linux-sg2042/lib/test_list_sort.c

123 lines
3.3 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m. It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable module. There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later, here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err() calls to KUNIT_FAIL()). What this conversion gives us: * a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros * a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2] * a structured way of reporting pass/fail * uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks * more descriptive error messages: * i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected values are, etc. What this conversion does not do: * change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module) * change the name of the config option Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide for both names, at least for now. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/ [2] Can be run via $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y EOF [16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ... [16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ======== [16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. [16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-04 04:58:35 +08:00
#include <kunit/test.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/list_sort.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/printk.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/random.h>
/*
* The pattern of set bits in the list length determines which cases
* are hit in list_sort().
*/
#define TEST_LIST_LEN (512+128+2) /* not including head */
#define TEST_POISON1 0xDEADBEEF
#define TEST_POISON2 0xA324354C
struct debug_el {
unsigned int poison1;
struct list_head list;
unsigned int poison2;
int value;
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m. It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable module. There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later, here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err() calls to KUNIT_FAIL()). What this conversion gives us: * a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros * a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2] * a structured way of reporting pass/fail * uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks * more descriptive error messages: * i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected values are, etc. What this conversion does not do: * change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module) * change the name of the config option Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide for both names, at least for now. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/ [2] Can be run via $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y EOF [16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ... [16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ======== [16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. [16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-04 04:58:35 +08:00
unsigned int serial;
};
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m. It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable module. There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later, here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err() calls to KUNIT_FAIL()). What this conversion gives us: * a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros * a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2] * a structured way of reporting pass/fail * uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks * more descriptive error messages: * i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected values are, etc. What this conversion does not do: * change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module) * change the name of the config option Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide for both names, at least for now. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/ [2] Can be run via $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y EOF [16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ... [16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ======== [16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. [16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-04 04:58:35 +08:00
static void check(struct kunit *test, struct debug_el *ela, struct debug_el *elb)
{
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m. It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable module. There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later, here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err() calls to KUNIT_FAIL()). What this conversion gives us: * a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros * a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2] * a structured way of reporting pass/fail * uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks * more descriptive error messages: * i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected values are, etc. What this conversion does not do: * change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module) * change the name of the config option Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide for both names, at least for now. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/ [2] Can be run via $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y EOF [16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ... [16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ======== [16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. [16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-04 04:58:35 +08:00
struct debug_el **elts = test->priv;
KUNIT_EXPECT_LT_MSG(test, ela->serial, (unsigned int)TEST_LIST_LEN, "incorrect serial");
KUNIT_EXPECT_LT_MSG(test, elb->serial, (unsigned int)TEST_LIST_LEN, "incorrect serial");
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, elts[ela->serial], ela, "phantom element");
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, elts[elb->serial], elb, "phantom element");
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, ela->poison1, TEST_POISON1, "bad poison");
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, ela->poison2, TEST_POISON2, "bad poison");
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, elb->poison1, TEST_POISON1, "bad poison");
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, elb->poison2, TEST_POISON2, "bad poison");
}
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m. It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable module. There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later, here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err() calls to KUNIT_FAIL()). What this conversion gives us: * a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros * a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2] * a structured way of reporting pass/fail * uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks * more descriptive error messages: * i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected values are, etc. What this conversion does not do: * change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module) * change the name of the config option Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide for both names, at least for now. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/ [2] Can be run via $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y EOF [16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ... [16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ======== [16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. [16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-04 04:58:35 +08:00
/* `priv` is the test pointer so check() can fail the test if the list is invalid. */
static int cmp(void *priv, const struct list_head *a, const struct list_head *b)
{
struct debug_el *ela, *elb;
ela = container_of(a, struct debug_el, list);
elb = container_of(b, struct debug_el, list);
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m. It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable module. There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later, here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err() calls to KUNIT_FAIL()). What this conversion gives us: * a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros * a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2] * a structured way of reporting pass/fail * uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks * more descriptive error messages: * i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected values are, etc. What this conversion does not do: * change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module) * change the name of the config option Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide for both names, at least for now. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/ [2] Can be run via $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y EOF [16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ... [16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ======== [16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. [16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-04 04:58:35 +08:00
check(priv, ela, elb);
return ela->value - elb->value;
}
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m. It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable module. There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later, here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err() calls to KUNIT_FAIL()). What this conversion gives us: * a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros * a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2] * a structured way of reporting pass/fail * uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks * more descriptive error messages: * i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected values are, etc. What this conversion does not do: * change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module) * change the name of the config option Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide for both names, at least for now. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/ [2] Can be run via $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y EOF [16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ... [16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ======== [16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. [16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-04 04:58:35 +08:00
static void list_sort_test(struct kunit *test)
{
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m. It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable module. There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later, here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err() calls to KUNIT_FAIL()). What this conversion gives us: * a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros * a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2] * a structured way of reporting pass/fail * uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks * more descriptive error messages: * i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected values are, etc. What this conversion does not do: * change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module) * change the name of the config option Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide for both names, at least for now. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/ [2] Can be run via $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y EOF [16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ... [16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ======== [16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. [16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-04 04:58:35 +08:00
int i, count = 1;
struct debug_el *el, **elts;
struct list_head *cur;
LIST_HEAD(head);
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m. It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable module. There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later, here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err() calls to KUNIT_FAIL()). What this conversion gives us: * a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros * a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2] * a structured way of reporting pass/fail * uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks * more descriptive error messages: * i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected values are, etc. What this conversion does not do: * change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module) * change the name of the config option Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide for both names, at least for now. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/ [2] Can be run via $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y EOF [16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ... [16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ======== [16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. [16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-04 04:58:35 +08:00
elts = kunit_kcalloc(test, TEST_LIST_LEN, sizeof(*elts), GFP_KERNEL);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, elts);
test->priv = elts;
for (i = 0; i < TEST_LIST_LEN; i++) {
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m. It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable module. There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later, here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err() calls to KUNIT_FAIL()). What this conversion gives us: * a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros * a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2] * a structured way of reporting pass/fail * uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks * more descriptive error messages: * i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected values are, etc. What this conversion does not do: * change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module) * change the name of the config option Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide for both names, at least for now. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/ [2] Can be run via $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y EOF [16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ... [16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ======== [16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. [16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-04 04:58:35 +08:00
el = kunit_kmalloc(test, sizeof(*el), GFP_KERNEL);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, el);
/* force some equivalencies */
el->value = prandom_u32() % (TEST_LIST_LEN / 3);
el->serial = i;
el->poison1 = TEST_POISON1;
el->poison2 = TEST_POISON2;
elts[i] = el;
list_add_tail(&el->list, &head);
}
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m. It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable module. There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later, here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err() calls to KUNIT_FAIL()). What this conversion gives us: * a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros * a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2] * a structured way of reporting pass/fail * uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks * more descriptive error messages: * i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected values are, etc. What this conversion does not do: * change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module) * change the name of the config option Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide for both names, at least for now. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/ [2] Can be run via $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y EOF [16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ... [16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ======== [16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. [16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-04 04:58:35 +08:00
list_sort(test, &head, cmp);
for (cur = head.next; cur->next != &head; cur = cur->next) {
struct debug_el *el1;
int cmp_result;
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m. It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable module. There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later, here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err() calls to KUNIT_FAIL()). What this conversion gives us: * a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros * a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2] * a structured way of reporting pass/fail * uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks * more descriptive error messages: * i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected values are, etc. What this conversion does not do: * change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module) * change the name of the config option Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide for both names, at least for now. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/ [2] Can be run via $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y EOF [16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ... [16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ======== [16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. [16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-04 04:58:35 +08:00
KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, cur->next->prev, cur,
"list is corrupted");
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m. It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable module. There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later, here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err() calls to KUNIT_FAIL()). What this conversion gives us: * a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros * a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2] * a structured way of reporting pass/fail * uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks * more descriptive error messages: * i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected values are, etc. What this conversion does not do: * change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module) * change the name of the config option Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide for both names, at least for now. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/ [2] Can be run via $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y EOF [16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ... [16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ======== [16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. [16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-04 04:58:35 +08:00
cmp_result = cmp(test, cur, cur->next);
KUNIT_ASSERT_LE_MSG(test, cmp_result, 0, "list is not sorted");
el = container_of(cur, struct debug_el, list);
el1 = container_of(cur->next, struct debug_el, list);
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m. It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable module. There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later, here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err() calls to KUNIT_FAIL()). What this conversion gives us: * a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros * a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2] * a structured way of reporting pass/fail * uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks * more descriptive error messages: * i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected values are, etc. What this conversion does not do: * change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module) * change the name of the config option Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide for both names, at least for now. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/ [2] Can be run via $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y EOF [16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ... [16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ======== [16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. [16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-04 04:58:35 +08:00
if (cmp_result == 0) {
KUNIT_ASSERT_LE_MSG(test, el->serial, el1->serial,
"order of equivalent elements not preserved");
}
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m. It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable module. There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later, here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err() calls to KUNIT_FAIL()). What this conversion gives us: * a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros * a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2] * a structured way of reporting pass/fail * uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks * more descriptive error messages: * i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected values are, etc. What this conversion does not do: * change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module) * change the name of the config option Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide for both names, at least for now. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/ [2] Can be run via $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y EOF [16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ... [16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ======== [16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. [16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-04 04:58:35 +08:00
check(test, el, el1);
count++;
}
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m. It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable module. There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later, here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err() calls to KUNIT_FAIL()). What this conversion gives us: * a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros * a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2] * a structured way of reporting pass/fail * uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks * more descriptive error messages: * i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected values are, etc. What this conversion does not do: * change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module) * change the name of the config option Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide for both names, at least for now. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/ [2] Can be run via $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y EOF [16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ... [16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ======== [16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. [16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-04 04:58:35 +08:00
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, head.prev, cur, "list is corrupted");
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m. It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable module. There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later, here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err() calls to KUNIT_FAIL()). What this conversion gives us: * a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros * a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2] * a structured way of reporting pass/fail * uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks * more descriptive error messages: * i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected values are, etc. What this conversion does not do: * change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module) * change the name of the config option Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide for both names, at least for now. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/ [2] Can be run via $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y EOF [16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ... [16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ======== [16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. [16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-04 04:58:35 +08:00
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, count, TEST_LIST_LEN,
"list length changed after sorting!");
}
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m. It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable module. There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later, here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err() calls to KUNIT_FAIL()). What this conversion gives us: * a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros * a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2] * a structured way of reporting pass/fail * uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks * more descriptive error messages: * i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected values are, etc. What this conversion does not do: * change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module) * change the name of the config option Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide for both names, at least for now. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/ [2] Can be run via $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y EOF [16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ... [16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ... [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ======== [16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test [16:56:32] ============================================================ [16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. [16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-04 04:58:35 +08:00
static struct kunit_case list_sort_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(list_sort_test),
{}
};
static struct kunit_suite list_sort_suite = {
.name = "list_sort",
.test_cases = list_sort_cases,
};
kunit_test_suites(&list_sort_suite);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");