2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCI Error Recovery
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
February 2, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current document maintainer:
|
|
|
|
Linas Vepstas <linas@austin.ibm.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many PCI bus controllers are able to detect a variety of hardware
|
|
|
|
PCI errors on the bus, such as parity errors on the data and address
|
|
|
|
busses, as well as SERR and PERR errors. Some of the more advanced
|
|
|
|
chipsets are able to deal with these errors; these include PCI-E chipsets,
|
|
|
|
and the PCI-host bridges found on IBM Power4 and Power5-based pSeries
|
|
|
|
boxes. A typical action taken is to disconnect the affected device,
|
|
|
|
halting all I/O to it. The goal of a disconnection is to avoid system
|
|
|
|
corruption; for example, to halt system memory corruption due to DMA's
|
|
|
|
to "wild" addresses. Typically, a reconnection mechanism is also
|
|
|
|
offered, so that the affected PCI device(s) are reset and put back
|
|
|
|
into working condition. The reset phase requires coordination
|
|
|
|
between the affected device drivers and the PCI controller chip.
|
|
|
|
This document describes a generic API for notifying device drivers
|
|
|
|
of a bus disconnection, and then performing error recovery.
|
|
|
|
This API is currently implemented in the 2.6.16 and later kernels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting and recovery is performed in several steps. First, when
|
|
|
|
a PCI hardware error has resulted in a bus disconnect, that event
|
|
|
|
is reported as soon as possible to all affected device drivers,
|
|
|
|
including multiple instances of a device driver on multi-function
|
|
|
|
cards. This allows device drivers to avoid deadlocking in spinloops,
|
|
|
|
waiting for some i/o-space register to change, when it never will.
|
|
|
|
It also gives the drivers a chance to defer incoming I/O as
|
|
|
|
needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Next, recovery is performed in several stages. Most of the complexity
|
|
|
|
is forced by the need to handle multi-function devices, that is,
|
|
|
|
devices that have multiple device drivers associated with them.
|
|
|
|
In the first stage, each driver is allowed to indicate what type
|
|
|
|
of reset it desires, the choices being a simple re-enabling of I/O
|
|
|
|
or requesting a hard reset (a full electrical #RST of the PCI card).
|
|
|
|
If any driver requests a full reset, that is what will be done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After a full reset and/or a re-enabling of I/O, all drivers are
|
|
|
|
again notified, so that they may then perform any device setup/config
|
|
|
|
that may be required. After these have all completed, a final
|
|
|
|
"resume normal operations" event is sent out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The biggest reason for choosing a kernel-based implementation rather
|
|
|
|
than a user-space implementation was the need to deal with bus
|
|
|
|
disconnects of PCI devices attached to storage media, and, in particular,
|
|
|
|
disconnects from devices holding the root file system. If the root
|
|
|
|
file system is disconnected, a user-space mechanism would have to go
|
|
|
|
through a large number of contortions to complete recovery. Almost all
|
|
|
|
of the current Linux file systems are not tolerant of disconnection
|
|
|
|
from/reconnection to their underlying block device. By contrast,
|
|
|
|
bus errors are easy to manage in the device driver. Indeed, most
|
|
|
|
device drivers already handle very similar recovery procedures;
|
|
|
|
for example, the SCSI-generic layer already provides significant
|
|
|
|
mechanisms for dealing with SCSI bus errors and SCSI bus resets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Detailed Design
|
|
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
Design and implementation details below, based on a chain of
|
|
|
|
public email discussions with Ben Herrenschmidt, circa 5 April 2005.
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The error recovery API support is exposed to the driver in the form of
|
|
|
|
a structure of function pointers pointed to by a new field in struct
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
pci_driver. A driver that fails to provide the structure is "non-aware",
|
|
|
|
and the actual recovery steps taken are platform dependent. The
|
|
|
|
arch/powerpc implementation will simulate a PCI hotplug remove/add.
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This structure has the form:
|
|
|
|
struct pci_error_handlers
|
|
|
|
{
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
int (*error_detected)(struct pci_dev *dev, enum pci_channel_state);
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
int (*mmio_enabled)(struct pci_dev *dev);
|
|
|
|
int (*link_reset)(struct pci_dev *dev);
|
|
|
|
int (*slot_reset)(struct pci_dev *dev);
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
void (*resume)(struct pci_dev *dev);
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
The possible channel states are:
|
|
|
|
enum pci_channel_state {
|
|
|
|
pci_channel_io_normal, /* I/O channel is in normal state */
|
|
|
|
pci_channel_io_frozen, /* I/O to channel is blocked */
|
|
|
|
pci_channel_io_perm_failure, /* PCI card is dead */
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Possible return values are:
|
|
|
|
enum pci_ers_result {
|
|
|
|
PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE, /* no result/none/not supported in device driver */
|
|
|
|
PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER, /* Device driver can recover without slot reset */
|
|
|
|
PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET, /* Device driver wants slot to be reset. */
|
|
|
|
PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT, /* Device has completely failed, is unrecoverable */
|
|
|
|
PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED, /* Device driver is fully recovered and operational */
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A driver does not have to implement all of these callbacks; however,
|
|
|
|
if it implements any, it must implement error_detected(). If a callback
|
|
|
|
is not implemented, the corresponding feature is considered unsupported.
|
|
|
|
For example, if mmio_enabled() and resume() aren't there, then it
|
|
|
|
is assumed that the driver is not doing any direct recovery and requires
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
a reset. If link_reset() is not implemented, the card is assumed as
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
not care about link resets. Typically a driver will want to know about
|
|
|
|
a slot_reset().
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The actual steps taken by a platform to recover from a PCI error
|
|
|
|
event will be platform-dependent, but will follow the general
|
|
|
|
sequence described below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STEP 0: Error Event
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
PCI bus error is detect by the PCI hardware. On powerpc, the slot
|
|
|
|
is isolated, in that all I/O is blocked: all reads return 0xffffffff,
|
|
|
|
all writes are ignored.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STEP 1: Notification
|
|
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
Platform calls the error_detected() callback on every instance of
|
|
|
|
every driver affected by the error.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At this point, the device might not be accessible anymore, depending on
|
|
|
|
the platform (the slot will be isolated on powerpc). The driver may
|
|
|
|
already have "noticed" the error because of a failing I/O, but this
|
|
|
|
is the proper "synchronization point", that is, it gives the driver
|
|
|
|
a chance to cleanup, waiting for pending stuff (timers, whatever, etc...)
|
|
|
|
to complete; it can take semaphores, schedule, etc... everything but
|
|
|
|
touch the device. Within this function and after it returns, the driver
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
shouldn't do any new IOs. Called in task context. This is sort of a
|
|
|
|
"quiesce" point. See note about interrupts at the end of this doc.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
All drivers participating in this system must implement this call.
|
|
|
|
The driver must return one of the following result codes:
|
|
|
|
- PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER:
|
|
|
|
Driver returns this if it thinks it might be able to recover
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
the HW by just banging IOs or if it wants to be given
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
a chance to extract some diagnostic information (see
|
|
|
|
mmio_enable, below).
|
|
|
|
- PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET:
|
|
|
|
Driver returns this if it can't recover without a hard
|
|
|
|
slot reset.
|
|
|
|
- PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT:
|
|
|
|
Driver returns this if it doesn't want to recover at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The next step taken will depend on the result codes returned by the
|
|
|
|
drivers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If all drivers on the segment/slot return PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER,
|
|
|
|
then the platform should re-enable IOs on the slot (or do nothing in
|
|
|
|
particular, if the platform doesn't isolate slots), and recovery
|
|
|
|
proceeds to STEP 2 (MMIO Enable).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If any driver requested a slot reset (by returning PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET),
|
|
|
|
then recovery proceeds to STEP 4 (Slot Reset).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the platform is unable to recover the slot, the next step
|
|
|
|
is STEP 6 (Permanent Failure).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> The current powerpc implementation assumes that a device driver will
|
|
|
|
>>> *not* schedule or semaphore in this routine; the current powerpc
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
>>> implementation uses one kernel thread to notify all devices;
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
>>> thus, if one device sleeps/schedules, all devices are affected.
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
>>> Doing better requires complex multi-threaded logic in the error
|
|
|
|
>>> recovery implementation (e.g. waiting for all notification threads
|
|
|
|
>>> to "join" before proceeding with recovery.) This seems excessively
|
|
|
|
>>> complex and not worth implementing.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
>>> The current powerpc implementation doesn't much care if the device
|
|
|
|
>>> attempts I/O at this point, or not. I/O's will fail, returning
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
>>> a value of 0xff on read, and writes will be dropped. If the device
|
|
|
|
>>> driver attempts more than 10K I/O's to a frozen adapter, it will
|
|
|
|
>>> assume that the device driver has gone into an infinite loop, and
|
2006-10-04 04:57:56 +08:00
|
|
|
>>> it will panic the kernel. There doesn't seem to be any other
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
>>> way of stopping a device driver that insists on spinning on I/O.
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
STEP 2: MMIO Enabled
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
The platform re-enables MMIO to the device (but typically not the
|
|
|
|
DMA), and then calls the mmio_enabled() callback on all affected
|
|
|
|
device drivers.
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
This is the "early recovery" call. IOs are allowed again, but DMA is
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
not (hrm... to be discussed, I prefer not), with some restrictions. This
|
|
|
|
is NOT a callback for the driver to start operations again, only to
|
|
|
|
peek/poke at the device, extract diagnostic information, if any, and
|
|
|
|
eventually do things like trigger a device local reset or some such,
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
but not restart operations. This is callback is made if all drivers on
|
|
|
|
a segment agree that they can try to recover and if no automatic link reset
|
|
|
|
was performed by the HW. If the platform can't just re-enable IOs without
|
|
|
|
a slot reset or a link reset, it wont call this callback, and instead
|
|
|
|
will have gone directly to STEP 3 (Link Reset) or STEP 4 (Slot Reset)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> The following is proposed; no platform implements this yet:
|
|
|
|
>>> Proposal: All I/O's should be done _synchronously_ from within
|
|
|
|
>>> this callback, errors triggered by them will be returned via
|
|
|
|
>>> the normal pci_check_whatever() API, no new error_detected()
|
|
|
|
>>> callback will be issued due to an error happening here. However,
|
|
|
|
>>> such an error might cause IOs to be re-blocked for the whole
|
|
|
|
>>> segment, and thus invalidate the recovery that other devices
|
|
|
|
>>> on the same segment might have done, forcing the whole segment
|
|
|
|
>>> into one of the next states, that is, link reset or slot reset.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The driver should return one of the following result codes:
|
|
|
|
- PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
Driver returns this if it thinks the device is fully
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
functional and thinks it is ready to start
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
normal driver operations again. There is no
|
|
|
|
guarantee that the driver will actually be
|
|
|
|
allowed to proceed, as another driver on the
|
|
|
|
same segment might have failed and thus triggered a
|
|
|
|
slot reset on platforms that support it.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
- PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
Driver returns this if it thinks the device is not
|
|
|
|
recoverable in it's current state and it needs a slot
|
|
|
|
reset to proceed.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
- PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
Same as above. Total failure, no recovery even after
|
|
|
|
reset driver dead. (To be defined more precisely)
|
|
|
|
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
The next step taken depends on the results returned by the drivers.
|
|
|
|
If all drivers returned PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED, then the platform
|
|
|
|
proceeds to either STEP3 (Link Reset) or to STEP 5 (Resume Operations).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If any driver returned PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET, then the platform
|
|
|
|
proceeds to STEP 4 (Slot Reset)
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
>>> The current powerpc implementation does not implement this callback.
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STEP 3: Link Reset
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
The platform resets the link, and then calls the link_reset() callback
|
|
|
|
on all affected device drivers. This is a PCI-Express specific state
|
|
|
|
and is done whenever a non-fatal error has been detected that can be
|
|
|
|
"solved" by resetting the link. This call informs the driver of the
|
|
|
|
reset and the driver should check to see if the device appears to be
|
|
|
|
in working condition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The driver is not supposed to restart normal driver I/O operations
|
|
|
|
at this point. It should limit itself to "probing" the device to
|
|
|
|
check it's recoverability status. If all is right, then the platform
|
|
|
|
will call resume() once all drivers have ack'd link_reset().
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Result codes:
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
(identical to STEP 3 (MMIO Enabled)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The platform then proceeds to either STEP 4 (Slot Reset) or STEP 5
|
|
|
|
(Resume Operations).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> The current powerpc implementation does not implement this callback.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STEP 4: Slot Reset
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
The platform performs a soft or hard reset of the device, and then
|
|
|
|
calls the slot_reset() callback.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A soft reset consists of asserting the adapter #RST line and then
|
|
|
|
restoring the PCI BAR's and PCI configuration header to a state
|
|
|
|
that is equivalent to what it would be after a fresh system
|
|
|
|
power-on followed by power-on BIOS/system firmware initialization.
|
|
|
|
If the platform supports PCI hotplug, then the reset might be
|
|
|
|
performed by toggling the slot electrical power off/on.
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
It is important for the platform to restore the PCI config space
|
|
|
|
to the "fresh poweron" state, rather than the "last state". After
|
|
|
|
a slot reset, the device driver will almost always use its standard
|
|
|
|
device initialization routines, and an unusual config space setup
|
|
|
|
may result in hung devices, kernel panics, or silent data corruption.
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
This call gives drivers the chance to re-initialize the hardware
|
|
|
|
(re-download firmware, etc.). At this point, the driver may assume
|
|
|
|
that he card is in a fresh state and is fully functional. In
|
|
|
|
particular, interrupt generation should work normally.
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
Drivers should not yet restart normal I/O processing operations
|
|
|
|
at this point. If all device drivers report success on this
|
|
|
|
callback, the platform will call resume() to complete the sequence,
|
|
|
|
and let the driver restart normal I/O processing.
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A driver can still return a critical failure for this function if
|
|
|
|
it can't get the device operational after reset. If the platform
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
previously tried a soft reset, it might now try a hard reset (power
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
cycle) and then call slot_reset() again. It the device still can't
|
|
|
|
be recovered, there is nothing more that can be done; the platform
|
|
|
|
will typically report a "permanent failure" in such a case. The
|
|
|
|
device will be considered "dead" in this case.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
Drivers for multi-function cards will need to coordinate among
|
|
|
|
themselves as to which driver instance will perform any "one-shot"
|
|
|
|
or global device initialization. For example, the Symbios sym53cxx2
|
|
|
|
driver performs device init only from PCI function 0:
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
+ if (PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn) == 0)
|
|
|
|
+ sym_reset_scsi_bus(np, 0);
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
Result codes:
|
|
|
|
- PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT
|
|
|
|
Same as above.
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
Platform proceeds either to STEP 5 (Resume Operations) or STEP 6 (Permanent
|
|
|
|
Failure).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> The current powerpc implementation does not currently try a
|
|
|
|
>>> power-cycle reset if the driver returned PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT.
|
|
|
|
>>> However, it probably should.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STEP 5: Resume Operations
|
|
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
The platform will call the resume() callback on all affected device
|
|
|
|
drivers if all drivers on the segment have returned
|
|
|
|
PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED from one of the 3 previous callbacks.
|
|
|
|
The goal of this callback is to tell the driver to restart activity,
|
|
|
|
that everything is back and running. This callback does not return
|
|
|
|
a result code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At this point, if a new error happens, the platform will restart
|
|
|
|
a new error recovery sequence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STEP 6: Permanent Failure
|
|
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
A "permanent failure" has occurred, and the platform cannot recover
|
|
|
|
the device. The platform will call error_detected() with a
|
|
|
|
pci_channel_state value of pci_channel_io_perm_failure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The device driver should, at this point, assume the worst. It should
|
|
|
|
cancel all pending I/O, refuse all new I/O, returning -EIO to
|
|
|
|
higher layers. The device driver should then clean up all of its
|
|
|
|
memory and remove itself from kernel operations, much as it would
|
|
|
|
during system shutdown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The platform will typically notify the system operator of the
|
|
|
|
permanent failure in some way. If the device is hotplug-capable,
|
|
|
|
the operator will probably want to remove and replace the device.
|
|
|
|
Note, however, not all failures are truly "permanent". Some are
|
|
|
|
caused by over-heating, some by a poorly seated card. Many
|
|
|
|
PCI error events are caused by software bugs, e.g. DMA's to
|
|
|
|
wild addresses or bogus split transactions due to programming
|
|
|
|
errors. See the discussion in powerpc/eeh-pci-error-recovery.txt
|
|
|
|
for additional detail on real-life experience of the causes of
|
|
|
|
software errors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusion; General Remarks
|
|
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
The way those callbacks are called is platform policy. A platform with
|
|
|
|
no slot reset capability may want to just "ignore" drivers that can't
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
recover (disconnect them) and try to let other cards on the same segment
|
|
|
|
recover. Keep in mind that in most real life cases, though, there will
|
|
|
|
be only one driver per segment.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
Now, a note about interrupts. If you get an interrupt and your
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
device is dead or has been isolated, there is a problem :)
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
The current policy is to turn this into a platform policy.
|
|
|
|
That is, the recovery API only requires that:
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- There is no guarantee that interrupt delivery can proceed from any
|
|
|
|
device on the segment starting from the error detection and until the
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
resume callback is sent, at which point interrupts are expected to be
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
fully operational.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
- There is no guarantee that interrupt delivery is stopped, that is,
|
|
|
|
a driver that gets an interrupt after detecting an error, or that detects
|
|
|
|
an error within the interrupt handler such that it prevents proper
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
ack'ing of the interrupt (and thus removal of the source) should just
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
return IRQ_NOTHANDLED. It's up to the platform to deal with that
|
|
|
|
condition, typically by masking the IRQ source during the duration of
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
the error handling. It is expected that the platform "knows" which
|
|
|
|
interrupts are routed to error-management capable slots and can deal
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
with temporarily disabling that IRQ number during error processing (this
|
2005-12-03 09:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
isn't terribly complex). That means some IRQ latency for other devices
|
|
|
|
sharing the interrupt, but there is simply no other way. High end
|
|
|
|
platforms aren't supposed to share interrupts between many devices
|
|
|
|
anyway :)
|
|
|
|
|
2006-02-03 19:03:45 +08:00
|
|
|
>>> Implementation details for the powerpc platform are discussed in
|
|
|
|
>>> the file Documentation/powerpc/eeh-pci-error-recovery.txt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> As of this writing, there are six device drivers with patches
|
|
|
|
>>> implementing error recovery. Not all of these patches are in
|
|
|
|
>>> mainline yet. These may be used as "examples":
|
|
|
|
>>>
|
|
|
|
>>> drivers/scsi/ipr.c
|
|
|
|
>>> drivers/scsi/sym53cxx_2
|
|
|
|
>>> drivers/next/e100.c
|
|
|
|
>>> drivers/net/e1000
|
|
|
|
>>> drivers/net/ixgb
|
|
|
|
>>> drivers/net/s2io.c
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The End
|
|
|
|
-------
|