This commit aligns the naming of the Bazel Maven jars with the names
used by Bazel's migration-tooling project:
https://github.com/bazelbuild/migration-tooling
Unfortunately, we can't fix @com_google_protobuf_java because it's
required by Bazel itself.
Fixes#3328
Bazel third party dependencies are specified in repositories.bzl which
gives the consumer the ability to opt-out of any dependencies they use
directly in their own project.
Fixes#2756
The new plugin uses a newer version of animalsniffer, allows overriding
the animalsniffer version used, and has up-to-date handling. The
up-to-date handling cuts fully incremental parallel build times in half,
from 5.5s to 2.7s.
The previous plugin was supposed to be verifying tests. However, either
it wasn't verifying them or its verification was broken.
core: adds @Nullable Object getAttachedObject() to ServiceDescriptor
compiler: Plumbing necessary to access proto file descriptors via
the reflection service
Protobuf-lite since beta-4 is now more of a fork than a subset of
protobuf-java, which may cause us problems later since lite API is not
stable. Also, lite-generated code may now depend on APIs only in
protobuf-lite, so our users must depend on the protobuf-lite runtime.
Having all our users explicitly override the dependency is bothersome to
them and can easily only expose problems only after we do a release.
So now we are doing the dependency overriding; most users should "just
work" and pick up the correct protobuf artifact. I've confirmed the
exclusion is listed in the grpc-protobuf pom and "gradle dependencies"
and "mvn dependency:tree" do not include protobuf-lite for the examples.
Vanilla protobuf users are most likely to experience any breakage, which
should detect problems more quickly since we use protobuf-java more
frequently than protobuf-lite during development.
protobuf-lite does not include pre-generated code for the well-known
protos, so users will need to generate them themselves for the moment
(google/protobuf#1889).
Note that today changing deps does not noticeably reduce the method code
for our users, since ProGuard already is stripping most classes. The
difference in output is only a reduction of 3 classes and 6 methods for
the android example.
Lite already worked by using the protobuf project, but would bring in
extra dependencies that are not intended to work with lite. Although
protobuf is not yet providing a lite package on Maven Central, we will
be able to swap to it once it is available.
There isn't any new original code in the Java portion, except for a new
overload in ProtoUtils that accepts Message instead of MessageLite.
Depending on Message in ProtoUtils allows us to support extra features
out-of-the-box without any changes to the generated code. For example,
JSON encoding could be supported in this way if Marshaller is enhanced.
However, now codegen must be aware of Lite in order to choose with Util
class to use. That is new code.
In-memory transport provides back the same input stream that was
provided, so if we notice our own object simply avoid serializing.
DeferredProtoInputStream is made package-private because 1) it doesn't
seem we need it to be public and 2) the change depends on it being
package-private so the constructor can be changed.
- Rename flushTo() to drainTo().
- Remove flushTo() from DeferredNanoProtoInputStream (which is renamed
to NanoProtoInputStream), because the optimization is not implemented.
- Rename DeferredProtoInputStream to ProtoInputStream.
#529
io.grpc.nano sort of seems like a "small" version of grpc-java. And
io.grpc.proto could also mean multiple things. Using "protobuf"
and "protobuf nano" gets us consistent names that are still
understandable, predictable, and more similar to protobuf project
itself.
Eric Anderson