott J <scott.norton@hp.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1366226594-5506-4-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2013-04-18 03:23:13 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER
|
2014-07-15 01:27:49 +08:00
|
|
|
struct optimistic_spin_queue osq; /* Spinner MCS lock */
|
mutex: Queue mutex spinners with MCS lock to reduce cacheline contention
The current mutex spinning code (with MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER option
turned on) allow multiple tasks to spin on a single mutex
concurrently. A potential problem with the current approach is
that when the mutex becomes available, all the spinning tasks
will try to acquire the mutex more or less simultaneously. As a
result, there will be a lot of cacheline bouncing especially on
systems with a large number of CPUs.
This patch tries to reduce this kind of contention by putting
the mutex spinners into a queue so that only the first one in
the queue will try to acquire the mutex. This will reduce
contention and allow all the tasks to move forward faster.
The queuing of mutex spinners is done using an MCS lock based
implementation which will further reduce contention on the mutex
cacheline than a similar ticket spinlock based implementation.
This patch will add a new field into the mutex data structure
for holding the MCS lock. This expands the mutex size by 8 bytes
for 64-bit system and 4 bytes for 32-bit system. This overhead
will be avoid if the MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER option is turned off.
The following table shows the jobs per minute (JPM) scalability
data on an 8-node 80-core Westmere box with a 3.7.10 kernel. The
numactl command is used to restrict the running of the fserver
workloads to 1/2/4/8 nodes with hyperthreading off.
+-----------------+-----------+-----------+-------------+----------+
| Configuration | Mean JPM | Mean JPM | Mean JPM | % Change |
| | w/o patch | patch 1 | patches 1&2 | 1->1&2 |
+-----------------+------------------------------------------------+
| | User Range 1100 - 2000 |
+-----------------+------------------------------------------------+
| 8 nodes, HT off | 227972 | 227237 | 305043 | +34.2% |
| 4 nodes, HT off | 393503 | 381558 | 394650 | +3.4% |
| 2 nodes, HT off | 334957 | 325240 | 338853 | +4.2% |
| 1 node , HT off | 198141 | 197972 | 198075 | +0.1% |
+-----------------+------------------------------------------------+
| | User Range 200 - 1000 |
+-----------------+------------------------------------------------+
| 8 nodes, HT off | 282325 | 312870 | 332185 | +6.2% |
| 4 nodes, HT off | 390698 | 378279 | 393419 | +4.0% |
| 2 nodes, HT off | 336986 | 326543 | 340260 | +4.2% |
| 1 node , HT off | 197588 | 197622 | 197582 | 0.0% |
+-----------------+-----------+-----------+-------------+----------+
At low user range 10-100, the JPM differences were within +/-1%.
So they are not that interesting.
The fserver workload uses mutex spinning extensively. With just
the mutex change in the first patch, there is no noticeable
change in performance. Rather, there is a slight drop in
performance. This mutex spinning patch more than recovers the
lost performance and show a significant increase of +30% at high
user load with the full 8 nodes. Similar improvements were also
seen in a 3.8 kernel.
The table below shows the %time spent by different kernel
functions as reported by perf when running the fserver workload
at 1500 users with all 8 nodes.
+-----------------------+-----------+---------+-------------+
| Function | % time | % time | % time |
| | w/o patch | patch 1 | patches 1&2 |
+-----------------------+-----------+---------+-------------+
| __read_lock_failed | 34.96% | 34.91% | 29.14% |
| __write_lock_failed | 10.14% | 10.68% | 7.51% |
| mutex_spin_on_owner | 3.62% | 3.42% | 2.33% |
| mspin_lock | N/A | N/A | 9.90% |
| __mutex_lock_slowpath | 1.46% | 0.81% | 0.14% |
| _raw_spin_lock | 2.25% | 2.50% | 1.10% |
+-----------------------+-----------+---------+-------------+
The fserver workload for an 8-node system is dominated by the
contention in the read/write lock. Mutex contention also plays a
role. With the first patch only, mutex contention is down (as
shown by the __mutex_lock_slowpath figure) which help a little
bit. We saw only a few percents improvement with that.
By applying patch 2 as well, the single mutex_spin_on_owner
figure is now split out into an additional mspin_lock figure.
The time increases from 3.42% to 11.23%. It shows a great
reduction in contention among the spinners leading to a 30%
improvement. The time ratio 9.9/2.33=4.3 indicates that there
are on average 4+ spinners waiting in the spin_lock loop for
each spinner in the mutex_spin_on_owner loop. Contention in
other locking functions also go down by quite a lot.
The table below shows the performance change of both patches 1 &
2 over patch 1 alone in other AIM7 workloads (at 8 nodes,
hyperthreading off).
+--------------+---------------+----------------+-----------------+
| Workload | mean % change | mean % change | mean % change |
| | 10-100 users | 200-1000 users | 1100-2000 users |
+--------------+---------------+----------------+-----------------+
| alltests | 0.0% | -0.8% | +0.6% |
| five_sec | -0.3% | +0.8% | +0.8% |
| high_systime | +0.4% | +2.4% | +2.1% |
| new_fserver | +0.1% | +14.1% | +34.2% |
| shared | -0.5% | -0.3% | -0.4% |
| short | -1.7% | -9.8% | -8.3% |
+--------------+---------------+----------------+-----------------+
The short workload is the only one that shows a decline in
performance probably due to the spinner locking and queuing
overhead.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Chandramouleeswaran Aswin <aswin@hp.com>
Cc: Norton Scott J <scott.norton@hp.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1366226594-5506-4-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2013-04-18 03:23:13 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2016-08-23 19:36:04 +08:00
|
|
|
struct list_head wait_list;
|
2009-01-12 21:01:47 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
|
2006-01-10 07:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
void *magic;
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2006-07-03 15:24:55 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
|
|
|
|
struct lockdep_map dep_map;
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2006-01-10 07:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2016-08-23 19:36:04 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline struct task_struct *__mutex_owner(struct mutex *lock)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return (struct task_struct *)(atomic_long_read(&lock->owner) & ~0x03);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-10 07:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* This is the control structure for tasks blocked on mutex,
|
|
|
|
* which resides on the blocked task's kernel stack:
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
struct mutex_waiter {
|
|
|
|
struct list_head list;
|
|
|
|
struct task_struct *task;
|
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
|
|
|
|
void *magic;
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
|
2016-08-23 19:36:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define __DEBUG_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname) \
|
|
|
|
, .magic = &lockname
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
extern void mutex_destroy(struct mutex *lock);
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-10 07:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
#else
|
2016-08-23 19:36:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-10 07:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
# define __DEBUG_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname)
|
2016-08-23 19:36:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static inline void mutex_destroy(struct mutex *lock) {}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
2010-09-03 06:48:16 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* mutex_init - initialize the mutex
|
|
|
|
* @mutex: the mutex to be initialized
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Initialize the mutex to unlocked state.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* It is not allowed to initialize an already locked mutex.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-08-23 19:36:04 +08:00
|
|
|
#define mutex_init(mutex) \
|
|
|
|
do { \
|
|
|
|
static struct lock_class_key __key; \
|
|
|
|
\
|
|
|
|
__mutex_init((mutex), #mutex, &__key); \
|
2006-07-03 15:24:55 +08:00
|
|
|
} while (0)
|
2006-01-10 07:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-03 15:24:55 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
|
|
|
|
# define __DEP_MAP_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname) \
|
|
|
|
, .dep_map = { .name = #lockname }
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
# define __DEP_MAP_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname)
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-10 07:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
#define __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname) \
|
2016-08-23 19:36:04 +08:00
|
|
|
{ .owner = ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(0) \
|
2006-12-07 12:37:22 +08:00
|
|
|
, .wait_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname.wait_lock) \
|
2006-01-10 07:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
, .wait_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(lockname.wait_list) \
|
2006-07-03 15:24:55 +08:00
|
|
|
__DEBUG_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname) \
|
|
|
|
__DEP_MAP_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname) }
|
2006-01-10 07:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define DEFINE_MUTEX(mutexname) \
|
|
|
|
struct mutex mutexname = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(mutexname)
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-03 15:24:55 +08:00
|
|
|
extern void __mutex_init(struct mutex *lock, const char *name,
|
|
|
|
struct lock_class_key *key);
|
2006-01-10 07:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-01-26 16:57:09 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
2006-01-10 07:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
* mutex_is_locked - is the mutex locked
|
|
|
|
* @lock: the mutex to be queried
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns 1 if the mutex is locked, 0 if unlocked.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2008-02-08 20:19:55 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline int mutex_is_locked(struct mutex *lock)
|
2006-01-10 07:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-08-23 19:36:04 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* XXX think about spin_is_locked
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
return __mutex_owner(lock) != NULL;
|
2006-01-10 07:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2013-11-08 15:26:39 +08:00
|
|
|
* See kernel/locking/mutex.c for detailed documentation of these APIs.
|
2014-07-31 04:41:55 +08:00
|
|
|
* Also see Documentation/locking/mutex-design.txt.
|
2006-01-10 07:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2006-07-03 15:24:55 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
|
|
|
|
extern void mutex_lock_nested(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int subclass);
|
2011-05-25 08:12:03 +08:00
|
|
|
extern void _mutex_lock_nest_lock(struct mutex *lock, struct lockdep_map *nest_lock);
|
2013-06-24 16:30:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-05-09 17:33:39 +08:00
|
|
|
extern int __must_check mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(struct mutex *lock,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int subclass);
|
2007-12-07 06:37:59 +08:00
|
|
|
extern int __must_check mutex_lock_killable_nested(struct mutex *lock,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int subclass);
|
2007-10-12 04:11:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define mutex_lock(lock) mutex_lock_nested(lock, 0)
|
|
|
|
#define mutex_lock_interruptible(lock) mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(lock, 0)
|
2007-12-07 06:37:59 +08:00
|
|
|
#define mutex_lock_killable(lock) mutex_lock_killable_nested(lock, 0)
|
2011-05-25 08:12:03 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define mutex_lock_nest_lock(lock, nest_lock) \
|
|
|
|
do { \
|
2013-06-24 16:30:04 +08:00
|
|
|
typecheck(struct lockdep_map *, &(nest_lock)->dep_map); \
|
2011-05-25 08:12:03 +08:00
|
|
|
_mutex_lock_nest_lock(lock, &(nest_lock)->dep_map); \
|
|
|
|
} while (0)
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-03 15:24:55 +08:00
|
|
|
#else
|
2008-02-08 20:19:55 +08:00
|
|
|
extern void mutex_lock(struct mutex *lock);
|
|
|
|
extern int __must_check mutex_lock_interruptible(struct mutex *lock);
|
|
|
|
extern int __must_check mutex_lock_killable(struct mutex *lock);
|
2007-10-12 04:11:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-03 15:24:55 +08:00
|
|
|
# define mutex_lock_nested(lock, subclass) mutex_lock(lock)
|
2006-12-08 18:36:17 +08:00
|
|
|
# define mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(lock, subclass) mutex_lock_interruptible(lock)
|
2007-12-07 06:37:59 +08:00
|
|
|
# define mutex_lock_killable_nested(lock, subclass) mutex_lock_killable(lock)
|
2011-05-25 08:12:03 +08:00
|
|
|
# define mutex_lock_nest_lock(lock, nest_lock) mutex_lock(lock)
|
2006-07-03 15:24:55 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-10 07:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* NOTE: mutex_trylock() follows the spin_trylock() convention,
|
|
|
|
* not the down_trylock() convention!
|
2008-10-30 05:24:09 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns 1 if the mutex has been acquired successfully, and 0 on contention.
|
2006-01-10 07:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2008-02-08 20:19:55 +08:00
|
|
|
extern int mutex_trylock(struct mutex *lock);
|
|
|
|
extern void mutex_unlock(struct mutex *lock);
|
2013-06-24 16:30:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-04-30 06:59:58 +08:00
|
|
|
extern int atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock(atomic_t *cnt, struct mutex *lock);
|
2009-03-24 01:22:09 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-10-07 23:43:51 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* These values are chosen such that FAIL and SUCCESS match the
|
|
|
|
* values of the regular mutex_trylock().
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
enum mutex_trylock_recursive_enum {
|
|
|
|
MUTEX_TRYLOCK_FAILED = 0,
|
|
|
|
MUTEX_TRYLOCK_SUCCESS = 1,
|
|
|
|
MUTEX_TRYLOCK_RECURSIVE,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* mutex_trylock_recursive - trylock variant that allows recursive locking
|
|
|
|
* @lock: mutex to be locked
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This function should not be used, _ever_. It is purely for hysterical GEM
|
|
|
|
* raisins, and once those are gone this will be removed.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns:
|
|
|
|
* MUTEX_TRYLOCK_FAILED - trylock failed,
|
|
|
|
* MUTEX_TRYLOCK_SUCCESS - lock acquired,
|
|
|
|
* MUTEX_TRYLOCK_RECURSIVE - we already owned the lock.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-11-16 17:36:05 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline /* __deprecated */ __must_check enum mutex_trylock_recursive_enum
|
2016-10-07 23:43:51 +08:00
|
|
|
mutex_trylock_recursive(struct mutex *lock)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (unlikely(__mutex_owner(lock) == current))
|
|
|
|
return MUTEX_TRYLOCK_RECURSIVE;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return mutex_trylock(lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-01-22 07:36:00 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif /* __LINUX_MUTEX_H */
|