d649c2aa3b
%{verbose:...} supported a special syntax of negation with %{!verbose} but this conflicts with general macro syntax. Now that we have expressions we can easily handle arbitrary conditions using generic syntax but %verbose semantics need to change for that: lose the argument and just return a simple boolean reflecting whether rpm is in verbose mode or not. This is obviously an incompatible change, but few things outside rpm itself should care about this anyhow. Update the sole user (build scriptlets) to use an expression instead (whee, the first actual in-tree user!), documentation and testcases accordingly. |
||
---|---|---|
build | ||
ci | ||
db3 | ||
doc | ||
fileattrs | ||
lib | ||
luaext | ||
misc | ||
plugins | ||
po | ||
python | ||
rpmio | ||
scripts | ||
sign | ||
tests | ||
tools | ||
.gitignore | ||
.mailmap | ||
CHANGES | ||
COPYING | ||
CREDITS | ||
INSTALL | ||
Makefile.am | ||
Makefile.maint | ||
README | ||
autogen.sh | ||
cliutils.c | ||
cliutils.h | ||
configure.ac | ||
debug.h | ||
installplatform | ||
macros.in | ||
mkinstalldirs | ||
platform.in | ||
preinstall.am | ||
rpm.am | ||
rpm.c | ||
rpm.pc.in | ||
rpm2archive.c | ||
rpm2cpio.c | ||
rpmbuild.c | ||
rpmdb.c | ||
rpmkeys.c | ||
rpmpopt.in | ||
rpmrc.in | ||
rpmsign.c | ||
rpmspec.c | ||
system.h |
README
This is RPM, the RPM Package Manager. The latest releases are always available at: http://rpm.org/releases/ Additional RPM documentation (papers, slides, HOWTOs) can also be found at the same site: http://rpm.org. http://rpm.org/community all rpm releated mailing lists. RPM was originally written by: Erik Troan <ewt@redhat.com> Marc Ewing <marc@redhat.com> See the CREDITS file for a list of folks who have helped us out tremendously. RPM is Copyright (c) 1998 by Red Hat Software, Inc., and may be distributed under the terms of the GPL and LGPL (see the file COPYING for details).