License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.
How this work was done:
Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).
All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.
- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.
For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139
and resulted in the first patch in this series.
If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930
and resulted in the second patch in this series.
- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1
and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).
- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.
In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.
Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.
In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.
Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct
This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.
These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-01 22:07:57 +08:00
|
|
|
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
|
2017-07-11 06:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifndef _LINUX_BUILD_BUG_H
|
|
|
|
#define _LINUX_BUILD_BUG_H
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/compiler.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef __CHECKER__
|
|
|
|
#define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) (0)
|
|
|
|
#else /* __CHECKER__ */
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Force a compilation error if condition is true, but also produce a
|
2019-12-05 08:50:20 +08:00
|
|
|
* result (of value 0 and type int), so the expression can be used
|
2017-07-11 06:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
* e.g. in a structure initializer (or where-ever else comma expressions
|
|
|
|
* aren't permitted).
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2019-12-05 08:50:20 +08:00
|
|
|
#define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) ((int)(sizeof(struct { int:(-!!(e)); })))
|
build_bug.h: remove most of dummy BUILD_BUG_ON stubs for Sparse
The introduction of these dummy BUILD_BUG_ON stubs dates back to commmit
903c0c7cdc21 ("sparse: define dummy BUILD_BUG_ON definition for
sparse").
At that time, BUILD_BUG_ON() was implemented with the negative array
trick *and* the link-time trick, like this:
extern int __build_bug_on_failed;
#define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition) \
do { \
((void)sizeof(char[1 - 2*!!(condition)])); \
if (condition) __build_bug_on_failed = 1; \
} while(0)
Sparse is more strict about the negative array trick than GCC because
Sparse requires the array length to be really constant.
Here is the simple test code for the macro above:
static const int x = 0;
BUILD_BUG_ON(x);
GCC is absolutely fine with it (-Wvla was enabled only very recently),
but Sparse warns like this:
error: bad constant expression
error: cannot size expression
(If you are using a newer version of Sparse, you will see a different
warning message, "warning: Variable length array is used".)
Anyway, Sparse was producing many false positives, and noisier than it
should be at that time.
With the previous commit, the leftover negative array trick is gone.
Sparse is fine with the current BUILD_BUG_ON(), which is implemented by
using the 'error' attribute.
I am keeping the stub for BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(). Otherwise, Sparse would
complain about the following code, which GCC is fine with:
static const int x = 0;
int y = BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(x);
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1542856462-18836-3-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-01-04 07:26:23 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif /* __CHECKER__ */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Force a compilation error if a constant expression is not a power of 2 */
|
|
|
|
#define __BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(n) \
|
|
|
|
BUILD_BUG_ON(((n) & ((n) - 1)) != 0)
|
|
|
|
#define BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(n) \
|
|
|
|
BUILD_BUG_ON((n) == 0 || (((n) & ((n) - 1)) != 0))
|
2017-07-11 06:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID() permits the compiler to check the validity of the
|
|
|
|
* expression but avoids the generation of any code, even if that expression
|
|
|
|
* has side-effects.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#define BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(e) ((void)(sizeof((__force long)(e))))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG - break compile if a condition is true & emit supplied
|
|
|
|
* error message.
|
|
|
|
* @condition: the condition which the compiler should know is false.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* See BUILD_BUG_ON for description.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* BUILD_BUG_ON - break compile if a condition is true.
|
|
|
|
* @condition: the condition which the compiler should know is false.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* If you have some code which relies on certain constants being equal, or
|
|
|
|
* some other compile-time-evaluated condition, you should use BUILD_BUG_ON to
|
|
|
|
* detect if someone changes it.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition) \
|
|
|
|
BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* BUILD_BUG - break compile if used.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* If you have some code that you expect the compiler to eliminate at
|
|
|
|
* build time, you should use BUILD_BUG to detect if it is
|
|
|
|
* unexpectedly used.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#define BUILD_BUG() BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(1, "BUILD_BUG failed")
|
|
|
|
|
build_bug.h: add wrapper for _Static_assert
BUILD_BUG_ON() is a little annoying, since it cannot be used outside
function scope. So one cannot put assertions about the sizeof() a
struct next to the struct definition, but has to hide that in some more
or less arbitrary function.
Since gcc 4.6 (which is now also the required minimum), there is support
for the C11 _Static_assert in all C modes, including gnu89. So add a
simple wrapper for that.
_Static_assert() requires a message argument, which is usually quite
redundant (and I believe that bug got fixed at least in newer C++
standards), but we can easily work around that with a little macro
magic, making it optional.
For example, adding
static_assert(sizeof(struct printf_spec) == 8);
in vsprintf.c and modifying that struct to violate it, one gets
./include/linux/build_bug.h:78:41: error: static assertion failed: "sizeof(struct printf_spec) == 8"
#define __static_assert(expr, msg, ...) _Static_assert(expr, "" msg "")
godbolt.org suggests that _Static_assert() has been support by clang
since at least 3.0.0.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190208203015.29702-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Acked-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 08:27:00 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* static_assert - check integer constant expression at build time
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* static_assert() is a wrapper for the C11 _Static_assert, with a
|
|
|
|
* little macro magic to make the message optional (defaulting to the
|
|
|
|
* stringification of the tested expression).
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Contrary to BUILD_BUG_ON(), static_assert() can be used at global
|
|
|
|
* scope, but requires the expression to be an integer constant
|
|
|
|
* expression (i.e., it is not enough that __builtin_constant_p() is
|
|
|
|
* true for expr).
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Also note that BUILD_BUG_ON() fails the build if the condition is
|
|
|
|
* true, while static_assert() fails the build if the expression is
|
|
|
|
* false.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#define static_assert(expr, ...) __static_assert(expr, ##__VA_ARGS__, #expr)
|
|
|
|
#define __static_assert(expr, msg, ...) _Static_assert(expr, msg)
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-11 06:51:07 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif /* _LINUX_BUILD_BUG_H */
|