To avoid having too many ShortBufferException thrown in ALTS code path on Java 8, we came up with this workaround creating new managed buffer, filling it, and passing it to underlying Conscrypt not to hit the code path throwing the exception. This might look to introduce another inefficiency but it's more like making it explicit because Conscrypt will do for non-managed buffer which gRPC uses.
Fix: #6761
Changed the logic of parsing Route to skip Routes with action that specifies cluster_header. Eliminate unnecessary validation logic in XdsClientImpl, of which is already covered in converters.
This PR changes the `NettyServerTransport#getLogLevel` method to log
`SocketException`s to `LogLevel.FINE`, rather than exclusively pure
IOExceptions. This may fix an unintentional regression introduced in
c166ec2c, although the message in my java version (14.0.1) wouldn't have
passed the old logic for quieting either. This also fixes the issue
raised in #6423 that was locked for inactivity.
This fixes
```
[2020/05/14 20:21:52 INFO] [io.grpc.netty.NettyServerTransport.connections] Transport failed
java.net.SocketException: Connection reset
at java.base/sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.throwConnectionReset(SocketChannelImpl.java:345)
at java.base/sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.read(SocketChannelImpl.java:376)
at io.netty.buffer.PooledUnsafeDirectByteBuf.setBytes(PooledUnsafeDirectByteBuf.java:288)
at io.netty.buffer.AbstractByteBuf.writeBytes(AbstractByteBuf.java:1125)
at io.netty.channel.socket.nio.NioSocketChannel.doReadBytes(NioSocketChannel.java:347)
at io.netty.channel.nio.AbstractNioByteChannel$NioByteUnsafe.read(AbstractNioByteChannel.java:148)
at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKey(NioEventLoop.java:677)
at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKeysOptimized(NioEventLoop.java:612)
at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKeys(NioEventLoop.java:529)
at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:491)
at io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$5.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:905)
at io.netty.util.concurrent.FastThreadLocalRunnable.run(FastThreadLocalRunnable.java:30)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:832)
```
being logged to level INFO, which occurs whenever a socket is improperly
closed by the client, such as with the grpc-health-probe (They've got an
[open issue](https://github.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-health-probe/issues/34)
for this)
If the server fails (e.g.: with an unimplemented status), the test still succeeds.
This change adds assertions to check the status code as well as the expected number of responses.
We include this dep in our examples, but never mentioned it in the README.
Instead of getting into details about what it's for, the brief comment should
avoid most confusion for existing Java 8 users about why it appears to be
unnecessary.
Add a new disableAutoRequest method that disables all automatic requests while disableAutoInboundFlowControl maintains existing behavior.
The default behavior of requesting initial messages is applied even if disableAutoInboundFlowControl is called. ServerCalls disables all automatic flow control which is much more useful in case the user can't handle incoming messages until some time after the call has started. This change creates a new StartableListener that has an onStart method that is invoked when the call is started which makes initial requests if necessary.
See #6806
This is a java analogue of the C++ test added in grpc/grpc#19623.
Proto changes were synced from grpc/grpc-proto
This client is suitable for testing fallback with any "grpclb" load-balanced service, but is particularly meant to implement a set of test cases described in an internal doc titled "DirectPath Cloud-to-Prod End-to-End Test Cases", section "gRPC DirectPath-to-CFE fallback".
- Use gradle configuration `api` for dependencies that are part of grpc public api signatures.
- Replace deprecated gradle configurations `compile`, `testCompile`, `runtime` and `testRuntime`.
- With minimal change in dependencies: If we need dep X and Y to compile our code, and if X transitively depends on Y, then our build would still pass even if we only include X as `compile`/`implementation` dependency for our project. Ideally we should include both X and Y explicitly as `implementation` dependency for our project, but in this PR we don't add the missing Y if it is previously missing.
Define util function to exclude guava's transitive dependencies jsr305 and animal-sniffer-annotations, and always manually add them as runtimeOnly dependency. error_prone_annotations is an exception: It is also excluded but manually added not as runtimeOnly. It must always compile with guava, otherwise users will see warning spams if guava is in the compile classpath but error_prone_annotations is not.
Eliminate the hack of InternalNotifyOnBuild mechanism for letting ProtoReflectionService get access to the Sever instance, which makes ProtoReflectionService incompatible with server interceptors. This change put the Server instance into the Context and let the ProtoReflectionService RPC obtain it in its RPC Context. Also enhanced ProtoReflectionService so that one service instance can be used across multiple servers.
Use onResourceDoesNotExist() API for notifying resource not found. Previously, it uses onError(), which mixes with errors for other failures (e.g., transient TD network error). This lets us be able to make further improvement of LB policies/resolver's behavior w.r.t control plane changes (e.g., should immediately go into TRANSIENT_FAILURE if the config received from control plane leads to it).
javax.annotation-api is licensed CDDL, which was not noticed when it was
introduced. Tomcat provides an Apache 2 version of the same annotation. Note
that this annotation is only used when compiling with Java 9+.
Unfortunately this may cause classpath collisions since there are _many_ copies
of this annotation on Maven Central; we wanted one canonical source and
javax.annotation-api seemed like that source. We hope this won't impact many
users since we have always suggested using it only for compilation. But it will
probably impact some users. However, we didn't create this mess, this seems to
be "standard practice" for J2EE, which this annotation is now part of, so we're
just impacted by it.
Fixes#6833
Jihun Cho