linux-sg2042/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c

781 lines
20 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* File: pci-acpi.c
* Purpose: Provide PCI support in ACPI
*
* Copyright (C) 2005 David Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
* Copyright (C) 2004 Tom Long Nguyen <tom.l.nguyen@intel.com>
* Copyright (C) 2004 Intel Corp.
*/
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
#include <linux/msi.h>
#include <linux/pci_hotplug.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/pci-aspm.h>
#include <linux/pci-acpi.h>
PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time, platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured correctly. Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them. Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up: o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify handlers for run-time PM. o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback for the ACPI platform. o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all PCI devices present in the ACPI tables. o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at run time. Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-02-18 06:44:09 +08:00
#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
#include "pci.h"
/*
* The UUID is defined in the PCI Firmware Specification available here:
* https://www.pcisig.com/members/downloads/pcifw_r3_1_13Dec10.pdf
*/
const u8 pci_acpi_dsm_uuid[] = {
0xd0, 0x37, 0xc9, 0xe5, 0x53, 0x35, 0x7a, 0x4d,
0x91, 0x17, 0xea, 0x4d, 0x19, 0xc3, 0x43, 0x4d
};
phys_addr_t acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(acpi_handle handle)
{
acpi_status status = AE_NOT_EXIST;
unsigned long long mcfg_addr;
if (handle)
status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__CBA,
NULL, &mcfg_addr);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
return 0;
return (phys_addr_t)mcfg_addr;
}
static acpi_status decode_type0_hpx_record(union acpi_object *record,
struct hotplug_params *hpx)
{
int i;
union acpi_object *fields = record->package.elements;
u32 revision = fields[1].integer.value;
switch (revision) {
case 1:
if (record->package.count != 6)
return AE_ERROR;
for (i = 2; i < 6; i++)
if (fields[i].type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER)
return AE_ERROR;
hpx->t0 = &hpx->type0_data;
hpx->t0->revision = revision;
hpx->t0->cache_line_size = fields[2].integer.value;
hpx->t0->latency_timer = fields[3].integer.value;
hpx->t0->enable_serr = fields[4].integer.value;
hpx->t0->enable_perr = fields[5].integer.value;
break;
default:
printk(KERN_WARNING
"%s: Type 0 Revision %d record not supported\n",
__func__, revision);
return AE_ERROR;
}
return AE_OK;
}
static acpi_status decode_type1_hpx_record(union acpi_object *record,
struct hotplug_params *hpx)
{
int i;
union acpi_object *fields = record->package.elements;
u32 revision = fields[1].integer.value;
switch (revision) {
case 1:
if (record->package.count != 5)
return AE_ERROR;
for (i = 2; i < 5; i++)
if (fields[i].type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER)
return AE_ERROR;
hpx->t1 = &hpx->type1_data;
hpx->t1->revision = revision;
hpx->t1->max_mem_read = fields[2].integer.value;
hpx->t1->avg_max_split = fields[3].integer.value;
hpx->t1->tot_max_split = fields[4].integer.value;
break;
default:
printk(KERN_WARNING
"%s: Type 1 Revision %d record not supported\n",
__func__, revision);
return AE_ERROR;
}
return AE_OK;
}
static acpi_status decode_type2_hpx_record(union acpi_object *record,
struct hotplug_params *hpx)
{
int i;
union acpi_object *fields = record->package.elements;
u32 revision = fields[1].integer.value;
switch (revision) {
case 1:
if (record->package.count != 18)
return AE_ERROR;
for (i = 2; i < 18; i++)
if (fields[i].type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER)
return AE_ERROR;
hpx->t2 = &hpx->type2_data;
hpx->t2->revision = revision;
hpx->t2->unc_err_mask_and = fields[2].integer.value;
hpx->t2->unc_err_mask_or = fields[3].integer.value;
hpx->t2->unc_err_sever_and = fields[4].integer.value;
hpx->t2->unc_err_sever_or = fields[5].integer.value;
hpx->t2->cor_err_mask_and = fields[6].integer.value;
hpx->t2->cor_err_mask_or = fields[7].integer.value;
hpx->t2->adv_err_cap_and = fields[8].integer.value;
hpx->t2->adv_err_cap_or = fields[9].integer.value;
hpx->t2->pci_exp_devctl_and = fields[10].integer.value;
hpx->t2->pci_exp_devctl_or = fields[11].integer.value;
hpx->t2->pci_exp_lnkctl_and = fields[12].integer.value;
hpx->t2->pci_exp_lnkctl_or = fields[13].integer.value;
hpx->t2->sec_unc_err_sever_and = fields[14].integer.value;
hpx->t2->sec_unc_err_sever_or = fields[15].integer.value;
hpx->t2->sec_unc_err_mask_and = fields[16].integer.value;
hpx->t2->sec_unc_err_mask_or = fields[17].integer.value;
break;
default:
printk(KERN_WARNING
"%s: Type 2 Revision %d record not supported\n",
__func__, revision);
return AE_ERROR;
}
return AE_OK;
}
static acpi_status acpi_run_hpx(acpi_handle handle, struct hotplug_params *hpx)
{
acpi_status status;
struct acpi_buffer buffer = {ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL};
union acpi_object *package, *record, *fields;
u32 type;
int i;
/* Clear the return buffer with zeros */
memset(hpx, 0, sizeof(struct hotplug_params));
status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_HPX", NULL, &buffer);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
return status;
package = (union acpi_object *)buffer.pointer;
if (package->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE) {
status = AE_ERROR;
goto exit;
}
for (i = 0; i < package->package.count; i++) {
record = &package->package.elements[i];
if (record->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE) {
status = AE_ERROR;
goto exit;
}
fields = record->package.elements;
if (fields[0].type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER ||
fields[1].type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
status = AE_ERROR;
goto exit;
}
type = fields[0].integer.value;
switch (type) {
case 0:
status = decode_type0_hpx_record(record, hpx);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
goto exit;
break;
case 1:
status = decode_type1_hpx_record(record, hpx);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
goto exit;
break;
case 2:
status = decode_type2_hpx_record(record, hpx);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
goto exit;
break;
default:
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Type %d record not supported\n",
__func__, type);
status = AE_ERROR;
goto exit;
}
}
exit:
kfree(buffer.pointer);
return status;
}
static acpi_status acpi_run_hpp(acpi_handle handle, struct hotplug_params *hpp)
{
acpi_status status;
struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
union acpi_object *package, *fields;
int i;
memset(hpp, 0, sizeof(struct hotplug_params));
status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_HPP", NULL, &buffer);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
return status;
package = (union acpi_object *) buffer.pointer;
if (package->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE ||
package->package.count != 4) {
status = AE_ERROR;
goto exit;
}
fields = package->package.elements;
for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
if (fields[i].type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
status = AE_ERROR;
goto exit;
}
}
hpp->t0 = &hpp->type0_data;
hpp->t0->revision = 1;
hpp->t0->cache_line_size = fields[0].integer.value;
hpp->t0->latency_timer = fields[1].integer.value;
hpp->t0->enable_serr = fields[2].integer.value;
hpp->t0->enable_perr = fields[3].integer.value;
exit:
kfree(buffer.pointer);
return status;
}
/* pci_get_hp_params
*
* @dev - the pci_dev for which we want parameters
* @hpp - allocated by the caller
*/
int pci_get_hp_params(struct pci_dev *dev, struct hotplug_params *hpp)
{
acpi_status status;
acpi_handle handle, phandle;
struct pci_bus *pbus;
if (acpi_pci_disabled)
return -ENODEV;
handle = NULL;
for (pbus = dev->bus; pbus; pbus = pbus->parent) {
handle = acpi_pci_get_bridge_handle(pbus);
if (handle)
break;
}
/*
* _HPP settings apply to all child buses, until another _HPP is
* encountered. If we don't find an _HPP for the input pci dev,
* look for it in the parent device scope since that would apply to
* this pci dev.
*/
while (handle) {
status = acpi_run_hpx(handle, hpp);
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
return 0;
status = acpi_run_hpp(handle, hpp);
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
return 0;
if (acpi_is_root_bridge(handle))
break;
status = acpi_get_parent(handle, &phandle);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
break;
handle = phandle;
}
return -ENODEV;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_get_hp_params);
/**
* pci_acpi_wake_bus - Root bus wakeup notification fork function.
* @work: Work item to handle.
*/
static void pci_acpi_wake_bus(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct acpi_device *adev;
struct acpi_pci_root *root;
adev = container_of(work, struct acpi_device, wakeup.context.work);
root = acpi_driver_data(adev);
pci_pme_wakeup_bus(root->bus);
}
/**
* pci_acpi_wake_dev - PCI device wakeup notification work function.
* @handle: ACPI handle of a device the notification is for.
* @work: Work item to handle.
*/
static void pci_acpi_wake_dev(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct acpi_device_wakeup_context *context;
struct pci_dev *pci_dev;
context = container_of(work, struct acpi_device_wakeup_context, work);
pci_dev = to_pci_dev(context->dev);
if (pci_dev->pme_poll)
pci_dev->pme_poll = false;
if (pci_dev->current_state == PCI_D3cold) {
pci_wakeup_event(pci_dev);
pm_runtime_resume(&pci_dev->dev);
return;
}
/* Clear PME Status if set. */
if (pci_dev->pme_support)
pci_check_pme_status(pci_dev);
pci_wakeup_event(pci_dev);
pm_runtime_resume(&pci_dev->dev);
pci_pme_wakeup_bus(pci_dev->subordinate);
}
/**
* pci_acpi_add_bus_pm_notifier - Register PM notifier for root PCI bus.
* @dev: PCI root bridge ACPI device.
*/
acpi_status pci_acpi_add_bus_pm_notifier(struct acpi_device *dev)
{
return acpi_add_pm_notifier(dev, NULL, pci_acpi_wake_bus);
}
/**
* pci_acpi_add_pm_notifier - Register PM notifier for given PCI device.
* @dev: ACPI device to add the notifier for.
* @pci_dev: PCI device to check for the PME status if an event is signaled.
*/
acpi_status pci_acpi_add_pm_notifier(struct acpi_device *dev,
struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
{
return acpi_add_pm_notifier(dev, &pci_dev->dev, pci_acpi_wake_dev);
}
/*
* _SxD returns the D-state with the highest power
* (lowest D-state number) supported in the S-state "x".
*
* If the devices does not have a _PRW
* (Power Resources for Wake) supporting system wakeup from "x"
* then the OS is free to choose a lower power (higher number
* D-state) than the return value from _SxD.
*
* But if _PRW is enabled at S-state "x", the OS
* must not choose a power lower than _SxD --
* unless the device has an _SxW method specifying
* the lowest power (highest D-state number) the device
* may enter while still able to wake the system.
*
* ie. depending on global OS policy:
*
* if (_PRW at S-state x)
* choose from highest power _SxD to lowest power _SxW
* else // no _PRW at S-state x
* choose highest power _SxD or any lower power
*/
static pci_power_t acpi_pci_choose_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
PCI/PM: add PCIe runtime D3cold support This patch adds runtime D3cold support and corresponding ACPI platform support. This patch only enables runtime D3cold support; it does not enable D3cold support during system suspend/hibernate. D3cold is the deepest power saving state for a PCIe device, where its main power is removed. While it is in D3cold, you can't access the device at all, not even its configuration space (which is still accessible in D3hot). Therefore the PCI PM registers can not be used to transition into/out of the D3cold state; that must be done by platform logic such as ACPI _PR3. To support wakeup from D3cold, a system may provide auxiliary power, which allows a device to request wakeup using a Beacon or the sideband WAKE# signal. WAKE# is usually connected to platform logic such as ACPI GPE. This is quite different from other power saving states, where devices request wakeup via a PME message on the PCIe link. Some devices, such as those in plug-in slots, have no direct platform logic. For example, there is usually no ACPI _PR3 for them. D3cold support for these devices can be done via the PCIe Downstream Port leading to the device. When the PCIe port is powered on/off, the device is powered on/off too. Wakeup events from the device will be notified to the corresponding PCIe port. For more information about PCIe D3cold and corresponding ACPI support, please refer to: - PCI Express Base Specification Revision 2.0 - Advanced Configuration and Power Interface Specification Revision 5.0 [bhelgaas: changelog] Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Originally-by: Zheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
2012-06-23 10:23:51 +08:00
int acpi_state, d_max;
PCI/PM: add PCIe runtime D3cold support This patch adds runtime D3cold support and corresponding ACPI platform support. This patch only enables runtime D3cold support; it does not enable D3cold support during system suspend/hibernate. D3cold is the deepest power saving state for a PCIe device, where its main power is removed. While it is in D3cold, you can't access the device at all, not even its configuration space (which is still accessible in D3hot). Therefore the PCI PM registers can not be used to transition into/out of the D3cold state; that must be done by platform logic such as ACPI _PR3. To support wakeup from D3cold, a system may provide auxiliary power, which allows a device to request wakeup using a Beacon or the sideband WAKE# signal. WAKE# is usually connected to platform logic such as ACPI GPE. This is quite different from other power saving states, where devices request wakeup via a PME message on the PCIe link. Some devices, such as those in plug-in slots, have no direct platform logic. For example, there is usually no ACPI _PR3 for them. D3cold support for these devices can be done via the PCIe Downstream Port leading to the device. When the PCIe port is powered on/off, the device is powered on/off too. Wakeup events from the device will be notified to the corresponding PCIe port. For more information about PCIe D3cold and corresponding ACPI support, please refer to: - PCI Express Base Specification Revision 2.0 - Advanced Configuration and Power Interface Specification Revision 5.0 [bhelgaas: changelog] Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Originally-by: Zheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
2012-06-23 10:23:51 +08:00
if (pdev->no_d3cold)
d_max = ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT;
else
d_max = ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD;
acpi_state = acpi_pm_device_sleep_state(&pdev->dev, NULL, d_max);
if (acpi_state < 0)
return PCI_POWER_ERROR;
switch (acpi_state) {
case ACPI_STATE_D0:
return PCI_D0;
case ACPI_STATE_D1:
return PCI_D1;
case ACPI_STATE_D2:
return PCI_D2;
case ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT:
return PCI_D3hot;
case ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD:
return PCI_D3cold;
}
return PCI_POWER_ERROR;
}
static bool acpi_pci_power_manageable(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&dev->dev);
return adev ? acpi_device_power_manageable(adev) : false;
}
static int acpi_pci_set_power_state(struct pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state)
{
struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&dev->dev);
static const u8 state_conv[] = {
[PCI_D0] = ACPI_STATE_D0,
[PCI_D1] = ACPI_STATE_D1,
[PCI_D2] = ACPI_STATE_D2,
ACPI / PM: Rework device power management to follow ACPI 6 The ACPI 6 specification has made some changes in the device power management area. In particular: * The D3hot power state is now supposed to be always available (instead of D3cold) and D3cold is only regarded as valid if the _PR3 object is present for the given device. * The required ordering of transitions into power states deeper than D0 is now such that for a transition into state Dx the _PSx method is supposed to be executed first, if present, and the states of the power resources the device depends on are supposed to be changed after that. * It is now explicitly forbidden to transition devices from lower-power (deeper) into higher-power (shallower) power states other than D0. Those changes have been made so the specification reflects the Windows' device power management code that the vast majority of systems using ACPI is validated against. To avoid artificial differences in ACPI device power management between Windows and Linux, modify the ACPI device power management code to follow the new specification. Add comments explaining the code flow in some unclear places. This only may affect some real corner cases in which the OS behavior expected by the firmware is different from the Windows one, but that's quite unlikely. The transition ordering change affects transitions to D1 and D2 which are rarely used (if at all) and into D3hot and D3cold for devices actually having _PR3, but those are likely to be validated against Windows anyway. The other changes may affect code calling acpi_device_get_power() or acpi_device_update_power() where ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT may be returned instead of ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD (that's why the ACPI fan driver needs to be updated too) and since transitions into ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT may remove power now, it is better to avoid this one in acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() if the "no power off" PM QoS flag is set. The only existing user of acpi_device_can_poweroff() really cares about the case when _PR3 is present, so the change in that function should not cause any problems to happen too. A plus is that PCI_D3hot can be mapped to ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT now and the compatibility with older systems should be covered automatically. In any case, if any real problems result from this, it still will be better to follow the Windows' behavior (which now is reflected by the specification too) in general and handle the cases when it doesn't work via quirks. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-05-16 07:55:35 +08:00
[PCI_D3hot] = ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT,
[PCI_D3cold] = ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD,
};
int error = -EINVAL;
/* If the ACPI device has _EJ0, ignore the device */
if (!adev || acpi_has_method(adev->handle, "_EJ0"))
return -ENODEV;
switch (state) {
case PCI_D3cold:
if (dev_pm_qos_flags(&dev->dev, PM_QOS_FLAG_NO_POWER_OFF) ==
PM_QOS_FLAGS_ALL) {
error = -EBUSY;
break;
}
case PCI_D0:
case PCI_D1:
case PCI_D2:
case PCI_D3hot:
error = acpi_device_set_power(adev, state_conv[state]);
}
if (!error)
dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "power state changed by ACPI to %s\n",
acpi_power_state_string(state_conv[state]));
return error;
}
static pci_power_t acpi_pci_get_power_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&dev->dev);
static const pci_power_t state_conv[] = {
[ACPI_STATE_D0] = PCI_D0,
[ACPI_STATE_D1] = PCI_D1,
[ACPI_STATE_D2] = PCI_D2,
[ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT] = PCI_D3hot,
[ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD] = PCI_D3cold,
};
int state;
if (!adev || !acpi_device_power_manageable(adev))
return PCI_UNKNOWN;
if (acpi_device_get_power(adev, &state) || state == ACPI_STATE_UNKNOWN)
return PCI_UNKNOWN;
return state_conv[state];
}
PCI ACPI: Rework PCI handling of wake-up * Introduce function acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() for enabling and disabling the system wake-up capability of devices that are power manageable by ACPI. * Introduce function acpi_bus_can_wakeup() allowing other (dependent) subsystems to check if ACPI is able to enable the system wake-up capability of given device. * Introduce callback .sleep_wake() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI PCI 'driver' make it use acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(). * Introduce callback .can_wakeup() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI 'driver' make it use acpi_bus_can_wakeup(). * Move the PME# handlig code out of pci_enable_wake() and split it into two functions, pci_pme_capable() and pci_pme_active(), allowing the caller to check if given device is capable of generating PME# from given power state and to enable/disable the device's PME# functionality, respectively. * Modify pci_enable_wake() to use the new ACPI callbacks and the new PME#-related functions. * Drop the generic .platform_enable_wakeup() callback that is not used any more. * Introduce device_set_wakeup_capable() that will set the power.can_wakeup flag of given device. * Rework PCI device PM initialization so that, if given device is capable of generating wake-up events, either natively through the PME# mechanism, or with the help of the platform, its power.can_wakeup flag is set and its power.should_wakeup flag is unset as appropriate. * Make ACPI set the power.can_wakeup flag for devices found to be wake-up capable by it. * Make the ACPI wake-up code enable/disable GPEs for devices that have the wakeup.flags.prepared flag set (which means that their wake-up power has been enabled). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2008-07-07 09:34:48 +08:00
static bool acpi_pci_can_wakeup(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&dev->dev);
return adev ? acpi_device_can_wakeup(adev) : false;
PCI ACPI: Rework PCI handling of wake-up * Introduce function acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() for enabling and disabling the system wake-up capability of devices that are power manageable by ACPI. * Introduce function acpi_bus_can_wakeup() allowing other (dependent) subsystems to check if ACPI is able to enable the system wake-up capability of given device. * Introduce callback .sleep_wake() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI PCI 'driver' make it use acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(). * Introduce callback .can_wakeup() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI 'driver' make it use acpi_bus_can_wakeup(). * Move the PME# handlig code out of pci_enable_wake() and split it into two functions, pci_pme_capable() and pci_pme_active(), allowing the caller to check if given device is capable of generating PME# from given power state and to enable/disable the device's PME# functionality, respectively. * Modify pci_enable_wake() to use the new ACPI callbacks and the new PME#-related functions. * Drop the generic .platform_enable_wakeup() callback that is not used any more. * Introduce device_set_wakeup_capable() that will set the power.can_wakeup flag of given device. * Rework PCI device PM initialization so that, if given device is capable of generating wake-up events, either natively through the PME# mechanism, or with the help of the platform, its power.can_wakeup flag is set and its power.should_wakeup flag is unset as appropriate. * Make ACPI set the power.can_wakeup flag for devices found to be wake-up capable by it. * Make the ACPI wake-up code enable/disable GPEs for devices that have the wakeup.flags.prepared flag set (which means that their wake-up power has been enabled). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2008-07-07 09:34:48 +08:00
}
static void acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup_enable(struct pci_bus *bus, bool enable)
{
while (bus->parent) {
if (!acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(&bus->self->dev, enable))
return;
bus = bus->parent;
}
/* We have reached the root bus. */
if (bus->bridge)
acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(bus->bridge, enable);
}
PCI ACPI: Rework PCI handling of wake-up * Introduce function acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() for enabling and disabling the system wake-up capability of devices that are power manageable by ACPI. * Introduce function acpi_bus_can_wakeup() allowing other (dependent) subsystems to check if ACPI is able to enable the system wake-up capability of given device. * Introduce callback .sleep_wake() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI PCI 'driver' make it use acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(). * Introduce callback .can_wakeup() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI 'driver' make it use acpi_bus_can_wakeup(). * Move the PME# handlig code out of pci_enable_wake() and split it into two functions, pci_pme_capable() and pci_pme_active(), allowing the caller to check if given device is capable of generating PME# from given power state and to enable/disable the device's PME# functionality, respectively. * Modify pci_enable_wake() to use the new ACPI callbacks and the new PME#-related functions. * Drop the generic .platform_enable_wakeup() callback that is not used any more. * Introduce device_set_wakeup_capable() that will set the power.can_wakeup flag of given device. * Rework PCI device PM initialization so that, if given device is capable of generating wake-up events, either natively through the PME# mechanism, or with the help of the platform, its power.can_wakeup flag is set and its power.should_wakeup flag is unset as appropriate. * Make ACPI set the power.can_wakeup flag for devices found to be wake-up capable by it. * Make the ACPI wake-up code enable/disable GPEs for devices that have the wakeup.flags.prepared flag set (which means that their wake-up power has been enabled). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2008-07-07 09:34:48 +08:00
static int acpi_pci_sleep_wake(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable)
{
if (acpi_pci_can_wakeup(dev))
return acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(&dev->dev, enable);
acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup_enable(dev->bus, enable);
return 0;
PCI ACPI: Rework PCI handling of wake-up * Introduce function acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() for enabling and disabling the system wake-up capability of devices that are power manageable by ACPI. * Introduce function acpi_bus_can_wakeup() allowing other (dependent) subsystems to check if ACPI is able to enable the system wake-up capability of given device. * Introduce callback .sleep_wake() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI PCI 'driver' make it use acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(). * Introduce callback .can_wakeup() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI 'driver' make it use acpi_bus_can_wakeup(). * Move the PME# handlig code out of pci_enable_wake() and split it into two functions, pci_pme_capable() and pci_pme_active(), allowing the caller to check if given device is capable of generating PME# from given power state and to enable/disable the device's PME# functionality, respectively. * Modify pci_enable_wake() to use the new ACPI callbacks and the new PME#-related functions. * Drop the generic .platform_enable_wakeup() callback that is not used any more. * Introduce device_set_wakeup_capable() that will set the power.can_wakeup flag of given device. * Rework PCI device PM initialization so that, if given device is capable of generating wake-up events, either natively through the PME# mechanism, or with the help of the platform, its power.can_wakeup flag is set and its power.should_wakeup flag is unset as appropriate. * Make ACPI set the power.can_wakeup flag for devices found to be wake-up capable by it. * Make the ACPI wake-up code enable/disable GPEs for devices that have the wakeup.flags.prepared flag set (which means that their wake-up power has been enabled). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2008-07-07 09:34:48 +08:00
}
PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time, platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured correctly. Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them. Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up: o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify handlers for run-time PM. o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback for the ACPI platform. o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all PCI devices present in the ACPI tables. o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at run time. Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-02-18 06:44:09 +08:00
static void acpi_pci_propagate_run_wake(struct pci_bus *bus, bool enable)
{
while (bus->parent) {
struct pci_dev *bridge = bus->self;
if (bridge->pme_interrupt)
return;
if (!acpi_pm_device_run_wake(&bridge->dev, enable))
PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time, platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured correctly. Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them. Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up: o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify handlers for run-time PM. o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback for the ACPI platform. o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all PCI devices present in the ACPI tables. o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at run time. Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-02-18 06:44:09 +08:00
return;
bus = bus->parent;
}
/* We have reached the root bus. */
if (bus->bridge)
acpi_pm_device_run_wake(bus->bridge, enable);
PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time, platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured correctly. Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them. Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up: o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify handlers for run-time PM. o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback for the ACPI platform. o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all PCI devices present in the ACPI tables. o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at run time. Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-02-18 06:44:09 +08:00
}
static int acpi_pci_run_wake(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable)
{
PCI/PM: add PCIe runtime D3cold support This patch adds runtime D3cold support and corresponding ACPI platform support. This patch only enables runtime D3cold support; it does not enable D3cold support during system suspend/hibernate. D3cold is the deepest power saving state for a PCIe device, where its main power is removed. While it is in D3cold, you can't access the device at all, not even its configuration space (which is still accessible in D3hot). Therefore the PCI PM registers can not be used to transition into/out of the D3cold state; that must be done by platform logic such as ACPI _PR3. To support wakeup from D3cold, a system may provide auxiliary power, which allows a device to request wakeup using a Beacon or the sideband WAKE# signal. WAKE# is usually connected to platform logic such as ACPI GPE. This is quite different from other power saving states, where devices request wakeup via a PME message on the PCIe link. Some devices, such as those in plug-in slots, have no direct platform logic. For example, there is usually no ACPI _PR3 for them. D3cold support for these devices can be done via the PCIe Downstream Port leading to the device. When the PCIe port is powered on/off, the device is powered on/off too. Wakeup events from the device will be notified to the corresponding PCIe port. For more information about PCIe D3cold and corresponding ACPI support, please refer to: - PCI Express Base Specification Revision 2.0 - Advanced Configuration and Power Interface Specification Revision 5.0 [bhelgaas: changelog] Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Originally-by: Zheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
2012-06-23 10:23:51 +08:00
/*
* Per PCI Express Base Specification Revision 2.0 section
* 5.3.3.2 Link Wakeup, platform support is needed for D3cold
* waking up to power on the main link even if there is PME
* support for D3cold
*/
if (dev->pme_interrupt && !dev->runtime_d3cold)
PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time, platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured correctly. Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them. Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up: o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify handlers for run-time PM. o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback for the ACPI platform. o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all PCI devices present in the ACPI tables. o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at run time. Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-02-18 06:44:09 +08:00
return 0;
if (!acpi_pm_device_run_wake(&dev->dev, enable))
PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time, platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured correctly. Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them. Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up: o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify handlers for run-time PM. o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback for the ACPI platform. o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all PCI devices present in the ACPI tables. o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at run time. Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-02-18 06:44:09 +08:00
return 0;
acpi_pci_propagate_run_wake(dev->bus, enable);
return 0;
}
static bool acpi_pci_need_resume(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&dev->dev);
if (!adev || !acpi_device_power_manageable(adev))
return false;
if (device_may_wakeup(&dev->dev) != !!adev->wakeup.prepare_count)
return true;
if (acpi_target_system_state() == ACPI_STATE_S0)
return false;
return !!adev->power.flags.dsw_present;
}
static const struct pci_platform_pm_ops acpi_pci_platform_pm = {
.is_manageable = acpi_pci_power_manageable,
.set_state = acpi_pci_set_power_state,
.get_state = acpi_pci_get_power_state,
.choose_state = acpi_pci_choose_state,
PCI ACPI: Rework PCI handling of wake-up * Introduce function acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() for enabling and disabling the system wake-up capability of devices that are power manageable by ACPI. * Introduce function acpi_bus_can_wakeup() allowing other (dependent) subsystems to check if ACPI is able to enable the system wake-up capability of given device. * Introduce callback .sleep_wake() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI PCI 'driver' make it use acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(). * Introduce callback .can_wakeup() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI 'driver' make it use acpi_bus_can_wakeup(). * Move the PME# handlig code out of pci_enable_wake() and split it into two functions, pci_pme_capable() and pci_pme_active(), allowing the caller to check if given device is capable of generating PME# from given power state and to enable/disable the device's PME# functionality, respectively. * Modify pci_enable_wake() to use the new ACPI callbacks and the new PME#-related functions. * Drop the generic .platform_enable_wakeup() callback that is not used any more. * Introduce device_set_wakeup_capable() that will set the power.can_wakeup flag of given device. * Rework PCI device PM initialization so that, if given device is capable of generating wake-up events, either natively through the PME# mechanism, or with the help of the platform, its power.can_wakeup flag is set and its power.should_wakeup flag is unset as appropriate. * Make ACPI set the power.can_wakeup flag for devices found to be wake-up capable by it. * Make the ACPI wake-up code enable/disable GPEs for devices that have the wakeup.flags.prepared flag set (which means that their wake-up power has been enabled). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2008-07-07 09:34:48 +08:00
.sleep_wake = acpi_pci_sleep_wake,
PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time, platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured correctly. Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them. Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up: o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify handlers for run-time PM. o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback for the ACPI platform. o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all PCI devices present in the ACPI tables. o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at run time. Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-02-18 06:44:09 +08:00
.run_wake = acpi_pci_run_wake,
.need_resume = acpi_pci_need_resume,
};
void acpi_pci_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
{
union acpi_object *obj;
struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
if (acpi_pci_disabled || !bus->bridge)
return;
acpi_pci_slot_enumerate(bus);
acpiphp_enumerate_slots(bus);
/*
* For a host bridge, check its _DSM for function 8 and if
* that is available, mark it in pci_host_bridge.
*/
if (!pci_is_root_bus(bus))
return;
obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(ACPI_HANDLE(bus->bridge), pci_acpi_dsm_uuid, 3,
RESET_DELAY_DSM, NULL);
if (!obj)
return;
if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER && obj->integer.value == 1) {
bridge = pci_find_host_bridge(bus);
bridge->ignore_reset_delay = 1;
}
ACPI_FREE(obj);
}
void acpi_pci_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
{
if (acpi_pci_disabled || !bus->bridge)
return;
acpiphp_remove_slots(bus);
acpi_pci_slot_remove(bus);
}
/* ACPI bus type */
static struct acpi_device *acpi_pci_find_companion(struct device *dev)
{
ACPI: Try harder to resolve _ADR collisions for bridges In theory, under a given ACPI namespace node there should be only one child device object with _ADR whose value matches a given bus address exactly. In practice, however, there are systems in which multiple child device objects under a given parent have _ADR matching exactly the same address. In those cases we use _STA to determine which of the multiple matching devices is enabled, since some systems are known to indicate which ACPI device object to associate with the given physical (usually PCI) device this way. Unfortunately, as it turns out, there are systems in which many device objects under the same parent have _ADR matching exactly the same bus address and none of them has _STA, in which case they all should be regarded as enabled according to the spec. Still, if those device objects are supposed to represent bridges (e.g. this is the case for device objects corresponding to PCIe ports), we can try harder and skip the ones that have no child device objects in the ACPI namespace. With luck, we can avoid using device objects that we are not expected to use this way. Although this only works for bridges whose children also have ACPI namespace representation, it is sufficient to address graphics adapter detection issues on some systems, so rework the code finding a matching device ACPI handle for a given bus address to implement this idea. Introduce a new function, acpi_find_child(), taking three arguments: the ACPI handle of the device's parent, a bus address suitable for the device's bus type and a bool indicating if the device is a bridge and make it work as outlined above. Reimplement the function currently used for this purpose, acpi_get_child(), as a call to acpi_find_child() with the last argument set to 'false' and make the PCI subsystem use acpi_find_child() with the bridge information passed as the last argument to it. [Lan Tianyu notices that it is not sufficient to use pci_is_bridge() for that, because the device's subordinate pointer hasn't been set yet at this point, so use hdr_type instead.] This change fixes a regression introduced inadvertently by commit 33f767d (ACPI: Rework acpi_get_child() to be more efficient) which overlooked the fact that for acpi_walk_namespace() "post-order" means "after all children have been visited" rather than "on the way back", so for device objects without children and for namespace walks of depth 1, as in the acpi_get_child() case, the "post-order" callbacks ordering is actually the same as the ordering of "pre-order" ones. Since that commit changed the namespace walk in acpi_get_child() to terminate after finding the first matching object instead of going through all of them and returning the last one, it effectively changed the result returned by that function in some rare cases and that led to problems (the switch from a "pre-order" to a "post-order" callback was supposed to prevent that from happening, but it was ineffective). As it turns out, the systems where the change made by commit 33f767d actually matters are those where there are multiple ACPI device objects representing the same PCIe port (which effectively is a bridge). Moreover, only one of them, and the one we are expected to use, has child device objects in the ACPI namespace, so the regression can be addressed as described above. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60561 Reported-by: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com> Tested-by: Vladimir Lalov <mail@vlalov.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+
2013-08-08 04:55:00 +08:00
struct pci_dev *pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
bool check_children;
ACPI: Try harder to resolve _ADR collisions for bridges In theory, under a given ACPI namespace node there should be only one child device object with _ADR whose value matches a given bus address exactly. In practice, however, there are systems in which multiple child device objects under a given parent have _ADR matching exactly the same address. In those cases we use _STA to determine which of the multiple matching devices is enabled, since some systems are known to indicate which ACPI device object to associate with the given physical (usually PCI) device this way. Unfortunately, as it turns out, there are systems in which many device objects under the same parent have _ADR matching exactly the same bus address and none of them has _STA, in which case they all should be regarded as enabled according to the spec. Still, if those device objects are supposed to represent bridges (e.g. this is the case for device objects corresponding to PCIe ports), we can try harder and skip the ones that have no child device objects in the ACPI namespace. With luck, we can avoid using device objects that we are not expected to use this way. Although this only works for bridges whose children also have ACPI namespace representation, it is sufficient to address graphics adapter detection issues on some systems, so rework the code finding a matching device ACPI handle for a given bus address to implement this idea. Introduce a new function, acpi_find_child(), taking three arguments: the ACPI handle of the device's parent, a bus address suitable for the device's bus type and a bool indicating if the device is a bridge and make it work as outlined above. Reimplement the function currently used for this purpose, acpi_get_child(), as a call to acpi_find_child() with the last argument set to 'false' and make the PCI subsystem use acpi_find_child() with the bridge information passed as the last argument to it. [Lan Tianyu notices that it is not sufficient to use pci_is_bridge() for that, because the device's subordinate pointer hasn't been set yet at this point, so use hdr_type instead.] This change fixes a regression introduced inadvertently by commit 33f767d (ACPI: Rework acpi_get_child() to be more efficient) which overlooked the fact that for acpi_walk_namespace() "post-order" means "after all children have been visited" rather than "on the way back", so for device objects without children and for namespace walks of depth 1, as in the acpi_get_child() case, the "post-order" callbacks ordering is actually the same as the ordering of "pre-order" ones. Since that commit changed the namespace walk in acpi_get_child() to terminate after finding the first matching object instead of going through all of them and returning the last one, it effectively changed the result returned by that function in some rare cases and that led to problems (the switch from a "pre-order" to a "post-order" callback was supposed to prevent that from happening, but it was ineffective). As it turns out, the systems where the change made by commit 33f767d actually matters are those where there are multiple ACPI device objects representing the same PCIe port (which effectively is a bridge). Moreover, only one of them, and the one we are expected to use, has child device objects in the ACPI namespace, so the regression can be addressed as described above. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60561 Reported-by: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com> Tested-by: Vladimir Lalov <mail@vlalov.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+
2013-08-08 04:55:00 +08:00
u64 addr;
check_children = pci_is_bridge(pci_dev);
/* Please ref to ACPI spec for the syntax of _ADR */
addr = (PCI_SLOT(pci_dev->devfn) << 16) | PCI_FUNC(pci_dev->devfn);
return acpi_find_child_device(ACPI_COMPANION(dev->parent), addr,
check_children);
}
/**
* pci_acpi_optimize_delay - optimize PCI D3 and D3cold delay from ACPI
* @pdev: the PCI device whose delay is to be updated
* @handle: ACPI handle of this device
*
* Update the d3_delay and d3cold_delay of a PCI device from the ACPI _DSM
* control method of either the device itself or the PCI host bridge.
*
* Function 8, "Reset Delay," applies to the entire hierarchy below a PCI
* host bridge. If it returns one, the OS may assume that all devices in
* the hierarchy have already completed power-on reset delays.
*
* Function 9, "Device Readiness Durations," applies only to the object
* where it is located. It returns delay durations required after various
* events if the device requires less time than the spec requires. Delays
* from this function take precedence over the Reset Delay function.
*
* These _DSM functions are defined by the draft ECN of January 28, 2014,
* titled "ACPI additions for FW latency optimizations."
*/
static void pci_acpi_optimize_delay(struct pci_dev *pdev,
acpi_handle handle)
{
struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = pci_find_host_bridge(pdev->bus);
int value;
union acpi_object *obj, *elements;
if (bridge->ignore_reset_delay)
pdev->d3cold_delay = 0;
obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(handle, pci_acpi_dsm_uuid, 3,
FUNCTION_DELAY_DSM, NULL);
if (!obj)
return;
if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE && obj->package.count == 5) {
elements = obj->package.elements;
if (elements[0].type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
value = (int)elements[0].integer.value / 1000;
if (value < PCI_PM_D3COLD_WAIT)
pdev->d3cold_delay = value;
}
if (elements[3].type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
value = (int)elements[3].integer.value / 1000;
if (value < PCI_PM_D3_WAIT)
pdev->d3_delay = value;
}
}
ACPI_FREE(obj);
}
static void pci_acpi_setup(struct device *dev)
{
struct pci_dev *pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
if (!adev)
return;
pci_acpi_optimize_delay(pci_dev, adev->handle);
pci_acpi_add_pm_notifier(adev, pci_dev);
if (!adev->wakeup.flags.valid)
return;
device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, true);
acpi_pci_sleep_wake(pci_dev, false);
if (adev->wakeup.flags.run_wake)
device_set_run_wake(dev, true);
}
static void pci_acpi_cleanup(struct device *dev)
{
struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
if (!adev)
return;
pci_acpi_remove_pm_notifier(adev);
if (adev->wakeup.flags.valid) {
device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, false);
device_set_run_wake(dev, false);
}
}
static bool pci_acpi_bus_match(struct device *dev)
{
return dev_is_pci(dev);
}
static struct acpi_bus_type acpi_pci_bus = {
.name = "PCI",
.match = pci_acpi_bus_match,
.find_companion = acpi_pci_find_companion,
.setup = pci_acpi_setup,
.cleanup = pci_acpi_cleanup,
};
static struct fwnode_handle *(*pci_msi_get_fwnode_cb)(struct device *dev);
/**
* pci_msi_register_fwnode_provider - Register callback to retrieve fwnode
* @fn: Callback matching a device to a fwnode that identifies a PCI
* MSI domain.
*
* This should be called by irqchip driver, which is the parent of
* the MSI domain to provide callback interface to query fwnode.
*/
void
pci_msi_register_fwnode_provider(struct fwnode_handle *(*fn)(struct device *))
{
pci_msi_get_fwnode_cb = fn;
}
/**
* pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain - Retrieve MSI domain of a PCI host bridge
* @bus: The PCI host bridge bus.
*
* This function uses the callback function registered by
* pci_msi_register_fwnode_provider() to retrieve the irq_domain with
* type DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI of the specified host bridge bus.
* This returns NULL on error or when the domain is not found.
*/
struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
{
struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
if (!pci_msi_get_fwnode_cb)
return NULL;
fwnode = pci_msi_get_fwnode_cb(&bus->dev);
if (!fwnode)
return NULL;
return irq_find_matching_fwnode(fwnode, DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI);
}
static int __init acpi_pci_init(void)
{
int ret;
if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_MSI) {
pr_info("ACPI FADT declares the system doesn't support MSI, so disable it\n");
pci_no_msi();
}
if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM) {
pr_info("ACPI FADT declares the system doesn't support PCIe ASPM, so disable it\n");
pcie_no_aspm();
}
ret = register_acpi_bus_type(&acpi_pci_bus);
if (ret)
return 0;
pci_set_platform_pm(&acpi_pci_platform_pm);
acpi_pci_slot_init();
acpiphp_init();
return 0;
}
arch_initcall(acpi_pci_init);