2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
FUSE: Filesystem in Userspace
|
2008-11-26 19:03:54 +08:00
|
|
|
Copyright (C) 2001-2008 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This program can be distributed under the terms of the GNU GPL.
|
|
|
|
See the file COPYING.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "fuse_i.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/pagemap.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/slab.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/kernel.h>
|
Detach sched.h from mm.h
First thing mm.h does is including sched.h solely for can_do_mlock() inline
function which has "current" dereference inside. By dealing with can_do_mlock()
mm.h can be detached from sched.h which is good. See below, why.
This patch
a) removes unconditional inclusion of sched.h from mm.h
b) makes can_do_mlock() normal function in mm/mlock.c
c) exports can_do_mlock() to not break compilation
d) adds sched.h inclusions back to files that were getting it indirectly.
e) adds less bloated headers to some files (asm/signal.h, jiffies.h) that were
getting them indirectly
Net result is:
a) mm.h users would get less code to open, read, preprocess, parse, ... if
they don't need sched.h
b) sched.h stops being dependency for significant number of files:
on x86_64 allmodconfig touching sched.h results in recompile of 4083 files,
after patch it's only 3744 (-8.3%).
Cross-compile tested on
all arm defconfigs, all mips defconfigs, all powerpc defconfigs,
alpha alpha-up
arm
i386 i386-up i386-defconfig i386-allnoconfig
ia64 ia64-up
m68k
mips
parisc parisc-up
powerpc powerpc-up
s390 s390-up
sparc sparc-up
sparc64 sparc64-up
um-x86_64
x86_64 x86_64-up x86_64-defconfig x86_64-allnoconfig
as well as my two usual configs.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-21 05:22:52 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/sched.h>
|
2017-09-27 01:45:33 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/sched/signal.h>
|
2009-04-14 09:54:53 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/module.h>
|
2010-11-30 23:39:27 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/compat.h>
|
2011-07-26 04:35:35 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/swap.h>
|
2013-05-17 21:30:32 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/falloc.h>
|
2015-02-23 00:58:50 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/uio.h>
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:11 +08:00
|
|
|
static struct page **fuse_pages_alloc(unsigned int npages, gfp_t flags,
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_page_desc **desc)
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct page **pages;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pages = kzalloc(npages * (sizeof(struct page *) +
|
|
|
|
sizeof(struct fuse_page_desc)), flags);
|
|
|
|
*desc = (void *) (pages + npages);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return pages;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2009-04-28 22:56:37 +08:00
|
|
|
static int fuse_send_open(struct fuse_conn *fc, u64 nodeid, struct file *file,
|
|
|
|
int opcode, struct fuse_open_out *outargp)
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_open_in inarg;
|
2014-12-12 16:49:05 +08:00
|
|
|
FUSE_ARGS(args);
|
2005-11-07 16:59:51 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
memset(&inarg, 0, sizeof(inarg));
|
2007-10-18 18:07:02 +08:00
|
|
|
inarg.flags = file->f_flags & ~(O_CREAT | O_EXCL | O_NOCTTY);
|
|
|
|
if (!fc->atomic_o_trunc)
|
|
|
|
inarg.flags &= ~O_TRUNC;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:08 +08:00
|
|
|
args.opcode = opcode;
|
|
|
|
args.nodeid = nodeid;
|
|
|
|
args.in_numargs = 1;
|
|
|
|
args.in_args[0].size = sizeof(inarg);
|
|
|
|
args.in_args[0].value = &inarg;
|
|
|
|
args.out_numargs = 1;
|
|
|
|
args.out_args[0].size = sizeof(*outargp);
|
|
|
|
args.out_args[0].value = outargp;
|
2005-11-07 16:59:51 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-12 16:49:05 +08:00
|
|
|
return fuse_simple_request(fc, &args);
|
2005-11-07 16:59:51 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_release_args {
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_args args;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_release_in inarg;
|
|
|
|
struct inode *inode;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *fuse_file_alloc(struct fuse_conn *fc)
|
2005-11-07 16:59:51 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff;
|
2009-04-14 09:54:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-18 03:35:33 +08:00
|
|
|
ff = kzalloc(sizeof(struct fuse_file), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
|
2009-04-14 09:54:49 +08:00
|
|
|
if (unlikely(!ff))
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
2009-04-28 22:56:36 +08:00
|
|
|
ff->fc = fc;
|
2019-09-18 03:35:33 +08:00
|
|
|
ff->release_args = kzalloc(sizeof(*ff->release_args),
|
|
|
|
GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!ff->release_args) {
|
2009-04-14 09:54:49 +08:00
|
|
|
kfree(ff);
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
2005-11-07 16:59:51 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2009-04-14 09:54:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ff->write_entry);
|
2018-10-01 16:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
mutex_init(&ff->readdir.lock);
|
2017-03-03 17:04:03 +08:00
|
|
|
refcount_set(&ff->count, 1);
|
2009-04-14 09:54:49 +08:00
|
|
|
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&ff->polled_node);
|
|
|
|
init_waitqueue_head(&ff->poll_wait);
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-24 17:40:17 +08:00
|
|
|
ff->kh = atomic64_inc_return(&fc->khctr);
|
2009-04-14 09:54:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-11-07 16:59:51 +08:00
|
|
|
return ff;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void fuse_file_free(struct fuse_file *ff)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
kfree(ff->release_args);
|
2018-10-01 16:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
mutex_destroy(&ff->readdir.lock);
|
2005-11-07 16:59:51 +08:00
|
|
|
kfree(ff);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-23 03:08:25 +08:00
|
|
|
static struct fuse_file *fuse_file_get(struct fuse_file *ff)
|
2007-10-17 14:31:00 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2017-03-03 17:04:03 +08:00
|
|
|
refcount_inc(&ff->count);
|
2007-10-17 14:31:00 +08:00
|
|
|
return ff;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
static void fuse_release_end(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_args *args,
|
|
|
|
int error)
|
2007-10-17 14:31:04 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_release_args *ra = container_of(args, typeof(*ra), args);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iput(ra->inode);
|
|
|
|
kfree(ra);
|
2007-10-17 14:31:04 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-12-11 02:54:52 +08:00
|
|
|
static void fuse_file_put(struct fuse_file *ff, bool sync, bool isdir)
|
2007-10-17 14:31:00 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2017-03-03 17:04:03 +08:00
|
|
|
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&ff->count)) {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_args *args = &ff->release_args->args;
|
2009-04-28 22:56:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-08 08:53:17 +08:00
|
|
|
if (isdir ? ff->fc->no_opendir : ff->fc->no_open) {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Do nothing when client does not implement 'open' */
|
|
|
|
fuse_release_end(ff->fc, args, 0);
|
2013-11-05 23:05:52 +08:00
|
|
|
} else if (sync) {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_simple_request(ff->fc, args);
|
|
|
|
fuse_release_end(ff->fc, args, 0);
|
2011-02-25 21:44:58 +08:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
args->end = fuse_release_end;
|
|
|
|
if (fuse_simple_background(ff->fc, args,
|
|
|
|
GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL))
|
|
|
|
fuse_release_end(ff->fc, args, -ENOTCONN);
|
2011-02-25 21:44:58 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2007-10-17 14:31:00 +08:00
|
|
|
kfree(ff);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2009-04-14 09:54:53 +08:00
|
|
|
int fuse_do_open(struct fuse_conn *fc, u64 nodeid, struct file *file,
|
|
|
|
bool isdir)
|
2009-04-28 22:56:37 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff;
|
|
|
|
int opcode = isdir ? FUSE_OPENDIR : FUSE_OPEN;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ff = fuse_file_alloc(fc);
|
|
|
|
if (!ff)
|
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
|
2013-11-05 23:05:52 +08:00
|
|
|
ff->fh = 0;
|
2019-01-29 08:34:34 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Default for no-open */
|
|
|
|
ff->open_flags = FOPEN_KEEP_CACHE | (isdir ? FOPEN_CACHE_DIR : 0);
|
2019-01-08 08:53:17 +08:00
|
|
|
if (isdir ? !fc->no_opendir : !fc->no_open) {
|
2013-11-05 23:05:52 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_open_out outarg;
|
|
|
|
int err;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = fuse_send_open(fc, nodeid, file, opcode, &outarg);
|
|
|
|
if (!err) {
|
|
|
|
ff->fh = outarg.fh;
|
|
|
|
ff->open_flags = outarg.open_flags;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-08 08:53:17 +08:00
|
|
|
} else if (err != -ENOSYS) {
|
2013-11-05 23:05:52 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_file_free(ff);
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2019-01-08 08:53:17 +08:00
|
|
|
if (isdir)
|
|
|
|
fc->no_opendir = 1;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
fc->no_open = 1;
|
2013-11-05 23:05:52 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2009-04-28 22:56:37 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (isdir)
|
2013-11-05 23:05:52 +08:00
|
|
|
ff->open_flags &= ~FOPEN_DIRECT_IO;
|
2009-04-28 22:56:37 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ff->nodeid = nodeid;
|
2017-02-23 03:08:25 +08:00
|
|
|
file->private_data = ff;
|
2009-04-28 22:56:37 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2009-04-14 09:54:53 +08:00
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fuse_do_open);
|
2009-04-28 22:56:37 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 21:10:04 +08:00
|
|
|
static void fuse_link_write_file(struct file *file)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* file may be written through mmap, so chain it onto the
|
|
|
|
* inodes's write_file list
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&fi->lock);
|
2013-10-10 21:10:04 +08:00
|
|
|
if (list_empty(&ff->write_entry))
|
|
|
|
list_add(&ff->write_entry, &fi->write_files);
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
|
2013-10-10 21:10:04 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2009-04-28 22:56:37 +08:00
|
|
|
void fuse_finish_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
|
2005-11-07 16:59:51 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2009-04-28 22:56:37 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
|
2010-11-25 04:57:00 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
2009-04-28 22:56:37 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!(ff->open_flags & FOPEN_KEEP_CACHE))
|
2007-10-17 14:31:01 +08:00
|
|
|
invalidate_inode_pages2(inode->i_mapping);
|
2019-04-24 15:13:57 +08:00
|
|
|
if (ff->open_flags & FOPEN_STREAM)
|
|
|
|
stream_open(inode, file);
|
|
|
|
else if (ff->open_flags & FOPEN_NONSEEKABLE)
|
2008-10-16 22:08:57 +08:00
|
|
|
nonseekable_open(inode, file);
|
2010-11-25 04:57:00 +08:00
|
|
|
if (fc->atomic_o_trunc && (file->f_flags & O_TRUNC)) {
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&fi->lock);
|
2018-11-09 18:33:17 +08:00
|
|
|
fi->attr_version = atomic64_inc_return(&fc->attr_version);
|
2010-11-25 04:57:00 +08:00
|
|
|
i_size_write(inode, 0);
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
|
2010-11-25 04:57:00 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_invalidate_attr(inode);
|
2014-04-28 20:19:22 +08:00
|
|
|
if (fc->writeback_cache)
|
|
|
|
file_update_time(file);
|
2010-11-25 04:57:00 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2013-10-10 21:12:18 +08:00
|
|
|
if ((file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE) && fc->writeback_cache)
|
|
|
|
fuse_link_write_file(file);
|
2005-11-07 16:59:51 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2009-04-28 22:56:37 +08:00
|
|
|
int fuse_open_common(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, bool isdir)
|
2005-11-07 16:59:51 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
int err;
|
2019-10-23 20:26:37 +08:00
|
|
|
bool is_wb_truncate = (file->f_flags & O_TRUNC) &&
|
2014-04-28 20:19:22 +08:00
|
|
|
fc->atomic_o_trunc &&
|
|
|
|
fc->writeback_cache;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = generic_file_open(inode, file);
|
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-23 20:26:37 +08:00
|
|
|
if (is_wb_truncate) {
|
2016-01-23 04:40:57 +08:00
|
|
|
inode_lock(inode);
|
2019-10-23 20:26:37 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_set_nowrite(inode);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-04-28 20:19:22 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-04-28 22:56:37 +08:00
|
|
|
err = fuse_do_open(fc, get_node_id(inode), file, isdir);
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-04-28 20:19:22 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!err)
|
|
|
|
fuse_finish_open(inode, file);
|
2009-04-28 22:56:37 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-10-23 20:26:37 +08:00
|
|
|
if (is_wb_truncate) {
|
|
|
|
fuse_release_nowrite(inode);
|
2016-01-23 04:40:57 +08:00
|
|
|
inode_unlock(inode);
|
2019-10-23 20:26:37 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-04-28 20:19:22 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-09 18:33:11 +08:00
|
|
|
static void fuse_prepare_release(struct fuse_inode *fi, struct fuse_file *ff,
|
|
|
|
int flags, int opcode)
|
2006-01-17 14:14:42 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2009-04-28 22:56:39 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = ff->fc;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_release_args *ra = ff->release_args;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Inode is NULL on error path of fuse_create_open() */
|
|
|
|
if (likely(fi)) {
|
|
|
|
spin_lock(&fi->lock);
|
|
|
|
list_del(&ff->write_entry);
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2009-04-28 22:56:39 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&fc->lock);
|
|
|
|
if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&ff->polled_node))
|
|
|
|
rb_erase(&ff->polled_node, &fc->polled_files);
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-02 08:43:52 +08:00
|
|
|
wake_up_interruptible_all(&ff->poll_wait);
|
2009-04-28 22:56:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
ra->inarg.fh = ff->fh;
|
|
|
|
ra->inarg.flags = flags;
|
|
|
|
ra->args.in_numargs = 1;
|
|
|
|
ra->args.in_args[0].size = sizeof(struct fuse_release_in);
|
|
|
|
ra->args.in_args[0].value = &ra->inarg;
|
|
|
|
ra->args.opcode = opcode;
|
|
|
|
ra->args.nodeid = ff->nodeid;
|
|
|
|
ra->args.force = true;
|
|
|
|
ra->args.nocreds = true;
|
2005-11-07 16:59:51 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-12-11 02:54:52 +08:00
|
|
|
void fuse_release_common(struct file *file, bool isdir)
|
2005-11-07 16:59:51 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-11-09 18:33:11 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(file_inode(file));
|
2017-02-23 03:08:25 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_release_args *ra = ff->release_args;
|
2018-12-11 02:54:52 +08:00
|
|
|
int opcode = isdir ? FUSE_RELEASEDIR : FUSE_RELEASE;
|
2009-04-14 09:54:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-09 18:33:11 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_prepare_release(fi, ff, file->f_flags, opcode);
|
2009-04-14 09:54:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-08-08 22:08:08 +08:00
|
|
|
if (ff->flock) {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
ra->inarg.release_flags |= FUSE_RELEASE_FLOCK_UNLOCK;
|
|
|
|
ra->inarg.lock_owner = fuse_lock_owner_id(ff->fc,
|
|
|
|
(fl_owner_t) file);
|
2011-08-08 22:08:08 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-12-12 16:49:04 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Hold inode until release is finished */
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
ra->inode = igrab(file_inode(file));
|
2009-04-14 09:54:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Normally this will send the RELEASE request, however if
|
|
|
|
* some asynchronous READ or WRITE requests are outstanding,
|
|
|
|
* the sending will be delayed.
|
2011-02-25 21:44:58 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Make the release synchronous if this is a fuseblk mount,
|
|
|
|
* synchronous RELEASE is allowed (and desirable) in this case
|
|
|
|
* because the server can be trusted not to screw up.
|
2009-04-14 09:54:49 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_file_put(ff, ff->fc->destroy, isdir);
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-10 04:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
static int fuse_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2009-04-28 22:56:37 +08:00
|
|
|
return fuse_open_common(inode, file, false);
|
2005-09-10 04:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int fuse_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2013-10-10 21:19:06 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* see fuse_vma_close() for !writeback_cache case */
|
|
|
|
if (fc->writeback_cache)
|
2014-04-28 20:19:23 +08:00
|
|
|
write_inode_now(inode, 1);
|
2013-12-26 23:51:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-12-11 02:54:52 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_release_common(file, false);
|
2009-04-28 22:56:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* return value is ignored by VFS */
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-09 18:33:11 +08:00
|
|
|
void fuse_sync_release(struct fuse_inode *fi, struct fuse_file *ff, int flags)
|
2009-04-28 22:56:39 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2017-03-03 17:04:03 +08:00
|
|
|
WARN_ON(refcount_read(&ff->count) > 1);
|
2018-11-09 18:33:11 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_prepare_release(fi, ff, flags, FUSE_RELEASE);
|
2017-02-23 03:08:25 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* iput(NULL) is a no-op and since the refcount is 1 and everything's
|
|
|
|
* synchronous, we are fine with not doing igrab() here"
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2018-12-11 02:54:52 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_file_put(ff, true, false);
|
2005-09-10 04:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2009-04-14 09:54:53 +08:00
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fuse_sync_release);
|
2005-09-10 04:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2006-06-25 20:48:55 +08:00
|
|
|
* Scramble the ID space with XTEA, so that the value of the files_struct
|
|
|
|
* pointer is not exposed to userspace.
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2007-10-18 18:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
u64 fuse_lock_owner_id(struct fuse_conn *fc, fl_owner_t id)
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2006-06-25 20:48:55 +08:00
|
|
|
u32 *k = fc->scramble_key;
|
|
|
|
u64 v = (unsigned long) id;
|
|
|
|
u32 v0 = v;
|
|
|
|
u32 v1 = v >> 32;
|
|
|
|
u32 sum = 0;
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
|
|
|
|
v0 += ((v1 << 4 ^ v1 >> 5) + v1) ^ (sum + k[sum & 3]);
|
|
|
|
sum += 0x9E3779B9;
|
|
|
|
v1 += ((v0 << 4 ^ v0 >> 5) + v0) ^ (sum + k[sum>>11 & 3]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (u64) v0 + ((u64) v1 << 32);
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_writepage_args {
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_io_args ia;
|
|
|
|
struct list_head writepages_entry;
|
|
|
|
struct list_head queue_entry;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_writepage_args *next;
|
|
|
|
struct inode *inode;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static struct fuse_writepage_args *fuse_find_writeback(struct fuse_inode *fi,
|
2019-01-16 17:27:59 +08:00
|
|
|
pgoff_t idx_from, pgoff_t idx_to)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_writepage_args *wpa;
|
2019-01-16 17:27:59 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
list_for_each_entry(wpa, &fi->writepages, writepages_entry) {
|
2019-01-16 17:27:59 +08:00
|
|
|
pgoff_t curr_index;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
WARN_ON(get_fuse_inode(wpa->inode) != fi);
|
|
|
|
curr_index = wpa->ia.write.in.offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
|
|
|
|
if (idx_from < curr_index + wpa->ia.ap.num_pages &&
|
2019-01-16 17:27:59 +08:00
|
|
|
curr_index <= idx_to) {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
return wpa;
|
2019-01-16 17:27:59 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2013-10-10 21:12:05 +08:00
|
|
|
* Check if any page in a range is under writeback
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This is currently done by walking the list of writepage requests
|
|
|
|
* for the inode, which can be pretty inefficient.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2013-10-10 21:12:05 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool fuse_range_is_writeback(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t idx_from,
|
|
|
|
pgoff_t idx_to)
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
|
2019-01-16 17:27:59 +08:00
|
|
|
bool found;
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&fi->lock);
|
2019-01-16 17:27:59 +08:00
|
|
|
found = fuse_find_writeback(fi, idx_from, idx_to);
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return found;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 21:12:05 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline bool fuse_page_is_writeback(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return fuse_range_is_writeback(inode, index, index);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Wait for page writeback to be completed.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Since fuse doesn't rely on the VM writeback tracking, this has to
|
|
|
|
* use some other means.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2019-07-22 15:17:17 +08:00
|
|
|
static void fuse_wait_on_page_writeback(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index)
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wait_event(fi->page_waitq, !fuse_page_is_writeback(inode, index));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 21:11:54 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Wait for all pending writepages on the inode to finish.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This is currently done by blocking further writes with FUSE_NOWRITE
|
|
|
|
* and waiting for all sent writes to complete.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This must be called under i_mutex, otherwise the FUSE_NOWRITE usage
|
|
|
|
* could conflict with truncation.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static void fuse_sync_writes(struct inode *inode)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
fuse_set_nowrite(inode);
|
|
|
|
fuse_release_nowrite(inode);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-23 17:05:12 +08:00
|
|
|
static int fuse_flush(struct file *file, fl_owner_t id)
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-02-28 05:59:05 +08:00
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_flush_in inarg;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:08 +08:00
|
|
|
FUSE_ARGS(args);
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
int err;
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-06 16:19:39 +08:00
|
|
|
if (is_bad_inode(inode))
|
|
|
|
return -EIO;
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
if (fc->no_flush)
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-28 20:19:23 +08:00
|
|
|
err = write_inode_now(inode, 1);
|
2013-10-10 21:11:54 +08:00
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-01-23 04:40:57 +08:00
|
|
|
inode_lock(inode);
|
2013-10-10 21:11:54 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_sync_writes(inode);
|
2016-01-23 04:40:57 +08:00
|
|
|
inode_unlock(inode);
|
2013-10-10 21:11:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-29 20:10:57 +08:00
|
|
|
err = filemap_check_errors(file->f_mapping);
|
2016-07-20 09:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
memset(&inarg, 0, sizeof(inarg));
|
|
|
|
inarg.fh = ff->fh;
|
2006-06-25 20:48:55 +08:00
|
|
|
inarg.lock_owner = fuse_lock_owner_id(fc, id);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:08 +08:00
|
|
|
args.opcode = FUSE_FLUSH;
|
|
|
|
args.nodeid = get_node_id(inode);
|
|
|
|
args.in_numargs = 1;
|
|
|
|
args.in_args[0].size = sizeof(inarg);
|
|
|
|
args.in_args[0].value = &inarg;
|
|
|
|
args.force = true;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = fuse_simple_request(fc, &args);
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
if (err == -ENOSYS) {
|
|
|
|
fc->no_flush = 1;
|
|
|
|
err = 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-07-17 08:44:56 +08:00
|
|
|
int fuse_fsync_common(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end,
|
2018-12-03 17:14:43 +08:00
|
|
|
int datasync, int opcode)
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2010-05-26 23:53:25 +08:00
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
|
2014-12-12 16:49:05 +08:00
|
|
|
FUSE_ARGS(args);
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_fsync_in inarg;
|
2018-12-03 17:14:43 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
memset(&inarg, 0, sizeof(inarg));
|
|
|
|
inarg.fh = ff->fh;
|
2019-04-20 05:42:44 +08:00
|
|
|
inarg.fsync_flags = datasync ? FUSE_FSYNC_FDATASYNC : 0;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:08 +08:00
|
|
|
args.opcode = opcode;
|
|
|
|
args.nodeid = get_node_id(inode);
|
|
|
|
args.in_numargs = 1;
|
|
|
|
args.in_args[0].size = sizeof(inarg);
|
|
|
|
args.in_args[0].value = &inarg;
|
2018-12-03 17:14:43 +08:00
|
|
|
return fuse_simple_request(fc, &args);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int fuse_fsync(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end,
|
|
|
|
int datasync)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
int err;
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-06 16:19:39 +08:00
|
|
|
if (is_bad_inode(inode))
|
|
|
|
return -EIO;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-01-23 04:40:57 +08:00
|
|
|
inode_lock(inode);
|
2011-07-17 08:44:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Start writeback against all dirty pages of the inode, then
|
|
|
|
* wait for all outstanding writes, before sending the FSYNC
|
|
|
|
* request.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2017-07-22 21:27:43 +08:00
|
|
|
err = file_write_and_wait_range(file, start, end);
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
if (err)
|
2011-07-17 08:44:56 +08:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse_sync_writes(inode);
|
2016-07-20 03:48:01 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Due to implementation of fuse writeback
|
2017-07-22 21:27:43 +08:00
|
|
|
* file_write_and_wait_range() does not catch errors.
|
2016-07-20 03:48:01 +08:00
|
|
|
* We have to do this directly after fuse_sync_writes()
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2017-07-22 21:27:43 +08:00
|
|
|
err = file_check_and_advance_wb_err(file);
|
2016-07-20 03:48:01 +08:00
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-28 20:19:23 +08:00
|
|
|
err = sync_inode_metadata(inode, 1);
|
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-12-03 17:14:43 +08:00
|
|
|
if (fc->no_fsync)
|
2014-04-28 20:19:23 +08:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
2013-12-26 23:51:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-12-03 17:14:43 +08:00
|
|
|
err = fuse_fsync_common(file, start, end, datasync, FUSE_FSYNC);
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
if (err == -ENOSYS) {
|
2018-12-03 17:14:43 +08:00
|
|
|
fc->no_fsync = 1;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
err = 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2011-07-17 08:44:56 +08:00
|
|
|
out:
|
2016-01-23 04:40:57 +08:00
|
|
|
inode_unlock(inode);
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-12-03 17:14:43 +08:00
|
|
|
return err;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:38 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
void fuse_read_args_fill(struct fuse_io_args *ia, struct file *file, loff_t pos,
|
|
|
|
size_t count, int opcode)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_args *args = &ia->ap.args;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ia->read.in.fh = ff->fh;
|
|
|
|
ia->read.in.offset = pos;
|
|
|
|
ia->read.in.size = count;
|
|
|
|
ia->read.in.flags = file->f_flags;
|
|
|
|
args->opcode = opcode;
|
|
|
|
args->nodeid = ff->nodeid;
|
|
|
|
args->in_numargs = 1;
|
|
|
|
args->in_args[0].size = sizeof(ia->read.in);
|
|
|
|
args->in_args[0].value = &ia->read.in;
|
|
|
|
args->out_argvar = true;
|
|
|
|
args->out_numargs = 1;
|
|
|
|
args->out_args[0].size = count;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
static void fuse_release_user_pages(struct fuse_args_pages *ap,
|
|
|
|
bool should_dirty)
|
2012-12-14 23:20:25 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned int i;
|
2012-12-14 23:20:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < ap->num_pages; i++) {
|
2016-08-25 00:17:04 +08:00
|
|
|
if (should_dirty)
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
set_page_dirty_lock(ap->pages[i]);
|
|
|
|
put_page(ap->pages[i]);
|
2012-12-14 23:20:25 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-12 00:35:34 +08:00
|
|
|
static void fuse_io_release(struct kref *kref)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
kfree(container_of(kref, struct fuse_io_priv, refcnt));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-02 21:59:43 +08:00
|
|
|
static ssize_t fuse_get_res_by_io(struct fuse_io_priv *io)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (io->err)
|
|
|
|
return io->err;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (io->bytes >= 0 && io->write)
|
|
|
|
return -EIO;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return io->bytes < 0 ? io->size : io->bytes;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2012-12-14 23:20:41 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* In case of short read, the caller sets 'pos' to the position of
|
|
|
|
* actual end of fuse request in IO request. Otherwise, if bytes_requested
|
|
|
|
* == bytes_transferred or rw == WRITE, the caller sets 'pos' to -1.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* An example:
|
|
|
|
* User requested DIO read of 64K. It was splitted into two 32K fuse requests,
|
|
|
|
* both submitted asynchronously. The first of them was ACKed by userspace as
|
|
|
|
* fully completed (req->out.args[0].size == 32K) resulting in pos == -1. The
|
|
|
|
* second request was ACKed as short, e.g. only 1K was read, resulting in
|
|
|
|
* pos == 33K.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Thus, when all fuse requests are completed, the minimal non-negative 'pos'
|
|
|
|
* will be equal to the length of the longest contiguous fragment of
|
|
|
|
* transferred data starting from the beginning of IO request.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static void fuse_aio_complete(struct fuse_io_priv *io, int err, ssize_t pos)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int left;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spin_lock(&io->lock);
|
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
|
|
io->err = io->err ? : err;
|
|
|
|
else if (pos >= 0 && (io->bytes < 0 || pos < io->bytes))
|
|
|
|
io->bytes = pos;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
left = --io->reqs;
|
2016-04-07 19:48:11 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!left && io->blocking)
|
2015-02-02 21:59:43 +08:00
|
|
|
complete(io->done);
|
2012-12-14 23:20:41 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&io->lock);
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-07 19:48:11 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!left && !io->blocking) {
|
2015-02-02 21:59:43 +08:00
|
|
|
ssize_t res = fuse_get_res_by_io(io);
|
2012-12-14 23:20:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-02 21:59:43 +08:00
|
|
|
if (res >= 0) {
|
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = file_inode(io->iocb->ki_filp);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
|
2012-12-14 23:20:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&fi->lock);
|
2018-11-09 18:33:17 +08:00
|
|
|
fi->attr_version = atomic64_inc_return(&fc->attr_version);
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
|
2012-12-14 23:20:41 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-02 21:49:06 +08:00
|
|
|
io->iocb->ki_complete(io->iocb, res, 0);
|
2012-12-14 23:20:41 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2016-03-12 00:35:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kref_put(&io->refcnt, fuse_io_release);
|
2012-12-14 23:20:41 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
static struct fuse_io_args *fuse_io_alloc(struct fuse_io_priv *io,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int npages)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_io_args *ia;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ia = kzalloc(sizeof(*ia), GFP_KERNEL);
|
|
|
|
if (ia) {
|
|
|
|
ia->io = io;
|
|
|
|
ia->ap.pages = fuse_pages_alloc(npages, GFP_KERNEL,
|
|
|
|
&ia->ap.descs);
|
|
|
|
if (!ia->ap.pages) {
|
|
|
|
kfree(ia);
|
|
|
|
ia = NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return ia;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void fuse_io_free(struct fuse_io_args *ia)
|
2012-12-14 23:20:41 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
kfree(ia->ap.pages);
|
|
|
|
kfree(ia);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void fuse_aio_complete_req(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_args *args,
|
|
|
|
int err)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_io_args *ia = container_of(args, typeof(*ia), ap.args);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_io_priv *io = ia->io;
|
2012-12-14 23:20:41 +08:00
|
|
|
ssize_t pos = -1;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_release_user_pages(&ia->ap, io->should_dirty);
|
2012-12-14 23:20:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
if (err) {
|
|
|
|
/* Nothing */
|
|
|
|
} else if (io->write) {
|
|
|
|
if (ia->write.out.size > ia->write.in.size) {
|
|
|
|
err = -EIO;
|
|
|
|
} else if (ia->write.in.size != ia->write.out.size) {
|
|
|
|
pos = ia->write.in.offset - io->offset +
|
|
|
|
ia->write.out.size;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2012-12-14 23:20:41 +08:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
u32 outsize = args->out_args[0].size;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (ia->read.in.size != outsize)
|
|
|
|
pos = ia->read.in.offset - io->offset + outsize;
|
2012-12-14 23:20:41 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_aio_complete(io, err, pos);
|
|
|
|
fuse_io_free(ia);
|
2012-12-14 23:20:41 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
static ssize_t fuse_async_req_send(struct fuse_conn *fc,
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_io_args *ia, size_t num_bytes)
|
2012-12-14 23:20:41 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
ssize_t err;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_io_priv *io = ia->io;
|
|
|
|
|
2012-12-14 23:20:41 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&io->lock);
|
2016-03-12 00:35:34 +08:00
|
|
|
kref_get(&io->refcnt);
|
2012-12-14 23:20:41 +08:00
|
|
|
io->size += num_bytes;
|
|
|
|
io->reqs++;
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&io->lock);
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
ia->ap.args.end = fuse_aio_complete_req;
|
|
|
|
err = fuse_simple_background(fc, &ia->ap.args, GFP_KERNEL);
|
2019-11-26 03:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
|
|
fuse_aio_complete_req(fc, &ia->ap.args, err);
|
2012-12-14 23:20:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-11-26 03:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
return num_bytes;
|
2012-12-14 23:20:41 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
static ssize_t fuse_send_read(struct fuse_io_args *ia, loff_t pos, size_t count,
|
|
|
|
fl_owner_t owner)
|
2005-09-10 04:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct file *file = ia->io->iocb->ki_filp;
|
2009-04-28 22:56:37 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = ff->fc;
|
2007-10-18 18:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_read_args_fill(ia, file, pos, count, FUSE_READ);
|
2007-10-18 18:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
if (owner != NULL) {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
ia->read.in.read_flags |= FUSE_READ_LOCKOWNER;
|
|
|
|
ia->read.in.lock_owner = fuse_lock_owner_id(fc, owner);
|
2007-10-18 18:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2012-12-14 23:20:51 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
if (ia->io->async)
|
|
|
|
return fuse_async_req_send(fc, ia, count);
|
2012-12-14 23:20:51 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
return fuse_simple_request(fc, &ia->ap.args);
|
2005-09-10 04:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2008-04-30 15:54:43 +08:00
|
|
|
static void fuse_read_update_size(struct inode *inode, loff_t size,
|
|
|
|
u64 attr_ver)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&fi->lock);
|
fuse: hotfix truncate_pagecache() issue
The way how fuse calls truncate_pagecache() from fuse_change_attributes()
is completely wrong. Because, w/o i_mutex held, we never sure whether
'oldsize' and 'attr->size' are valid by the time of execution of
truncate_pagecache(inode, oldsize, attr->size). In fact, as soon as we
released fc->lock in the middle of fuse_change_attributes(), we completely
loose control of actions which may happen with given inode until we reach
truncate_pagecache. The list of potentially dangerous actions includes
mmap-ed reads and writes, ftruncate(2) and write(2) extending file size.
The typical outcome of doing truncate_pagecache() with outdated arguments
is data corruption from user point of view. This is (in some sense)
acceptable in cases when the issue is triggered by a change of the file on
the server (i.e. externally wrt fuse operation), but it is absolutely
intolerable in scenarios when a single fuse client modifies a file without
any external intervention. A real life case I discovered by fsx-linux
looked like this:
1. Shrinking ftruncate(2) comes to fuse_do_setattr(). The latter sends
FUSE_SETATTR to the server synchronously, but before getting fc->lock ...
2. fuse_dentry_revalidate() is asynchronously called. It sends FUSE_LOOKUP
to the server synchronously, then calls fuse_change_attributes(). The
latter updates i_size, releases fc->lock, but before comparing oldsize vs
attr->size..
3. fuse_do_setattr() from the first step proceeds by acquiring fc->lock and
updating attributes and i_size, but now oldsize is equal to
outarg.attr.size because i_size has just been updated (step 2). Hence,
fuse_do_setattr() returns w/o calling truncate_pagecache().
4. As soon as ftruncate(2) completes, the user extends file size by
write(2) making a hole in the middle of file, then reads data from the hole
either by read(2) or mmap-ed read. The user expects to get zero data from
the hole, but gets stale data because truncate_pagecache() is not executed
yet.
The scenario above illustrates one side of the problem: not truncating the
page cache even though we should. Another side corresponds to truncating
page cache too late, when the state of inode changed significantly.
Theoretically, the following is possible:
1. As in the previous scenario fuse_dentry_revalidate() discovered that
i_size changed (due to our own fuse_do_setattr()) and is going to call
truncate_pagecache() for some 'new_size' it believes valid right now. But
by the time that particular truncate_pagecache() is called ...
2. fuse_do_setattr() returns (either having called truncate_pagecache() or
not -- it doesn't matter).
3. The file is extended either by write(2) or ftruncate(2) or fallocate(2).
4. mmap-ed write makes a page in the extended region dirty.
The result will be the lost of data user wrote on the fourth step.
The patch is a hotfix resolving the issue in a simplistic way: let's skip
dangerous i_size update and truncate_pagecache if an operation changing
file size is in progress. This simplistic approach looks correct for the
cases w/o external changes. And to handle them properly, more sophisticated
and intrusive techniques (e.g. NFS-like one) would be required. I'd like to
postpone it until the issue is well discussed on the mailing list(s).
Changed in v2:
- improved patch description to cover both sides of the issue.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2013-08-30 21:06:04 +08:00
|
|
|
if (attr_ver == fi->attr_version && size < inode->i_size &&
|
|
|
|
!test_bit(FUSE_I_SIZE_UNSTABLE, &fi->state)) {
|
2018-11-09 18:33:17 +08:00
|
|
|
fi->attr_version = atomic64_inc_return(&fc->attr_version);
|
2008-04-30 15:54:43 +08:00
|
|
|
i_size_write(inode, size);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
|
2008-04-30 15:54:43 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
static void fuse_short_read(struct inode *inode, u64 attr_ver, size_t num_read,
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_args_pages *ap)
|
2013-10-10 21:10:16 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-10-10 21:10:46 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (fc->writeback_cache) {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* A hole in a file. Some data after the hole are in page cache,
|
|
|
|
* but have not reached the client fs yet. So, the hole is not
|
|
|
|
* present there.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 20:29:47 +08:00
|
|
|
int start_idx = num_read >> PAGE_SHIFT;
|
|
|
|
size_t off = num_read & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
|
2013-10-10 21:10:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = start_idx; i < ap->num_pages; i++) {
|
|
|
|
zero_user_segment(ap->pages[i], off, PAGE_SIZE);
|
2013-10-10 21:10:46 +08:00
|
|
|
off = 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
loff_t pos = page_offset(ap->pages[0]) + num_read;
|
2013-10-10 21:10:46 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_read_update_size(inode, pos, attr_ver);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-10-10 21:10:16 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 21:11:25 +08:00
|
|
|
static int fuse_do_readpage(struct file *file, struct page *page)
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
2008-04-30 15:54:43 +08:00
|
|
|
loff_t pos = page_offset(page);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_page_desc desc = { .length = PAGE_SIZE };
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_io_args ia = {
|
|
|
|
.ap.args.page_zeroing = true,
|
|
|
|
.ap.args.out_pages = true,
|
|
|
|
.ap.num_pages = 1,
|
|
|
|
.ap.pages = &page,
|
|
|
|
.ap.descs = &desc,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
ssize_t res;
|
2008-04-30 15:54:43 +08:00
|
|
|
u64 attr_ver;
|
2006-01-06 16:19:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2011-03-31 09:57:33 +08:00
|
|
|
* Page writeback can extend beyond the lifetime of the
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
* page-cache page, so make sure we read a properly synced
|
|
|
|
* page.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
fuse_wait_on_page_writeback(inode, page->index);
|
|
|
|
|
2008-04-30 15:54:43 +08:00
|
|
|
attr_ver = fuse_get_attr_version(fc);
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-06 23:39:28 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Don't overflow end offset */
|
|
|
|
if (pos + (desc.length - 1) == LLONG_MAX)
|
|
|
|
desc.length--;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_read_args_fill(&ia, file, pos, desc.length, FUSE_READ);
|
|
|
|
res = fuse_simple_request(fc, &ia.ap.args);
|
|
|
|
if (res < 0)
|
|
|
|
return res;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Short read means EOF. If file size is larger, truncate it
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (res < desc.length)
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_short_read(inode, attr_ver, res, &ia.ap);
|
2008-04-30 15:54:43 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
SetPageUptodate(page);
|
2013-10-10 21:11:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2013-10-10 21:11:25 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int fuse_readpage(struct file *file, struct page *page)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
|
|
|
|
int err;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = -EIO;
|
|
|
|
if (is_bad_inode(inode))
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = fuse_do_readpage(file, page);
|
2013-11-05 19:55:43 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_invalidate_atime(inode);
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
out:
|
|
|
|
unlock_page(page);
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
static void fuse_readpages_end(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_args *args,
|
|
|
|
int err)
|
2005-09-10 04:10:33 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2006-01-17 14:14:46 +08:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_io_args *ia = container_of(args, typeof(*ia), ap.args);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_args_pages *ap = &ia->ap;
|
|
|
|
size_t count = ia->read.in.size;
|
|
|
|
size_t num_read = args->out_args[0].size;
|
2010-05-25 21:06:07 +08:00
|
|
|
struct address_space *mapping = NULL;
|
2006-01-17 14:14:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; mapping == NULL && i < ap->num_pages; i++)
|
|
|
|
mapping = ap->pages[i]->mapping;
|
2008-04-30 15:54:43 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 21:06:07 +08:00
|
|
|
if (mapping) {
|
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Short read means EOF. If file size is larger, truncate it
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!err && num_read < count)
|
|
|
|
fuse_short_read(inode, ia->read.attr_ver, num_read, ap);
|
2010-05-25 21:06:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-11-05 19:55:43 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_invalidate_atime(inode);
|
2010-05-25 21:06:07 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2006-01-17 14:14:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < ap->num_pages; i++) {
|
|
|
|
struct page *page = ap->pages[i];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!err)
|
2005-09-10 04:10:33 +08:00
|
|
|
SetPageUptodate(page);
|
2006-01-17 14:14:46 +08:00
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
SetPageError(page);
|
2005-09-10 04:10:33 +08:00
|
|
|
unlock_page(page);
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 20:29:47 +08:00
|
|
|
put_page(page);
|
2005-09-10 04:10:33 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
if (ia->ff)
|
|
|
|
fuse_file_put(ia->ff, false, false);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse_io_free(ia);
|
2006-01-17 14:14:46 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
static void fuse_send_readpages(struct fuse_io_args *ia, struct file *file)
|
2006-01-17 14:14:46 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2009-04-28 22:56:37 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = ff->fc;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_args_pages *ap = &ia->ap;
|
|
|
|
loff_t pos = page_offset(ap->pages[0]);
|
|
|
|
size_t count = ap->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
|
2020-01-16 18:09:36 +08:00
|
|
|
ssize_t res;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
int err;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ap->args.out_pages = true;
|
|
|
|
ap->args.page_zeroing = true;
|
|
|
|
ap->args.page_replace = true;
|
2020-02-06 23:39:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Don't overflow end offset */
|
|
|
|
if (pos + (count - 1) == LLONG_MAX) {
|
|
|
|
count--;
|
|
|
|
ap->descs[ap->num_pages - 1].length--;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
WARN_ON((loff_t) (pos + count) < 0);
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_read_args_fill(ia, file, pos, count, FUSE_READ);
|
|
|
|
ia->read.attr_ver = fuse_get_attr_version(fc);
|
2006-02-01 19:04:40 +08:00
|
|
|
if (fc->async_read) {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
ia->ff = fuse_file_get(ff);
|
|
|
|
ap->args.end = fuse_readpages_end;
|
|
|
|
err = fuse_simple_background(fc, &ap->args, GFP_KERNEL);
|
|
|
|
if (!err)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
2006-02-01 19:04:40 +08:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2020-01-16 18:09:36 +08:00
|
|
|
res = fuse_simple_request(fc, &ap->args);
|
|
|
|
err = res < 0 ? res : 0;
|
2006-02-01 19:04:40 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_readpages_end(fc, &ap->args, err);
|
2005-09-10 04:10:33 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-17 14:31:00 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_fill_data {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_io_args *ia;
|
2007-11-29 08:22:00 +08:00
|
|
|
struct file *file;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:33 +08:00
|
|
|
struct inode *inode;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned int nr_pages;
|
|
|
|
unsigned int max_pages;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:33 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int fuse_readpages_fill(void *_data, struct page *page)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2007-10-17 14:31:00 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_fill_data *data = _data;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_io_args *ia = data->ia;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_args_pages *ap = &ia->ap;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:33 +08:00
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = data->inode;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_wait_on_page_writeback(inode, page->index);
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
if (ap->num_pages &&
|
|
|
|
(ap->num_pages == fc->max_pages ||
|
|
|
|
(ap->num_pages + 1) * PAGE_SIZE > fc->max_read ||
|
|
|
|
ap->pages[ap->num_pages - 1]->index + 1 != page->index)) {
|
|
|
|
data->max_pages = min_t(unsigned int, data->nr_pages,
|
|
|
|
fc->max_pages);
|
|
|
|
fuse_send_readpages(ia, data->file);
|
|
|
|
data->ia = ia = fuse_io_alloc(NULL, data->max_pages);
|
|
|
|
if (!ia) {
|
2005-09-10 04:10:33 +08:00
|
|
|
unlock_page(page);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:33 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
ap = &ia->ap;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:33 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2012-10-26 23:48:51 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
if (WARN_ON(ap->num_pages >= data->max_pages)) {
|
2018-07-19 20:49:39 +08:00
|
|
|
unlock_page(page);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_io_free(ia);
|
2012-10-26 23:48:51 +08:00
|
|
|
return -EIO;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 20:29:47 +08:00
|
|
|
get_page(page);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
ap->pages[ap->num_pages] = page;
|
|
|
|
ap->descs[ap->num_pages].length = PAGE_SIZE;
|
|
|
|
ap->num_pages++;
|
2012-10-26 23:48:51 +08:00
|
|
|
data->nr_pages--;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:33 +08:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int fuse_readpages(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
|
|
|
|
struct list_head *pages, unsigned nr_pages)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
2007-10-17 14:31:00 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_fill_data data;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:33 +08:00
|
|
|
int err;
|
2006-01-06 16:19:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-14 14:24:27 +08:00
|
|
|
err = -EIO;
|
2006-01-06 16:19:39 +08:00
|
|
|
if (is_bad_inode(inode))
|
2006-11-03 14:07:09 +08:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
2006-01-06 16:19:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-11-29 08:22:00 +08:00
|
|
|
data.file = file;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:33 +08:00
|
|
|
data.inode = inode;
|
2012-10-26 23:48:51 +08:00
|
|
|
data.nr_pages = nr_pages;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
data.max_pages = min_t(unsigned int, nr_pages, fc->max_pages);
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
data.ia = fuse_io_alloc(NULL, data.max_pages);
|
|
|
|
err = -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
if (!data.ia)
|
2006-11-03 14:07:09 +08:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:33 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = read_cache_pages(mapping, pages, fuse_readpages_fill, &data);
|
2006-04-11 13:54:49 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!err) {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
if (data.ia->ap.num_pages)
|
|
|
|
fuse_send_readpages(data.ia, file);
|
2006-04-11 13:54:49 +08:00
|
|
|
else
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_io_free(data.ia);
|
2006-04-11 13:54:49 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2006-11-03 14:07:09 +08:00
|
|
|
out:
|
2006-08-14 14:24:27 +08:00
|
|
|
return err;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:33 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-24 17:40:17 +08:00
|
|
|
static ssize_t fuse_cache_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
|
2007-11-29 08:21:59 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping->host;
|
2012-07-17 03:23:50 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
2007-11-29 08:21:59 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-07-17 03:23:50 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* In auto invalidate mode, always update attributes on read.
|
|
|
|
* Otherwise, only update if we attempt to read past EOF (to ensure
|
|
|
|
* i_size is up to date).
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (fc->auto_inval_data ||
|
2014-04-03 02:47:09 +08:00
|
|
|
(iocb->ki_pos + iov_iter_count(to) > i_size_read(inode))) {
|
2007-11-29 08:21:59 +08:00
|
|
|
int err;
|
2017-09-12 22:57:54 +08:00
|
|
|
err = fuse_update_attributes(inode, iocb->ki_filp);
|
2007-11-29 08:21:59 +08:00
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-03 02:47:09 +08:00
|
|
|
return generic_file_read_iter(iocb, to);
|
2007-11-29 08:21:59 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
static void fuse_write_args_fill(struct fuse_io_args *ia, struct fuse_file *ff,
|
|
|
|
loff_t pos, size_t count)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_args *args = &ia->ap.args;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ia->write.in.fh = ff->fh;
|
|
|
|
ia->write.in.offset = pos;
|
|
|
|
ia->write.in.size = count;
|
|
|
|
args->opcode = FUSE_WRITE;
|
|
|
|
args->nodeid = ff->nodeid;
|
|
|
|
args->in_numargs = 2;
|
|
|
|
if (ff->fc->minor < 9)
|
|
|
|
args->in_args[0].size = FUSE_COMPAT_WRITE_IN_SIZE;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
args->in_args[0].size = sizeof(ia->write.in);
|
|
|
|
args->in_args[0].value = &ia->write.in;
|
|
|
|
args->in_args[1].size = count;
|
|
|
|
args->out_numargs = 1;
|
|
|
|
args->out_args[0].size = sizeof(ia->write.out);
|
|
|
|
args->out_args[0].value = &ia->write.out;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static unsigned int fuse_write_flags(struct kiocb *iocb)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned int flags = iocb->ki_filp->f_flags;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DSYNC)
|
|
|
|
flags |= O_DSYNC;
|
|
|
|
if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_SYNC)
|
|
|
|
flags |= O_SYNC;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return flags;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
static ssize_t fuse_send_write(struct fuse_io_args *ia, loff_t pos,
|
|
|
|
size_t count, fl_owner_t owner)
|
2007-10-18 18:07:03 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct kiocb *iocb = ia->io->iocb;
|
2017-09-12 22:57:53 +08:00
|
|
|
struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
|
2009-04-28 22:56:37 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = ff->fc;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_write_in *inarg = &ia->write.in;
|
|
|
|
ssize_t err;
|
2009-04-28 22:56:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_write_args_fill(ia, ff, pos, count);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
inarg->flags = fuse_write_flags(iocb);
|
2007-10-18 18:07:04 +08:00
|
|
|
if (owner != NULL) {
|
|
|
|
inarg->write_flags |= FUSE_WRITE_LOCKOWNER;
|
|
|
|
inarg->lock_owner = fuse_lock_owner_id(fc, owner);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2012-12-14 23:20:51 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
if (ia->io->async)
|
|
|
|
return fuse_async_req_send(fc, ia, count);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = fuse_simple_request(fc, &ia->ap.args);
|
|
|
|
if (!err && ia->write.out.size > count)
|
|
|
|
err = -EIO;
|
2012-12-14 23:20:51 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
return err ?: ia->write.out.size;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-12-26 23:51:11 +08:00
|
|
|
bool fuse_write_update_size(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos)
|
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
|
2013-12-26 23:51:11 +08:00
|
|
|
bool ret = false;
|
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&fi->lock);
|
2018-11-09 18:33:17 +08:00
|
|
|
fi->attr_version = atomic64_inc_return(&fc->attr_version);
|
2013-12-26 23:51:11 +08:00
|
|
|
if (pos > inode->i_size) {
|
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
i_size_write(inode, pos);
|
2013-12-26 23:51:11 +08:00
|
|
|
ret = true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
|
2013-12-26 23:51:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
static ssize_t fuse_send_write_pages(struct fuse_io_args *ia,
|
|
|
|
struct kiocb *iocb, struct inode *inode,
|
|
|
|
loff_t pos, size_t count)
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_args_pages *ap = &ia->ap;
|
|
|
|
struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = ff->fc;
|
|
|
|
unsigned int offset, i;
|
|
|
|
int err;
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < ap->num_pages; i++)
|
|
|
|
fuse_wait_on_page_writeback(inode, ap->pages[i]->index);
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_write_args_fill(ia, ff, pos, count);
|
|
|
|
ia->write.in.flags = fuse_write_flags(iocb);
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
err = fuse_simple_request(fc, &ap->args);
|
2019-11-12 18:49:04 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!err && ia->write.out.size > count)
|
|
|
|
err = -EIO;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
offset = ap->descs[0].offset;
|
|
|
|
count = ia->write.out.size;
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < ap->num_pages; i++) {
|
|
|
|
struct page *page = ap->pages[i];
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!err && !offset && count >= PAGE_SIZE)
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
SetPageUptodate(page);
|
|
|
|
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 20:29:47 +08:00
|
|
|
if (count > PAGE_SIZE - offset)
|
|
|
|
count -= PAGE_SIZE - offset;
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
count = 0;
|
|
|
|
offset = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unlock_page(page);
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 20:29:47 +08:00
|
|
|
put_page(page);
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
return err;
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
static ssize_t fuse_fill_write_pages(struct fuse_args_pages *ap,
|
|
|
|
struct address_space *mapping,
|
|
|
|
struct iov_iter *ii, loff_t pos,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int max_pages)
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(mapping->host);
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 20:29:47 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned offset = pos & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
size_t count = 0;
|
|
|
|
int err;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
ap->args.in_pages = true;
|
|
|
|
ap->descs[0].offset = offset;
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
do {
|
|
|
|
size_t tmp;
|
|
|
|
struct page *page;
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 20:29:47 +08:00
|
|
|
pgoff_t index = pos >> PAGE_SHIFT;
|
|
|
|
size_t bytes = min_t(size_t, PAGE_SIZE - offset,
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
iov_iter_count(ii));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bytes = min_t(size_t, bytes, fc->max_write - count);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
again:
|
|
|
|
err = -EFAULT;
|
|
|
|
if (iov_iter_fault_in_readable(ii, bytes))
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = -ENOMEM;
|
fs: symlink write_begin allocation context fix
With the write_begin/write_end aops, page_symlink was broken because it
could no longer pass a GFP_NOFS type mask into the point where the
allocations happened. They are done in write_begin, which would always
assume that the filesystem can be entered from reclaim. This bug could
cause filesystem deadlocks.
The funny thing with having a gfp_t mask there is that it doesn't really
allow the caller to arbitrarily tinker with the context in which it can be
called. It couldn't ever be GFP_ATOMIC, for example, because it needs to
take the page lock. The only thing any callers care about is __GFP_FS
anyway, so turn that into a single flag.
Add a new flag for write_begin, AOP_FLAG_NOFS. Filesystems can now act on
this flag in their write_begin function. Change __grab_cache_page to
accept a nofs argument as well, to honour that flag (while we're there,
change the name to grab_cache_page_write_begin which is more instructive
and does away with random leading underscores).
This is really a more flexible way to go in the end anyway -- if a
filesystem happens to want any extra allocations aside from the pagecache
ones in ints write_begin function, it may now use GFP_KERNEL (rather than
GFP_NOFS) for common case allocations (eg. ocfs2_alloc_write_ctxt, for a
random example).
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix ubifs]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix fuse]
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.28.x]
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[ Cleaned up the calling convention: just pass in the AOP flags
untouched to the grab_cache_page_write_begin() function. That
just simplifies everybody, and may even allow future expansion of the
logic. - Linus ]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-01-05 04:00:53 +08:00
|
|
|
page = grab_cache_page_write_begin(mapping, index, 0);
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!page)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
mm: flush dcache before writing into page to avoid alias
The cache alias problem will happen if the changes of user shared mapping
is not flushed before copying, then user and kernel mapping may be mapped
into two different cache line, it is impossible to guarantee the coherence
after iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic. So the right steps should be:
flush_dcache_page(page);
kmap_atomic(page);
write to page;
kunmap_atomic(page);
flush_dcache_page(page);
More precisely, we might create two new APIs flush_dcache_user_page and
flush_dcache_kern_page to replace the two flush_dcache_page accordingly.
Here is a snippet tested on omap2430 with VIPT cache, and I think it is
not ARM-specific:
int val = 0x11111111;
fd = open("abc", O_RDWR);
addr = mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
*(addr+0) = 0x44444444;
tmp = *(addr+0);
*(addr+1) = 0x77777777;
write(fd, &val, sizeof(int));
close(fd);
The results are not always 0x11111111 0x77777777 at the beginning as expected. Sometimes we see 0x44444444 0x77777777.
Signed-off-by: Anfei <anfei.zhou@gmail.com>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-02-03 05:44:02 +08:00
|
|
|
if (mapping_writably_mapped(mapping))
|
|
|
|
flush_dcache_page(page);
|
|
|
|
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
tmp = iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic(page, ii, offset, bytes);
|
|
|
|
flush_dcache_page(page);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-10-12 21:33:44 +08:00
|
|
|
iov_iter_advance(ii, tmp);
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!tmp) {
|
|
|
|
unlock_page(page);
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 20:29:47 +08:00
|
|
|
put_page(page);
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
bytes = min(bytes, iov_iter_single_seg_count(ii));
|
|
|
|
goto again;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = 0;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
ap->pages[ap->num_pages] = page;
|
|
|
|
ap->descs[ap->num_pages].length = tmp;
|
|
|
|
ap->num_pages++;
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
count += tmp;
|
|
|
|
pos += tmp;
|
|
|
|
offset += tmp;
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 20:29:47 +08:00
|
|
|
if (offset == PAGE_SIZE)
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
offset = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
2008-05-13 05:02:32 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!fc->big_writes)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
} while (iov_iter_count(ii) && count < fc->max_write &&
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
ap->num_pages < max_pages && offset == 0);
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return count > 0 ? count : err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: add max_pages to init_out
Replace FUSE_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ with the configurable parameter max_pages to
improve performance.
Old RFC with detailed description of the problem and many fixes by Mitsuo
Hayasaka (mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@hitachi.com):
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136
We've encountered performance degradation and fixed it on a big and complex
virtual environment.
Environment to reproduce degradation and improvement:
1. Add lag to user mode FUSE
Add nanosleep(&(struct timespec){ 0, 1000 }, NULL); to xmp_write_buf in
passthrough_fh.c
2. patch UM fuse with configurable max_pages parameter. The patch will be
provided latter.
3. run test script and perform test on tmpfs
fuse_test()
{
cd /tmp
mkdir -p fusemnt
passthrough_fh -o max_pages=$1 /tmp/fusemnt
grep fuse /proc/self/mounts
dd conv=fdatasync oflag=dsync if=/dev/zero of=fusemnt/tmp/tmp \
count=1K bs=1M 2>&1 | grep -v records
rm fusemnt/tmp/tmp
killall passthrough_fh
}
Test results:
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.73867 s, 618 MB/s
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,max_pages=256 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.15643 s, 928 MB/s
Obviously with bigger lag the difference between 'before' and 'after'
will be more significant.
Mitsuo Hayasaka, in 2012 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136),
observed improvement from 400-550 to 520-740.
Signed-off-by: Constantine Shulyupin <const@MakeLinux.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2018-09-06 20:37:06 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline unsigned int fuse_wr_pages(loff_t pos, size_t len,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int max_pages)
|
2012-10-26 23:49:00 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
fuse: add max_pages to init_out
Replace FUSE_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ with the configurable parameter max_pages to
improve performance.
Old RFC with detailed description of the problem and many fixes by Mitsuo
Hayasaka (mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@hitachi.com):
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136
We've encountered performance degradation and fixed it on a big and complex
virtual environment.
Environment to reproduce degradation and improvement:
1. Add lag to user mode FUSE
Add nanosleep(&(struct timespec){ 0, 1000 }, NULL); to xmp_write_buf in
passthrough_fh.c
2. patch UM fuse with configurable max_pages parameter. The patch will be
provided latter.
3. run test script and perform test on tmpfs
fuse_test()
{
cd /tmp
mkdir -p fusemnt
passthrough_fh -o max_pages=$1 /tmp/fusemnt
grep fuse /proc/self/mounts
dd conv=fdatasync oflag=dsync if=/dev/zero of=fusemnt/tmp/tmp \
count=1K bs=1M 2>&1 | grep -v records
rm fusemnt/tmp/tmp
killall passthrough_fh
}
Test results:
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.73867 s, 618 MB/s
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,max_pages=256 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.15643 s, 928 MB/s
Obviously with bigger lag the difference between 'before' and 'after'
will be more significant.
Mitsuo Hayasaka, in 2012 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136),
observed improvement from 400-550 to 520-740.
Signed-off-by: Constantine Shulyupin <const@MakeLinux.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2018-09-06 20:37:06 +08:00
|
|
|
return min_t(unsigned int,
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 20:29:47 +08:00
|
|
|
((pos + len - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT) -
|
|
|
|
(pos >> PAGE_SHIFT) + 1,
|
fuse: add max_pages to init_out
Replace FUSE_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ with the configurable parameter max_pages to
improve performance.
Old RFC with detailed description of the problem and many fixes by Mitsuo
Hayasaka (mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@hitachi.com):
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136
We've encountered performance degradation and fixed it on a big and complex
virtual environment.
Environment to reproduce degradation and improvement:
1. Add lag to user mode FUSE
Add nanosleep(&(struct timespec){ 0, 1000 }, NULL); to xmp_write_buf in
passthrough_fh.c
2. patch UM fuse with configurable max_pages parameter. The patch will be
provided latter.
3. run test script and perform test on tmpfs
fuse_test()
{
cd /tmp
mkdir -p fusemnt
passthrough_fh -o max_pages=$1 /tmp/fusemnt
grep fuse /proc/self/mounts
dd conv=fdatasync oflag=dsync if=/dev/zero of=fusemnt/tmp/tmp \
count=1K bs=1M 2>&1 | grep -v records
rm fusemnt/tmp/tmp
killall passthrough_fh
}
Test results:
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.73867 s, 618 MB/s
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,max_pages=256 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.15643 s, 928 MB/s
Obviously with bigger lag the difference between 'before' and 'after'
will be more significant.
Mitsuo Hayasaka, in 2012 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136),
observed improvement from 400-550 to 520-740.
Signed-off-by: Constantine Shulyupin <const@MakeLinux.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2018-09-06 20:37:06 +08:00
|
|
|
max_pages);
|
2012-10-26 23:49:00 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-12 22:57:53 +08:00
|
|
|
static ssize_t fuse_perform_write(struct kiocb *iocb,
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
struct address_space *mapping,
|
|
|
|
struct iov_iter *ii, loff_t pos)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
fuse: hotfix truncate_pagecache() issue
The way how fuse calls truncate_pagecache() from fuse_change_attributes()
is completely wrong. Because, w/o i_mutex held, we never sure whether
'oldsize' and 'attr->size' are valid by the time of execution of
truncate_pagecache(inode, oldsize, attr->size). In fact, as soon as we
released fc->lock in the middle of fuse_change_attributes(), we completely
loose control of actions which may happen with given inode until we reach
truncate_pagecache. The list of potentially dangerous actions includes
mmap-ed reads and writes, ftruncate(2) and write(2) extending file size.
The typical outcome of doing truncate_pagecache() with outdated arguments
is data corruption from user point of view. This is (in some sense)
acceptable in cases when the issue is triggered by a change of the file on
the server (i.e. externally wrt fuse operation), but it is absolutely
intolerable in scenarios when a single fuse client modifies a file without
any external intervention. A real life case I discovered by fsx-linux
looked like this:
1. Shrinking ftruncate(2) comes to fuse_do_setattr(). The latter sends
FUSE_SETATTR to the server synchronously, but before getting fc->lock ...
2. fuse_dentry_revalidate() is asynchronously called. It sends FUSE_LOOKUP
to the server synchronously, then calls fuse_change_attributes(). The
latter updates i_size, releases fc->lock, but before comparing oldsize vs
attr->size..
3. fuse_do_setattr() from the first step proceeds by acquiring fc->lock and
updating attributes and i_size, but now oldsize is equal to
outarg.attr.size because i_size has just been updated (step 2). Hence,
fuse_do_setattr() returns w/o calling truncate_pagecache().
4. As soon as ftruncate(2) completes, the user extends file size by
write(2) making a hole in the middle of file, then reads data from the hole
either by read(2) or mmap-ed read. The user expects to get zero data from
the hole, but gets stale data because truncate_pagecache() is not executed
yet.
The scenario above illustrates one side of the problem: not truncating the
page cache even though we should. Another side corresponds to truncating
page cache too late, when the state of inode changed significantly.
Theoretically, the following is possible:
1. As in the previous scenario fuse_dentry_revalidate() discovered that
i_size changed (due to our own fuse_do_setattr()) and is going to call
truncate_pagecache() for some 'new_size' it believes valid right now. But
by the time that particular truncate_pagecache() is called ...
2. fuse_do_setattr() returns (either having called truncate_pagecache() or
not -- it doesn't matter).
3. The file is extended either by write(2) or ftruncate(2) or fallocate(2).
4. mmap-ed write makes a page in the extended region dirty.
The result will be the lost of data user wrote on the fourth step.
The patch is a hotfix resolving the issue in a simplistic way: let's skip
dangerous i_size update and truncate_pagecache if an operation changing
file size is in progress. This simplistic approach looks correct for the
cases w/o external changes. And to handle them properly, more sophisticated
and intrusive techniques (e.g. NFS-like one) would be required. I'd like to
postpone it until the issue is well discussed on the mailing list(s).
Changed in v2:
- improved patch description to cover both sides of the issue.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2013-08-30 21:06:04 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
int err = 0;
|
|
|
|
ssize_t res = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: hotfix truncate_pagecache() issue
The way how fuse calls truncate_pagecache() from fuse_change_attributes()
is completely wrong. Because, w/o i_mutex held, we never sure whether
'oldsize' and 'attr->size' are valid by the time of execution of
truncate_pagecache(inode, oldsize, attr->size). In fact, as soon as we
released fc->lock in the middle of fuse_change_attributes(), we completely
loose control of actions which may happen with given inode until we reach
truncate_pagecache. The list of potentially dangerous actions includes
mmap-ed reads and writes, ftruncate(2) and write(2) extending file size.
The typical outcome of doing truncate_pagecache() with outdated arguments
is data corruption from user point of view. This is (in some sense)
acceptable in cases when the issue is triggered by a change of the file on
the server (i.e. externally wrt fuse operation), but it is absolutely
intolerable in scenarios when a single fuse client modifies a file without
any external intervention. A real life case I discovered by fsx-linux
looked like this:
1. Shrinking ftruncate(2) comes to fuse_do_setattr(). The latter sends
FUSE_SETATTR to the server synchronously, but before getting fc->lock ...
2. fuse_dentry_revalidate() is asynchronously called. It sends FUSE_LOOKUP
to the server synchronously, then calls fuse_change_attributes(). The
latter updates i_size, releases fc->lock, but before comparing oldsize vs
attr->size..
3. fuse_do_setattr() from the first step proceeds by acquiring fc->lock and
updating attributes and i_size, but now oldsize is equal to
outarg.attr.size because i_size has just been updated (step 2). Hence,
fuse_do_setattr() returns w/o calling truncate_pagecache().
4. As soon as ftruncate(2) completes, the user extends file size by
write(2) making a hole in the middle of file, then reads data from the hole
either by read(2) or mmap-ed read. The user expects to get zero data from
the hole, but gets stale data because truncate_pagecache() is not executed
yet.
The scenario above illustrates one side of the problem: not truncating the
page cache even though we should. Another side corresponds to truncating
page cache too late, when the state of inode changed significantly.
Theoretically, the following is possible:
1. As in the previous scenario fuse_dentry_revalidate() discovered that
i_size changed (due to our own fuse_do_setattr()) and is going to call
truncate_pagecache() for some 'new_size' it believes valid right now. But
by the time that particular truncate_pagecache() is called ...
2. fuse_do_setattr() returns (either having called truncate_pagecache() or
not -- it doesn't matter).
3. The file is extended either by write(2) or ftruncate(2) or fallocate(2).
4. mmap-ed write makes a page in the extended region dirty.
The result will be the lost of data user wrote on the fourth step.
The patch is a hotfix resolving the issue in a simplistic way: let's skip
dangerous i_size update and truncate_pagecache if an operation changing
file size is in progress. This simplistic approach looks correct for the
cases w/o external changes. And to handle them properly, more sophisticated
and intrusive techniques (e.g. NFS-like one) would be required. I'd like to
postpone it until the issue is well discussed on the mailing list(s).
Changed in v2:
- improved patch description to cover both sides of the issue.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2013-08-30 21:06:04 +08:00
|
|
|
if (inode->i_size < pos + iov_iter_count(ii))
|
|
|
|
set_bit(FUSE_I_SIZE_UNSTABLE, &fi->state);
|
|
|
|
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
do {
|
|
|
|
ssize_t count;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_io_args ia = {};
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_args_pages *ap = &ia.ap;
|
fuse: add max_pages to init_out
Replace FUSE_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ with the configurable parameter max_pages to
improve performance.
Old RFC with detailed description of the problem and many fixes by Mitsuo
Hayasaka (mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@hitachi.com):
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136
We've encountered performance degradation and fixed it on a big and complex
virtual environment.
Environment to reproduce degradation and improvement:
1. Add lag to user mode FUSE
Add nanosleep(&(struct timespec){ 0, 1000 }, NULL); to xmp_write_buf in
passthrough_fh.c
2. patch UM fuse with configurable max_pages parameter. The patch will be
provided latter.
3. run test script and perform test on tmpfs
fuse_test()
{
cd /tmp
mkdir -p fusemnt
passthrough_fh -o max_pages=$1 /tmp/fusemnt
grep fuse /proc/self/mounts
dd conv=fdatasync oflag=dsync if=/dev/zero of=fusemnt/tmp/tmp \
count=1K bs=1M 2>&1 | grep -v records
rm fusemnt/tmp/tmp
killall passthrough_fh
}
Test results:
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.73867 s, 618 MB/s
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,max_pages=256 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.15643 s, 928 MB/s
Obviously with bigger lag the difference between 'before' and 'after'
will be more significant.
Mitsuo Hayasaka, in 2012 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136),
observed improvement from 400-550 to 520-740.
Signed-off-by: Constantine Shulyupin <const@MakeLinux.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2018-09-06 20:37:06 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned int nr_pages = fuse_wr_pages(pos, iov_iter_count(ii),
|
|
|
|
fc->max_pages);
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
ap->pages = fuse_pages_alloc(nr_pages, GFP_KERNEL, &ap->descs);
|
|
|
|
if (!ap->pages) {
|
|
|
|
err = -ENOMEM;
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
count = fuse_fill_write_pages(ap, mapping, ii, pos, nr_pages);
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
if (count <= 0) {
|
|
|
|
err = count;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
err = fuse_send_write_pages(&ia, iocb, inode,
|
|
|
|
pos, count);
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!err) {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
size_t num_written = ia.write.out.size;
|
|
|
|
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
res += num_written;
|
|
|
|
pos += num_written;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* break out of the loop on short write */
|
|
|
|
if (num_written != count)
|
|
|
|
err = -EIO;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
kfree(ap->pages);
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
} while (!err && iov_iter_count(ii));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (res > 0)
|
|
|
|
fuse_write_update_size(inode, pos);
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: hotfix truncate_pagecache() issue
The way how fuse calls truncate_pagecache() from fuse_change_attributes()
is completely wrong. Because, w/o i_mutex held, we never sure whether
'oldsize' and 'attr->size' are valid by the time of execution of
truncate_pagecache(inode, oldsize, attr->size). In fact, as soon as we
released fc->lock in the middle of fuse_change_attributes(), we completely
loose control of actions which may happen with given inode until we reach
truncate_pagecache. The list of potentially dangerous actions includes
mmap-ed reads and writes, ftruncate(2) and write(2) extending file size.
The typical outcome of doing truncate_pagecache() with outdated arguments
is data corruption from user point of view. This is (in some sense)
acceptable in cases when the issue is triggered by a change of the file on
the server (i.e. externally wrt fuse operation), but it is absolutely
intolerable in scenarios when a single fuse client modifies a file without
any external intervention. A real life case I discovered by fsx-linux
looked like this:
1. Shrinking ftruncate(2) comes to fuse_do_setattr(). The latter sends
FUSE_SETATTR to the server synchronously, but before getting fc->lock ...
2. fuse_dentry_revalidate() is asynchronously called. It sends FUSE_LOOKUP
to the server synchronously, then calls fuse_change_attributes(). The
latter updates i_size, releases fc->lock, but before comparing oldsize vs
attr->size..
3. fuse_do_setattr() from the first step proceeds by acquiring fc->lock and
updating attributes and i_size, but now oldsize is equal to
outarg.attr.size because i_size has just been updated (step 2). Hence,
fuse_do_setattr() returns w/o calling truncate_pagecache().
4. As soon as ftruncate(2) completes, the user extends file size by
write(2) making a hole in the middle of file, then reads data from the hole
either by read(2) or mmap-ed read. The user expects to get zero data from
the hole, but gets stale data because truncate_pagecache() is not executed
yet.
The scenario above illustrates one side of the problem: not truncating the
page cache even though we should. Another side corresponds to truncating
page cache too late, when the state of inode changed significantly.
Theoretically, the following is possible:
1. As in the previous scenario fuse_dentry_revalidate() discovered that
i_size changed (due to our own fuse_do_setattr()) and is going to call
truncate_pagecache() for some 'new_size' it believes valid right now. But
by the time that particular truncate_pagecache() is called ...
2. fuse_do_setattr() returns (either having called truncate_pagecache() or
not -- it doesn't matter).
3. The file is extended either by write(2) or ftruncate(2) or fallocate(2).
4. mmap-ed write makes a page in the extended region dirty.
The result will be the lost of data user wrote on the fourth step.
The patch is a hotfix resolving the issue in a simplistic way: let's skip
dangerous i_size update and truncate_pagecache if an operation changing
file size is in progress. This simplistic approach looks correct for the
cases w/o external changes. And to handle them properly, more sophisticated
and intrusive techniques (e.g. NFS-like one) would be required. I'd like to
postpone it until the issue is well discussed on the mailing list(s).
Changed in v2:
- improved patch description to cover both sides of the issue.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2013-08-30 21:06:04 +08:00
|
|
|
clear_bit(FUSE_I_SIZE_UNSTABLE, &fi->state);
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_invalidate_attr(inode);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return res > 0 ? res : err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-24 17:40:17 +08:00
|
|
|
static ssize_t fuse_cache_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
|
|
|
|
struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping;
|
|
|
|
ssize_t written = 0;
|
2012-02-18 01:46:25 +08:00
|
|
|
ssize_t written_buffered = 0;
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
|
|
|
|
ssize_t err;
|
2012-02-18 01:46:25 +08:00
|
|
|
loff_t endbyte = 0;
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 21:12:18 +08:00
|
|
|
if (get_fuse_conn(inode)->writeback_cache) {
|
|
|
|
/* Update size (EOF optimization) and mode (SUID clearing) */
|
2017-09-12 22:57:54 +08:00
|
|
|
err = fuse_update_attributes(mapping->host, file);
|
2013-10-10 21:12:18 +08:00
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-04 02:33:23 +08:00
|
|
|
return generic_file_write_iter(iocb, from);
|
2013-10-10 21:12:18 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-01-23 04:40:57 +08:00
|
|
|
inode_lock(inode);
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* We can write back this queue in page reclaim */
|
2015-01-14 17:42:36 +08:00
|
|
|
current->backing_dev_info = inode_to_bdi(inode);
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-10 00:55:47 +08:00
|
|
|
err = generic_write_checks(iocb, from);
|
|
|
|
if (err <= 0)
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-21 22:05:53 +08:00
|
|
|
err = file_remove_privs(file);
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
2012-03-26 21:59:21 +08:00
|
|
|
err = file_update_time(file);
|
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-10 01:52:01 +08:00
|
|
|
if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) {
|
2015-04-10 00:55:47 +08:00
|
|
|
loff_t pos = iocb->ki_pos;
|
2016-04-07 23:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
written = generic_file_direct_write(iocb, from);
|
2014-04-04 02:33:23 +08:00
|
|
|
if (written < 0 || !iov_iter_count(from))
|
2012-02-18 01:46:25 +08:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pos += written;
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-12 22:57:53 +08:00
|
|
|
written_buffered = fuse_perform_write(iocb, mapping, from, pos);
|
2012-02-18 01:46:25 +08:00
|
|
|
if (written_buffered < 0) {
|
|
|
|
err = written_buffered;
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
endbyte = pos + written_buffered - 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = filemap_write_and_wait_range(file->f_mapping, pos,
|
|
|
|
endbyte);
|
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
invalidate_mapping_pages(file->f_mapping,
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 20:29:47 +08:00
|
|
|
pos >> PAGE_SHIFT,
|
|
|
|
endbyte >> PAGE_SHIFT);
|
2012-02-18 01:46:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
written += written_buffered;
|
|
|
|
iocb->ki_pos = pos + written_buffered;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2017-09-12 22:57:53 +08:00
|
|
|
written = fuse_perform_write(iocb, mapping, from, iocb->ki_pos);
|
2012-02-18 01:46:25 +08:00
|
|
|
if (written >= 0)
|
2015-04-10 00:55:47 +08:00
|
|
|
iocb->ki_pos += written;
|
2012-02-18 01:46:25 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
out:
|
|
|
|
current->backing_dev_info = NULL;
|
2016-01-23 04:40:57 +08:00
|
|
|
inode_unlock(inode);
|
2017-09-12 22:57:53 +08:00
|
|
|
if (written > 0)
|
|
|
|
written = generic_write_sync(iocb, written);
|
2008-04-30 15:54:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return written ? written : err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline void fuse_page_descs_length_init(struct fuse_page_desc *descs,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int index,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int nr_pages)
|
2012-10-26 23:49:33 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
2012-10-26 23:50:29 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = index; i < index + nr_pages; i++)
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
descs[i].length = PAGE_SIZE - descs[i].offset;
|
2012-10-26 23:49:33 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2012-10-26 23:50:29 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline unsigned long fuse_get_user_addr(const struct iov_iter *ii)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return (unsigned long)ii->iov->iov_base + ii->iov_offset;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static inline size_t fuse_get_frag_size(const struct iov_iter *ii,
|
|
|
|
size_t max_size)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return min(iov_iter_single_seg_count(ii), max_size);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
static int fuse_get_user_pages(struct fuse_args_pages *ap, struct iov_iter *ii,
|
|
|
|
size_t *nbytesp, int write,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int max_pages)
|
2005-09-10 04:10:35 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2012-10-26 23:50:29 +08:00
|
|
|
size_t nbytes = 0; /* # bytes already packed in req */
|
2016-03-15 12:57:35 +08:00
|
|
|
ssize_t ret = 0;
|
2012-10-26 23:50:15 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-04-02 20:25:34 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Special case for kernel I/O: can copy directly into the buffer */
|
2018-10-22 20:07:28 +08:00
|
|
|
if (iov_iter_is_kvec(ii)) {
|
2012-10-26 23:50:29 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long user_addr = fuse_get_user_addr(ii);
|
|
|
|
size_t frag_size = fuse_get_frag_size(ii, *nbytesp);
|
|
|
|
|
2009-04-02 20:25:34 +08:00
|
|
|
if (write)
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
ap->args.in_args[1].value = (void *) user_addr;
|
2009-04-02 20:25:34 +08:00
|
|
|
else
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
ap->args.out_args[0].value = (void *) user_addr;
|
2009-04-02 20:25:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-10-26 23:50:15 +08:00
|
|
|
iov_iter_advance(ii, frag_size);
|
|
|
|
*nbytesp = frag_size;
|
2009-04-02 20:25:34 +08:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2005-09-10 04:10:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
while (nbytes < *nbytesp && ap->num_pages < max_pages) {
|
2012-10-26 23:50:29 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned npages;
|
2014-03-19 13:16:16 +08:00
|
|
|
size_t start;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
ret = iov_iter_get_pages(ii, &ap->pages[ap->num_pages],
|
2014-09-24 23:09:11 +08:00
|
|
|
*nbytesp - nbytes,
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
max_pages - ap->num_pages,
|
2014-06-19 08:34:33 +08:00
|
|
|
&start);
|
2012-10-26 23:50:29 +08:00
|
|
|
if (ret < 0)
|
2016-03-15 12:57:35 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
2012-10-26 23:50:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-03-17 04:08:30 +08:00
|
|
|
iov_iter_advance(ii, ret);
|
|
|
|
nbytes += ret;
|
2012-10-26 23:50:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-03-17 04:08:30 +08:00
|
|
|
ret += start;
|
|
|
|
npages = (ret + PAGE_SIZE - 1) / PAGE_SIZE;
|
2012-10-26 23:50:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
ap->descs[ap->num_pages].offset = start;
|
|
|
|
fuse_page_descs_length_init(ap->descs, ap->num_pages, npages);
|
2012-10-26 23:50:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
ap->num_pages += npages;
|
|
|
|
ap->descs[ap->num_pages - 1].length -=
|
2014-03-17 04:08:30 +08:00
|
|
|
(PAGE_SIZE - ret) & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
|
2012-10-26 23:50:29 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2009-04-02 20:25:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (write)
|
2020-01-14 20:39:45 +08:00
|
|
|
ap->args.in_pages = true;
|
2009-04-02 20:25:34 +08:00
|
|
|
else
|
2020-01-14 20:39:45 +08:00
|
|
|
ap->args.out_pages = true;
|
2009-04-02 20:25:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-10-26 23:50:29 +08:00
|
|
|
*nbytesp = nbytes;
|
2009-04-02 20:25:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-03-26 01:53:41 +08:00
|
|
|
return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:35 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-03-17 03:50:47 +08:00
|
|
|
ssize_t fuse_direct_io(struct fuse_io_priv *io, struct iov_iter *iter,
|
|
|
|
loff_t *ppos, int flags)
|
2005-09-10 04:10:35 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-10-10 21:12:05 +08:00
|
|
|
int write = flags & FUSE_DIO_WRITE;
|
|
|
|
int cuse = flags & FUSE_DIO_CUSE;
|
2017-09-12 22:57:53 +08:00
|
|
|
struct file *file = io->iocb->ki_filp;
|
2013-10-10 21:12:05 +08:00
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
|
2009-04-28 22:56:37 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = ff->fc;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:35 +08:00
|
|
|
size_t nmax = write ? fc->max_write : fc->max_read;
|
|
|
|
loff_t pos = *ppos;
|
2014-03-17 03:50:47 +08:00
|
|
|
size_t count = iov_iter_count(iter);
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 20:29:47 +08:00
|
|
|
pgoff_t idx_from = pos >> PAGE_SHIFT;
|
|
|
|
pgoff_t idx_to = (pos + count - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:35 +08:00
|
|
|
ssize_t res = 0;
|
2016-03-15 12:57:35 +08:00
|
|
|
int err = 0;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_io_args *ia;
|
|
|
|
unsigned int max_pages;
|
2006-01-06 16:19:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
max_pages = iov_iter_npages(iter, fc->max_pages);
|
|
|
|
ia = fuse_io_alloc(io, max_pages);
|
|
|
|
if (!ia)
|
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
ia->io = io;
|
2013-10-10 21:12:05 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!cuse && fuse_range_is_writeback(inode, idx_from, idx_to)) {
|
|
|
|
if (!write)
|
2016-01-23 04:40:57 +08:00
|
|
|
inode_lock(inode);
|
2013-10-10 21:12:05 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_sync_writes(inode);
|
|
|
|
if (!write)
|
2016-01-23 04:40:57 +08:00
|
|
|
inode_unlock(inode);
|
2013-10-10 21:12:05 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-13 10:26:58 +08:00
|
|
|
io->should_dirty = !write && iter_is_iovec(iter);
|
2005-09-10 04:10:35 +08:00
|
|
|
while (count) {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
ssize_t nres;
|
2009-04-28 22:56:37 +08:00
|
|
|
fl_owner_t owner = current->files;
|
2009-04-02 20:25:34 +08:00
|
|
|
size_t nbytes = min(count, nmax);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = fuse_get_user_pages(&ia->ap, iter, &nbytes, write,
|
|
|
|
max_pages);
|
2016-03-15 12:57:35 +08:00
|
|
|
if (err && !nbytes)
|
2005-09-10 04:10:35 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
2009-04-02 20:25:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-27 15:08:12 +08:00
|
|
|
if (write) {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!capable(CAP_FSETID))
|
|
|
|
ia->write.in.write_flags |= FUSE_WRITE_KILL_PRIV;
|
2019-05-27 15:08:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
nres = fuse_send_write(ia, pos, nbytes, owner);
|
2019-05-27 15:08:12 +08:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
nres = fuse_send_read(ia, pos, nbytes, owner);
|
2019-05-27 15:08:12 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2009-04-28 22:56:37 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!io->async || nres < 0) {
|
|
|
|
fuse_release_user_pages(&ia->ap, io->should_dirty);
|
|
|
|
fuse_io_free(ia);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ia = NULL;
|
|
|
|
if (nres < 0) {
|
2020-02-06 23:39:28 +08:00
|
|
|
iov_iter_revert(iter, nbytes);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
err = nres;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:35 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
WARN_ON(nres > nbytes);
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-10 04:10:35 +08:00
|
|
|
count -= nres;
|
|
|
|
res += nres;
|
|
|
|
pos += nres;
|
2020-02-06 23:39:28 +08:00
|
|
|
if (nres != nbytes) {
|
|
|
|
iov_iter_revert(iter, nbytes - nres);
|
2005-09-10 04:10:35 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
2020-02-06 23:39:28 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2006-04-12 03:16:51 +08:00
|
|
|
if (count) {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
max_pages = iov_iter_npages(iter, fc->max_pages);
|
|
|
|
ia = fuse_io_alloc(io, max_pages);
|
|
|
|
if (!ia)
|
2006-04-12 03:16:51 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2005-09-10 04:10:35 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
if (ia)
|
|
|
|
fuse_io_free(ia);
|
2009-04-28 22:56:36 +08:00
|
|
|
if (res > 0)
|
2005-09-10 04:10:35 +08:00
|
|
|
*ppos = pos;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-15 12:57:35 +08:00
|
|
|
return res > 0 ? res : err;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:35 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2009-04-14 09:54:53 +08:00
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fuse_direct_io);
|
2005-09-10 04:10:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-12-14 23:20:51 +08:00
|
|
|
static ssize_t __fuse_direct_read(struct fuse_io_priv *io,
|
2014-03-17 03:50:47 +08:00
|
|
|
struct iov_iter *iter,
|
|
|
|
loff_t *ppos)
|
2005-09-10 04:10:35 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2009-04-28 22:56:36 +08:00
|
|
|
ssize_t res;
|
2017-09-12 22:57:53 +08:00
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = file_inode(io->iocb->ki_filp);
|
2009-04-28 22:56:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-03-17 03:50:47 +08:00
|
|
|
res = fuse_direct_io(io, iter, ppos, 0);
|
2009-04-28 22:56:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-15 21:43:06 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_invalidate_atime(inode);
|
2009-04-28 22:56:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return res;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:35 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-28 00:48:48 +08:00
|
|
|
static ssize_t fuse_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-03-31 10:08:36 +08:00
|
|
|
static ssize_t fuse_direct_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
|
2012-10-26 23:50:15 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-28 00:48:48 +08:00
|
|
|
ssize_t res;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!is_sync_kiocb(iocb) && iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) {
|
|
|
|
res = fuse_direct_IO(iocb, to);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_io_priv io = FUSE_IO_PRIV_SYNC(iocb);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
res = __fuse_direct_read(&io, to, &iocb->ki_pos);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return res;
|
2012-10-26 23:50:15 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-03-31 10:08:36 +08:00
|
|
|
static ssize_t fuse_direct_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
|
2012-02-18 01:46:25 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2017-09-12 22:57:53 +08:00
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_io_priv io = FUSE_IO_PRIV_SYNC(iocb);
|
2015-03-31 10:08:36 +08:00
|
|
|
ssize_t res;
|
2012-02-18 01:46:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Don't allow parallel writes to the same file */
|
2016-01-23 04:40:57 +08:00
|
|
|
inode_lock(inode);
|
2015-04-10 00:55:47 +08:00
|
|
|
res = generic_write_checks(iocb, from);
|
2018-10-28 00:48:48 +08:00
|
|
|
if (res > 0) {
|
|
|
|
if (!is_sync_kiocb(iocb) && iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) {
|
|
|
|
res = fuse_direct_IO(iocb, from);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
res = fuse_direct_io(&io, from, &iocb->ki_pos,
|
|
|
|
FUSE_DIO_WRITE);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-03-31 10:15:58 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_invalidate_attr(inode);
|
2012-12-14 23:21:08 +08:00
|
|
|
if (res > 0)
|
2015-03-31 10:08:36 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_write_update_size(inode, iocb->ki_pos);
|
2016-01-23 04:40:57 +08:00
|
|
|
inode_unlock(inode);
|
2012-02-18 01:46:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return res;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-24 17:40:17 +08:00
|
|
|
static ssize_t fuse_file_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2019-01-24 17:40:17 +08:00
|
|
|
struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (is_bad_inode(file_inode(file)))
|
|
|
|
return -EIO;
|
2019-01-24 17:40:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!(ff->open_flags & FOPEN_DIRECT_IO))
|
|
|
|
return fuse_cache_read_iter(iocb, to);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
return fuse_direct_read_iter(iocb, to);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static ssize_t fuse_file_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2019-01-24 17:40:17 +08:00
|
|
|
struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (is_bad_inode(file_inode(file)))
|
|
|
|
return -EIO;
|
2019-01-24 17:40:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!(ff->open_flags & FOPEN_DIRECT_IO))
|
|
|
|
return fuse_cache_write_iter(iocb, from);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
return fuse_direct_write_iter(iocb, from);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
static void fuse_writepage_free(struct fuse_writepage_args *wpa)
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_args_pages *ap = &wpa->ia.ap;
|
2013-06-30 01:42:48 +08:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < ap->num_pages; i++)
|
|
|
|
__free_page(ap->pages[i]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (wpa->ia.ff)
|
|
|
|
fuse_file_put(wpa->ia.ff, false, false);
|
2013-10-01 22:44:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
kfree(ap->pages);
|
|
|
|
kfree(wpa);
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
static void fuse_writepage_finish(struct fuse_conn *fc,
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_writepage_args *wpa)
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_args_pages *ap = &wpa->ia.ap;
|
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = wpa->inode;
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
|
2015-01-14 17:42:36 +08:00
|
|
|
struct backing_dev_info *bdi = inode_to_bdi(inode);
|
2013-06-30 01:42:48 +08:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
list_del(&wpa->writepages_entry);
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < ap->num_pages; i++) {
|
2015-05-23 05:13:27 +08:00
|
|
|
dec_wb_stat(&bdi->wb, WB_WRITEBACK);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
dec_node_page_state(ap->pages[i], NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP);
|
2015-05-23 05:13:27 +08:00
|
|
|
wb_writeout_inc(&bdi->wb);
|
2013-06-30 01:42:48 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
wake_up(&fi->page_waitq);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Called under fi->lock, may release and reacquire it */
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
static void fuse_send_writepage(struct fuse_conn *fc,
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_writepage_args *wpa, loff_t size)
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
__releases(fi->lock)
|
|
|
|
__acquires(fi->lock)
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_writepage_args *aux, *next;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(wpa->inode);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_write_in *inarg = &wpa->ia.write.in;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_args *args = &wpa->ia.ap.args;
|
|
|
|
__u64 data_size = wpa->ia.ap.num_pages * PAGE_SIZE;
|
|
|
|
int err;
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
fi->writectr++;
|
2013-06-30 01:42:48 +08:00
|
|
|
if (inarg->offset + data_size <= size) {
|
|
|
|
inarg->size = data_size;
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
} else if (inarg->offset < size) {
|
2013-06-30 01:42:48 +08:00
|
|
|
inarg->size = size - inarg->offset;
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
/* Got truncated off completely */
|
|
|
|
goto out_free;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
args->in_args[1].size = inarg->size;
|
|
|
|
args->force = true;
|
|
|
|
args->nocreds = true;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = fuse_simple_background(fc, args, GFP_ATOMIC);
|
|
|
|
if (err == -ENOMEM) {
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
|
|
|
|
err = fuse_simple_background(fc, args, GFP_NOFS | __GFP_NOFAIL);
|
|
|
|
spin_lock(&fi->lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Fails on broken connection only */
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
if (unlikely(err))
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
goto out_free;
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
out_free:
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
fi->writectr--;
|
|
|
|
fuse_writepage_finish(fc, wpa);
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
|
2019-01-24 17:40:15 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* After fuse_writepage_finish() aux request list is private */
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
for (aux = wpa->next; aux; aux = next) {
|
|
|
|
next = aux->next;
|
|
|
|
aux->next = NULL;
|
|
|
|
fuse_writepage_free(aux);
|
2019-01-24 17:40:15 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_writepage_free(wpa);
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&fi->lock);
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* If fi->writectr is positive (no truncate or fsync going on) send
|
|
|
|
* all queued writepage requests.
|
|
|
|
*
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
* Called with fi->lock
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void fuse_flush_writepages(struct inode *inode)
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
__releases(fi->lock)
|
|
|
|
__acquires(fi->lock)
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
|
2019-04-24 23:05:06 +08:00
|
|
|
loff_t crop = i_size_read(inode);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_writepage_args *wpa;
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (fi->writectr >= 0 && !list_empty(&fi->queued_writes)) {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
wpa = list_entry(fi->queued_writes.next,
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_writepage_args, queue_entry);
|
|
|
|
list_del_init(&wpa->queue_entry);
|
|
|
|
fuse_send_writepage(fc, wpa, crop);
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
static void fuse_writepage_end(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_args *args,
|
|
|
|
int error)
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_writepage_args *wpa =
|
|
|
|
container_of(args, typeof(*wpa), ia.ap.args);
|
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = wpa->inode;
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
mapping_set_error(inode->i_mapping, error);
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&fi->lock);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
while (wpa->next) {
|
2013-10-03 01:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_write_in *inarg = &wpa->ia.write.in;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_writepage_args *next = wpa->next;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wpa->next = next->next;
|
|
|
|
next->next = NULL;
|
|
|
|
next->ia.ff = fuse_file_get(wpa->ia.ff);
|
2013-10-01 22:44:53 +08:00
|
|
|
list_add(&next->writepages_entry, &fi->writepages);
|
2013-10-03 01:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Skip fuse_flush_writepages() to make it easy to crop requests
|
|
|
|
* based on primary request size.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* 1st case (trivial): there are no concurrent activities using
|
|
|
|
* fuse_set/release_nowrite. Then we're on safe side because
|
|
|
|
* fuse_flush_writepages() would call fuse_send_writepage()
|
|
|
|
* anyway.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* 2nd case: someone called fuse_set_nowrite and it is waiting
|
|
|
|
* now for completion of all in-flight requests. This happens
|
|
|
|
* rarely and no more than once per page, so this should be
|
|
|
|
* okay.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* 3rd case: someone (e.g. fuse_do_setattr()) is in the middle
|
|
|
|
* of fuse_set_nowrite..fuse_release_nowrite section. The fact
|
|
|
|
* that fuse_set_nowrite returned implies that all in-flight
|
|
|
|
* requests were completed along with all of their secondary
|
|
|
|
* requests. Further primary requests are blocked by negative
|
|
|
|
* writectr. Hence there cannot be any in-flight requests and
|
|
|
|
* no invocations of fuse_writepage_end() while we're in
|
|
|
|
* fuse_set_nowrite..fuse_release_nowrite section.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
fuse_send_writepage(fc, next, inarg->offset + inarg->size);
|
2013-10-01 22:44:53 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
fi->writectr--;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_writepage_finish(fc, wpa);
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_writepage_free(wpa);
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-28 20:19:23 +08:00
|
|
|
static struct fuse_file *__fuse_write_file_get(struct fuse_conn *fc,
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_inode *fi)
|
2013-06-30 01:42:20 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-10-01 22:44:52 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff = NULL;
|
2013-06-30 01:42:20 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&fi->lock);
|
2014-04-28 20:19:23 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!list_empty(&fi->write_files)) {
|
2013-10-01 22:44:52 +08:00
|
|
|
ff = list_entry(fi->write_files.next, struct fuse_file,
|
|
|
|
write_entry);
|
|
|
|
fuse_file_get(ff);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
|
2013-06-30 01:42:20 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return ff;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-28 20:19:23 +08:00
|
|
|
static struct fuse_file *fuse_write_file_get(struct fuse_conn *fc,
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_inode *fi)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff = __fuse_write_file_get(fc, fi);
|
|
|
|
WARN_ON(!ff);
|
|
|
|
return ff;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int fuse_write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff;
|
|
|
|
int err;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ff = __fuse_write_file_get(fc, fi);
|
2014-04-28 20:19:24 +08:00
|
|
|
err = fuse_flush_times(inode, ff);
|
2014-04-28 20:19:23 +08:00
|
|
|
if (ff)
|
2018-12-11 02:54:52 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_file_put(ff, false, false);
|
2014-04-28 20:19:23 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
static struct fuse_writepage_args *fuse_writepage_args_alloc(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_writepage_args *wpa;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_args_pages *ap;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wpa = kzalloc(sizeof(*wpa), GFP_NOFS);
|
|
|
|
if (wpa) {
|
|
|
|
ap = &wpa->ia.ap;
|
|
|
|
ap->num_pages = 0;
|
|
|
|
ap->pages = fuse_pages_alloc(1, GFP_NOFS, &ap->descs);
|
|
|
|
if (!ap->pages) {
|
|
|
|
kfree(wpa);
|
|
|
|
wpa = NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return wpa;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
static int fuse_writepage_locked(struct page *page)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct address_space *mapping = page->mapping;
|
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_writepage_args *wpa;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_args_pages *ap;
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
struct page *tmp_page;
|
2013-10-01 22:44:52 +08:00
|
|
|
int error = -ENOMEM;
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
set_page_writeback(page);
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
wpa = fuse_writepage_args_alloc();
|
|
|
|
if (!wpa)
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
goto err;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
ap = &wpa->ia.ap;
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tmp_page = alloc_page(GFP_NOFS | __GFP_HIGHMEM);
|
|
|
|
if (!tmp_page)
|
|
|
|
goto err_free;
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-01 22:44:52 +08:00
|
|
|
error = -EIO;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
wpa->ia.ff = fuse_write_file_get(fc, fi);
|
|
|
|
if (!wpa->ia.ff)
|
2014-07-10 19:32:43 +08:00
|
|
|
goto err_nofile;
|
2013-10-01 22:44:52 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_write_args_fill(&wpa->ia, wpa->ia.ff, page_offset(page), 0);
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
copy_highpage(tmp_page, page);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
wpa->ia.write.in.write_flags |= FUSE_WRITE_CACHE;
|
|
|
|
wpa->next = NULL;
|
|
|
|
ap->args.in_pages = true;
|
|
|
|
ap->num_pages = 1;
|
|
|
|
ap->pages[0] = tmp_page;
|
|
|
|
ap->descs[0].offset = 0;
|
|
|
|
ap->descs[0].length = PAGE_SIZE;
|
|
|
|
ap->args.end = fuse_writepage_end;
|
|
|
|
wpa->inode = inode;
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-23 05:13:27 +08:00
|
|
|
inc_wb_stat(&inode_to_bdi(inode)->wb, WB_WRITEBACK);
|
2016-07-29 06:46:20 +08:00
|
|
|
inc_node_page_state(tmp_page, NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP);
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&fi->lock);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
list_add(&wpa->writepages_entry, &fi->writepages);
|
|
|
|
list_add_tail(&wpa->queue_entry, &fi->queued_writes);
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_flush_writepages(inode);
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-08-13 00:39:30 +08:00
|
|
|
end_page_writeback(page);
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-07-10 19:32:43 +08:00
|
|
|
err_nofile:
|
|
|
|
__free_page(tmp_page);
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
err_free:
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
kfree(wpa);
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
err:
|
2017-05-25 18:57:50 +08:00
|
|
|
mapping_set_error(page->mapping, error);
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
end_page_writeback(page);
|
2013-10-01 22:44:52 +08:00
|
|
|
return error;
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int fuse_writepage(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int err;
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-01 22:44:53 +08:00
|
|
|
if (fuse_page_is_writeback(page->mapping->host, page->index)) {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* ->writepages() should be called for sync() and friends. We
|
|
|
|
* should only get here on direct reclaim and then we are
|
|
|
|
* allowed to skip a page which is already in flight
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
WARN_ON(wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
redirty_page_for_writepage(wbc, page);
|
2019-09-13 23:17:11 +08:00
|
|
|
unlock_page(page);
|
2013-10-01 22:44:53 +08:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
err = fuse_writepage_locked(page);
|
|
|
|
unlock_page(page);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_fill_wb_data {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_writepage_args *wpa;
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff;
|
|
|
|
struct inode *inode;
|
2013-08-16 19:51:41 +08:00
|
|
|
struct page **orig_pages;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned int max_pages;
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool fuse_pages_realloc(struct fuse_fill_wb_data *data)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_args_pages *ap = &data->wpa->ia.ap;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(data->inode);
|
|
|
|
struct page **pages;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_page_desc *descs;
|
|
|
|
unsigned int npages = min_t(unsigned int,
|
|
|
|
max_t(unsigned int, data->max_pages * 2,
|
|
|
|
FUSE_DEFAULT_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ),
|
|
|
|
fc->max_pages);
|
|
|
|
WARN_ON(npages <= data->max_pages);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pages = fuse_pages_alloc(npages, GFP_NOFS, &descs);
|
|
|
|
if (!pages)
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
memcpy(pages, ap->pages, sizeof(struct page *) * ap->num_pages);
|
|
|
|
memcpy(descs, ap->descs, sizeof(struct fuse_page_desc) * ap->num_pages);
|
|
|
|
kfree(ap->pages);
|
|
|
|
ap->pages = pages;
|
|
|
|
ap->descs = descs;
|
|
|
|
data->max_pages = npages;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
static void fuse_writepages_send(struct fuse_fill_wb_data *data)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_writepage_args *wpa = data->wpa;
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = data->inode;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
int num_pages = wpa->ia.ap.num_pages;
|
2013-08-16 19:51:41 +08:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
wpa->ia.ff = fuse_file_get(data->ff);
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&fi->lock);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
list_add_tail(&wpa->queue_entry, &fi->queued_writes);
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_flush_writepages(inode);
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
|
2013-08-16 19:51:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < num_pages; i++)
|
|
|
|
end_page_writeback(data->orig_pages[i]);
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-16 17:27:59 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* First recheck under fi->lock if the offending offset is still under
|
2019-01-16 17:27:59 +08:00
|
|
|
* writeback. If yes, then iterate auxiliary write requests, to see if there's
|
|
|
|
* one already added for a page at this offset. If there's none, then insert
|
|
|
|
* this new request onto the auxiliary list, otherwise reuse the existing one by
|
2019-01-16 17:27:59 +08:00
|
|
|
* copying the new page contents over to the old temporary page.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool fuse_writepage_in_flight(struct fuse_writepage_args *new_wpa,
|
2013-10-01 22:44:53 +08:00
|
|
|
struct page *page)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(new_wpa->inode);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_writepage_args *tmp;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_writepage_args *old_wpa;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_args_pages *new_ap = &new_wpa->ia.ap;
|
2013-10-01 22:44:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
WARN_ON(new_ap->num_pages != 0);
|
2013-10-01 22:44:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&fi->lock);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
list_del(&new_wpa->writepages_entry);
|
|
|
|
old_wpa = fuse_find_writeback(fi, page->index, page->index);
|
|
|
|
if (!old_wpa) {
|
|
|
|
list_add(&new_wpa->writepages_entry, &fi->writepages);
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
|
2019-01-16 17:27:59 +08:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
2013-10-02 19:01:07 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2013-10-01 22:44:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
new_ap->num_pages = 1;
|
|
|
|
for (tmp = old_wpa->next; tmp; tmp = tmp->next) {
|
2019-01-16 17:27:59 +08:00
|
|
|
pgoff_t curr_index;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
WARN_ON(tmp->inode != new_wpa->inode);
|
|
|
|
curr_index = tmp->ia.write.in.offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
|
2019-01-16 17:27:59 +08:00
|
|
|
if (curr_index == page->index) {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
WARN_ON(tmp->ia.ap.num_pages != 1);
|
|
|
|
swap(tmp->ia.ap.pages[0], new_ap->pages[0]);
|
2019-01-16 17:27:59 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
2013-10-01 22:44:53 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-16 17:27:59 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!tmp) {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
new_wpa->next = old_wpa->next;
|
|
|
|
old_wpa->next = new_wpa;
|
2019-01-16 17:27:59 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2013-10-03 01:38:43 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
|
2019-01-16 17:27:59 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (tmp) {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct backing_dev_info *bdi = inode_to_bdi(new_wpa->inode);
|
2013-10-01 22:44:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-23 05:13:27 +08:00
|
|
|
dec_wb_stat(&bdi->wb, WB_WRITEBACK);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
dec_node_page_state(new_ap->pages[0], NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP);
|
2015-05-23 05:13:27 +08:00
|
|
|
wb_writeout_inc(&bdi->wb);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_writepage_free(new_wpa);
|
2013-10-01 22:44:53 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-01-16 17:27:59 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-16 17:27:59 +08:00
|
|
|
return true;
|
2013-10-01 22:44:53 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
static int fuse_writepages_fill(struct page *page,
|
|
|
|
struct writeback_control *wbc, void *_data)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_fill_wb_data *data = _data;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_writepage_args *wpa = data->wpa;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_args_pages *ap = &wpa->ia.ap;
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = data->inode;
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
|
|
|
struct page *tmp_page;
|
2013-10-01 22:44:53 +08:00
|
|
|
bool is_writeback;
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
int err;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!data->ff) {
|
|
|
|
err = -EIO;
|
2019-08-19 13:48:26 +08:00
|
|
|
data->ff = fuse_write_file_get(fc, fi);
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!data->ff)
|
|
|
|
goto out_unlock;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-01 22:44:53 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Being under writeback is unlikely but possible. For example direct
|
|
|
|
* read to an mmaped fuse file will set the page dirty twice; once when
|
|
|
|
* the pages are faulted with get_user_pages(), and then after the read
|
|
|
|
* completed.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
is_writeback = fuse_page_is_writeback(inode, page->index);
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
if (wpa && ap->num_pages &&
|
|
|
|
(is_writeback || ap->num_pages == fc->max_pages ||
|
|
|
|
(ap->num_pages + 1) * PAGE_SIZE > fc->max_write ||
|
|
|
|
data->orig_pages[ap->num_pages - 1]->index + 1 != page->index)) {
|
2013-10-01 22:44:53 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_writepages_send(data);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
data->wpa = NULL;
|
|
|
|
} else if (wpa && ap->num_pages == data->max_pages) {
|
|
|
|
if (!fuse_pages_realloc(data)) {
|
2018-10-01 16:07:06 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_writepages_send(data);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
data->wpa = NULL;
|
2018-10-01 16:07:06 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-10-01 16:07:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
err = -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
tmp_page = alloc_page(GFP_NOFS | __GFP_HIGHMEM);
|
|
|
|
if (!tmp_page)
|
|
|
|
goto out_unlock;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* The page must not be redirtied until the writeout is completed
|
|
|
|
* (i.e. userspace has sent a reply to the write request). Otherwise
|
|
|
|
* there could be more than one temporary page instance for each real
|
|
|
|
* page.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This is ensured by holding the page lock in page_mkwrite() while
|
|
|
|
* checking fuse_page_is_writeback(). We already hold the page lock
|
|
|
|
* since clear_page_dirty_for_io() and keep it held until we add the
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
* request to the fi->writepages list and increment ap->num_pages.
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
* After this fuse_page_is_writeback() will indicate that the page is
|
|
|
|
* under writeback, so we can release the page lock.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
if (data->wpa == NULL) {
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
err = -ENOMEM;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
wpa = fuse_writepage_args_alloc();
|
|
|
|
if (!wpa) {
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
__free_page(tmp_page);
|
|
|
|
goto out_unlock;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
data->max_pages = 1;
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
ap = &wpa->ia.ap;
|
|
|
|
fuse_write_args_fill(&wpa->ia, data->ff, page_offset(page), 0);
|
|
|
|
wpa->ia.write.in.write_flags |= FUSE_WRITE_CACHE;
|
|
|
|
wpa->next = NULL;
|
|
|
|
ap->args.in_pages = true;
|
|
|
|
ap->args.end = fuse_writepage_end;
|
|
|
|
ap->num_pages = 0;
|
|
|
|
wpa->inode = inode;
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&fi->lock);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
list_add(&wpa->writepages_entry, &fi->writepages);
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
data->wpa = wpa;
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
set_page_writeback(page);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
copy_highpage(tmp_page, page);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
ap->pages[ap->num_pages] = tmp_page;
|
|
|
|
ap->descs[ap->num_pages].offset = 0;
|
|
|
|
ap->descs[ap->num_pages].length = PAGE_SIZE;
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-23 05:13:27 +08:00
|
|
|
inc_wb_stat(&inode_to_bdi(inode)->wb, WB_WRITEBACK);
|
2016-07-29 06:46:20 +08:00
|
|
|
inc_node_page_state(tmp_page, NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP);
|
2013-10-01 22:44:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = 0;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
if (is_writeback && fuse_writepage_in_flight(wpa, page)) {
|
2013-10-01 22:44:53 +08:00
|
|
|
end_page_writeback(page);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
data->wpa = NULL;
|
2013-10-01 22:44:53 +08:00
|
|
|
goto out_unlock;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
data->orig_pages[ap->num_pages] = page;
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
* Protected by fi->lock against concurrent access by
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
* fuse_page_is_writeback().
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&fi->lock);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
ap->num_pages++;
|
2018-11-09 18:33:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
out_unlock:
|
|
|
|
unlock_page(page);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int fuse_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
|
|
|
|
struct writeback_control *wbc)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
|
fuse: add max_pages to init_out
Replace FUSE_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ with the configurable parameter max_pages to
improve performance.
Old RFC with detailed description of the problem and many fixes by Mitsuo
Hayasaka (mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@hitachi.com):
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136
We've encountered performance degradation and fixed it on a big and complex
virtual environment.
Environment to reproduce degradation and improvement:
1. Add lag to user mode FUSE
Add nanosleep(&(struct timespec){ 0, 1000 }, NULL); to xmp_write_buf in
passthrough_fh.c
2. patch UM fuse with configurable max_pages parameter. The patch will be
provided latter.
3. run test script and perform test on tmpfs
fuse_test()
{
cd /tmp
mkdir -p fusemnt
passthrough_fh -o max_pages=$1 /tmp/fusemnt
grep fuse /proc/self/mounts
dd conv=fdatasync oflag=dsync if=/dev/zero of=fusemnt/tmp/tmp \
count=1K bs=1M 2>&1 | grep -v records
rm fusemnt/tmp/tmp
killall passthrough_fh
}
Test results:
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.73867 s, 618 MB/s
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,max_pages=256 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.15643 s, 928 MB/s
Obviously with bigger lag the difference between 'before' and 'after'
will be more significant.
Mitsuo Hayasaka, in 2012 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136),
observed improvement from 400-550 to 520-740.
Signed-off-by: Constantine Shulyupin <const@MakeLinux.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2018-09-06 20:37:06 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_fill_wb_data data;
|
|
|
|
int err;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = -EIO;
|
|
|
|
if (is_bad_inode(inode))
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
data.inode = inode;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
data.wpa = NULL;
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
data.ff = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-16 19:51:41 +08:00
|
|
|
err = -ENOMEM;
|
fuse: add max_pages to init_out
Replace FUSE_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ with the configurable parameter max_pages to
improve performance.
Old RFC with detailed description of the problem and many fixes by Mitsuo
Hayasaka (mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@hitachi.com):
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136
We've encountered performance degradation and fixed it on a big and complex
virtual environment.
Environment to reproduce degradation and improvement:
1. Add lag to user mode FUSE
Add nanosleep(&(struct timespec){ 0, 1000 }, NULL); to xmp_write_buf in
passthrough_fh.c
2. patch UM fuse with configurable max_pages parameter. The patch will be
provided latter.
3. run test script and perform test on tmpfs
fuse_test()
{
cd /tmp
mkdir -p fusemnt
passthrough_fh -o max_pages=$1 /tmp/fusemnt
grep fuse /proc/self/mounts
dd conv=fdatasync oflag=dsync if=/dev/zero of=fusemnt/tmp/tmp \
count=1K bs=1M 2>&1 | grep -v records
rm fusemnt/tmp/tmp
killall passthrough_fh
}
Test results:
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.73867 s, 618 MB/s
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,max_pages=256 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.15643 s, 928 MB/s
Obviously with bigger lag the difference between 'before' and 'after'
will be more significant.
Mitsuo Hayasaka, in 2012 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136),
observed improvement from 400-550 to 520-740.
Signed-off-by: Constantine Shulyupin <const@MakeLinux.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2018-09-06 20:37:06 +08:00
|
|
|
data.orig_pages = kcalloc(fc->max_pages,
|
2014-06-24 00:35:15 +08:00
|
|
|
sizeof(struct page *),
|
2013-08-16 19:51:41 +08:00
|
|
|
GFP_NOFS);
|
|
|
|
if (!data.orig_pages)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
err = write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc, fuse_writepages_fill, &data);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
if (data.wpa) {
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Ignore errors if we can write at least one page */
|
2019-09-10 21:04:10 +08:00
|
|
|
WARN_ON(!data.wpa->ia.ap.num_pages);
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_writepages_send(&data);
|
|
|
|
err = 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (data.ff)
|
2018-12-11 02:54:52 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_file_put(data.ff, false, false);
|
2013-08-16 19:51:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kfree(data.orig_pages);
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
out:
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 21:11:43 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* It's worthy to make sure that space is reserved on disk for the write,
|
|
|
|
* but how to implement it without killing performance need more thinking.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static int fuse_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
|
|
|
|
loff_t pos, unsigned len, unsigned flags,
|
|
|
|
struct page **pagep, void **fsdata)
|
|
|
|
{
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 20:29:47 +08:00
|
|
|
pgoff_t index = pos >> PAGE_SHIFT;
|
2014-10-22 08:11:25 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(file_inode(file));
|
2013-10-10 21:11:43 +08:00
|
|
|
struct page *page;
|
|
|
|
loff_t fsize;
|
|
|
|
int err = -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WARN_ON(!fc->writeback_cache);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
page = grab_cache_page_write_begin(mapping, index, flags);
|
|
|
|
if (!page)
|
|
|
|
goto error;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse_wait_on_page_writeback(mapping->host, page->index);
|
|
|
|
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 20:29:47 +08:00
|
|
|
if (PageUptodate(page) || len == PAGE_SIZE)
|
2013-10-10 21:11:43 +08:00
|
|
|
goto success;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Check if the start this page comes after the end of file, in which
|
|
|
|
* case the readpage can be optimized away.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
fsize = i_size_read(mapping->host);
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 20:29:47 +08:00
|
|
|
if (fsize <= (pos & PAGE_MASK)) {
|
|
|
|
size_t off = pos & ~PAGE_MASK;
|
2013-10-10 21:11:43 +08:00
|
|
|
if (off)
|
|
|
|
zero_user_segment(page, 0, off);
|
|
|
|
goto success;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
err = fuse_do_readpage(file, page);
|
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
|
|
goto cleanup;
|
|
|
|
success:
|
|
|
|
*pagep = page;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cleanup:
|
|
|
|
unlock_page(page);
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 20:29:47 +08:00
|
|
|
put_page(page);
|
2013-10-10 21:11:43 +08:00
|
|
|
error:
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int fuse_write_end(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
|
|
|
|
loff_t pos, unsigned len, unsigned copied,
|
|
|
|
struct page *page, void *fsdata)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-08-18 15:10:44 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Haven't copied anything? Skip zeroing, size extending, dirtying. */
|
|
|
|
if (!copied)
|
|
|
|
goto unlock;
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 21:11:43 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
|
|
|
|
/* Zero any unwritten bytes at the end of the page */
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 20:29:47 +08:00
|
|
|
size_t endoff = (pos + copied) & ~PAGE_MASK;
|
2013-10-10 21:11:43 +08:00
|
|
|
if (endoff)
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 20:29:47 +08:00
|
|
|
zero_user_segment(page, endoff, PAGE_SIZE);
|
2013-10-10 21:11:43 +08:00
|
|
|
SetPageUptodate(page);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse_write_update_size(inode, pos + copied);
|
|
|
|
set_page_dirty(page);
|
2016-08-18 15:10:44 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unlock:
|
2013-10-10 21:11:43 +08:00
|
|
|
unlock_page(page);
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 20:29:47 +08:00
|
|
|
put_page(page);
|
2013-10-10 21:11:43 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return copied;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
static int fuse_launder_page(struct page *page)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int err = 0;
|
|
|
|
if (clear_page_dirty_for_io(page)) {
|
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
|
|
|
|
err = fuse_writepage_locked(page);
|
|
|
|
if (!err)
|
|
|
|
fuse_wait_on_page_writeback(inode, page->index);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Write back dirty pages now, because there may not be any suitable
|
|
|
|
* open files later
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static void fuse_vma_close(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
filemap_write_and_wait(vma->vm_file->f_mapping);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Wait for writeback against this page to complete before allowing it
|
|
|
|
* to be marked dirty again, and hence written back again, possibly
|
|
|
|
* before the previous writepage completed.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Block here, instead of in ->writepage(), so that the userspace fs
|
|
|
|
* can only block processes actually operating on the filesystem.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Otherwise unprivileged userspace fs would be able to block
|
|
|
|
* unrelated:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* - page migration
|
|
|
|
* - sync(2)
|
|
|
|
* - try_to_free_pages() with order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2018-05-12 12:55:37 +08:00
|
|
|
static vm_fault_t fuse_page_mkwrite(struct vm_fault *vmf)
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2009-04-01 06:23:21 +08:00
|
|
|
struct page *page = vmf->page;
|
2017-02-25 06:56:41 +08:00
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = file_inode(vmf->vma->vm_file);
|
2013-10-01 22:44:51 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-02-25 06:56:41 +08:00
|
|
|
file_update_time(vmf->vma->vm_file);
|
2013-10-01 22:44:51 +08:00
|
|
|
lock_page(page);
|
|
|
|
if (page->mapping != inode->i_mapping) {
|
|
|
|
unlock_page(page);
|
|
|
|
return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse_wait_on_page_writeback(inode, page->index);
|
2013-10-01 22:44:51 +08:00
|
|
|
return VM_FAULT_LOCKED;
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2009-09-28 02:29:37 +08:00
|
|
|
static const struct vm_operations_struct fuse_file_vm_ops = {
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
.close = fuse_vma_close,
|
|
|
|
.fault = filemap_fault,
|
2014-04-08 06:37:19 +08:00
|
|
|
.map_pages = filemap_map_pages,
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
.page_mkwrite = fuse_page_mkwrite,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int fuse_file_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2019-01-24 17:40:17 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (ff->open_flags & FOPEN_DIRECT_IO) {
|
|
|
|
/* Can't provide the coherency needed for MAP_SHARED */
|
|
|
|
if (vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYSHARE)
|
|
|
|
return -ENODEV;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
invalidate_inode_pages2(file->f_mapping);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return generic_file_mmap(file, vma);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-10 21:10:04 +08:00
|
|
|
if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) && (vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYWRITE))
|
|
|
|
fuse_link_write_file(file);
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
file_accessed(file);
|
|
|
|
vma->vm_ops = &fuse_file_vm_ops;
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-07-03 05:29:19 +08:00
|
|
|
static int convert_fuse_file_lock(struct fuse_conn *fc,
|
|
|
|
const struct fuse_file_lock *ffl,
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
struct file_lock *fl)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
switch (ffl->type) {
|
|
|
|
case F_UNLCK:
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case F_RDLCK:
|
|
|
|
case F_WRLCK:
|
|
|
|
if (ffl->start > OFFSET_MAX || ffl->end > OFFSET_MAX ||
|
|
|
|
ffl->end < ffl->start)
|
|
|
|
return -EIO;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fl->fl_start = ffl->start;
|
|
|
|
fl->fl_end = ffl->end;
|
2014-07-03 05:29:19 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
fs/locks: Remove fl_nspid and use fs-specific l_pid for remote locks
Since commit c69899a17ca4 "NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range lock must be
atomic with the stateid update", NFSv4 has been inserting locks in rpciod
worker context. The result is that the file_lock's fl_nspid is the
kworker's pid instead of the original userspace pid.
The fl_nspid is only used to represent the namespaced virtual pid number
when displaying locks or returning from F_GETLK. There's no reason to set
it for every inserted lock, since we can usually just look it up from
fl_pid. So, instead of looking up and holding struct pid for every lock,
let's just look up the virtual pid number from fl_pid when it is needed.
That means we can remove fl_nspid entirely.
The translaton and presentation of fl_pid should handle the following four
cases:
1 - F_GETLK on a remote file with a remote lock:
In this case, the filesystem should determine the l_pid to return here.
Filesystems should indicate that the fl_pid represents a non-local pid
value that should not be translated by returning an fl_pid <= 0.
2 - F_GETLK on a local file with a remote lock:
This should be the l_pid of the lock manager process, and translated.
3 - F_GETLK on a remote file with a local lock, and
4 - F_GETLK on a local file with a local lock:
These should be the translated l_pid of the local locking process.
Fuse was already doing the correct thing by translating the pid into the
caller's namespace. With this change we must update fuse to translate
to init's pid namespace, so that the locks API can then translate from
init's pid namespace into the pid namespace of the caller.
With this change, the locks API will expect that if a filesystem returns
a remote pid as opposed to a local pid for F_GETLK, that remote pid will
be <= 0. This signifies that the pid is remote, and the locks API will
forego translating that pid into the pid namespace of the local calling
process.
Finally, we convert remote filesystems to present remote pids using
negative numbers. Have lustre, 9p, ceph, cifs, and dlm negate the remote
pid returned for F_GETLK lock requests.
Since local pids will never be larger than PID_MAX_LIMIT (which is
currently defined as <= 4 million), but pid_t is an unsigned int, we
should have plenty of room to represent remote pids with negative
numbers if we assume that remote pid numbers are similarly limited.
If this is not the case, then we run the risk of having a remote pid
returned for which there is also a corresponding local pid. This is a
problem we have now, but this patch should reduce the chances of that
occurring, while also returning those remote pid numbers, for whatever
that may be worth.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-16 22:28:22 +08:00
|
|
|
* Convert pid into init's pid namespace. The locks API will
|
|
|
|
* translate it into the caller's pid namespace.
|
2014-07-03 05:29:19 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
rcu_read_lock();
|
fs/locks: Remove fl_nspid and use fs-specific l_pid for remote locks
Since commit c69899a17ca4 "NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range lock must be
atomic with the stateid update", NFSv4 has been inserting locks in rpciod
worker context. The result is that the file_lock's fl_nspid is the
kworker's pid instead of the original userspace pid.
The fl_nspid is only used to represent the namespaced virtual pid number
when displaying locks or returning from F_GETLK. There's no reason to set
it for every inserted lock, since we can usually just look it up from
fl_pid. So, instead of looking up and holding struct pid for every lock,
let's just look up the virtual pid number from fl_pid when it is needed.
That means we can remove fl_nspid entirely.
The translaton and presentation of fl_pid should handle the following four
cases:
1 - F_GETLK on a remote file with a remote lock:
In this case, the filesystem should determine the l_pid to return here.
Filesystems should indicate that the fl_pid represents a non-local pid
value that should not be translated by returning an fl_pid <= 0.
2 - F_GETLK on a local file with a remote lock:
This should be the l_pid of the lock manager process, and translated.
3 - F_GETLK on a remote file with a local lock, and
4 - F_GETLK on a local file with a local lock:
These should be the translated l_pid of the local locking process.
Fuse was already doing the correct thing by translating the pid into the
caller's namespace. With this change we must update fuse to translate
to init's pid namespace, so that the locks API can then translate from
init's pid namespace into the pid namespace of the caller.
With this change, the locks API will expect that if a filesystem returns
a remote pid as opposed to a local pid for F_GETLK, that remote pid will
be <= 0. This signifies that the pid is remote, and the locks API will
forego translating that pid into the pid namespace of the local calling
process.
Finally, we convert remote filesystems to present remote pids using
negative numbers. Have lustre, 9p, ceph, cifs, and dlm negate the remote
pid returned for F_GETLK lock requests.
Since local pids will never be larger than PID_MAX_LIMIT (which is
currently defined as <= 4 million), but pid_t is an unsigned int, we
should have plenty of room to represent remote pids with negative
numbers if we assume that remote pid numbers are similarly limited.
If this is not the case, then we run the risk of having a remote pid
returned for which there is also a corresponding local pid. This is a
problem we have now, but this patch should reduce the chances of that
occurring, while also returning those remote pid numbers, for whatever
that may be worth.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-16 22:28:22 +08:00
|
|
|
fl->fl_pid = pid_nr_ns(find_pid_ns(ffl->pid, fc->pid_ns), &init_pid_ns);
|
2014-07-03 05:29:19 +08:00
|
|
|
rcu_read_unlock();
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
return -EIO;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fl->fl_type = ffl->type;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-12 16:49:05 +08:00
|
|
|
static void fuse_lk_fill(struct fuse_args *args, struct file *file,
|
2007-10-18 18:07:02 +08:00
|
|
|
const struct file_lock *fl, int opcode, pid_t pid,
|
2014-12-12 16:49:05 +08:00
|
|
|
int flock, struct fuse_lk_in *inarg)
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-02-28 05:59:05 +08:00
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
|
2006-06-25 20:48:55 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
|
2014-12-12 16:49:05 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
memset(inarg, 0, sizeof(*inarg));
|
|
|
|
inarg->fh = ff->fh;
|
|
|
|
inarg->owner = fuse_lock_owner_id(fc, fl->fl_owner);
|
|
|
|
inarg->lk.start = fl->fl_start;
|
|
|
|
inarg->lk.end = fl->fl_end;
|
|
|
|
inarg->lk.type = fl->fl_type;
|
|
|
|
inarg->lk.pid = pid;
|
2007-10-18 18:07:02 +08:00
|
|
|
if (flock)
|
2014-12-12 16:49:05 +08:00
|
|
|
inarg->lk_flags |= FUSE_LK_FLOCK;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:08 +08:00
|
|
|
args->opcode = opcode;
|
|
|
|
args->nodeid = get_node_id(inode);
|
|
|
|
args->in_numargs = 1;
|
|
|
|
args->in_args[0].size = sizeof(*inarg);
|
|
|
|
args->in_args[0].value = inarg;
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int fuse_getlk(struct file *file, struct file_lock *fl)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2013-02-28 05:59:05 +08:00
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
2014-12-12 16:49:05 +08:00
|
|
|
FUSE_ARGS(args);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_lk_in inarg;
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_lk_out outarg;
|
|
|
|
int err;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-12 16:49:05 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_lk_fill(&args, file, fl, FUSE_GETLK, 0, 0, &inarg);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:08 +08:00
|
|
|
args.out_numargs = 1;
|
|
|
|
args.out_args[0].size = sizeof(outarg);
|
|
|
|
args.out_args[0].value = &outarg;
|
2014-12-12 16:49:05 +08:00
|
|
|
err = fuse_simple_request(fc, &args);
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!err)
|
2014-07-03 05:29:19 +08:00
|
|
|
err = convert_fuse_file_lock(fc, &outarg.lk, fl);
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-18 18:07:02 +08:00
|
|
|
static int fuse_setlk(struct file *file, struct file_lock *fl, int flock)
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-02-28 05:59:05 +08:00
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
2014-12-12 16:49:05 +08:00
|
|
|
FUSE_ARGS(args);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_lk_in inarg;
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
int opcode = (fl->fl_flags & FL_SLEEP) ? FUSE_SETLKW : FUSE_SETLK;
|
2014-07-03 05:29:19 +08:00
|
|
|
struct pid *pid = fl->fl_type != F_UNLCK ? task_tgid(current) : NULL;
|
|
|
|
pid_t pid_nr = pid_nr_ns(pid, fc->pid_ns);
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
int err;
|
|
|
|
|
2011-07-21 08:21:59 +08:00
|
|
|
if (fl->fl_lmops && fl->fl_lmops->lm_grant) {
|
2008-07-25 16:49:02 +08:00
|
|
|
/* NLM needs asynchronous locks, which we don't support yet */
|
|
|
|
return -ENOLCK;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Unlock on close is handled by the flush method */
|
2017-04-12 00:50:09 +08:00
|
|
|
if ((fl->fl_flags & FL_CLOSE_POSIX) == FL_CLOSE_POSIX)
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-07-03 05:29:19 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_lk_fill(&args, file, fl, opcode, pid_nr, flock, &inarg);
|
2014-12-12 16:49:05 +08:00
|
|
|
err = fuse_simple_request(fc, &args);
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 20:48:54 +08:00
|
|
|
/* locking is restartable */
|
|
|
|
if (err == -EINTR)
|
|
|
|
err = -ERESTARTSYS;
|
2014-12-12 16:49:05 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int fuse_file_lock(struct file *file, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2013-02-28 05:59:05 +08:00
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
|
|
|
int err;
|
|
|
|
|
2008-07-25 16:49:02 +08:00
|
|
|
if (cmd == F_CANCELLK) {
|
|
|
|
err = 0;
|
|
|
|
} else if (cmd == F_GETLK) {
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
if (fc->no_lock) {
|
2007-02-21 13:55:18 +08:00
|
|
|
posix_test_lock(file, fl);
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
err = 0;
|
|
|
|
} else
|
|
|
|
err = fuse_getlk(file, fl);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
if (fc->no_lock)
|
2008-07-25 16:49:02 +08:00
|
|
|
err = posix_lock_file(file, fl, NULL);
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
else
|
2007-10-18 18:07:02 +08:00
|
|
|
err = fuse_setlk(file, fl, 0);
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-18 18:07:02 +08:00
|
|
|
static int fuse_file_flock(struct file *file, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2013-02-28 05:59:05 +08:00
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
|
2007-10-18 18:07:02 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
|
|
|
int err;
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-08 22:08:08 +08:00
|
|
|
if (fc->no_flock) {
|
2015-10-23 01:38:14 +08:00
|
|
|
err = locks_lock_file_wait(file, fl);
|
2007-10-18 18:07:02 +08:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2011-08-08 22:08:08 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-18 18:07:02 +08:00
|
|
|
/* emulate flock with POSIX locks */
|
2011-08-08 22:08:08 +08:00
|
|
|
ff->flock = true;
|
2007-10-18 18:07:02 +08:00
|
|
|
err = fuse_setlk(file, fl, 1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-07 12:35:51 +08:00
|
|
|
static sector_t fuse_bmap(struct address_space *mapping, sector_t block)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
2014-12-12 16:49:05 +08:00
|
|
|
FUSE_ARGS(args);
|
2006-12-07 12:35:51 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_bmap_in inarg;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_bmap_out outarg;
|
|
|
|
int err;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!inode->i_sb->s_bdev || fc->no_bmap)
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
memset(&inarg, 0, sizeof(inarg));
|
|
|
|
inarg.block = block;
|
|
|
|
inarg.blocksize = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:08 +08:00
|
|
|
args.opcode = FUSE_BMAP;
|
|
|
|
args.nodeid = get_node_id(inode);
|
|
|
|
args.in_numargs = 1;
|
|
|
|
args.in_args[0].size = sizeof(inarg);
|
|
|
|
args.in_args[0].value = &inarg;
|
|
|
|
args.out_numargs = 1;
|
|
|
|
args.out_args[0].size = sizeof(outarg);
|
|
|
|
args.out_args[0].value = &outarg;
|
2014-12-12 16:49:05 +08:00
|
|
|
err = fuse_simple_request(fc, &args);
|
2006-12-07 12:35:51 +08:00
|
|
|
if (err == -ENOSYS)
|
|
|
|
fc->no_bmap = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return err ? 0 : outarg.block;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 02:10:22 +08:00
|
|
|
static loff_t fuse_lseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
|
|
|
|
FUSE_ARGS(args);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_lseek_in inarg = {
|
|
|
|
.fh = ff->fh,
|
|
|
|
.offset = offset,
|
|
|
|
.whence = whence
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_lseek_out outarg;
|
|
|
|
int err;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (fc->no_lseek)
|
|
|
|
goto fallback;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:08 +08:00
|
|
|
args.opcode = FUSE_LSEEK;
|
|
|
|
args.nodeid = ff->nodeid;
|
|
|
|
args.in_numargs = 1;
|
|
|
|
args.in_args[0].size = sizeof(inarg);
|
|
|
|
args.in_args[0].value = &inarg;
|
|
|
|
args.out_numargs = 1;
|
|
|
|
args.out_args[0].size = sizeof(outarg);
|
|
|
|
args.out_args[0].value = &outarg;
|
2015-07-01 02:10:22 +08:00
|
|
|
err = fuse_simple_request(fc, &args);
|
|
|
|
if (err) {
|
|
|
|
if (err == -ENOSYS) {
|
|
|
|
fc->no_lseek = 1;
|
|
|
|
goto fallback;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return vfs_setpos(file, outarg.offset, inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fallback:
|
2017-09-12 22:57:54 +08:00
|
|
|
err = fuse_update_attributes(inode, file);
|
2015-07-01 02:10:22 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!err)
|
|
|
|
return generic_file_llseek(file, offset, whence);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2012-12-18 07:59:39 +08:00
|
|
|
static loff_t fuse_file_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
|
2008-04-30 15:54:45 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
loff_t retval;
|
2013-02-28 05:59:05 +08:00
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
|
2008-04-30 15:54:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 02:10:22 +08:00
|
|
|
switch (whence) {
|
|
|
|
case SEEK_SET:
|
|
|
|
case SEEK_CUR:
|
|
|
|
/* No i_mutex protection necessary for SEEK_CUR and SEEK_SET */
|
2012-12-18 07:59:39 +08:00
|
|
|
retval = generic_file_llseek(file, offset, whence);
|
2015-07-01 02:10:22 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case SEEK_END:
|
2016-01-23 04:40:57 +08:00
|
|
|
inode_lock(inode);
|
2017-09-12 22:57:54 +08:00
|
|
|
retval = fuse_update_attributes(inode, file);
|
2015-07-01 02:10:22 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!retval)
|
|
|
|
retval = generic_file_llseek(file, offset, whence);
|
2016-01-23 04:40:57 +08:00
|
|
|
inode_unlock(inode);
|
2015-07-01 02:10:22 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case SEEK_HOLE:
|
|
|
|
case SEEK_DATA:
|
2016-01-23 04:40:57 +08:00
|
|
|
inode_lock(inode);
|
2015-07-01 02:10:22 +08:00
|
|
|
retval = fuse_lseek(file, offset, whence);
|
2016-01-23 04:40:57 +08:00
|
|
|
inode_unlock(inode);
|
2015-07-01 02:10:22 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
retval = -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2011-12-13 18:58:48 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-04-30 15:54:45 +08:00
|
|
|
return retval;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-11-30 23:39:27 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* CUSE servers compiled on 32bit broke on 64bit kernels because the
|
|
|
|
* ABI was defined to be 'struct iovec' which is different on 32bit
|
|
|
|
* and 64bit. Fortunately we can determine which structure the server
|
|
|
|
* used from the size of the reply.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2010-12-08 03:16:56 +08:00
|
|
|
static int fuse_copy_ioctl_iovec_old(struct iovec *dst, void *src,
|
|
|
|
size_t transferred, unsigned count,
|
|
|
|
bool is_compat)
|
2010-11-30 23:39:27 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
|
|
|
|
if (count * sizeof(struct compat_iovec) == transferred) {
|
|
|
|
struct compat_iovec *ciov = src;
|
|
|
|
unsigned i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* With this interface a 32bit server cannot support
|
|
|
|
* non-compat (i.e. ones coming from 64bit apps) ioctl
|
|
|
|
* requests
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (!is_compat)
|
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
|
|
|
|
dst[i].iov_base = compat_ptr(ciov[i].iov_base);
|
|
|
|
dst[i].iov_len = ciov[i].iov_len;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (count * sizeof(struct iovec) != transferred)
|
|
|
|
return -EIO;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
memcpy(dst, src, transferred);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-11-30 23:39:27 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Make sure iov_length() won't overflow */
|
fuse: add max_pages to init_out
Replace FUSE_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ with the configurable parameter max_pages to
improve performance.
Old RFC with detailed description of the problem and many fixes by Mitsuo
Hayasaka (mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@hitachi.com):
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136
We've encountered performance degradation and fixed it on a big and complex
virtual environment.
Environment to reproduce degradation and improvement:
1. Add lag to user mode FUSE
Add nanosleep(&(struct timespec){ 0, 1000 }, NULL); to xmp_write_buf in
passthrough_fh.c
2. patch UM fuse with configurable max_pages parameter. The patch will be
provided latter.
3. run test script and perform test on tmpfs
fuse_test()
{
cd /tmp
mkdir -p fusemnt
passthrough_fh -o max_pages=$1 /tmp/fusemnt
grep fuse /proc/self/mounts
dd conv=fdatasync oflag=dsync if=/dev/zero of=fusemnt/tmp/tmp \
count=1K bs=1M 2>&1 | grep -v records
rm fusemnt/tmp/tmp
killall passthrough_fh
}
Test results:
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.73867 s, 618 MB/s
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,max_pages=256 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.15643 s, 928 MB/s
Obviously with bigger lag the difference between 'before' and 'after'
will be more significant.
Mitsuo Hayasaka, in 2012 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136),
observed improvement from 400-550 to 520-740.
Signed-off-by: Constantine Shulyupin <const@MakeLinux.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2018-09-06 20:37:06 +08:00
|
|
|
static int fuse_verify_ioctl_iov(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct iovec *iov,
|
|
|
|
size_t count)
|
2010-11-30 23:39:27 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
size_t n;
|
fuse: add max_pages to init_out
Replace FUSE_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ with the configurable parameter max_pages to
improve performance.
Old RFC with detailed description of the problem and many fixes by Mitsuo
Hayasaka (mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@hitachi.com):
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136
We've encountered performance degradation and fixed it on a big and complex
virtual environment.
Environment to reproduce degradation and improvement:
1. Add lag to user mode FUSE
Add nanosleep(&(struct timespec){ 0, 1000 }, NULL); to xmp_write_buf in
passthrough_fh.c
2. patch UM fuse with configurable max_pages parameter. The patch will be
provided latter.
3. run test script and perform test on tmpfs
fuse_test()
{
cd /tmp
mkdir -p fusemnt
passthrough_fh -o max_pages=$1 /tmp/fusemnt
grep fuse /proc/self/mounts
dd conv=fdatasync oflag=dsync if=/dev/zero of=fusemnt/tmp/tmp \
count=1K bs=1M 2>&1 | grep -v records
rm fusemnt/tmp/tmp
killall passthrough_fh
}
Test results:
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.73867 s, 618 MB/s
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,max_pages=256 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.15643 s, 928 MB/s
Obviously with bigger lag the difference between 'before' and 'after'
will be more significant.
Mitsuo Hayasaka, in 2012 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136),
observed improvement from 400-550 to 520-740.
Signed-off-by: Constantine Shulyupin <const@MakeLinux.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2018-09-06 20:37:06 +08:00
|
|
|
u32 max = fc->max_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
|
2010-11-30 23:39:27 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-07-25 03:10:11 +08:00
|
|
|
for (n = 0; n < count; n++, iov++) {
|
2010-11-30 23:39:27 +08:00
|
|
|
if (iov->iov_len > (size_t) max)
|
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
max -= iov->iov_len;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-08 03:16:56 +08:00
|
|
|
static int fuse_copy_ioctl_iovec(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct iovec *dst,
|
|
|
|
void *src, size_t transferred, unsigned count,
|
|
|
|
bool is_compat)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned i;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_ioctl_iovec *fiov = src;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (fc->minor < 16) {
|
|
|
|
return fuse_copy_ioctl_iovec_old(dst, src, transferred,
|
|
|
|
count, is_compat);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (count * sizeof(struct fuse_ioctl_iovec) != transferred)
|
|
|
|
return -EIO;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
|
|
|
|
/* Did the server supply an inappropriate value? */
|
|
|
|
if (fiov[i].base != (unsigned long) fiov[i].base ||
|
|
|
|
fiov[i].len != (unsigned long) fiov[i].len)
|
|
|
|
return -EIO;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dst[i].iov_base = (void __user *) (unsigned long) fiov[i].base;
|
|
|
|
dst[i].iov_len = (size_t) fiov[i].len;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
|
|
|
|
if (is_compat &&
|
|
|
|
(ptr_to_compat(dst[i].iov_base) != fiov[i].base ||
|
|
|
|
(compat_size_t) dst[i].iov_len != fiov[i].len))
|
|
|
|
return -EIO;
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* For ioctls, there is no generic way to determine how much memory
|
|
|
|
* needs to be read and/or written. Furthermore, ioctls are allowed
|
|
|
|
* to dereference the passed pointer, so the parameter requires deep
|
|
|
|
* copying but FUSE has no idea whatsoever about what to copy in or
|
|
|
|
* out.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This is solved by allowing FUSE server to retry ioctl with
|
|
|
|
* necessary in/out iovecs. Let's assume the ioctl implementation
|
|
|
|
* needs to read in the following structure.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* struct a {
|
|
|
|
* char *buf;
|
|
|
|
* size_t buflen;
|
|
|
|
* }
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* On the first callout to FUSE server, inarg->in_size and
|
|
|
|
* inarg->out_size will be NULL; then, the server completes the ioctl
|
|
|
|
* with FUSE_IOCTL_RETRY set in out->flags, out->in_iovs set to 1 and
|
|
|
|
* the actual iov array to
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* { { .iov_base = inarg.arg, .iov_len = sizeof(struct a) } }
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* which tells FUSE to copy in the requested area and retry the ioctl.
|
|
|
|
* On the second round, the server has access to the structure and
|
|
|
|
* from that it can tell what to look for next, so on the invocation,
|
|
|
|
* it sets FUSE_IOCTL_RETRY, out->in_iovs to 2 and iov array to
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* { { .iov_base = inarg.arg, .iov_len = sizeof(struct a) },
|
|
|
|
* { .iov_base = a.buf, .iov_len = a.buflen } }
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* FUSE will copy both struct a and the pointed buffer from the
|
|
|
|
* process doing the ioctl and retry ioctl with both struct a and the
|
|
|
|
* buffer.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This time, FUSE server has everything it needs and completes ioctl
|
|
|
|
* without FUSE_IOCTL_RETRY which finishes the ioctl call.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Copying data out works the same way.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Note that if FUSE_IOCTL_UNRESTRICTED is clear, the kernel
|
|
|
|
* automatically initializes in and out iovs by decoding @cmd with
|
|
|
|
* _IOC_* macros and the server is not allowed to request RETRY. This
|
|
|
|
* limits ioctl data transfers to well-formed ioctls and is the forced
|
|
|
|
* behavior for all FUSE servers.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2009-04-14 09:54:53 +08:00
|
|
|
long fuse_do_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int flags)
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
|
2009-04-28 22:56:39 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = ff->fc;
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_ioctl_in inarg = {
|
|
|
|
.fh = ff->fh,
|
|
|
|
.cmd = cmd,
|
|
|
|
.arg = arg,
|
|
|
|
.flags = flags
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_ioctl_out outarg;
|
2010-12-08 03:16:56 +08:00
|
|
|
struct iovec *iov_page = NULL;
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
struct iovec *in_iov = NULL, *out_iov = NULL;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned int in_iovs = 0, out_iovs = 0, max_pages;
|
|
|
|
size_t in_size, out_size, c;
|
|
|
|
ssize_t transferred;
|
2016-10-01 13:32:33 +08:00
|
|
|
int err, i;
|
|
|
|
struct iov_iter ii;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_args_pages ap = {};
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-08 03:16:56 +08:00
|
|
|
#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
|
|
|
|
inarg.flags |= FUSE_IOCTL_32BIT;
|
|
|
|
#else
|
2019-04-24 22:14:11 +08:00
|
|
|
if (flags & FUSE_IOCTL_COMPAT) {
|
2010-12-08 03:16:56 +08:00
|
|
|
inarg.flags |= FUSE_IOCTL_32BIT;
|
2019-04-24 22:14:11 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_X32
|
|
|
|
if (in_x32_syscall())
|
|
|
|
inarg.flags |= FUSE_IOCTL_COMPAT_X32;
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
}
|
2010-12-08 03:16:56 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
/* assume all the iovs returned by client always fits in a page */
|
2010-12-08 03:16:56 +08:00
|
|
|
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct fuse_ioctl_iovec) * FUSE_IOCTL_MAX_IOV > PAGE_SIZE);
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = -ENOMEM;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
ap.pages = fuse_pages_alloc(fc->max_pages, GFP_KERNEL, &ap.descs);
|
2010-12-08 03:16:56 +08:00
|
|
|
iov_page = (struct iovec *) __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!ap.pages || !iov_page)
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_page_descs_length_init(ap.descs, 0, fc->max_pages);
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* If restricted, initialize IO parameters as encoded in @cmd.
|
|
|
|
* RETRY from server is not allowed.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (!(flags & FUSE_IOCTL_UNRESTRICTED)) {
|
2010-12-08 03:16:56 +08:00
|
|
|
struct iovec *iov = iov_page;
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-12-02 21:49:42 +08:00
|
|
|
iov->iov_base = (void __user *)arg;
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
iov->iov_len = _IOC_SIZE(cmd);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (_IOC_DIR(cmd) & _IOC_WRITE) {
|
|
|
|
in_iov = iov;
|
|
|
|
in_iovs = 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (_IOC_DIR(cmd) & _IOC_READ) {
|
|
|
|
out_iov = iov;
|
|
|
|
out_iovs = 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
retry:
|
|
|
|
inarg.in_size = in_size = iov_length(in_iov, in_iovs);
|
|
|
|
inarg.out_size = out_size = iov_length(out_iov, out_iovs);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Out data can be used either for actual out data or iovs,
|
|
|
|
* make sure there always is at least one page.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
out_size = max_t(size_t, out_size, PAGE_SIZE);
|
|
|
|
max_pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(max(in_size, out_size), PAGE_SIZE);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* make sure there are enough buffer pages and init request with them */
|
|
|
|
err = -ENOMEM;
|
fuse: add max_pages to init_out
Replace FUSE_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ with the configurable parameter max_pages to
improve performance.
Old RFC with detailed description of the problem and many fixes by Mitsuo
Hayasaka (mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@hitachi.com):
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136
We've encountered performance degradation and fixed it on a big and complex
virtual environment.
Environment to reproduce degradation and improvement:
1. Add lag to user mode FUSE
Add nanosleep(&(struct timespec){ 0, 1000 }, NULL); to xmp_write_buf in
passthrough_fh.c
2. patch UM fuse with configurable max_pages parameter. The patch will be
provided latter.
3. run test script and perform test on tmpfs
fuse_test()
{
cd /tmp
mkdir -p fusemnt
passthrough_fh -o max_pages=$1 /tmp/fusemnt
grep fuse /proc/self/mounts
dd conv=fdatasync oflag=dsync if=/dev/zero of=fusemnt/tmp/tmp \
count=1K bs=1M 2>&1 | grep -v records
rm fusemnt/tmp/tmp
killall passthrough_fh
}
Test results:
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.73867 s, 618 MB/s
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,max_pages=256 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.15643 s, 928 MB/s
Obviously with bigger lag the difference between 'before' and 'after'
will be more significant.
Mitsuo Hayasaka, in 2012 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136),
observed improvement from 400-550 to 520-740.
Signed-off-by: Constantine Shulyupin <const@MakeLinux.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2018-09-06 20:37:06 +08:00
|
|
|
if (max_pages > fc->max_pages)
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
while (ap.num_pages < max_pages) {
|
|
|
|
ap.pages[ap.num_pages] = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_HIGHMEM);
|
|
|
|
if (!ap.pages[ap.num_pages])
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
ap.num_pages++;
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* okay, let's send it to the client */
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
ap.args.opcode = FUSE_IOCTL;
|
|
|
|
ap.args.nodeid = ff->nodeid;
|
|
|
|
ap.args.in_numargs = 1;
|
|
|
|
ap.args.in_args[0].size = sizeof(inarg);
|
|
|
|
ap.args.in_args[0].value = &inarg;
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
if (in_size) {
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
ap.args.in_numargs++;
|
|
|
|
ap.args.in_args[1].size = in_size;
|
|
|
|
ap.args.in_pages = true;
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-10-01 13:32:33 +08:00
|
|
|
err = -EFAULT;
|
|
|
|
iov_iter_init(&ii, WRITE, in_iov, in_iovs, in_size);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; iov_iter_count(&ii) && !WARN_ON(i >= ap.num_pages); i++) {
|
|
|
|
c = copy_page_from_iter(ap.pages[i], 0, PAGE_SIZE, &ii);
|
2016-10-01 13:32:33 +08:00
|
|
|
if (c != PAGE_SIZE && iov_iter_count(&ii))
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
ap.args.out_numargs = 2;
|
|
|
|
ap.args.out_args[0].size = sizeof(outarg);
|
|
|
|
ap.args.out_args[0].value = &outarg;
|
|
|
|
ap.args.out_args[1].size = out_size;
|
|
|
|
ap.args.out_pages = true;
|
|
|
|
ap.args.out_argvar = true;
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
transferred = fuse_simple_request(fc, &ap.args);
|
|
|
|
err = transferred;
|
|
|
|
if (transferred < 0)
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* did it ask for retry? */
|
|
|
|
if (outarg.flags & FUSE_IOCTL_RETRY) {
|
2010-12-08 03:16:56 +08:00
|
|
|
void *vaddr;
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* no retry if in restricted mode */
|
|
|
|
err = -EIO;
|
|
|
|
if (!(flags & FUSE_IOCTL_UNRESTRICTED))
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in_iovs = outarg.in_iovs;
|
|
|
|
out_iovs = outarg.out_iovs;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Make sure things are in boundary, separate checks
|
|
|
|
* are to protect against overflow.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
err = -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
if (in_iovs > FUSE_IOCTL_MAX_IOV ||
|
|
|
|
out_iovs > FUSE_IOCTL_MAX_IOV ||
|
|
|
|
in_iovs + out_iovs > FUSE_IOCTL_MAX_IOV)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
vaddr = kmap_atomic(ap.pages[0]);
|
2010-12-08 03:16:56 +08:00
|
|
|
err = fuse_copy_ioctl_iovec(fc, iov_page, vaddr,
|
2010-11-30 23:39:27 +08:00
|
|
|
transferred, in_iovs + out_iovs,
|
|
|
|
(flags & FUSE_IOCTL_COMPAT) != 0);
|
2011-11-25 23:14:30 +08:00
|
|
|
kunmap_atomic(vaddr);
|
2010-11-30 23:39:27 +08:00
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-08 03:16:56 +08:00
|
|
|
in_iov = iov_page;
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
out_iov = in_iov + in_iovs;
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: add max_pages to init_out
Replace FUSE_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ with the configurable parameter max_pages to
improve performance.
Old RFC with detailed description of the problem and many fixes by Mitsuo
Hayasaka (mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@hitachi.com):
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136
We've encountered performance degradation and fixed it on a big and complex
virtual environment.
Environment to reproduce degradation and improvement:
1. Add lag to user mode FUSE
Add nanosleep(&(struct timespec){ 0, 1000 }, NULL); to xmp_write_buf in
passthrough_fh.c
2. patch UM fuse with configurable max_pages parameter. The patch will be
provided latter.
3. run test script and perform test on tmpfs
fuse_test()
{
cd /tmp
mkdir -p fusemnt
passthrough_fh -o max_pages=$1 /tmp/fusemnt
grep fuse /proc/self/mounts
dd conv=fdatasync oflag=dsync if=/dev/zero of=fusemnt/tmp/tmp \
count=1K bs=1M 2>&1 | grep -v records
rm fusemnt/tmp/tmp
killall passthrough_fh
}
Test results:
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.73867 s, 618 MB/s
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,max_pages=256 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.15643 s, 928 MB/s
Obviously with bigger lag the difference between 'before' and 'after'
will be more significant.
Mitsuo Hayasaka, in 2012 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136),
observed improvement from 400-550 to 520-740.
Signed-off-by: Constantine Shulyupin <const@MakeLinux.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2018-09-06 20:37:06 +08:00
|
|
|
err = fuse_verify_ioctl_iov(fc, in_iov, in_iovs);
|
2010-11-30 23:39:27 +08:00
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: add max_pages to init_out
Replace FUSE_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ with the configurable parameter max_pages to
improve performance.
Old RFC with detailed description of the problem and many fixes by Mitsuo
Hayasaka (mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@hitachi.com):
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136
We've encountered performance degradation and fixed it on a big and complex
virtual environment.
Environment to reproduce degradation and improvement:
1. Add lag to user mode FUSE
Add nanosleep(&(struct timespec){ 0, 1000 }, NULL); to xmp_write_buf in
passthrough_fh.c
2. patch UM fuse with configurable max_pages parameter. The patch will be
provided latter.
3. run test script and perform test on tmpfs
fuse_test()
{
cd /tmp
mkdir -p fusemnt
passthrough_fh -o max_pages=$1 /tmp/fusemnt
grep fuse /proc/self/mounts
dd conv=fdatasync oflag=dsync if=/dev/zero of=fusemnt/tmp/tmp \
count=1K bs=1M 2>&1 | grep -v records
rm fusemnt/tmp/tmp
killall passthrough_fh
}
Test results:
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.73867 s, 618 MB/s
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,max_pages=256 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.15643 s, 928 MB/s
Obviously with bigger lag the difference between 'before' and 'after'
will be more significant.
Mitsuo Hayasaka, in 2012 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136),
observed improvement from 400-550 to 520-740.
Signed-off-by: Constantine Shulyupin <const@MakeLinux.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2018-09-06 20:37:06 +08:00
|
|
|
err = fuse_verify_ioctl_iov(fc, out_iov, out_iovs);
|
2010-11-30 23:39:27 +08:00
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
goto retry;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = -EIO;
|
|
|
|
if (transferred > inarg.out_size)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-10-01 13:32:33 +08:00
|
|
|
err = -EFAULT;
|
|
|
|
iov_iter_init(&ii, READ, out_iov, out_iovs, transferred);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; iov_iter_count(&ii) && !WARN_ON(i >= ap.num_pages); i++) {
|
|
|
|
c = copy_page_to_iter(ap.pages[i], 0, PAGE_SIZE, &ii);
|
2016-10-01 13:32:33 +08:00
|
|
|
if (c != PAGE_SIZE && iov_iter_count(&ii))
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
err = 0;
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
out:
|
2010-12-08 03:16:56 +08:00
|
|
|
free_page((unsigned long) iov_page);
|
2019-09-10 21:04:09 +08:00
|
|
|
while (ap.num_pages)
|
|
|
|
__free_page(ap.pages[--ap.num_pages]);
|
|
|
|
kfree(ap.pages);
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return err ? err : outarg.result;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2009-04-14 09:54:53 +08:00
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fuse_do_ioctl);
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-12-13 18:58:49 +08:00
|
|
|
long fuse_ioctl_common(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
|
|
|
|
unsigned long arg, unsigned int flags)
|
2009-04-28 22:56:39 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-02-28 05:59:05 +08:00
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
|
2009-04-28 22:56:39 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-15 14:30:00 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!fuse_allow_current_process(fc))
|
2009-04-28 22:56:39 +08:00
|
|
|
return -EACCES;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (is_bad_inode(inode))
|
|
|
|
return -EIO;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return fuse_do_ioctl(file, cmd, arg, flags);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
static long fuse_file_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
|
|
|
|
unsigned long arg)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2011-12-13 18:58:49 +08:00
|
|
|
return fuse_ioctl_common(file, cmd, arg, 0);
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static long fuse_file_compat_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
|
|
|
|
unsigned long arg)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2011-12-13 18:58:49 +08:00
|
|
|
return fuse_ioctl_common(file, cmd, arg, FUSE_IOCTL_COMPAT);
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* All files which have been polled are linked to RB tree
|
|
|
|
* fuse_conn->polled_files which is indexed by kh. Walk the tree and
|
|
|
|
* find the matching one.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static struct rb_node **fuse_find_polled_node(struct fuse_conn *fc, u64 kh,
|
|
|
|
struct rb_node **parent_out)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct rb_node **link = &fc->polled_files.rb_node;
|
|
|
|
struct rb_node *last = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (*link) {
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
last = *link;
|
|
|
|
ff = rb_entry(last, struct fuse_file, polled_node);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (kh < ff->kh)
|
|
|
|
link = &last->rb_left;
|
|
|
|
else if (kh > ff->kh)
|
|
|
|
link = &last->rb_right;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
return link;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (parent_out)
|
|
|
|
*parent_out = last;
|
|
|
|
return link;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* The file is about to be polled. Make sure it's on the polled_files
|
|
|
|
* RB tree. Note that files once added to the polled_files tree are
|
|
|
|
* not removed before the file is released. This is because a file
|
|
|
|
* polled once is likely to be polled again.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static void fuse_register_polled_file(struct fuse_conn *fc,
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
spin_lock(&fc->lock);
|
|
|
|
if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&ff->polled_node)) {
|
2014-02-06 07:24:57 +08:00
|
|
|
struct rb_node **link, *uninitialized_var(parent);
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
link = fuse_find_polled_node(fc, ff->kh, &parent);
|
|
|
|
BUG_ON(*link);
|
|
|
|
rb_link_node(&ff->polled_node, parent, link);
|
|
|
|
rb_insert_color(&ff->polled_node, &fc->polled_files);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-03 13:02:18 +08:00
|
|
|
__poll_t fuse_file_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
|
2009-04-28 22:56:41 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = ff->fc;
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_poll_in inarg = { .fh = ff->fh, .kh = ff->kh };
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_poll_out outarg;
|
2014-12-12 16:49:05 +08:00
|
|
|
FUSE_ARGS(args);
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
int err;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (fc->no_poll)
|
|
|
|
return DEFAULT_POLLMASK;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
poll_wait(file, &ff->poll_wait, wait);
|
2017-11-30 08:00:41 +08:00
|
|
|
inarg.events = mangle_poll(poll_requested_events(wait));
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Ask for notification iff there's someone waiting for it.
|
|
|
|
* The client may ignore the flag and always notify.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (waitqueue_active(&ff->poll_wait)) {
|
|
|
|
inarg.flags |= FUSE_POLL_SCHEDULE_NOTIFY;
|
|
|
|
fuse_register_polled_file(fc, ff);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:08 +08:00
|
|
|
args.opcode = FUSE_POLL;
|
|
|
|
args.nodeid = ff->nodeid;
|
|
|
|
args.in_numargs = 1;
|
|
|
|
args.in_args[0].size = sizeof(inarg);
|
|
|
|
args.in_args[0].value = &inarg;
|
|
|
|
args.out_numargs = 1;
|
|
|
|
args.out_args[0].size = sizeof(outarg);
|
|
|
|
args.out_args[0].value = &outarg;
|
2014-12-12 16:49:05 +08:00
|
|
|
err = fuse_simple_request(fc, &args);
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!err)
|
2017-11-30 08:00:41 +08:00
|
|
|
return demangle_poll(outarg.revents);
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
if (err == -ENOSYS) {
|
|
|
|
fc->no_poll = 1;
|
|
|
|
return DEFAULT_POLLMASK;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-02-12 06:34:03 +08:00
|
|
|
return EPOLLERR;
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2009-04-14 09:54:53 +08:00
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fuse_file_poll);
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* This is called from fuse_handle_notify() on FUSE_NOTIFY_POLL and
|
|
|
|
* wakes up the poll waiters.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
int fuse_notify_poll_wakeup(struct fuse_conn *fc,
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_notify_poll_wakeup_out *outarg)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u64 kh = outarg->kh;
|
|
|
|
struct rb_node **link;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spin_lock(&fc->lock);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
link = fuse_find_polled_node(fc, kh, NULL);
|
|
|
|
if (*link) {
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ff = rb_entry(*link, struct fuse_file, polled_node);
|
|
|
|
wake_up_interruptible_sync(&ff->poll_wait);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2012-12-18 18:05:08 +08:00
|
|
|
static void fuse_do_truncate(struct file *file)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
|
|
|
|
struct iattr attr;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
attr.ia_valid = ATTR_SIZE;
|
|
|
|
attr.ia_size = i_size_read(inode);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
attr.ia_file = file;
|
|
|
|
attr.ia_valid |= ATTR_FILE;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-26 23:12:41 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_do_setattr(file_dentry(file), &attr, file);
|
2012-12-18 18:05:08 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: add max_pages to init_out
Replace FUSE_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ with the configurable parameter max_pages to
improve performance.
Old RFC with detailed description of the problem and many fixes by Mitsuo
Hayasaka (mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@hitachi.com):
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136
We've encountered performance degradation and fixed it on a big and complex
virtual environment.
Environment to reproduce degradation and improvement:
1. Add lag to user mode FUSE
Add nanosleep(&(struct timespec){ 0, 1000 }, NULL); to xmp_write_buf in
passthrough_fh.c
2. patch UM fuse with configurable max_pages parameter. The patch will be
provided latter.
3. run test script and perform test on tmpfs
fuse_test()
{
cd /tmp
mkdir -p fusemnt
passthrough_fh -o max_pages=$1 /tmp/fusemnt
grep fuse /proc/self/mounts
dd conv=fdatasync oflag=dsync if=/dev/zero of=fusemnt/tmp/tmp \
count=1K bs=1M 2>&1 | grep -v records
rm fusemnt/tmp/tmp
killall passthrough_fh
}
Test results:
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.73867 s, 618 MB/s
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,max_pages=256 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.15643 s, 928 MB/s
Obviously with bigger lag the difference between 'before' and 'after'
will be more significant.
Mitsuo Hayasaka, in 2012 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136),
observed improvement from 400-550 to 520-740.
Signed-off-by: Constantine Shulyupin <const@MakeLinux.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2018-09-06 20:37:06 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline loff_t fuse_round_up(struct fuse_conn *fc, loff_t off)
|
2013-05-30 20:41:34 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
fuse: add max_pages to init_out
Replace FUSE_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ with the configurable parameter max_pages to
improve performance.
Old RFC with detailed description of the problem and many fixes by Mitsuo
Hayasaka (mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@hitachi.com):
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136
We've encountered performance degradation and fixed it on a big and complex
virtual environment.
Environment to reproduce degradation and improvement:
1. Add lag to user mode FUSE
Add nanosleep(&(struct timespec){ 0, 1000 }, NULL); to xmp_write_buf in
passthrough_fh.c
2. patch UM fuse with configurable max_pages parameter. The patch will be
provided latter.
3. run test script and perform test on tmpfs
fuse_test()
{
cd /tmp
mkdir -p fusemnt
passthrough_fh -o max_pages=$1 /tmp/fusemnt
grep fuse /proc/self/mounts
dd conv=fdatasync oflag=dsync if=/dev/zero of=fusemnt/tmp/tmp \
count=1K bs=1M 2>&1 | grep -v records
rm fusemnt/tmp/tmp
killall passthrough_fh
}
Test results:
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.73867 s, 618 MB/s
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,max_pages=256 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.15643 s, 928 MB/s
Obviously with bigger lag the difference between 'before' and 'after'
will be more significant.
Mitsuo Hayasaka, in 2012 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136),
observed improvement from 400-550 to 520-740.
Signed-off-by: Constantine Shulyupin <const@MakeLinux.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2018-09-06 20:37:06 +08:00
|
|
|
return round_up(off, fc->max_pages << PAGE_SHIFT);
|
2013-05-30 20:41:34 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2012-02-18 01:46:25 +08:00
|
|
|
static ssize_t
|
2016-04-07 23:51:58 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
|
2012-02-18 01:46:25 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2015-02-02 21:59:43 +08:00
|
|
|
DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(wait);
|
2012-02-18 01:46:25 +08:00
|
|
|
ssize_t ret = 0;
|
2013-05-01 20:37:21 +08:00
|
|
|
struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
|
2013-05-30 20:41:34 +08:00
|
|
|
bool async_dio = ff->fc->async_dio;
|
2012-02-18 01:46:25 +08:00
|
|
|
loff_t pos = 0;
|
2012-12-14 23:21:08 +08:00
|
|
|
struct inode *inode;
|
|
|
|
loff_t i_size;
|
2014-03-05 11:38:00 +08:00
|
|
|
size_t count = iov_iter_count(iter);
|
2016-04-07 23:51:58 +08:00
|
|
|
loff_t offset = iocb->ki_pos;
|
2012-12-14 23:20:51 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_io_priv *io;
|
2012-02-18 01:46:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pos = offset;
|
2012-12-14 23:21:08 +08:00
|
|
|
inode = file->f_mapping->host;
|
|
|
|
i_size = i_size_read(inode);
|
2012-02-18 01:46:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-03-16 19:33:52 +08:00
|
|
|
if ((iov_iter_rw(iter) == READ) && (offset > i_size))
|
Fix race when checking i_size on direct i/o read
So far I've had one ACK for this, and no other comments. So I think it
is probably time to send this via some suitable tree. I'm guessing that
the vfs tree would be the most appropriate route, but not sure that
there is one at the moment (don't see anything recent at kernel.org)
so in that case I think -mm is the "back up plan". Al, please let me
know if you will take this?
Steve.
---------------------
Following on from the "Re: [PATCH v3] vfs: fix a bug when we do some dio
reads with append dio writes" thread on linux-fsdevel, this patch is my
current version of the fix proposed as option (b) in that thread.
Removing the i_size test from the direct i/o read path at vfs level
means that filesystems now have to deal with requests which are beyond
i_size themselves. These I've divided into three sets:
a) Those with "no op" ->direct_IO (9p, cifs, ceph)
These are obviously not going to be an issue
b) Those with "home brew" ->direct_IO (nfs, fuse)
I've been told that NFS should not have any problem with the larger
i_size, however I've added an extra test to FUSE to duplicate the
original behaviour just to be on the safe side.
c) Those using __blockdev_direct_IO()
These call through to ->get_block() which should deal with the EOF
condition correctly. I've verified that with GFS2 and I believe that
Zheng has verified it for ext4. I've also run the test on XFS and it
passes both before and after this change.
The part of the patch in filemap.c looks a lot larger than it really is
- there are only two lines of real change. The rest is just indentation
of the contained code.
There remains a test of i_size though, which was added for btrfs. It
doesn't cause the other filesystems a problem as the test is performed
after ->direct_IO has been called. It is possible that there is a race
that does matter to btrfs, however this patch doesn't change that, so
its still an overall improvement.
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Acked-by: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2014-01-24 22:42:22 +08:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
2012-12-14 23:21:26 +08:00
|
|
|
/* optimization for short read */
|
2015-03-16 19:33:52 +08:00
|
|
|
if (async_dio && iov_iter_rw(iter) != WRITE && offset + count > i_size) {
|
2012-12-14 23:21:26 +08:00
|
|
|
if (offset >= i_size)
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
fuse: add max_pages to init_out
Replace FUSE_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ with the configurable parameter max_pages to
improve performance.
Old RFC with detailed description of the problem and many fixes by Mitsuo
Hayasaka (mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@hitachi.com):
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136
We've encountered performance degradation and fixed it on a big and complex
virtual environment.
Environment to reproduce degradation and improvement:
1. Add lag to user mode FUSE
Add nanosleep(&(struct timespec){ 0, 1000 }, NULL); to xmp_write_buf in
passthrough_fh.c
2. patch UM fuse with configurable max_pages parameter. The patch will be
provided latter.
3. run test script and perform test on tmpfs
fuse_test()
{
cd /tmp
mkdir -p fusemnt
passthrough_fh -o max_pages=$1 /tmp/fusemnt
grep fuse /proc/self/mounts
dd conv=fdatasync oflag=dsync if=/dev/zero of=fusemnt/tmp/tmp \
count=1K bs=1M 2>&1 | grep -v records
rm fusemnt/tmp/tmp
killall passthrough_fh
}
Test results:
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.73867 s, 618 MB/s
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,max_pages=256 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.15643 s, 928 MB/s
Obviously with bigger lag the difference between 'before' and 'after'
will be more significant.
Mitsuo Hayasaka, in 2012 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136),
observed improvement from 400-550 to 520-740.
Signed-off-by: Constantine Shulyupin <const@MakeLinux.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2018-09-06 20:37:06 +08:00
|
|
|
iov_iter_truncate(iter, fuse_round_up(ff->fc, i_size - offset));
|
2015-04-08 03:06:19 +08:00
|
|
|
count = iov_iter_count(iter);
|
2012-12-14 23:21:26 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2012-12-14 23:21:08 +08:00
|
|
|
io = kmalloc(sizeof(struct fuse_io_priv), GFP_KERNEL);
|
2012-12-14 23:20:51 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!io)
|
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
2012-12-14 23:21:08 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock_init(&io->lock);
|
2016-03-12 00:35:34 +08:00
|
|
|
kref_init(&io->refcnt);
|
2012-12-14 23:21:08 +08:00
|
|
|
io->reqs = 1;
|
|
|
|
io->bytes = -1;
|
|
|
|
io->size = 0;
|
|
|
|
io->offset = offset;
|
2015-03-16 19:33:52 +08:00
|
|
|
io->write = (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE);
|
2012-12-14 23:21:08 +08:00
|
|
|
io->err = 0;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* By default, we want to optimize all I/Os with async request
|
2013-05-01 20:37:21 +08:00
|
|
|
* submission to the client filesystem if supported.
|
2012-12-14 23:21:08 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2013-05-30 20:41:34 +08:00
|
|
|
io->async = async_dio;
|
2012-12-14 23:21:08 +08:00
|
|
|
io->iocb = iocb;
|
2016-04-07 19:48:11 +08:00
|
|
|
io->blocking = is_sync_kiocb(iocb);
|
2012-12-14 23:21:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2016-04-07 19:48:11 +08:00
|
|
|
* We cannot asynchronously extend the size of a file.
|
|
|
|
* In such case the aio will behave exactly like sync io.
|
2012-12-14 23:21:08 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-04-07 19:48:11 +08:00
|
|
|
if ((offset + count > i_size) && iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE)
|
|
|
|
io->blocking = true;
|
2012-02-18 01:46:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-07 19:48:11 +08:00
|
|
|
if (io->async && io->blocking) {
|
2016-03-12 00:35:34 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Additional reference to keep io around after
|
|
|
|
* calling fuse_aio_complete()
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
kref_get(&io->refcnt);
|
2015-02-02 21:59:43 +08:00
|
|
|
io->done = &wait;
|
2016-03-12 00:35:34 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-02-02 21:59:43 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-03-16 19:33:52 +08:00
|
|
|
if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE) {
|
2015-04-08 03:06:19 +08:00
|
|
|
ret = fuse_direct_io(io, iter, &pos, FUSE_DIO_WRITE);
|
2015-03-31 10:15:58 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_invalidate_attr(inode);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2014-03-17 03:50:47 +08:00
|
|
|
ret = __fuse_direct_read(io, iter, &pos);
|
2015-03-31 10:15:58 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2012-12-14 23:20:51 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-12-14 23:21:08 +08:00
|
|
|
if (io->async) {
|
2018-11-09 21:51:46 +08:00
|
|
|
bool blocking = io->blocking;
|
|
|
|
|
2012-12-14 23:21:08 +08:00
|
|
|
fuse_aio_complete(io, ret < 0 ? ret : 0, -1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* we have a non-extending, async request, so return */
|
2018-11-09 21:51:46 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!blocking)
|
2012-12-14 23:21:08 +08:00
|
|
|
return -EIOCBQUEUED;
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-02 21:59:43 +08:00
|
|
|
wait_for_completion(&wait);
|
|
|
|
ret = fuse_get_res_by_io(io);
|
2012-12-14 23:21:08 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-12 00:35:34 +08:00
|
|
|
kref_put(&io->refcnt, fuse_io_release);
|
2015-02-02 21:59:43 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-03-16 19:33:52 +08:00
|
|
|
if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE) {
|
2012-12-18 18:05:08 +08:00
|
|
|
if (ret > 0)
|
|
|
|
fuse_write_update_size(inode, pos);
|
|
|
|
else if (ret < 0 && offset + count > i_size)
|
|
|
|
fuse_do_truncate(file);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2012-02-18 01:46:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-05-28 19:22:50 +08:00
|
|
|
static int fuse_writeback_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t start, loff_t end)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int err = filemap_write_and_wait_range(inode->i_mapping, start, end);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!err)
|
|
|
|
fuse_sync_writes(inode);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-10 23:55:56 +08:00
|
|
|
static long fuse_file_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset,
|
|
|
|
loff_t length)
|
2012-04-23 09:45:24 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
|
2014-12-12 17:04:51 +08:00
|
|
|
struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
|
2013-09-13 23:20:16 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
|
2012-04-23 09:45:24 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = ff->fc;
|
2014-12-12 16:49:05 +08:00
|
|
|
FUSE_ARGS(args);
|
2012-04-23 09:45:24 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_fallocate_in inarg = {
|
|
|
|
.fh = ff->fh,
|
|
|
|
.offset = offset,
|
|
|
|
.length = length,
|
|
|
|
.mode = mode
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
int err;
|
2013-06-13 16:16:39 +08:00
|
|
|
bool lock_inode = !(mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE) ||
|
|
|
|
(mode & FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE);
|
2012-04-23 09:45:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-04-28 20:19:21 +08:00
|
|
|
if (mode & ~(FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE))
|
|
|
|
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
|
|
|
|
2012-04-26 16:56:36 +08:00
|
|
|
if (fc->no_fallocate)
|
|
|
|
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-13 16:16:39 +08:00
|
|
|
if (lock_inode) {
|
2016-01-23 04:40:57 +08:00
|
|
|
inode_lock(inode);
|
2013-09-13 23:19:54 +08:00
|
|
|
if (mode & FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE) {
|
|
|
|
loff_t endbyte = offset + length - 1;
|
2019-05-28 19:22:50 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = fuse_writeback_range(inode, offset, endbyte);
|
2013-09-13 23:19:54 +08:00
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-05-17 21:30:32 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-18 04:04:41 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!(mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE) &&
|
|
|
|
offset + length > i_size_read(inode)) {
|
|
|
|
err = inode_newsize_ok(inode, offset + length);
|
|
|
|
if (err)
|
2019-05-27 17:42:07 +08:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
2019-04-18 04:04:41 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-13 23:20:16 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!(mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE))
|
|
|
|
set_bit(FUSE_I_SIZE_UNSTABLE, &fi->state);
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:08 +08:00
|
|
|
args.opcode = FUSE_FALLOCATE;
|
|
|
|
args.nodeid = ff->nodeid;
|
|
|
|
args.in_numargs = 1;
|
|
|
|
args.in_args[0].size = sizeof(inarg);
|
|
|
|
args.in_args[0].value = &inarg;
|
2014-12-12 16:49:05 +08:00
|
|
|
err = fuse_simple_request(fc, &args);
|
2012-04-26 16:56:36 +08:00
|
|
|
if (err == -ENOSYS) {
|
|
|
|
fc->no_fallocate = 1;
|
|
|
|
err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-05-18 03:27:34 +08:00
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* we could have extended the file */
|
2013-12-26 23:51:11 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!(mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE)) {
|
|
|
|
bool changed = fuse_write_update_size(inode, offset + length);
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-28 20:19:22 +08:00
|
|
|
if (changed && fc->writeback_cache)
|
|
|
|
file_update_time(file);
|
2013-12-26 23:51:11 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2013-05-18 03:27:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (mode & FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE)
|
|
|
|
truncate_pagecache_range(inode, offset, offset + length - 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse_invalidate_attr(inode);
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-17 21:30:32 +08:00
|
|
|
out:
|
2013-09-13 23:20:16 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!(mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE))
|
|
|
|
clear_bit(FUSE_I_SIZE_UNSTABLE, &fi->state);
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-13 23:19:54 +08:00
|
|
|
if (lock_inode)
|
2016-01-23 04:40:57 +08:00
|
|
|
inode_unlock(inode);
|
2013-05-17 21:30:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-04-23 09:45:24 +08:00
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-05 23:04:47 +08:00
|
|
|
static ssize_t __fuse_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
|
|
|
|
struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
|
|
|
|
size_t len, unsigned int flags)
|
2018-08-21 20:36:31 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff_in = file_in->private_data;
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_file *ff_out = file_out->private_data;
|
2019-05-28 19:22:50 +08:00
|
|
|
struct inode *inode_in = file_inode(file_in);
|
2018-08-21 20:36:31 +08:00
|
|
|
struct inode *inode_out = file_inode(file_out);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_inode *fi_out = get_fuse_inode(inode_out);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_conn *fc = ff_in->fc;
|
|
|
|
FUSE_ARGS(args);
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_copy_file_range_in inarg = {
|
|
|
|
.fh_in = ff_in->fh,
|
|
|
|
.off_in = pos_in,
|
|
|
|
.nodeid_out = ff_out->nodeid,
|
|
|
|
.fh_out = ff_out->fh,
|
|
|
|
.off_out = pos_out,
|
|
|
|
.len = len,
|
|
|
|
.flags = flags
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct fuse_write_out outarg;
|
|
|
|
ssize_t err;
|
|
|
|
/* mark unstable when write-back is not used, and file_out gets
|
|
|
|
* extended */
|
|
|
|
bool is_unstable = (!fc->writeback_cache) &&
|
|
|
|
((pos_out + len) > inode_out->i_size);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (fc->no_copy_file_range)
|
|
|
|
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-05 23:04:50 +08:00
|
|
|
if (file_inode(file_in)->i_sb != file_inode(file_out)->i_sb)
|
|
|
|
return -EXDEV;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-05-28 19:22:50 +08:00
|
|
|
if (fc->writeback_cache) {
|
|
|
|
inode_lock(inode_in);
|
2019-05-28 19:22:50 +08:00
|
|
|
err = fuse_writeback_range(inode_in, pos_in, pos_in + len);
|
2019-05-28 19:22:50 +08:00
|
|
|
inode_unlock(inode_in);
|
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-21 20:36:31 +08:00
|
|
|
inode_lock(inode_out);
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-05 23:04:51 +08:00
|
|
|
err = file_modified(file_out);
|
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-21 20:36:31 +08:00
|
|
|
if (fc->writeback_cache) {
|
2019-05-28 19:22:50 +08:00
|
|
|
err = fuse_writeback_range(inode_out, pos_out, pos_out + len);
|
2018-08-21 20:36:31 +08:00
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (is_unstable)
|
|
|
|
set_bit(FUSE_I_SIZE_UNSTABLE, &fi_out->state);
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 21:04:08 +08:00
|
|
|
args.opcode = FUSE_COPY_FILE_RANGE;
|
|
|
|
args.nodeid = ff_in->nodeid;
|
|
|
|
args.in_numargs = 1;
|
|
|
|
args.in_args[0].size = sizeof(inarg);
|
|
|
|
args.in_args[0].value = &inarg;
|
|
|
|
args.out_numargs = 1;
|
|
|
|
args.out_args[0].size = sizeof(outarg);
|
|
|
|
args.out_args[0].value = &outarg;
|
2018-08-21 20:36:31 +08:00
|
|
|
err = fuse_simple_request(fc, &args);
|
|
|
|
if (err == -ENOSYS) {
|
|
|
|
fc->no_copy_file_range = 1;
|
|
|
|
err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (fc->writeback_cache) {
|
|
|
|
fuse_write_update_size(inode_out, pos_out + outarg.size);
|
|
|
|
file_update_time(file_out);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse_invalidate_attr(inode_out);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = outarg.size;
|
|
|
|
out:
|
|
|
|
if (is_unstable)
|
|
|
|
clear_bit(FUSE_I_SIZE_UNSTABLE, &fi_out->state);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
inode_unlock(inode_out);
|
2019-06-05 23:04:51 +08:00
|
|
|
file_accessed(file_in);
|
2018-08-21 20:36:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-05 23:04:47 +08:00
|
|
|
static ssize_t fuse_copy_file_range(struct file *src_file, loff_t src_off,
|
|
|
|
struct file *dst_file, loff_t dst_off,
|
|
|
|
size_t len, unsigned int flags)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ssize_t ret;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ret = __fuse_copy_file_range(src_file, src_off, dst_file, dst_off,
|
|
|
|
len, flags);
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-05 23:04:50 +08:00
|
|
|
if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP || ret == -EXDEV)
|
2019-06-05 23:04:47 +08:00
|
|
|
ret = generic_copy_file_range(src_file, src_off, dst_file,
|
|
|
|
dst_off, len, flags);
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-28 17:56:42 +08:00
|
|
|
static const struct file_operations fuse_file_operations = {
|
2008-04-30 15:54:45 +08:00
|
|
|
.llseek = fuse_file_llseek,
|
2014-04-03 02:47:09 +08:00
|
|
|
.read_iter = fuse_file_read_iter,
|
2014-04-04 02:33:23 +08:00
|
|
|
.write_iter = fuse_file_write_iter,
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
.mmap = fuse_file_mmap,
|
|
|
|
.open = fuse_open,
|
|
|
|
.flush = fuse_flush,
|
|
|
|
.release = fuse_release,
|
|
|
|
.fsync = fuse_fsync,
|
2006-06-25 20:48:52 +08:00
|
|
|
.lock = fuse_file_lock,
|
2007-10-18 18:07:02 +08:00
|
|
|
.flock = fuse_file_flock,
|
2019-01-24 17:40:17 +08:00
|
|
|
.splice_read = generic_file_splice_read,
|
|
|
|
.splice_write = iter_file_splice_write,
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
.unlocked_ioctl = fuse_file_ioctl,
|
|
|
|
.compat_ioctl = fuse_file_compat_ioctl,
|
2008-11-26 19:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
.poll = fuse_file_poll,
|
2012-04-23 09:45:24 +08:00
|
|
|
.fallocate = fuse_file_fallocate,
|
2019-01-24 17:40:17 +08:00
|
|
|
.copy_file_range = fuse_copy_file_range,
|
2005-09-10 04:10:35 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-28 19:26:44 +08:00
|
|
|
static const struct address_space_operations fuse_file_aops = {
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
.readpage = fuse_readpage,
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
.writepage = fuse_writepage,
|
2013-06-30 01:45:29 +08:00
|
|
|
.writepages = fuse_writepages,
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
.launder_page = fuse_launder_page,
|
2005-09-10 04:10:33 +08:00
|
|
|
.readpages = fuse_readpages,
|
fuse: support writable mmap
Quoting Linus (3 years ago, FUSE inclusion discussions):
"User-space filesystems are hard to get right. I'd claim that they
are almost impossible, unless you limit them somehow (shared
writable mappings are the nastiest part - if you don't have those,
you can reasonably limit your problems by limiting the number of
dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls)."
Instead of attempting the impossible, I've just waited for the dirty page
accounting infrastructure to materialize (thanks to Peter Zijlstra and
others). This nicely solved the biggest problem: limiting the number of pages
used for write caching.
Some small details remained, however, which this largish patch attempts to
address. It provides a page writeback implementation for fuse, which is
completely safe against VM related deadlocks. Performance may not be very
good for certain usage patterns, but generally it should be acceptable.
It has been tested extensively with fsx-linux and bash-shared-mapping.
Fuse page writeback design
--------------------------
fuse_writepage() allocates a new temporary page with GFP_NOFS|__GFP_HIGHMEM.
It copies the contents of the original page, and queues a WRITE request to the
userspace filesystem using this temp page.
The writeback is finished instantly from the MM's point of view: the page is
removed from the radix trees, and the PageDirty and PageWriteback flags are
cleared.
For the duration of the actual write, the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP counter is
incremented. The per-bdi writeback count is not decremented until the actual
write completes.
On dirtying the page, fuse waits for a previous write to finish before
proceeding. This makes sure, there can only be one temporary page used at a
time for one cached page.
This approach is wasteful in both memory and CPU bandwidth, so why is this
complication needed?
The basic problem is that there can be no guarantee about the time in which
the userspace filesystem will complete a write. It may be buggy or even
malicious, and fail to complete WRITE requests. We don't want unrelated parts
of the system to grind to a halt in such cases.
Also a filesystem may need additional resources (particularly memory) to
complete a WRITE request. There's a great danger of a deadlock if that
allocation may wait for the writepage to finish.
Currently there are several cases where the kernel can block on page
writeback:
- allocation order is larger than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
- page migration
- throttle_vm_writeout (through NR_WRITEBACK)
- sync(2)
Of course in some cases (fsync, msync) we explicitly want to allow blocking.
So for these cases new code has to be added to fuse, since the VM is not
tracking writeback pages for us any more.
As an extra safetly measure, the maximum dirty ratio allocated to a single
fuse filesystem is set to 1% by default. This way one (or several) buggy or
malicious fuse filesystems cannot slow down the rest of the system by hogging
dirty memory.
With appropriate privileges, this limit can be raised through
'/sys/class/bdi/<bdi>/max_ratio'.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-30 15:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
.set_page_dirty = __set_page_dirty_nobuffers,
|
2006-12-07 12:35:51 +08:00
|
|
|
.bmap = fuse_bmap,
|
2012-02-18 01:46:25 +08:00
|
|
|
.direct_IO = fuse_direct_IO,
|
2013-10-10 21:11:43 +08:00
|
|
|
.write_begin = fuse_write_begin,
|
|
|
|
.write_end = fuse_write_end,
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void fuse_init_file_inode(struct inode *inode)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2018-10-01 16:07:05 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-10 04:10:37 +08:00
|
|
|
inode->i_fop = &fuse_file_operations;
|
|
|
|
inode->i_data.a_ops = &fuse_file_aops;
|
2018-10-01 16:07:05 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fi->write_files);
|
|
|
|
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fi->queued_writes);
|
|
|
|
fi->writectr = 0;
|
|
|
|
init_waitqueue_head(&fi->page_waitq);
|
|
|
|
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fi->writepages);
|
2005-09-10 04:10:30 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|