2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifndef __LINUX_PERCPU_H
|
|
|
|
|
#define __LINUX_PERCPU_H
|
2006-09-26 14:31:21 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-01-24 07:52:54 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/mmdebug.h>
|
2007-07-16 14:39:57 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/preempt.h>
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/smp.h>
|
2006-09-26 14:31:21 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
|
2009-03-06 13:33:58 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/pfn.h>
|
2010-03-24 16:06:43 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/init.h>
|
2006-09-26 14:31:21 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <asm/percpu.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-03-06 13:33:58 +08:00
|
|
|
/* enough to cover all DEFINE_PER_CPUs in modules */
|
2007-05-03 01:27:11 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
|
2009-03-06 13:33:58 +08:00
|
|
|
#define PERCPU_MODULE_RESERVE (8 << 10)
|
2007-05-03 01:27:11 +08:00
|
|
|
#else
|
2009-03-06 13:33:58 +08:00
|
|
|
#define PERCPU_MODULE_RESERVE 0
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-03-06 13:33:58 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifndef PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM
|
2007-05-03 01:27:11 +08:00
|
|
|
#define PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM \
|
2009-03-06 13:33:58 +08:00
|
|
|
(ALIGN(__per_cpu_end - __per_cpu_start, SMP_CACHE_BYTES) + \
|
|
|
|
|
PERCPU_MODULE_RESERVE)
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2007-05-03 01:27:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-09-26 14:30:53 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* Must be an lvalue. Since @var must be a simple identifier,
|
|
|
|
|
* we force a syntax error here if it isn't.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
#define get_cpu_var(var) (*({ \
|
|
|
|
|
preempt_disable(); \
|
|
|
|
|
&__get_cpu_var(var); }))
|
2009-10-29 21:34:15 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-29 21:34:15 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* The weird & is necessary because sparse considers (void)(var) to be
|
|
|
|
|
* a direct dereference of percpu variable (var).
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2009-10-29 21:34:15 +08:00
|
|
|
#define put_cpu_var(var) do { \
|
2009-10-29 21:34:15 +08:00
|
|
|
(void)&(var); \
|
2009-10-29 21:34:15 +08:00
|
|
|
preempt_enable(); \
|
|
|
|
|
} while (0)
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-09-17 01:21:28 +08:00
|
|
|
#define get_cpu_ptr(var) ({ \
|
|
|
|
|
preempt_disable(); \
|
|
|
|
|
this_cpu_ptr(var); })
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define put_cpu_ptr(var) do { \
|
|
|
|
|
(void)(var); \
|
|
|
|
|
preempt_enable(); \
|
|
|
|
|
} while (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-02-24 10:57:21 +08:00
|
|
|
/* minimum unit size, also is the maximum supported allocation size */
|
2010-09-04 00:22:47 +08:00
|
|
|
#define PCPU_MIN_UNIT_SIZE PFN_ALIGN(32 << 10)
|
2009-02-24 10:57:21 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-28 00:50:00 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* Percpu allocator can serve percpu allocations before slab is
|
|
|
|
|
* initialized which allows slab to depend on the percpu allocator.
|
|
|
|
|
* The following two parameters decide how much resource to
|
|
|
|
|
* preallocate for this. Keep PERCPU_DYNAMIC_RESERVE equal to or
|
|
|
|
|
* larger than PERCPU_DYNAMIC_EARLY_SIZE.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
#define PERCPU_DYNAMIC_EARLY_SLOTS 128
|
|
|
|
|
#define PERCPU_DYNAMIC_EARLY_SIZE (12 << 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-02-24 10:57:21 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* PERCPU_DYNAMIC_RESERVE indicates the amount of free area to piggy
|
2009-03-06 13:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
* back on the first chunk for dynamic percpu allocation if arch is
|
|
|
|
|
* manually allocating and mapping it for faster access (as a part of
|
|
|
|
|
* large page mapping for example).
|
2009-02-24 10:57:21 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
2009-03-06 13:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
* The following values give between one and two pages of free space
|
|
|
|
|
* after typical minimal boot (2-way SMP, single disk and NIC) with
|
|
|
|
|
* both defconfig and a distro config on x86_64 and 32. More
|
|
|
|
|
* intelligent way to determine this would be nice.
|
2009-02-24 10:57:21 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2009-03-06 13:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
#if BITS_PER_LONG > 32
|
|
|
|
|
#define PERCPU_DYNAMIC_RESERVE (20 << 10)
|
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
|
#define PERCPU_DYNAMIC_RESERVE (12 << 10)
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2009-02-24 10:57:21 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-02-20 15:29:08 +08:00
|
|
|
extern void *pcpu_base_addr;
|
2009-08-14 14:00:51 +08:00
|
|
|
extern const unsigned long *pcpu_unit_offsets;
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
percpu: introduce pcpu_alloc_info and pcpu_group_info
Till now, non-linear cpu->unit map was expressed using an integer
array which maps each cpu to a unit and used only by lpage allocator.
Although how many units have been placed in a single contiguos area
(group) is known while building unit_map, the information is lost when
the result is recorded into the unit_map array. For lpage allocator,
as all allocations are done by lpages and whether two adjacent lpages
are in the same group or not is irrelevant, this didn't cause any
problem. Non-linear cpu->unit mapping will be used for sparse
embedding and this grouping information is necessary for that.
This patch introduces pcpu_alloc_info which contains all the
information necessary for initializing percpu allocator.
pcpu_alloc_info contains array of pcpu_group_info which describes how
units are grouped and mapped to cpus. pcpu_group_info also has
base_offset field to specify its offset from the chunk's base address.
pcpu_build_alloc_info() initializes this field as if all groups are
allocated back-to-back as is currently done but this will be used to
sparsely place groups.
pcpu_alloc_info is a rather complex data structure which contains a
flexible array which in turn points to nested cpu_map arrays.
* pcpu_alloc_alloc_info() and pcpu_free_alloc_info() are provided to
help dealing with pcpu_alloc_info.
* pcpu_lpage_build_unit_map() is updated to build pcpu_alloc_info,
generalized and renamed to pcpu_build_alloc_info().
@cpu_distance_fn may be NULL indicating that all cpus are of
LOCAL_DISTANCE.
* pcpul_lpage_dump_cfg() is updated to process pcpu_alloc_info,
generalized and renamed to pcpu_dump_alloc_info(). It now also
prints which group each alloc unit belongs to.
* pcpu_setup_first_chunk() now takes pcpu_alloc_info instead of the
separate parameters. All first chunk allocators are updated to use
pcpu_build_alloc_info() to build alloc_info and call
pcpu_setup_first_chunk() with it. This has the side effect of
packing units for sparse possible cpus. ie. if cpus 0, 2 and 4 are
possible, they'll be assigned unit 0, 1 and 2 instead of 0, 2 and 4.
* x86 setup_pcpu_lpage() is updated to deal with alloc_info.
* sparc64 setup_per_cpu_areas() is updated to build alloc_info.
Although the changes made by this patch are pretty pervasive, it
doesn't cause any behavior difference other than packing of sparse
cpus. It mostly changes how information is passed among
initialization functions and makes room for more flexibility.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2009-08-14 14:00:51 +08:00
|
|
|
struct pcpu_group_info {
|
|
|
|
|
int nr_units; /* aligned # of units */
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned long base_offset; /* base address offset */
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned int *cpu_map; /* unit->cpu map, empty
|
|
|
|
|
* entries contain NR_CPUS */
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct pcpu_alloc_info {
|
|
|
|
|
size_t static_size;
|
|
|
|
|
size_t reserved_size;
|
|
|
|
|
size_t dyn_size;
|
|
|
|
|
size_t unit_size;
|
|
|
|
|
size_t atom_size;
|
|
|
|
|
size_t alloc_size;
|
|
|
|
|
size_t __ai_size; /* internal, don't use */
|
|
|
|
|
int nr_groups; /* 0 if grouping unnecessary */
|
|
|
|
|
struct pcpu_group_info groups[];
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-14 14:00:50 +08:00
|
|
|
enum pcpu_fc {
|
|
|
|
|
PCPU_FC_AUTO,
|
|
|
|
|
PCPU_FC_EMBED,
|
|
|
|
|
PCPU_FC_PAGE,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCPU_FC_NR,
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
2012-10-05 08:12:07 +08:00
|
|
|
extern const char * const pcpu_fc_names[PCPU_FC_NR];
|
2009-08-14 14:00:50 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
extern enum pcpu_fc pcpu_chosen_fc;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-14 14:00:50 +08:00
|
|
|
typedef void * (*pcpu_fc_alloc_fn_t)(unsigned int cpu, size_t size,
|
|
|
|
|
size_t align);
|
2009-07-04 07:10:59 +08:00
|
|
|
typedef void (*pcpu_fc_free_fn_t)(void *ptr, size_t size);
|
|
|
|
|
typedef void (*pcpu_fc_populate_pte_fn_t)(unsigned long addr);
|
2009-07-04 07:11:00 +08:00
|
|
|
typedef int (pcpu_fc_cpu_distance_fn_t)(unsigned int from, unsigned int to);
|
2009-02-20 15:29:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
percpu: introduce pcpu_alloc_info and pcpu_group_info
Till now, non-linear cpu->unit map was expressed using an integer
array which maps each cpu to a unit and used only by lpage allocator.
Although how many units have been placed in a single contiguos area
(group) is known while building unit_map, the information is lost when
the result is recorded into the unit_map array. For lpage allocator,
as all allocations are done by lpages and whether two adjacent lpages
are in the same group or not is irrelevant, this didn't cause any
problem. Non-linear cpu->unit mapping will be used for sparse
embedding and this grouping information is necessary for that.
This patch introduces pcpu_alloc_info which contains all the
information necessary for initializing percpu allocator.
pcpu_alloc_info contains array of pcpu_group_info which describes how
units are grouped and mapped to cpus. pcpu_group_info also has
base_offset field to specify its offset from the chunk's base address.
pcpu_build_alloc_info() initializes this field as if all groups are
allocated back-to-back as is currently done but this will be used to
sparsely place groups.
pcpu_alloc_info is a rather complex data structure which contains a
flexible array which in turn points to nested cpu_map arrays.
* pcpu_alloc_alloc_info() and pcpu_free_alloc_info() are provided to
help dealing with pcpu_alloc_info.
* pcpu_lpage_build_unit_map() is updated to build pcpu_alloc_info,
generalized and renamed to pcpu_build_alloc_info().
@cpu_distance_fn may be NULL indicating that all cpus are of
LOCAL_DISTANCE.
* pcpul_lpage_dump_cfg() is updated to process pcpu_alloc_info,
generalized and renamed to pcpu_dump_alloc_info(). It now also
prints which group each alloc unit belongs to.
* pcpu_setup_first_chunk() now takes pcpu_alloc_info instead of the
separate parameters. All first chunk allocators are updated to use
pcpu_build_alloc_info() to build alloc_info and call
pcpu_setup_first_chunk() with it. This has the side effect of
packing units for sparse possible cpus. ie. if cpus 0, 2 and 4 are
possible, they'll be assigned unit 0, 1 and 2 instead of 0, 2 and 4.
* x86 setup_pcpu_lpage() is updated to deal with alloc_info.
* sparc64 setup_per_cpu_areas() is updated to build alloc_info.
Although the changes made by this patch are pretty pervasive, it
doesn't cause any behavior difference other than packing of sparse
cpus. It mostly changes how information is passed among
initialization functions and makes room for more flexibility.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2009-08-14 14:00:51 +08:00
|
|
|
extern struct pcpu_alloc_info * __init pcpu_alloc_alloc_info(int nr_groups,
|
|
|
|
|
int nr_units);
|
|
|
|
|
extern void __init pcpu_free_alloc_info(struct pcpu_alloc_info *ai);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-14 14:00:51 +08:00
|
|
|
extern int __init pcpu_setup_first_chunk(const struct pcpu_alloc_info *ai,
|
|
|
|
|
void *base_addr);
|
2009-02-24 10:57:21 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-08-14 14:00:49 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_NEED_PER_CPU_EMBED_FIRST_CHUNK
|
2010-06-28 00:49:59 +08:00
|
|
|
extern int __init pcpu_embed_first_chunk(size_t reserved_size, size_t dyn_size,
|
2009-08-14 14:00:52 +08:00
|
|
|
size_t atom_size,
|
|
|
|
|
pcpu_fc_cpu_distance_fn_t cpu_distance_fn,
|
|
|
|
|
pcpu_fc_alloc_fn_t alloc_fn,
|
|
|
|
|
pcpu_fc_free_fn_t free_fn);
|
2009-08-14 14:00:49 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2009-03-10 15:27:48 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-08-14 14:00:49 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK
|
2009-08-14 14:00:51 +08:00
|
|
|
extern int __init pcpu_page_first_chunk(size_t reserved_size,
|
2009-07-04 07:10:59 +08:00
|
|
|
pcpu_fc_alloc_fn_t alloc_fn,
|
|
|
|
|
pcpu_fc_free_fn_t free_fn,
|
|
|
|
|
pcpu_fc_populate_pte_fn_t populate_pte_fn);
|
2009-08-14 14:00:49 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2009-07-04 07:10:59 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-02-20 15:29:08 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* Use this to get to a cpu's version of the per-cpu object
|
|
|
|
|
* dynamically allocated. Non-atomic access to the current CPU's
|
|
|
|
|
* version should probably be combined with get_cpu()/put_cpu().
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2010-09-04 00:22:48 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
2009-02-20 15:29:08 +08:00
|
|
|
#define per_cpu_ptr(ptr, cpu) SHIFT_PERCPU_PTR((ptr), per_cpu_offset((cpu)))
|
2010-09-04 00:22:48 +08:00
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
|
#define per_cpu_ptr(ptr, cpu) ({ (void)(cpu); VERIFY_PERCPU_PTR((ptr)); })
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2009-02-20 15:29:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-29 21:34:15 +08:00
|
|
|
extern void __percpu *__alloc_reserved_percpu(size_t size, size_t align);
|
2010-03-10 17:57:54 +08:00
|
|
|
extern bool is_kernel_percpu_address(unsigned long addr);
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-09-04 00:22:48 +08:00
|
|
|
#if !defined(CONFIG_SMP) || !defined(CONFIG_HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA)
|
2009-03-30 18:07:44 +08:00
|
|
|
extern void __init setup_per_cpu_areas(void);
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2010-06-28 00:50:00 +08:00
|
|
|
extern void __init percpu_init_late(void);
|
2009-03-30 18:07:44 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-24 16:06:43 +08:00
|
|
|
extern void __percpu *__alloc_percpu(size_t size, size_t align);
|
|
|
|
|
extern void free_percpu(void __percpu *__pdata);
|
|
|
|
|
extern phys_addr_t per_cpu_ptr_to_phys(void *addr);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-29 21:34:12 +08:00
|
|
|
#define alloc_percpu(type) \
|
2009-10-29 21:34:15 +08:00
|
|
|
(typeof(type) __percpu *)__alloc_percpu(sizeof(type), __alignof__(type))
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* Branching function to split up a function into a set of functions that
|
|
|
|
|
* are called for different scalar sizes of the objects handled.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
extern void __bad_size_call_parameter(void);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-08 06:39:44 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
|
|
|
|
|
extern void __this_cpu_preempt_check(const char *op);
|
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
|
static inline void __this_cpu_preempt_check(const char *op) { }
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-29 21:34:12 +08:00
|
|
|
#define __pcpu_size_call_return(stem, variable) \
|
|
|
|
|
({ typeof(variable) pscr_ret__; \
|
2009-10-29 21:34:15 +08:00
|
|
|
__verify_pcpu_ptr(&(variable)); \
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
switch(sizeof(variable)) { \
|
2009-10-29 21:34:12 +08:00
|
|
|
case 1: pscr_ret__ = stem##1(variable);break; \
|
|
|
|
|
case 2: pscr_ret__ = stem##2(variable);break; \
|
|
|
|
|
case 4: pscr_ret__ = stem##4(variable);break; \
|
|
|
|
|
case 8: pscr_ret__ = stem##8(variable);break; \
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
default: \
|
|
|
|
|
__bad_size_call_parameter();break; \
|
|
|
|
|
} \
|
2009-10-29 21:34:12 +08:00
|
|
|
pscr_ret__; \
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 01:39:59 +08:00
|
|
|
#define __pcpu_size_call_return2(stem, variable, ...) \
|
|
|
|
|
({ \
|
|
|
|
|
typeof(variable) pscr2_ret__; \
|
|
|
|
|
__verify_pcpu_ptr(&(variable)); \
|
|
|
|
|
switch(sizeof(variable)) { \
|
|
|
|
|
case 1: pscr2_ret__ = stem##1(variable, __VA_ARGS__); break; \
|
|
|
|
|
case 2: pscr2_ret__ = stem##2(variable, __VA_ARGS__); break; \
|
|
|
|
|
case 4: pscr2_ret__ = stem##4(variable, __VA_ARGS__); break; \
|
|
|
|
|
case 8: pscr2_ret__ = stem##8(variable, __VA_ARGS__); break; \
|
|
|
|
|
default: \
|
|
|
|
|
__bad_size_call_parameter(); break; \
|
|
|
|
|
} \
|
|
|
|
|
pscr2_ret__; \
|
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-28 18:02:24 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* Special handling for cmpxchg_double. cmpxchg_double is passed two
|
|
|
|
|
* percpu variables. The first has to be aligned to a double word
|
|
|
|
|
* boundary and the second has to follow directly thereafter.
|
2011-06-02 22:19:41 +08:00
|
|
|
* We enforce this on all architectures even if they don't support
|
|
|
|
|
* a double cmpxchg instruction, since it's a cheap requirement, and it
|
|
|
|
|
* avoids breaking the requirement for architectures with the instruction.
|
2011-02-28 18:02:24 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
#define __pcpu_double_call_return_bool(stem, pcp1, pcp2, ...) \
|
|
|
|
|
({ \
|
|
|
|
|
bool pdcrb_ret__; \
|
|
|
|
|
__verify_pcpu_ptr(&pcp1); \
|
|
|
|
|
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(pcp1) != sizeof(pcp2)); \
|
|
|
|
|
VM_BUG_ON((unsigned long)(&pcp1) % (2 * sizeof(pcp1))); \
|
|
|
|
|
VM_BUG_ON((unsigned long)(&pcp2) != \
|
|
|
|
|
(unsigned long)(&pcp1) + sizeof(pcp1)); \
|
|
|
|
|
switch(sizeof(pcp1)) { \
|
|
|
|
|
case 1: pdcrb_ret__ = stem##1(pcp1, pcp2, __VA_ARGS__); break; \
|
|
|
|
|
case 2: pdcrb_ret__ = stem##2(pcp1, pcp2, __VA_ARGS__); break; \
|
|
|
|
|
case 4: pdcrb_ret__ = stem##4(pcp1, pcp2, __VA_ARGS__); break; \
|
|
|
|
|
case 8: pdcrb_ret__ = stem##8(pcp1, pcp2, __VA_ARGS__); break; \
|
|
|
|
|
default: \
|
|
|
|
|
__bad_size_call_parameter(); break; \
|
|
|
|
|
} \
|
|
|
|
|
pdcrb_ret__; \
|
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-29 21:34:12 +08:00
|
|
|
#define __pcpu_size_call(stem, variable, ...) \
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
do { \
|
2009-10-29 21:34:15 +08:00
|
|
|
__verify_pcpu_ptr(&(variable)); \
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
switch(sizeof(variable)) { \
|
|
|
|
|
case 1: stem##1(variable, __VA_ARGS__);break; \
|
|
|
|
|
case 2: stem##2(variable, __VA_ARGS__);break; \
|
|
|
|
|
case 4: stem##4(variable, __VA_ARGS__);break; \
|
|
|
|
|
case 8: stem##8(variable, __VA_ARGS__);break; \
|
|
|
|
|
default: \
|
|
|
|
|
__bad_size_call_parameter();break; \
|
|
|
|
|
} \
|
|
|
|
|
} while (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
* this_cpu operations (C) 2008-2013 Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
* Optimized manipulation for memory allocated through the per cpu
|
2009-10-29 21:34:15 +08:00
|
|
|
* allocator or for addresses of per cpu variables.
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* These operation guarantee exclusivity of access for other operations
|
|
|
|
|
* on the *same* processor. The assumption is that per cpu data is only
|
|
|
|
|
* accessed by a single processor instance (the current one).
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* The first group is used for accesses that must be done in a
|
|
|
|
|
* preemption safe way since we know that the context is not preempt
|
|
|
|
|
* safe. Interrupts may occur. If the interrupt modifies the variable
|
|
|
|
|
* too then RMW actions will not be reliable.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* The arch code can provide optimized functions in two ways:
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* 1. Override the function completely. F.e. define this_cpu_add().
|
|
|
|
|
* The arch must then ensure that the various scalar format passed
|
|
|
|
|
* are handled correctly.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* 2. Provide functions for certain scalar sizes. F.e. provide
|
|
|
|
|
* this_cpu_add_2() to provide per cpu atomic operations for 2 byte
|
|
|
|
|
* sized RMW actions. If arch code does not provide operations for
|
|
|
|
|
* a scalar size then the fallback in the generic code will be
|
|
|
|
|
* used.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define _this_cpu_generic_read(pcp) \
|
|
|
|
|
({ typeof(pcp) ret__; \
|
|
|
|
|
preempt_disable(); \
|
|
|
|
|
ret__ = *this_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)); \
|
|
|
|
|
preempt_enable(); \
|
|
|
|
|
ret__; \
|
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef this_cpu_read
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_read_1
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_read_1(pcp) _this_cpu_generic_read(pcp)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_read_2
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_read_2(pcp) _this_cpu_generic_read(pcp)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_read_4
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_read_4(pcp) _this_cpu_generic_read(pcp)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_read_8
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_read_8(pcp) _this_cpu_generic_read(pcp)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
2009-10-29 21:34:12 +08:00
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_read(pcp) __pcpu_size_call_return(this_cpu_read_, (pcp))
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define _this_cpu_generic_to_op(pcp, val, op) \
|
|
|
|
|
do { \
|
2011-12-23 01:58:51 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long flags; \
|
percpu: use raw_local_irq_* in _this_cpu op
It doesn't make sense to trace irq off or do irq flags
lock proving inside 'this_cpu' operations, so replace local_irq_*
with raw_local_irq_* in 'this_cpu' op.
Also the patch fixes onelockdep warning[1] by the replacement, see
below:
In commit: 933393f58fef9963eac61db8093689544e29a600(percpu:
Remove irqsafe_cpu_xxx variants), local_irq_save/restore(flags) are
added inside this_cpu_inc operation, so that trace_hardirqs_off_caller
will be called by trace_hardirqs_on_caller directly because
__debug_atomic_inc is implemented as this_cpu_inc, which may trigger
the lockdep warning[1], for example in the below ARM scenary:
kernel_thread_helper /*irq disabled*/
->trace_hardirqs_on_caller /*hardirqs_enabled was set*/
->trace_hardirqs_off_caller /*hardirqs_enabled cleared*/
__this_cpu_add(redundant_hardirqs_on)
->trace_hardirqs_off_caller /*irq disabled, so call here*/
The 'unannotated irqs-on' warning will be triggered somewhere because
irq is just enabled after the irq trace in kernel_thread_helper.
[1],
[ 0.162841] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 0.167694] WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:3493 check_flags+0xc0/0x1d0()
[ 0.174468] Modules linked in:
[ 0.177703] Backtrace:
[ 0.180328] [<c00171f0>] (dump_backtrace+0x0/0x110) from [<c0412320>] (dump_stack+0x18/0x1c)
[ 0.189086] r6:c051f778 r5:00000da5 r4:00000000 r3:60000093
[ 0.195007] [<c0412308>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x1c) from [<c00410e8>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x54/0x6c)
[ 0.204223] [<c0041094>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x0/0x6c) from [<c0041124>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x24/0x2c)
[ 0.214111] r8:00000000 r7:00000000 r6:ee069598 r5:60000013 r4:ee082000
[ 0.220825] r3:00000009
[ 0.223693] [<c0041100>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x0/0x2c) from [<c0088f38>] (check_flags+0xc0/0x1d0)
[ 0.232910] [<c0088e78>] (check_flags+0x0/0x1d0) from [<c008d348>] (lock_acquire+0x4c/0x11c)
[ 0.241668] [<c008d2fc>] (lock_acquire+0x0/0x11c) from [<c0415aa4>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x3c/0x74)
[ 0.250610] [<c0415a68>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x0/0x74) from [<c010a844>] (set_task_comm+0x20/0xc0)
[ 0.259521] r6:ee069588 r5:ee0691c0 r4:ee082000
[ 0.264404] [<c010a824>] (set_task_comm+0x0/0xc0) from [<c0060780>] (kthreadd+0x28/0x108)
[ 0.272857] r8:00000000 r7:00000013 r6:c0044a08 r5:ee0691c0 r4:ee082000
[ 0.279571] r3:ee083fe0
[ 0.282470] [<c0060758>] (kthreadd+0x0/0x108) from [<c0044a08>] (do_exit+0x0/0x6dc)
[ 0.290405] r5:c0060758 r4:00000000
[ 0.294189] ---[ end trace 1b75b31a2719ed1c ]---
[ 0.299041] possible reason: unannotated irqs-on.
[ 0.303955] irq event stamp: 5
[ 0.307159] hardirqs last enabled at (4): [<c001331c>] no_work_pending+0x8/0x2c
[ 0.314880] hardirqs last disabled at (5): [<c0089b08>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x60/0x26c
[ 0.323547] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<c003f754>] copy_process+0x33c/0xef4
[ 0.331207] softirqs last disabled at (0): [< (null)>] (null)
[ 0.337585] CPU0: thread -1, cpu 0, socket 0, mpidr 80000000
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2012-02-15 16:54:38 +08:00
|
|
|
raw_local_irq_save(flags); \
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
*raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)) op val; \
|
percpu: use raw_local_irq_* in _this_cpu op
It doesn't make sense to trace irq off or do irq flags
lock proving inside 'this_cpu' operations, so replace local_irq_*
with raw_local_irq_* in 'this_cpu' op.
Also the patch fixes onelockdep warning[1] by the replacement, see
below:
In commit: 933393f58fef9963eac61db8093689544e29a600(percpu:
Remove irqsafe_cpu_xxx variants), local_irq_save/restore(flags) are
added inside this_cpu_inc operation, so that trace_hardirqs_off_caller
will be called by trace_hardirqs_on_caller directly because
__debug_atomic_inc is implemented as this_cpu_inc, which may trigger
the lockdep warning[1], for example in the below ARM scenary:
kernel_thread_helper /*irq disabled*/
->trace_hardirqs_on_caller /*hardirqs_enabled was set*/
->trace_hardirqs_off_caller /*hardirqs_enabled cleared*/
__this_cpu_add(redundant_hardirqs_on)
->trace_hardirqs_off_caller /*irq disabled, so call here*/
The 'unannotated irqs-on' warning will be triggered somewhere because
irq is just enabled after the irq trace in kernel_thread_helper.
[1],
[ 0.162841] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 0.167694] WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:3493 check_flags+0xc0/0x1d0()
[ 0.174468] Modules linked in:
[ 0.177703] Backtrace:
[ 0.180328] [<c00171f0>] (dump_backtrace+0x0/0x110) from [<c0412320>] (dump_stack+0x18/0x1c)
[ 0.189086] r6:c051f778 r5:00000da5 r4:00000000 r3:60000093
[ 0.195007] [<c0412308>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x1c) from [<c00410e8>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x54/0x6c)
[ 0.204223] [<c0041094>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x0/0x6c) from [<c0041124>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x24/0x2c)
[ 0.214111] r8:00000000 r7:00000000 r6:ee069598 r5:60000013 r4:ee082000
[ 0.220825] r3:00000009
[ 0.223693] [<c0041100>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x0/0x2c) from [<c0088f38>] (check_flags+0xc0/0x1d0)
[ 0.232910] [<c0088e78>] (check_flags+0x0/0x1d0) from [<c008d348>] (lock_acquire+0x4c/0x11c)
[ 0.241668] [<c008d2fc>] (lock_acquire+0x0/0x11c) from [<c0415aa4>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x3c/0x74)
[ 0.250610] [<c0415a68>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x0/0x74) from [<c010a844>] (set_task_comm+0x20/0xc0)
[ 0.259521] r6:ee069588 r5:ee0691c0 r4:ee082000
[ 0.264404] [<c010a824>] (set_task_comm+0x0/0xc0) from [<c0060780>] (kthreadd+0x28/0x108)
[ 0.272857] r8:00000000 r7:00000013 r6:c0044a08 r5:ee0691c0 r4:ee082000
[ 0.279571] r3:ee083fe0
[ 0.282470] [<c0060758>] (kthreadd+0x0/0x108) from [<c0044a08>] (do_exit+0x0/0x6dc)
[ 0.290405] r5:c0060758 r4:00000000
[ 0.294189] ---[ end trace 1b75b31a2719ed1c ]---
[ 0.299041] possible reason: unannotated irqs-on.
[ 0.303955] irq event stamp: 5
[ 0.307159] hardirqs last enabled at (4): [<c001331c>] no_work_pending+0x8/0x2c
[ 0.314880] hardirqs last disabled at (5): [<c0089b08>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x60/0x26c
[ 0.323547] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<c003f754>] copy_process+0x33c/0xef4
[ 0.331207] softirqs last disabled at (0): [< (null)>] (null)
[ 0.337585] CPU0: thread -1, cpu 0, socket 0, mpidr 80000000
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2012-02-15 16:54:38 +08:00
|
|
|
raw_local_irq_restore(flags); \
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
} while (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef this_cpu_write
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_write_1
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_write_1(pcp, val) _this_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), =)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_write_2
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_write_2(pcp, val) _this_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), =)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_write_4
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_write_4(pcp, val) _this_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), =)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_write_8
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_write_8(pcp, val) _this_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), =)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
2009-10-29 21:34:12 +08:00
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_write(pcp, val) __pcpu_size_call(this_cpu_write_, (pcp), (val))
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef this_cpu_add
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_add_1
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_add_1(pcp, val) _this_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), +=)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_add_2
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_add_2(pcp, val) _this_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), +=)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_add_4
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_add_4(pcp, val) _this_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), +=)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_add_8
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_add_8(pcp, val) _this_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), +=)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
2009-10-29 21:34:12 +08:00
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_add(pcp, val) __pcpu_size_call(this_cpu_add_, (pcp), (val))
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef this_cpu_sub
|
percpu: fix this_cpu_sub() subtrahend casting for unsigneds
this_cpu_sub() is implemented as negation and addition.
This patch casts the adjustment to the counter type before negation to
sign extend the adjustment. This helps in cases where the counter type
is wider than an unsigned adjustment. An alternative to this patch is
to declare such operations unsupported, but it seemed useful to avoid
surprises.
This patch specifically helps the following example:
unsigned int delta = 1
preempt_disable()
this_cpu_write(long_counter, 0)
this_cpu_sub(long_counter, delta)
preempt_enable()
Before this change long_counter on a 64 bit machine ends with value
0xffffffff, rather than 0xffffffffffffffff. This is because
this_cpu_sub(pcp, delta) boils down to this_cpu_add(pcp, -delta),
which is basically:
long_counter = 0 + 0xffffffff
Also apply the same cast to:
__this_cpu_sub()
__this_cpu_sub_return()
this_cpu_sub_return()
All percpu_test.ko passes, especially the following cases which
previously failed:
l -= ui_one;
__this_cpu_sub(long_counter, ui_one);
CHECK(l, long_counter, -1);
l -= ui_one;
this_cpu_sub(long_counter, ui_one);
CHECK(l, long_counter, -1);
CHECK(l, long_counter, 0xffffffffffffffff);
ul -= ui_one;
__this_cpu_sub(ulong_counter, ui_one);
CHECK(ul, ulong_counter, -1);
CHECK(ul, ulong_counter, 0xffffffffffffffff);
ul = this_cpu_sub_return(ulong_counter, ui_one);
CHECK(ul, ulong_counter, 2);
ul = __this_cpu_sub_return(ulong_counter, ui_one);
CHECK(ul, ulong_counter, 1);
Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-10-31 04:56:20 +08:00
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_sub(pcp, val) this_cpu_add((pcp), -(typeof(pcp))(val))
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef this_cpu_inc
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_inc(pcp) this_cpu_add((pcp), 1)
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef this_cpu_dec
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_dec(pcp) this_cpu_sub((pcp), 1)
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef this_cpu_and
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_and_1
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_and_1(pcp, val) _this_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), &=)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_and_2
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_and_2(pcp, val) _this_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), &=)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_and_4
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_and_4(pcp, val) _this_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), &=)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_and_8
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_and_8(pcp, val) _this_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), &=)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
2009-10-29 21:34:12 +08:00
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_and(pcp, val) __pcpu_size_call(this_cpu_and_, (pcp), (val))
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef this_cpu_or
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_or_1
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_or_1(pcp, val) _this_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), |=)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_or_2
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_or_2(pcp, val) _this_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), |=)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_or_4
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_or_4(pcp, val) _this_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), |=)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_or_8
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_or_8(pcp, val) _this_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), |=)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
2009-10-29 21:34:12 +08:00
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_or(pcp, val) __pcpu_size_call(this_cpu_or_, (pcp), (val))
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-17 22:47:04 +08:00
|
|
|
#define _this_cpu_generic_add_return(pcp, val) \
|
|
|
|
|
({ \
|
|
|
|
|
typeof(pcp) ret__; \
|
2011-12-23 01:58:51 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long flags; \
|
percpu: use raw_local_irq_* in _this_cpu op
It doesn't make sense to trace irq off or do irq flags
lock proving inside 'this_cpu' operations, so replace local_irq_*
with raw_local_irq_* in 'this_cpu' op.
Also the patch fixes onelockdep warning[1] by the replacement, see
below:
In commit: 933393f58fef9963eac61db8093689544e29a600(percpu:
Remove irqsafe_cpu_xxx variants), local_irq_save/restore(flags) are
added inside this_cpu_inc operation, so that trace_hardirqs_off_caller
will be called by trace_hardirqs_on_caller directly because
__debug_atomic_inc is implemented as this_cpu_inc, which may trigger
the lockdep warning[1], for example in the below ARM scenary:
kernel_thread_helper /*irq disabled*/
->trace_hardirqs_on_caller /*hardirqs_enabled was set*/
->trace_hardirqs_off_caller /*hardirqs_enabled cleared*/
__this_cpu_add(redundant_hardirqs_on)
->trace_hardirqs_off_caller /*irq disabled, so call here*/
The 'unannotated irqs-on' warning will be triggered somewhere because
irq is just enabled after the irq trace in kernel_thread_helper.
[1],
[ 0.162841] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 0.167694] WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:3493 check_flags+0xc0/0x1d0()
[ 0.174468] Modules linked in:
[ 0.177703] Backtrace:
[ 0.180328] [<c00171f0>] (dump_backtrace+0x0/0x110) from [<c0412320>] (dump_stack+0x18/0x1c)
[ 0.189086] r6:c051f778 r5:00000da5 r4:00000000 r3:60000093
[ 0.195007] [<c0412308>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x1c) from [<c00410e8>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x54/0x6c)
[ 0.204223] [<c0041094>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x0/0x6c) from [<c0041124>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x24/0x2c)
[ 0.214111] r8:00000000 r7:00000000 r6:ee069598 r5:60000013 r4:ee082000
[ 0.220825] r3:00000009
[ 0.223693] [<c0041100>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x0/0x2c) from [<c0088f38>] (check_flags+0xc0/0x1d0)
[ 0.232910] [<c0088e78>] (check_flags+0x0/0x1d0) from [<c008d348>] (lock_acquire+0x4c/0x11c)
[ 0.241668] [<c008d2fc>] (lock_acquire+0x0/0x11c) from [<c0415aa4>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x3c/0x74)
[ 0.250610] [<c0415a68>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x0/0x74) from [<c010a844>] (set_task_comm+0x20/0xc0)
[ 0.259521] r6:ee069588 r5:ee0691c0 r4:ee082000
[ 0.264404] [<c010a824>] (set_task_comm+0x0/0xc0) from [<c0060780>] (kthreadd+0x28/0x108)
[ 0.272857] r8:00000000 r7:00000013 r6:c0044a08 r5:ee0691c0 r4:ee082000
[ 0.279571] r3:ee083fe0
[ 0.282470] [<c0060758>] (kthreadd+0x0/0x108) from [<c0044a08>] (do_exit+0x0/0x6dc)
[ 0.290405] r5:c0060758 r4:00000000
[ 0.294189] ---[ end trace 1b75b31a2719ed1c ]---
[ 0.299041] possible reason: unannotated irqs-on.
[ 0.303955] irq event stamp: 5
[ 0.307159] hardirqs last enabled at (4): [<c001331c>] no_work_pending+0x8/0x2c
[ 0.314880] hardirqs last disabled at (5): [<c0089b08>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x60/0x26c
[ 0.323547] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<c003f754>] copy_process+0x33c/0xef4
[ 0.331207] softirqs last disabled at (0): [< (null)>] (null)
[ 0.337585] CPU0: thread -1, cpu 0, socket 0, mpidr 80000000
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2012-02-15 16:54:38 +08:00
|
|
|
raw_local_irq_save(flags); \
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
raw_cpu_add(pcp, val); \
|
|
|
|
|
ret__ = raw_cpu_read(pcp); \
|
percpu: use raw_local_irq_* in _this_cpu op
It doesn't make sense to trace irq off or do irq flags
lock proving inside 'this_cpu' operations, so replace local_irq_*
with raw_local_irq_* in 'this_cpu' op.
Also the patch fixes onelockdep warning[1] by the replacement, see
below:
In commit: 933393f58fef9963eac61db8093689544e29a600(percpu:
Remove irqsafe_cpu_xxx variants), local_irq_save/restore(flags) are
added inside this_cpu_inc operation, so that trace_hardirqs_off_caller
will be called by trace_hardirqs_on_caller directly because
__debug_atomic_inc is implemented as this_cpu_inc, which may trigger
the lockdep warning[1], for example in the below ARM scenary:
kernel_thread_helper /*irq disabled*/
->trace_hardirqs_on_caller /*hardirqs_enabled was set*/
->trace_hardirqs_off_caller /*hardirqs_enabled cleared*/
__this_cpu_add(redundant_hardirqs_on)
->trace_hardirqs_off_caller /*irq disabled, so call here*/
The 'unannotated irqs-on' warning will be triggered somewhere because
irq is just enabled after the irq trace in kernel_thread_helper.
[1],
[ 0.162841] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 0.167694] WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:3493 check_flags+0xc0/0x1d0()
[ 0.174468] Modules linked in:
[ 0.177703] Backtrace:
[ 0.180328] [<c00171f0>] (dump_backtrace+0x0/0x110) from [<c0412320>] (dump_stack+0x18/0x1c)
[ 0.189086] r6:c051f778 r5:00000da5 r4:00000000 r3:60000093
[ 0.195007] [<c0412308>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x1c) from [<c00410e8>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x54/0x6c)
[ 0.204223] [<c0041094>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x0/0x6c) from [<c0041124>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x24/0x2c)
[ 0.214111] r8:00000000 r7:00000000 r6:ee069598 r5:60000013 r4:ee082000
[ 0.220825] r3:00000009
[ 0.223693] [<c0041100>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x0/0x2c) from [<c0088f38>] (check_flags+0xc0/0x1d0)
[ 0.232910] [<c0088e78>] (check_flags+0x0/0x1d0) from [<c008d348>] (lock_acquire+0x4c/0x11c)
[ 0.241668] [<c008d2fc>] (lock_acquire+0x0/0x11c) from [<c0415aa4>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x3c/0x74)
[ 0.250610] [<c0415a68>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x0/0x74) from [<c010a844>] (set_task_comm+0x20/0xc0)
[ 0.259521] r6:ee069588 r5:ee0691c0 r4:ee082000
[ 0.264404] [<c010a824>] (set_task_comm+0x0/0xc0) from [<c0060780>] (kthreadd+0x28/0x108)
[ 0.272857] r8:00000000 r7:00000013 r6:c0044a08 r5:ee0691c0 r4:ee082000
[ 0.279571] r3:ee083fe0
[ 0.282470] [<c0060758>] (kthreadd+0x0/0x108) from [<c0044a08>] (do_exit+0x0/0x6dc)
[ 0.290405] r5:c0060758 r4:00000000
[ 0.294189] ---[ end trace 1b75b31a2719ed1c ]---
[ 0.299041] possible reason: unannotated irqs-on.
[ 0.303955] irq event stamp: 5
[ 0.307159] hardirqs last enabled at (4): [<c001331c>] no_work_pending+0x8/0x2c
[ 0.314880] hardirqs last disabled at (5): [<c0089b08>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x60/0x26c
[ 0.323547] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<c003f754>] copy_process+0x33c/0xef4
[ 0.331207] softirqs last disabled at (0): [< (null)>] (null)
[ 0.337585] CPU0: thread -1, cpu 0, socket 0, mpidr 80000000
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2012-02-15 16:54:38 +08:00
|
|
|
raw_local_irq_restore(flags); \
|
2010-12-17 22:47:04 +08:00
|
|
|
ret__; \
|
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef this_cpu_add_return
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_add_return_1
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_add_return_1(pcp, val) _this_cpu_generic_add_return(pcp, val)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_add_return_2
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_add_return_2(pcp, val) _this_cpu_generic_add_return(pcp, val)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_add_return_4
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_add_return_4(pcp, val) _this_cpu_generic_add_return(pcp, val)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_add_return_8
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_add_return_8(pcp, val) _this_cpu_generic_add_return(pcp, val)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_add_return(pcp, val) __pcpu_size_call_return2(this_cpu_add_return_, pcp, val)
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
percpu: fix this_cpu_sub() subtrahend casting for unsigneds
this_cpu_sub() is implemented as negation and addition.
This patch casts the adjustment to the counter type before negation to
sign extend the adjustment. This helps in cases where the counter type
is wider than an unsigned adjustment. An alternative to this patch is
to declare such operations unsupported, but it seemed useful to avoid
surprises.
This patch specifically helps the following example:
unsigned int delta = 1
preempt_disable()
this_cpu_write(long_counter, 0)
this_cpu_sub(long_counter, delta)
preempt_enable()
Before this change long_counter on a 64 bit machine ends with value
0xffffffff, rather than 0xffffffffffffffff. This is because
this_cpu_sub(pcp, delta) boils down to this_cpu_add(pcp, -delta),
which is basically:
long_counter = 0 + 0xffffffff
Also apply the same cast to:
__this_cpu_sub()
__this_cpu_sub_return()
this_cpu_sub_return()
All percpu_test.ko passes, especially the following cases which
previously failed:
l -= ui_one;
__this_cpu_sub(long_counter, ui_one);
CHECK(l, long_counter, -1);
l -= ui_one;
this_cpu_sub(long_counter, ui_one);
CHECK(l, long_counter, -1);
CHECK(l, long_counter, 0xffffffffffffffff);
ul -= ui_one;
__this_cpu_sub(ulong_counter, ui_one);
CHECK(ul, ulong_counter, -1);
CHECK(ul, ulong_counter, 0xffffffffffffffff);
ul = this_cpu_sub_return(ulong_counter, ui_one);
CHECK(ul, ulong_counter, 2);
ul = __this_cpu_sub_return(ulong_counter, ui_one);
CHECK(ul, ulong_counter, 1);
Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-10-31 04:56:20 +08:00
|
|
|
#define this_cpu_sub_return(pcp, val) this_cpu_add_return(pcp, -(typeof(pcp))(val))
|
2010-12-17 22:47:04 +08:00
|
|
|
#define this_cpu_inc_return(pcp) this_cpu_add_return(pcp, 1)
|
|
|
|
|
#define this_cpu_dec_return(pcp) this_cpu_add_return(pcp, -1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-18 22:54:04 +08:00
|
|
|
#define _this_cpu_generic_xchg(pcp, nval) \
|
|
|
|
|
({ typeof(pcp) ret__; \
|
2011-12-23 01:58:51 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long flags; \
|
percpu: use raw_local_irq_* in _this_cpu op
It doesn't make sense to trace irq off or do irq flags
lock proving inside 'this_cpu' operations, so replace local_irq_*
with raw_local_irq_* in 'this_cpu' op.
Also the patch fixes onelockdep warning[1] by the replacement, see
below:
In commit: 933393f58fef9963eac61db8093689544e29a600(percpu:
Remove irqsafe_cpu_xxx variants), local_irq_save/restore(flags) are
added inside this_cpu_inc operation, so that trace_hardirqs_off_caller
will be called by trace_hardirqs_on_caller directly because
__debug_atomic_inc is implemented as this_cpu_inc, which may trigger
the lockdep warning[1], for example in the below ARM scenary:
kernel_thread_helper /*irq disabled*/
->trace_hardirqs_on_caller /*hardirqs_enabled was set*/
->trace_hardirqs_off_caller /*hardirqs_enabled cleared*/
__this_cpu_add(redundant_hardirqs_on)
->trace_hardirqs_off_caller /*irq disabled, so call here*/
The 'unannotated irqs-on' warning will be triggered somewhere because
irq is just enabled after the irq trace in kernel_thread_helper.
[1],
[ 0.162841] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 0.167694] WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:3493 check_flags+0xc0/0x1d0()
[ 0.174468] Modules linked in:
[ 0.177703] Backtrace:
[ 0.180328] [<c00171f0>] (dump_backtrace+0x0/0x110) from [<c0412320>] (dump_stack+0x18/0x1c)
[ 0.189086] r6:c051f778 r5:00000da5 r4:00000000 r3:60000093
[ 0.195007] [<c0412308>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x1c) from [<c00410e8>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x54/0x6c)
[ 0.204223] [<c0041094>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x0/0x6c) from [<c0041124>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x24/0x2c)
[ 0.214111] r8:00000000 r7:00000000 r6:ee069598 r5:60000013 r4:ee082000
[ 0.220825] r3:00000009
[ 0.223693] [<c0041100>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x0/0x2c) from [<c0088f38>] (check_flags+0xc0/0x1d0)
[ 0.232910] [<c0088e78>] (check_flags+0x0/0x1d0) from [<c008d348>] (lock_acquire+0x4c/0x11c)
[ 0.241668] [<c008d2fc>] (lock_acquire+0x0/0x11c) from [<c0415aa4>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x3c/0x74)
[ 0.250610] [<c0415a68>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x0/0x74) from [<c010a844>] (set_task_comm+0x20/0xc0)
[ 0.259521] r6:ee069588 r5:ee0691c0 r4:ee082000
[ 0.264404] [<c010a824>] (set_task_comm+0x0/0xc0) from [<c0060780>] (kthreadd+0x28/0x108)
[ 0.272857] r8:00000000 r7:00000013 r6:c0044a08 r5:ee0691c0 r4:ee082000
[ 0.279571] r3:ee083fe0
[ 0.282470] [<c0060758>] (kthreadd+0x0/0x108) from [<c0044a08>] (do_exit+0x0/0x6dc)
[ 0.290405] r5:c0060758 r4:00000000
[ 0.294189] ---[ end trace 1b75b31a2719ed1c ]---
[ 0.299041] possible reason: unannotated irqs-on.
[ 0.303955] irq event stamp: 5
[ 0.307159] hardirqs last enabled at (4): [<c001331c>] no_work_pending+0x8/0x2c
[ 0.314880] hardirqs last disabled at (5): [<c0089b08>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x60/0x26c
[ 0.323547] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<c003f754>] copy_process+0x33c/0xef4
[ 0.331207] softirqs last disabled at (0): [< (null)>] (null)
[ 0.337585] CPU0: thread -1, cpu 0, socket 0, mpidr 80000000
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2012-02-15 16:54:38 +08:00
|
|
|
raw_local_irq_save(flags); \
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
ret__ = raw_cpu_read(pcp); \
|
|
|
|
|
raw_cpu_write(pcp, nval); \
|
percpu: use raw_local_irq_* in _this_cpu op
It doesn't make sense to trace irq off or do irq flags
lock proving inside 'this_cpu' operations, so replace local_irq_*
with raw_local_irq_* in 'this_cpu' op.
Also the patch fixes onelockdep warning[1] by the replacement, see
below:
In commit: 933393f58fef9963eac61db8093689544e29a600(percpu:
Remove irqsafe_cpu_xxx variants), local_irq_save/restore(flags) are
added inside this_cpu_inc operation, so that trace_hardirqs_off_caller
will be called by trace_hardirqs_on_caller directly because
__debug_atomic_inc is implemented as this_cpu_inc, which may trigger
the lockdep warning[1], for example in the below ARM scenary:
kernel_thread_helper /*irq disabled*/
->trace_hardirqs_on_caller /*hardirqs_enabled was set*/
->trace_hardirqs_off_caller /*hardirqs_enabled cleared*/
__this_cpu_add(redundant_hardirqs_on)
->trace_hardirqs_off_caller /*irq disabled, so call here*/
The 'unannotated irqs-on' warning will be triggered somewhere because
irq is just enabled after the irq trace in kernel_thread_helper.
[1],
[ 0.162841] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 0.167694] WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:3493 check_flags+0xc0/0x1d0()
[ 0.174468] Modules linked in:
[ 0.177703] Backtrace:
[ 0.180328] [<c00171f0>] (dump_backtrace+0x0/0x110) from [<c0412320>] (dump_stack+0x18/0x1c)
[ 0.189086] r6:c051f778 r5:00000da5 r4:00000000 r3:60000093
[ 0.195007] [<c0412308>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x1c) from [<c00410e8>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x54/0x6c)
[ 0.204223] [<c0041094>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x0/0x6c) from [<c0041124>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x24/0x2c)
[ 0.214111] r8:00000000 r7:00000000 r6:ee069598 r5:60000013 r4:ee082000
[ 0.220825] r3:00000009
[ 0.223693] [<c0041100>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x0/0x2c) from [<c0088f38>] (check_flags+0xc0/0x1d0)
[ 0.232910] [<c0088e78>] (check_flags+0x0/0x1d0) from [<c008d348>] (lock_acquire+0x4c/0x11c)
[ 0.241668] [<c008d2fc>] (lock_acquire+0x0/0x11c) from [<c0415aa4>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x3c/0x74)
[ 0.250610] [<c0415a68>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x0/0x74) from [<c010a844>] (set_task_comm+0x20/0xc0)
[ 0.259521] r6:ee069588 r5:ee0691c0 r4:ee082000
[ 0.264404] [<c010a824>] (set_task_comm+0x0/0xc0) from [<c0060780>] (kthreadd+0x28/0x108)
[ 0.272857] r8:00000000 r7:00000013 r6:c0044a08 r5:ee0691c0 r4:ee082000
[ 0.279571] r3:ee083fe0
[ 0.282470] [<c0060758>] (kthreadd+0x0/0x108) from [<c0044a08>] (do_exit+0x0/0x6dc)
[ 0.290405] r5:c0060758 r4:00000000
[ 0.294189] ---[ end trace 1b75b31a2719ed1c ]---
[ 0.299041] possible reason: unannotated irqs-on.
[ 0.303955] irq event stamp: 5
[ 0.307159] hardirqs last enabled at (4): [<c001331c>] no_work_pending+0x8/0x2c
[ 0.314880] hardirqs last disabled at (5): [<c0089b08>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x60/0x26c
[ 0.323547] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<c003f754>] copy_process+0x33c/0xef4
[ 0.331207] softirqs last disabled at (0): [< (null)>] (null)
[ 0.337585] CPU0: thread -1, cpu 0, socket 0, mpidr 80000000
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2012-02-15 16:54:38 +08:00
|
|
|
raw_local_irq_restore(flags); \
|
2010-12-18 22:54:04 +08:00
|
|
|
ret__; \
|
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef this_cpu_xchg
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_xchg_1
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_xchg_1(pcp, nval) _this_cpu_generic_xchg(pcp, nval)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_xchg_2
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_xchg_2(pcp, nval) _this_cpu_generic_xchg(pcp, nval)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_xchg_4
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_xchg_4(pcp, nval) _this_cpu_generic_xchg(pcp, nval)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_xchg_8
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_xchg_8(pcp, nval) _this_cpu_generic_xchg(pcp, nval)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_xchg(pcp, nval) \
|
|
|
|
|
__pcpu_size_call_return2(this_cpu_xchg_, (pcp), nval)
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define _this_cpu_generic_cmpxchg(pcp, oval, nval) \
|
2011-12-23 01:58:51 +08:00
|
|
|
({ \
|
|
|
|
|
typeof(pcp) ret__; \
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned long flags; \
|
percpu: use raw_local_irq_* in _this_cpu op
It doesn't make sense to trace irq off or do irq flags
lock proving inside 'this_cpu' operations, so replace local_irq_*
with raw_local_irq_* in 'this_cpu' op.
Also the patch fixes onelockdep warning[1] by the replacement, see
below:
In commit: 933393f58fef9963eac61db8093689544e29a600(percpu:
Remove irqsafe_cpu_xxx variants), local_irq_save/restore(flags) are
added inside this_cpu_inc operation, so that trace_hardirqs_off_caller
will be called by trace_hardirqs_on_caller directly because
__debug_atomic_inc is implemented as this_cpu_inc, which may trigger
the lockdep warning[1], for example in the below ARM scenary:
kernel_thread_helper /*irq disabled*/
->trace_hardirqs_on_caller /*hardirqs_enabled was set*/
->trace_hardirqs_off_caller /*hardirqs_enabled cleared*/
__this_cpu_add(redundant_hardirqs_on)
->trace_hardirqs_off_caller /*irq disabled, so call here*/
The 'unannotated irqs-on' warning will be triggered somewhere because
irq is just enabled after the irq trace in kernel_thread_helper.
[1],
[ 0.162841] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 0.167694] WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:3493 check_flags+0xc0/0x1d0()
[ 0.174468] Modules linked in:
[ 0.177703] Backtrace:
[ 0.180328] [<c00171f0>] (dump_backtrace+0x0/0x110) from [<c0412320>] (dump_stack+0x18/0x1c)
[ 0.189086] r6:c051f778 r5:00000da5 r4:00000000 r3:60000093
[ 0.195007] [<c0412308>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x1c) from [<c00410e8>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x54/0x6c)
[ 0.204223] [<c0041094>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x0/0x6c) from [<c0041124>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x24/0x2c)
[ 0.214111] r8:00000000 r7:00000000 r6:ee069598 r5:60000013 r4:ee082000
[ 0.220825] r3:00000009
[ 0.223693] [<c0041100>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x0/0x2c) from [<c0088f38>] (check_flags+0xc0/0x1d0)
[ 0.232910] [<c0088e78>] (check_flags+0x0/0x1d0) from [<c008d348>] (lock_acquire+0x4c/0x11c)
[ 0.241668] [<c008d2fc>] (lock_acquire+0x0/0x11c) from [<c0415aa4>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x3c/0x74)
[ 0.250610] [<c0415a68>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x0/0x74) from [<c010a844>] (set_task_comm+0x20/0xc0)
[ 0.259521] r6:ee069588 r5:ee0691c0 r4:ee082000
[ 0.264404] [<c010a824>] (set_task_comm+0x0/0xc0) from [<c0060780>] (kthreadd+0x28/0x108)
[ 0.272857] r8:00000000 r7:00000013 r6:c0044a08 r5:ee0691c0 r4:ee082000
[ 0.279571] r3:ee083fe0
[ 0.282470] [<c0060758>] (kthreadd+0x0/0x108) from [<c0044a08>] (do_exit+0x0/0x6dc)
[ 0.290405] r5:c0060758 r4:00000000
[ 0.294189] ---[ end trace 1b75b31a2719ed1c ]---
[ 0.299041] possible reason: unannotated irqs-on.
[ 0.303955] irq event stamp: 5
[ 0.307159] hardirqs last enabled at (4): [<c001331c>] no_work_pending+0x8/0x2c
[ 0.314880] hardirqs last disabled at (5): [<c0089b08>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x60/0x26c
[ 0.323547] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<c003f754>] copy_process+0x33c/0xef4
[ 0.331207] softirqs last disabled at (0): [< (null)>] (null)
[ 0.337585] CPU0: thread -1, cpu 0, socket 0, mpidr 80000000
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2012-02-15 16:54:38 +08:00
|
|
|
raw_local_irq_save(flags); \
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
ret__ = raw_cpu_read(pcp); \
|
2010-12-18 22:54:04 +08:00
|
|
|
if (ret__ == (oval)) \
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
raw_cpu_write(pcp, nval); \
|
percpu: use raw_local_irq_* in _this_cpu op
It doesn't make sense to trace irq off or do irq flags
lock proving inside 'this_cpu' operations, so replace local_irq_*
with raw_local_irq_* in 'this_cpu' op.
Also the patch fixes onelockdep warning[1] by the replacement, see
below:
In commit: 933393f58fef9963eac61db8093689544e29a600(percpu:
Remove irqsafe_cpu_xxx variants), local_irq_save/restore(flags) are
added inside this_cpu_inc operation, so that trace_hardirqs_off_caller
will be called by trace_hardirqs_on_caller directly because
__debug_atomic_inc is implemented as this_cpu_inc, which may trigger
the lockdep warning[1], for example in the below ARM scenary:
kernel_thread_helper /*irq disabled*/
->trace_hardirqs_on_caller /*hardirqs_enabled was set*/
->trace_hardirqs_off_caller /*hardirqs_enabled cleared*/
__this_cpu_add(redundant_hardirqs_on)
->trace_hardirqs_off_caller /*irq disabled, so call here*/
The 'unannotated irqs-on' warning will be triggered somewhere because
irq is just enabled after the irq trace in kernel_thread_helper.
[1],
[ 0.162841] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 0.167694] WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:3493 check_flags+0xc0/0x1d0()
[ 0.174468] Modules linked in:
[ 0.177703] Backtrace:
[ 0.180328] [<c00171f0>] (dump_backtrace+0x0/0x110) from [<c0412320>] (dump_stack+0x18/0x1c)
[ 0.189086] r6:c051f778 r5:00000da5 r4:00000000 r3:60000093
[ 0.195007] [<c0412308>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x1c) from [<c00410e8>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x54/0x6c)
[ 0.204223] [<c0041094>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x0/0x6c) from [<c0041124>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x24/0x2c)
[ 0.214111] r8:00000000 r7:00000000 r6:ee069598 r5:60000013 r4:ee082000
[ 0.220825] r3:00000009
[ 0.223693] [<c0041100>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x0/0x2c) from [<c0088f38>] (check_flags+0xc0/0x1d0)
[ 0.232910] [<c0088e78>] (check_flags+0x0/0x1d0) from [<c008d348>] (lock_acquire+0x4c/0x11c)
[ 0.241668] [<c008d2fc>] (lock_acquire+0x0/0x11c) from [<c0415aa4>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x3c/0x74)
[ 0.250610] [<c0415a68>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x0/0x74) from [<c010a844>] (set_task_comm+0x20/0xc0)
[ 0.259521] r6:ee069588 r5:ee0691c0 r4:ee082000
[ 0.264404] [<c010a824>] (set_task_comm+0x0/0xc0) from [<c0060780>] (kthreadd+0x28/0x108)
[ 0.272857] r8:00000000 r7:00000013 r6:c0044a08 r5:ee0691c0 r4:ee082000
[ 0.279571] r3:ee083fe0
[ 0.282470] [<c0060758>] (kthreadd+0x0/0x108) from [<c0044a08>] (do_exit+0x0/0x6dc)
[ 0.290405] r5:c0060758 r4:00000000
[ 0.294189] ---[ end trace 1b75b31a2719ed1c ]---
[ 0.299041] possible reason: unannotated irqs-on.
[ 0.303955] irq event stamp: 5
[ 0.307159] hardirqs last enabled at (4): [<c001331c>] no_work_pending+0x8/0x2c
[ 0.314880] hardirqs last disabled at (5): [<c0089b08>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x60/0x26c
[ 0.323547] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<c003f754>] copy_process+0x33c/0xef4
[ 0.331207] softirqs last disabled at (0): [< (null)>] (null)
[ 0.337585] CPU0: thread -1, cpu 0, socket 0, mpidr 80000000
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2012-02-15 16:54:38 +08:00
|
|
|
raw_local_irq_restore(flags); \
|
2010-12-18 22:54:04 +08:00
|
|
|
ret__; \
|
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef this_cpu_cmpxchg
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_cmpxchg_1
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_cmpxchg_1(pcp, oval, nval) _this_cpu_generic_cmpxchg(pcp, oval, nval)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_cmpxchg_2
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_cmpxchg_2(pcp, oval, nval) _this_cpu_generic_cmpxchg(pcp, oval, nval)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_cmpxchg_4
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_cmpxchg_4(pcp, oval, nval) _this_cpu_generic_cmpxchg(pcp, oval, nval)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_cmpxchg_8
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_cmpxchg_8(pcp, oval, nval) _this_cpu_generic_cmpxchg(pcp, oval, nval)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_cmpxchg(pcp, oval, nval) \
|
|
|
|
|
__pcpu_size_call_return2(this_cpu_cmpxchg_, pcp, oval, nval)
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-28 18:02:24 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* cmpxchg_double replaces two adjacent scalars at once. The first
|
|
|
|
|
* two parameters are per cpu variables which have to be of the same
|
|
|
|
|
* size. A truth value is returned to indicate success or failure
|
|
|
|
|
* (since a double register result is difficult to handle). There is
|
|
|
|
|
* very limited hardware support for these operations, so only certain
|
|
|
|
|
* sizes may work.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
#define _this_cpu_generic_cmpxchg_double(pcp1, pcp2, oval1, oval2, nval1, nval2) \
|
|
|
|
|
({ \
|
|
|
|
|
int ret__; \
|
2011-12-23 01:58:51 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long flags; \
|
percpu: use raw_local_irq_* in _this_cpu op
It doesn't make sense to trace irq off or do irq flags
lock proving inside 'this_cpu' operations, so replace local_irq_*
with raw_local_irq_* in 'this_cpu' op.
Also the patch fixes onelockdep warning[1] by the replacement, see
below:
In commit: 933393f58fef9963eac61db8093689544e29a600(percpu:
Remove irqsafe_cpu_xxx variants), local_irq_save/restore(flags) are
added inside this_cpu_inc operation, so that trace_hardirqs_off_caller
will be called by trace_hardirqs_on_caller directly because
__debug_atomic_inc is implemented as this_cpu_inc, which may trigger
the lockdep warning[1], for example in the below ARM scenary:
kernel_thread_helper /*irq disabled*/
->trace_hardirqs_on_caller /*hardirqs_enabled was set*/
->trace_hardirqs_off_caller /*hardirqs_enabled cleared*/
__this_cpu_add(redundant_hardirqs_on)
->trace_hardirqs_off_caller /*irq disabled, so call here*/
The 'unannotated irqs-on' warning will be triggered somewhere because
irq is just enabled after the irq trace in kernel_thread_helper.
[1],
[ 0.162841] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 0.167694] WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:3493 check_flags+0xc0/0x1d0()
[ 0.174468] Modules linked in:
[ 0.177703] Backtrace:
[ 0.180328] [<c00171f0>] (dump_backtrace+0x0/0x110) from [<c0412320>] (dump_stack+0x18/0x1c)
[ 0.189086] r6:c051f778 r5:00000da5 r4:00000000 r3:60000093
[ 0.195007] [<c0412308>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x1c) from [<c00410e8>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x54/0x6c)
[ 0.204223] [<c0041094>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x0/0x6c) from [<c0041124>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x24/0x2c)
[ 0.214111] r8:00000000 r7:00000000 r6:ee069598 r5:60000013 r4:ee082000
[ 0.220825] r3:00000009
[ 0.223693] [<c0041100>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x0/0x2c) from [<c0088f38>] (check_flags+0xc0/0x1d0)
[ 0.232910] [<c0088e78>] (check_flags+0x0/0x1d0) from [<c008d348>] (lock_acquire+0x4c/0x11c)
[ 0.241668] [<c008d2fc>] (lock_acquire+0x0/0x11c) from [<c0415aa4>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x3c/0x74)
[ 0.250610] [<c0415a68>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x0/0x74) from [<c010a844>] (set_task_comm+0x20/0xc0)
[ 0.259521] r6:ee069588 r5:ee0691c0 r4:ee082000
[ 0.264404] [<c010a824>] (set_task_comm+0x0/0xc0) from [<c0060780>] (kthreadd+0x28/0x108)
[ 0.272857] r8:00000000 r7:00000013 r6:c0044a08 r5:ee0691c0 r4:ee082000
[ 0.279571] r3:ee083fe0
[ 0.282470] [<c0060758>] (kthreadd+0x0/0x108) from [<c0044a08>] (do_exit+0x0/0x6dc)
[ 0.290405] r5:c0060758 r4:00000000
[ 0.294189] ---[ end trace 1b75b31a2719ed1c ]---
[ 0.299041] possible reason: unannotated irqs-on.
[ 0.303955] irq event stamp: 5
[ 0.307159] hardirqs last enabled at (4): [<c001331c>] no_work_pending+0x8/0x2c
[ 0.314880] hardirqs last disabled at (5): [<c0089b08>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x60/0x26c
[ 0.323547] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<c003f754>] copy_process+0x33c/0xef4
[ 0.331207] softirqs last disabled at (0): [< (null)>] (null)
[ 0.337585] CPU0: thread -1, cpu 0, socket 0, mpidr 80000000
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2012-02-15 16:54:38 +08:00
|
|
|
raw_local_irq_save(flags); \
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
ret__ = raw_cpu_generic_cmpxchg_double(pcp1, pcp2, \
|
2011-02-28 18:02:24 +08:00
|
|
|
oval1, oval2, nval1, nval2); \
|
percpu: use raw_local_irq_* in _this_cpu op
It doesn't make sense to trace irq off or do irq flags
lock proving inside 'this_cpu' operations, so replace local_irq_*
with raw_local_irq_* in 'this_cpu' op.
Also the patch fixes onelockdep warning[1] by the replacement, see
below:
In commit: 933393f58fef9963eac61db8093689544e29a600(percpu:
Remove irqsafe_cpu_xxx variants), local_irq_save/restore(flags) are
added inside this_cpu_inc operation, so that trace_hardirqs_off_caller
will be called by trace_hardirqs_on_caller directly because
__debug_atomic_inc is implemented as this_cpu_inc, which may trigger
the lockdep warning[1], for example in the below ARM scenary:
kernel_thread_helper /*irq disabled*/
->trace_hardirqs_on_caller /*hardirqs_enabled was set*/
->trace_hardirqs_off_caller /*hardirqs_enabled cleared*/
__this_cpu_add(redundant_hardirqs_on)
->trace_hardirqs_off_caller /*irq disabled, so call here*/
The 'unannotated irqs-on' warning will be triggered somewhere because
irq is just enabled after the irq trace in kernel_thread_helper.
[1],
[ 0.162841] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 0.167694] WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:3493 check_flags+0xc0/0x1d0()
[ 0.174468] Modules linked in:
[ 0.177703] Backtrace:
[ 0.180328] [<c00171f0>] (dump_backtrace+0x0/0x110) from [<c0412320>] (dump_stack+0x18/0x1c)
[ 0.189086] r6:c051f778 r5:00000da5 r4:00000000 r3:60000093
[ 0.195007] [<c0412308>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x1c) from [<c00410e8>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x54/0x6c)
[ 0.204223] [<c0041094>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x0/0x6c) from [<c0041124>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x24/0x2c)
[ 0.214111] r8:00000000 r7:00000000 r6:ee069598 r5:60000013 r4:ee082000
[ 0.220825] r3:00000009
[ 0.223693] [<c0041100>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x0/0x2c) from [<c0088f38>] (check_flags+0xc0/0x1d0)
[ 0.232910] [<c0088e78>] (check_flags+0x0/0x1d0) from [<c008d348>] (lock_acquire+0x4c/0x11c)
[ 0.241668] [<c008d2fc>] (lock_acquire+0x0/0x11c) from [<c0415aa4>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x3c/0x74)
[ 0.250610] [<c0415a68>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x0/0x74) from [<c010a844>] (set_task_comm+0x20/0xc0)
[ 0.259521] r6:ee069588 r5:ee0691c0 r4:ee082000
[ 0.264404] [<c010a824>] (set_task_comm+0x0/0xc0) from [<c0060780>] (kthreadd+0x28/0x108)
[ 0.272857] r8:00000000 r7:00000013 r6:c0044a08 r5:ee0691c0 r4:ee082000
[ 0.279571] r3:ee083fe0
[ 0.282470] [<c0060758>] (kthreadd+0x0/0x108) from [<c0044a08>] (do_exit+0x0/0x6dc)
[ 0.290405] r5:c0060758 r4:00000000
[ 0.294189] ---[ end trace 1b75b31a2719ed1c ]---
[ 0.299041] possible reason: unannotated irqs-on.
[ 0.303955] irq event stamp: 5
[ 0.307159] hardirqs last enabled at (4): [<c001331c>] no_work_pending+0x8/0x2c
[ 0.314880] hardirqs last disabled at (5): [<c0089b08>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x60/0x26c
[ 0.323547] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<c003f754>] copy_process+0x33c/0xef4
[ 0.331207] softirqs last disabled at (0): [< (null)>] (null)
[ 0.337585] CPU0: thread -1, cpu 0, socket 0, mpidr 80000000
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2012-02-15 16:54:38 +08:00
|
|
|
raw_local_irq_restore(flags); \
|
2011-02-28 18:02:24 +08:00
|
|
|
ret__; \
|
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef this_cpu_cmpxchg_double
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_cmpxchg_double_1
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_cmpxchg_double_1(pcp1, pcp2, oval1, oval2, nval1, nval2) \
|
|
|
|
|
_this_cpu_generic_cmpxchg_double(pcp1, pcp2, oval1, oval2, nval1, nval2)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_cmpxchg_double_2
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_cmpxchg_double_2(pcp1, pcp2, oval1, oval2, nval1, nval2) \
|
|
|
|
|
_this_cpu_generic_cmpxchg_double(pcp1, pcp2, oval1, oval2, nval1, nval2)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_cmpxchg_double_4
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_cmpxchg_double_4(pcp1, pcp2, oval1, oval2, nval1, nval2) \
|
|
|
|
|
_this_cpu_generic_cmpxchg_double(pcp1, pcp2, oval1, oval2, nval1, nval2)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef this_cpu_cmpxchg_double_8
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_cmpxchg_double_8(pcp1, pcp2, oval1, oval2, nval1, nval2) \
|
|
|
|
|
_this_cpu_generic_cmpxchg_double(pcp1, pcp2, oval1, oval2, nval1, nval2)
|
|
|
|
|
# endif
|
|
|
|
|
# define this_cpu_cmpxchg_double(pcp1, pcp2, oval1, oval2, nval1, nval2) \
|
|
|
|
|
__pcpu_double_call_return_bool(this_cpu_cmpxchg_double_, (pcp1), (pcp2), (oval1), (oval2), (nval1), (nval2))
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
* Generic percpu operations for contexts where we do not want to do
|
|
|
|
|
* any checks for preemptiosn.
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* If there is no other protection through preempt disable and/or
|
|
|
|
|
* disabling interupts then one of these RMW operations can show unexpected
|
|
|
|
|
* behavior because the execution thread was rescheduled on another processor
|
|
|
|
|
* or an interrupt occurred and the same percpu variable was modified from
|
|
|
|
|
* the interrupt context.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifndef raw_cpu_read
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_read_1
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_read_1(pcp) (*raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)))
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_read_2
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_read_2(pcp) (*raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)))
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_read_4
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_read_4(pcp) (*raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)))
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_read_8
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_read_8(pcp) (*raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)))
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_read(pcp) __pcpu_size_call_return(raw_cpu_read_, (pcp))
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#define raw_cpu_generic_to_op(pcp, val, op) \
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
do { \
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
*raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)) op val; \
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
} while (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef raw_cpu_write
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_write_1
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_write_1(pcp, val) raw_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), =)
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_write_2
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_write_2(pcp, val) raw_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), =)
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_write_4
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_write_4(pcp, val) raw_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), =)
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_write_8
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_write_8(pcp, val) raw_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), =)
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_write(pcp, val) __pcpu_size_call(raw_cpu_write_, (pcp), (val))
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifndef raw_cpu_add
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_add_1
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_add_1(pcp, val) raw_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), +=)
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_add_2
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_add_2(pcp, val) raw_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), +=)
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_add_4
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_add_4(pcp, val) raw_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), +=)
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_add_8
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_add_8(pcp, val) raw_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), +=)
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_add(pcp, val) __pcpu_size_call(raw_cpu_add_, (pcp), (val))
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifndef raw_cpu_sub
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_sub(pcp, val) raw_cpu_add((pcp), -(val))
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifndef raw_cpu_inc
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_inc(pcp) raw_cpu_add((pcp), 1)
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifndef raw_cpu_dec
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_dec(pcp) raw_cpu_sub((pcp), 1)
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifndef raw_cpu_and
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_and_1
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_and_1(pcp, val) raw_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), &=)
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_and_2
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_and_2(pcp, val) raw_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), &=)
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_and_4
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_and_4(pcp, val) raw_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), &=)
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_and_8
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_and_8(pcp, val) raw_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), &=)
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_and(pcp, val) __pcpu_size_call(raw_cpu_and_, (pcp), (val))
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifndef raw_cpu_or
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_or_1
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_or_1(pcp, val) raw_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), |=)
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_or_2
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_or_2(pcp, val) raw_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), |=)
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_or_4
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_or_4(pcp, val) raw_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), |=)
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_or_8
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_or_8(pcp, val) raw_cpu_generic_to_op((pcp), (val), |=)
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_or(pcp, val) __pcpu_size_call(raw_cpu_or_, (pcp), (val))
|
this_cpu: Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations
This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
atomic operations.
this_cpu_ptr
------------
A common operation when dealing with cpu data is to get the instance of the
cpu data associated with the currently executing processor. This can be
optimized by
this_cpu_ptr(xx) = per_cpu_ptr(xx, smp_processor_id).
The problem with per_cpu_ptr(x, smp_processor_id) is that it requires
an array lookup to find the offset for the cpu. Processors typically
have the offset for the current cpu area in some kind of (arch dependent)
efficiently accessible register or memory location.
We can use that instead of doing the array lookup to speed up the
determination of the address of the percpu variable. This is particularly
significant because these lookups occur in performance critical paths
of the core kernel. this_cpu_ptr() can avoid memory accesses and
this_cpu_ptr comes in two flavors. The preemption context matters since we
are referring the the currently executing processor. In many cases we must
insure that the processor does not change while a code segment is executed.
__this_cpu_ptr -> Do not check for preemption context
this_cpu_ptr -> Check preemption context
The parameter to these operations is a per cpu pointer. This can be the
address of a statically defined per cpu variable (&per_cpu_var(xxx)) or
the address of a per cpu variable allocated with the per cpu allocator.
per cpu atomic operations: this_cpu_*(var, val)
-----------------------------------------------
this_cpu_* operations (like this_cpu_add(struct->y, value) operate on
abitrary scalars that are members of structures allocated with the new
per cpu allocator. They can also operate on static per_cpu variables
if they are passed to per_cpu_var() (See patch to use this_cpu_*
operations for vm statistics).
These operations are guaranteed to be atomic vs preemption when modifying
the scalar. The calculation of the per cpu offset is also guaranteed to
be atomic at the same time. This means that a this_cpu_* operation can be
safely used to modify a per cpu variable in a context where interrupts are
enabled and preemption is allowed. Many architectures can perform such
a per cpu atomic operation with a single instruction.
Note that the atomicity here is different from regular atomic operations.
Atomicity is only guaranteed for data accessed from the currently executing
processor. Modifications from other processors are still possible. There
must be other guarantees that the per cpu data is not modified from another
processor when using these instruction. The per cpu atomicity is created
by the fact that the processor either executes and instruction or not.
Embedded in the instruction is the relocation of the per cpu address to
the are reserved for the current processor and the RMW action. Therefore
interrupts or preemption cannot occur in the mids of this processing.
Generic fallback functions are used if an arch does not define optimized
this_cpu operations. The functions come also come in the two flavors used
for this_cpu_ptr().
The firstparameter is a scalar that is a member of a structure allocated
through allocpercpu or a per cpu variable (use per_cpu_var(xxx)). The
operations are similar to what percpu_add() and friends do.
this_cpu_read(scalar)
this_cpu_write(scalar, value)
this_cpu_add(scale, value)
this_cpu_sub(scalar, value)
this_cpu_inc(scalar)
this_cpu_dec(scalar)
this_cpu_and(scalar, value)
this_cpu_or(scalar, value)
this_cpu_xor(scalar, value)
Arch code can override the generic functions and provide optimized atomic
per cpu operations. These atomic operations must provide both the relocation
(x86 does it through a segment override) and the operation on the data in a
single instruction. Otherwise preempt needs to be disabled and there is no
gain from providing arch implementations.
A third variant is provided prefixed by irqsafe_. These variants are safe
against hardware interrupts on the *same* processor (all per cpu atomic
primitives are *always* *only* providing safety for code running on the
*same* processor!). The increment needs to be implemented by the hardware
in such a way that it is a single RMW instruction that is either processed
before or after an interrupt.
cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-10-03 18:48:22 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#define raw_cpu_generic_add_return(pcp, val) \
|
2010-12-07 01:39:59 +08:00
|
|
|
({ \
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
raw_cpu_add(pcp, val); \
|
|
|
|
|
raw_cpu_read(pcp); \
|
2010-12-07 01:39:59 +08:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifndef raw_cpu_add_return
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_add_return_1
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_add_return_1(pcp, val) raw_cpu_generic_add_return(pcp, val)
|
2010-12-07 01:39:59 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_add_return_2
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_add_return_2(pcp, val) raw_cpu_generic_add_return(pcp, val)
|
2010-12-07 01:39:59 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_add_return_4
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_add_return_4(pcp, val) raw_cpu_generic_add_return(pcp, val)
|
2010-12-07 01:39:59 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_add_return_8
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_add_return_8(pcp, val) raw_cpu_generic_add_return(pcp, val)
|
2010-12-07 01:39:59 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_add_return(pcp, val) \
|
|
|
|
|
__pcpu_size_call_return2(raw_add_return_, pcp, val)
|
2010-12-07 01:39:59 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#define raw_cpu_sub_return(pcp, val) raw_cpu_add_return(pcp, -(typeof(pcp))(val))
|
|
|
|
|
#define raw_cpu_inc_return(pcp) raw_cpu_add_return(pcp, 1)
|
|
|
|
|
#define raw_cpu_dec_return(pcp) raw_cpu_add_return(pcp, -1)
|
2010-12-07 01:39:59 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#define raw_cpu_generic_xchg(pcp, nval) \
|
2010-12-18 22:54:04 +08:00
|
|
|
({ typeof(pcp) ret__; \
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
ret__ = raw_cpu_read(pcp); \
|
|
|
|
|
raw_cpu_write(pcp, nval); \
|
2010-12-18 22:54:04 +08:00
|
|
|
ret__; \
|
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifndef raw_cpu_xchg
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_xchg_1
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_xchg_1(pcp, nval) raw_cpu_generic_xchg(pcp, nval)
|
2010-12-18 22:54:04 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_xchg_2
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_xchg_2(pcp, nval) raw_cpu_generic_xchg(pcp, nval)
|
2010-12-18 22:54:04 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_xchg_4
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_xchg_4(pcp, nval) raw_cpu_generic_xchg(pcp, nval)
|
2010-12-18 22:54:04 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_xchg_8
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_xchg_8(pcp, nval) raw_cpu_generic_xchg(pcp, nval)
|
2010-12-18 22:54:04 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_xchg(pcp, nval) \
|
|
|
|
|
__pcpu_size_call_return2(raw_cpu_xchg_, (pcp), nval)
|
2010-12-18 22:54:04 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#define raw_cpu_generic_cmpxchg(pcp, oval, nval) \
|
2010-12-18 22:54:04 +08:00
|
|
|
({ \
|
|
|
|
|
typeof(pcp) ret__; \
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
ret__ = raw_cpu_read(pcp); \
|
2010-12-18 22:54:04 +08:00
|
|
|
if (ret__ == (oval)) \
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
raw_cpu_write(pcp, nval); \
|
2010-12-18 22:54:04 +08:00
|
|
|
ret__; \
|
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifndef raw_cpu_cmpxchg
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_cmpxchg_1
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_cmpxchg_1(pcp, oval, nval) raw_cpu_generic_cmpxchg(pcp, oval, nval)
|
2010-12-18 22:54:04 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_cmpxchg_2
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_cmpxchg_2(pcp, oval, nval) raw_cpu_generic_cmpxchg(pcp, oval, nval)
|
2010-12-18 22:54:04 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_cmpxchg_4
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_cmpxchg_4(pcp, oval, nval) raw_cpu_generic_cmpxchg(pcp, oval, nval)
|
2010-12-18 22:54:04 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_cmpxchg_8
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_cmpxchg_8(pcp, oval, nval) raw_cpu_generic_cmpxchg(pcp, oval, nval)
|
2010-12-18 22:54:04 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_cmpxchg(pcp, oval, nval) \
|
|
|
|
|
__pcpu_size_call_return2(raw_cpu_cmpxchg_, pcp, oval, nval)
|
2010-12-18 22:54:04 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#define raw_cpu_generic_cmpxchg_double(pcp1, pcp2, oval1, oval2, nval1, nval2) \
|
2011-02-28 18:02:24 +08:00
|
|
|
({ \
|
|
|
|
|
int __ret = 0; \
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
if (raw_cpu_read(pcp1) == (oval1) && \
|
|
|
|
|
raw_cpu_read(pcp2) == (oval2)) { \
|
|
|
|
|
raw_cpu_write(pcp1, (nval1)); \
|
|
|
|
|
raw_cpu_write(pcp2, (nval2)); \
|
2011-02-28 18:02:24 +08:00
|
|
|
__ret = 1; \
|
|
|
|
|
} \
|
|
|
|
|
(__ret); \
|
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifndef raw_cpu_cmpxchg_double
|
|
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_cmpxchg_double_1
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_cmpxchg_double_1(pcp1, pcp2, oval1, oval2, nval1, nval2) \
|
|
|
|
|
raw_cpu_generic_cmpxchg_double(pcp1, pcp2, oval1, oval2, nval1, nval2)
|
2011-02-28 18:02:24 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_cmpxchg_double_2
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_cmpxchg_double_2(pcp1, pcp2, oval1, oval2, nval1, nval2) \
|
|
|
|
|
raw_cpu_generic_cmpxchg_double(pcp1, pcp2, oval1, oval2, nval1, nval2)
|
2011-02-28 18:02:24 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_cmpxchg_double_4
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_cmpxchg_double_4(pcp1, pcp2, oval1, oval2, nval1, nval2) \
|
|
|
|
|
raw_cpu_generic_cmpxchg_double(pcp1, pcp2, oval1, oval2, nval1, nval2)
|
2011-02-28 18:02:24 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# ifndef raw_cpu_cmpxchg_double_8
|
|
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_cmpxchg_double_8(pcp1, pcp2, oval1, oval2, nval1, nval2) \
|
|
|
|
|
raw_cpu_generic_cmpxchg_double(pcp1, pcp2, oval1, oval2, nval1, nval2)
|
2011-02-28 18:02:24 +08:00
|
|
|
# endif
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
# define raw_cpu_cmpxchg_double(pcp1, pcp2, oval1, oval2, nval1, nval2) \
|
|
|
|
|
__pcpu_double_call_return_bool(raw_cpu_cmpxchg_double_, (pcp1), (pcp2), (oval1), (oval2), (nval1), (nval2))
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* Generic percpu operations for context that are safe from preemption/interrupts.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef __this_cpu_read
|
2014-04-08 06:39:44 +08:00
|
|
|
# define __this_cpu_read(pcp) \
|
|
|
|
|
(__this_cpu_preempt_check("read"),__pcpu_size_call_return(raw_cpu_read_, (pcp)))
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef __this_cpu_write
|
2014-04-08 06:39:44 +08:00
|
|
|
# define __this_cpu_write(pcp, val) \
|
|
|
|
|
do { __this_cpu_preempt_check("write"); \
|
|
|
|
|
__pcpu_size_call(raw_cpu_write_, (pcp), (val)); \
|
|
|
|
|
} while (0)
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef __this_cpu_add
|
2014-04-08 06:39:44 +08:00
|
|
|
# define __this_cpu_add(pcp, val) \
|
|
|
|
|
do { __this_cpu_preempt_check("add"); \
|
|
|
|
|
__pcpu_size_call(raw_cpu_add_, (pcp), (val)); \
|
|
|
|
|
} while (0)
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef __this_cpu_sub
|
|
|
|
|
# define __this_cpu_sub(pcp, val) __this_cpu_add((pcp), -(typeof(pcp))(val))
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef __this_cpu_inc
|
|
|
|
|
# define __this_cpu_inc(pcp) __this_cpu_add((pcp), 1)
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef __this_cpu_dec
|
|
|
|
|
# define __this_cpu_dec(pcp) __this_cpu_sub((pcp), 1)
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef __this_cpu_and
|
2014-04-08 06:39:44 +08:00
|
|
|
# define __this_cpu_and(pcp, val) \
|
|
|
|
|
do { __this_cpu_preempt_check("and"); \
|
|
|
|
|
__pcpu_size_call(raw_cpu_and_, (pcp), (val)); \
|
|
|
|
|
} while (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef __this_cpu_or
|
2014-04-08 06:39:44 +08:00
|
|
|
# define __this_cpu_or(pcp, val) \
|
|
|
|
|
do { __this_cpu_preempt_check("or"); \
|
|
|
|
|
__pcpu_size_call(raw_cpu_or_, (pcp), (val)); \
|
|
|
|
|
} while (0)
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef __this_cpu_add_return
|
|
|
|
|
# define __this_cpu_add_return(pcp, val) \
|
2014-04-08 06:39:44 +08:00
|
|
|
(__this_cpu_preempt_check("add_return"),__pcpu_size_call_return2(raw_cpu_add_return_, pcp, val))
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define __this_cpu_sub_return(pcp, val) __this_cpu_add_return(pcp, -(typeof(pcp))(val))
|
|
|
|
|
#define __this_cpu_inc_return(pcp) __this_cpu_add_return(pcp, 1)
|
|
|
|
|
#define __this_cpu_dec_return(pcp) __this_cpu_add_return(pcp, -1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef __this_cpu_xchg
|
|
|
|
|
# define __this_cpu_xchg(pcp, nval) \
|
2014-04-08 06:39:44 +08:00
|
|
|
(__this_cpu_preempt_check("xchg"),__pcpu_size_call_return2(raw_cpu_xchg_, (pcp), nval))
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef __this_cpu_cmpxchg
|
|
|
|
|
# define __this_cpu_cmpxchg(pcp, oval, nval) \
|
2014-04-08 06:39:44 +08:00
|
|
|
(__this_cpu_preempt_check("cmpxchg"),__pcpu_size_call_return2(raw_cpu_cmpxchg_, pcp, oval, nval))
|
2014-04-08 06:39:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef __this_cpu_cmpxchg_double
|
2011-02-28 18:02:24 +08:00
|
|
|
# define __this_cpu_cmpxchg_double(pcp1, pcp2, oval1, oval2, nval1, nval2) \
|
2014-04-08 06:39:44 +08:00
|
|
|
(__this_cpu_preempt_check("cmpxchg_double"),__pcpu_double_call_return_bool(raw_cpu_cmpxchg_double_, (pcp1), (pcp2), (oval1), (oval2), (nval1), (nval2)))
|
2011-02-28 18:02:24 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif /* __LINUX_PERCPU_H */
|