Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Florian Festi d5c69756cf Explicitly mention that the rpmio/ sub dir is under LGPL
As the code in the rpmio sub directory was split out of the lib sub dir
it is already under LGPL as "code derived from" "the source code in the
lib subdirectory" according to the license. But not having the sub directory
mentioned in the license confuses users and contributers.

The original release tarballs in http://ftp.rpm.org/releases/historical/ show
the license was changed into the existing dual one between rpm 2.4.3 and 2.4.4,
and that no rpmio/ directory exists at that time. Our git repo disagrees with
the time of rpmio/ split due to some conversion artifacts (cvs to mercury to
git), as it shows rpmio/ directory existing from the first commit, but this was
not actually the case.

The license stating that the dual license is there to allow linking with librpm
from non-GPL code supports this interpretation as librpmio is required in order
to use librpm even if it is a separate library nowadays.

So this change does not change the license of any code but only clearifies the
current situation.

Resolves: #516
2020-01-29 14:48:38 +02:00
Colin Walters c4040afc16 COPYING: Minor grammar fixes
I was looking at this file in the context of dnf/rpm-ostree integration:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/991#issuecomment-355587679

The incorrect use of "it's" was distracting; I ended up rewording the initial
sentence to be more direct.

The second hunk is another grammar fix.
2018-01-09 11:01:45 +02:00
Panu Matilainen 6359697b25 Update contact address in COPYING (RhBug:742362)
- marc and ewt haven't been valid email addresses in the last 10+
  years, cough...
2012-11-05 15:09:58 +02:00
ewt 3a7e18a373 Changed licensing of librpm to LGPL
CVS patchset: 1781
CVS date: 1997/08/10 13:40:16
1997-08-10 13:40:16 +00:00
root 84a95a572a Initial revision
CVS patchset: 594
CVS date: 1996/05/23 03:05:34
1996-05-23 03:05:34 +00:00