Fix misaligned loads when loading UEFI arg pointers
Currently, the two UEFI argument pointers are stored in an `alloca` of alignment 1, a pointer to which is then passed as `argv`. However, [the library code](9c3ad802d9/library/std/src/sys/pal/uefi/mod.rs (L60-L61)) treats `argv` as a pointer to an array of pointers and dereferences it as such, meaning that it presumes the `alloca` is aligned to at least the alignment of a pointer. This PR fixes this mismatch by aligning the `alloca` to the alignment of a pointer.
This PR also changed the `gep` to use the new `inbounds_ptradd` method.
Add the new description field to Target::to_json, and add descriptions for some MSVC targets
The original PR to add a `description` field to `Target` (<https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121905>) didn't add the field to `Target::to_json`, which meant that the `check_consistency` testwould fail if you tried to set a description as it wouldn't survive round-tripping via JSON: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/8180997936/job/22370052535#step:27:4967
This change adds the field to `Target::to_json`, and sets some descriptions to verify that it works correctly.
Tweak the way we protect in-place function arguments in interpreters
Use `MPlaceTy` instead of `PlaceTy` in `FnArg` and ignore (copy) locals in an earlier step ("Locals that don't have their address taken are as protected as they can ever be").
This seems to be crucial for tail call support (as they can't refer to caller's locals which are killed when replacing the stack frame).
r? `@RalfJung`
cc `@oli-obk`
see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121273#issuecomment-1980210690
align_offset, align_to: no longer allow implementations to spuriously fail to align
For a long time, we have allowed `align_offset` to fail to compute a properly aligned offset, and `align_to` to return a smaller-than-maximal "middle slice". This was done to cover the implementation of `align_offset` in const-eval and Miri. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62420 for more background. For about the same amount of time, this has caused confusion and surprise, where people didn't realize they have to write their code to be defensive against `align_offset` failures.
Another way to put this is: the specification is effectively non-deterministic, and non-determinism is hard to test for -- in particular if the implementation everyone uses to test always produces the same reliable result, and nobody expects it to be non-deterministic to begin with.
With https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117840, Miri has stopped making use of this liberty in the spec; it now always behaves like rustc. That only leaves const-eval as potential motivation for this behavior. I do not think this is sufficient motivation. Currently, none of the relevant functions are stably const: `align_offset` is unstably const, `align_to` is not const at all. I propose that if we ever want to make these const-stable, we just accept the fact that they can behave differently at compile-time vs at run-time. This is not the end of the world, and it seems to be much less surprising to programmers than unexpected non-determinism. (Related: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3352.)
`@thomcc` has repeatedly made it clear that they strongly dislike the non-determinism in align_offset, so I expect they will support this. `@oli-obk,` what do you think? Also, whom else should we involve? The primary team responsible is clearly libs-api, so I will nominate this for them. However, allowing const-evaluated code to behave different from run-time code is t-lang territory. The thing is, this is not stabilizing anything t-lang-worthy immediately, but it still does make a decision we will be bound to: if we accept this change, then
- either `align_offset`/`align_to` can never be called in const fn,
- or we allow compile-time behavior to differ from run-time behavior.
So I will nominate for t-lang as well, with the question being: are you okay with accepting either of these outcomes (without committing to which one, just accepting that it has to be one of them)? This closes the door to "have `align_offset` and `align_to` at compile-time and also always have compile-time behavior match run-time behavior".
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62420
Merge `collect_mod_item_types` query into `check_well_formed`
follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121154
this removes more potential parallel-compiler bottlenecks and moves diagnostics for the same items next to each other, instead of grouping diagnostics by analysis kind
Use `MPlaceTy` instead of `PlaceTy` in `FnArg` and ignore (copy) locals in an
earlier step ("Locals that don't have their address taken are as protected as
they can ever be").
This seems to be crucial for tail call support (as they can't refer to caller's
locals which are killed when replacing the stack frame).
Use `ControlFlow` in visitors.
Follow up to #121256
This does have a few small behaviour changes in some diagnostic output where the visitor will now find the first match rather than the last match. The change in `find_anon_types.rs` has the only affected test. I don't see this being an issue as the last occurrence isn't any better of a choice than the first.
Refactor pre-getopts command line argument handling
Rebased version of #111658. I've also fixed the Windows CI failure (although I don't have access to Windows to test it myself).
add known-bug tests for derive failure to detect packed repr
We only taint if it was a normal item. Modules and imports are untouched. Tainting them needs to be done differently, and it's unclear if that would be useful or desirable. If we just taint them into `Res::Err`, we end up losing some duplicate name messages *in the presence of other resolution errors*.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Make TAITs and ATPITs capture late-bound lifetimes in scope
This generalizes the behavior that RPITs have, where they duplicate their in-scope lifetimes so that they will always *reify* late-bound lifetimes that they capture. This allows TAITs and ATPITs to properly error when they capture in-scope late-bound lifetimes.
r? `@oli-obk` cc `@aliemjay`
Fixes#122093 and therefore https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120700#issuecomment-1981213868
Add `#[inline]` to `BTreeMap::new` constructor
This PR add the `#[inline]` attribute to `BTreeMap::new` constructor as to make it eligible for inlining.
<details>
For some context: I was profiling `rustc --check-cfg` with callgrind and due to the way we currently setup all the targets and we end-up calling `BTreeMap::new` multiple times for (nearly) all the targets. Adding the `#[inline]` attribute reduced the number of instructions needed.
</details>
Fix quadratic behavior of repeated vectored writes
Some implementations of `Write::write_vectored` in the standard library (`BufWriter`, `LineWriter`, `Stdout`, `Stderr`) check all buffers to calculate the total length. This is O(n) over the number of buffers.
It's common that only a limited number of buffers is written at a time (e.g. 1024 for `writev(2)`). `write_vectored_all` will then call `write_vectored` repeatedly, leading to a runtime of O(n²) over the number of buffers.
This fix is to only calculate as much as needed if it's needed.
Here's a test program:
```rust
#![feature(write_all_vectored)]
use std::fs::File;
use std::io::{BufWriter, IoSlice, Write};
use std::time::Instant;
fn main() {
let buf = vec![b'\0'; 100_000_000];
let mut slices: Vec<IoSlice<'_>> = buf.chunks(100).map(IoSlice::new).collect();
let mut writer = BufWriter::new(File::create("/dev/null").unwrap());
let start = Instant::now();
write_smart(&slices, &mut writer);
println!("write_smart(): {:?}", start.elapsed());
let start = Instant::now();
writer.write_all_vectored(&mut slices).unwrap();
println!("write_all_vectored(): {:?}", start.elapsed());
}
fn write_smart(mut slices: &[IoSlice<'_>], writer: &mut impl Write) {
while !slices.is_empty() {
// Only try to write as many slices as can be written
let res = writer
.write_vectored(slices.get(..1024).unwrap_or(slices))
.unwrap();
slices = &slices[(res / 100)..];
}
}
```
Before this change:
```
write_smart(): 6.666952ms
write_all_vectored(): 498.437092ms
```
After this change:
```
write_smart(): 6.377158ms
write_all_vectored(): 6.923412ms
```
`LineWriter` (and by extension `Stdout`) isn't fully repaired by this because it looks for newlines. I could open an issue for that after this is merged, I think it's fixable but not trivially.
Add asm goto support to `asm!`
Tracking issue: #119364
This PR implements asm-goto support, using the syntax described in "future possibilities" section of [RFC2873](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2873-inline-asm.html#asm-goto).
Currently I have only implemented the `label` part, not the `fallthrough` part (i.e. fallthrough is implicit). This doesn't reduce the expressive though, since you can use label-break to get arbitrary control flow or simply set a value and rely on jump threading optimisation to get the desired control flow. I can add that later if deemed necessary.
r? ``@Amanieu``
cc ``@ojeda``
Improve std::fs::read_to_string example
Resolves [#118621](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/118621)
For the original code to succeed it requires address.txt to contain a socketaddress, however it is much easier to follow if this is just any strong - eg address could be a street address or just text.
Also changed the variable name from "foo" to something more meaningful as cargo clippy warns you against using foo as a placeholder.
```
$ cat main.rs
use std::fs;
use std::error::Error;
fn main() -> Result<(), Box<dyn Error>> {
let addr: String = fs::read_to_string("address.txt")?.parse()?;
println!("{}", addr);
Ok(())
}
$ cat address.txt
123 rusty lane
san francisco 94999
$ cargo run
Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.00s
Running `/home/haydon/workspace/rust-test-pr/tester/target/debug/tester`
123 rusty lane
san francisco 94999
```
Add arm64ec-pc-windows-msvc target
Introduces the `arm64ec-pc-windows-msvc` target for building Arm64EC ("Emulation Compatible") binaries for Windows.
For more information about Arm64EC see <https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/arm/arm64ec>.
## Tier 3 policy:
> A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
I will be the maintainer for this target.
> Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important even for a tier 3 target.
Target uses the `arm64ec` architecture to match LLVM and MSVC, and the `-pc-windows-msvc` suffix to indicate that it targets Windows via the MSVC environment.
> Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to disambiguate it.
Target name exactly specifies the type of code that will be produced.
> If possible, use only letters, numbers, dashes and underscores for the name. Periods (.) are known to cause issues in Cargo.
Done.
> Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users.
> The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
Uses the same dependencies, requirements and licensing as the other `*-pc-windows-msvc` targets.
> Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0).
Understood.
> The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be subject to any new license requirements.
> Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries. Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require such libraries at all. For instance, rustc built for the target may depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library, but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
> "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous" legal/licensing terms include but are not limited to: non-disclosure requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms, requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its developers or users.
Uses the same dependencies, requirements and licensing as the other `*-pc-windows-msvc` targets.
> Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions.
> This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
Understood, I am not a member of the Rust team.
> Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions.
Both `core` and `alloc` are supported.
Support for `std` depends on making changes to the standard library, `stdarch` and `backtrace` which cannot be done yet as they require fixes coming in LLVM 18.
> The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
Documentation is provided in src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support/arm64ec-pc-windows-msvc.md
> Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via `@)` to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages.
> Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested such notifications.
> Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target.
> In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets, such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
Understood.
Make `std::os::unix::ucred` module private
Tracking issue: #42839
Currently, this unstable module exists: [`std::os::unix::ucred`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/os/unix/ucred/index.html).
All it does is provide `UCred` (which is also available from `std::os::unix::net`), `impl_*` (which is probably a mishap and should be private) and `peer_cred` (which is undocumented but has a documented counterpart at `std::os::unix::net::UnixStream::peer_cred`).
This PR makes the entire `ucred` module private and moves it into `net`, because that's where it is used.
I hope it's fine to simply remove it without a deprecation phase. Otherwise, I can add back a deprecated reexport module `std::os::unix::ucred`.
`@rustbot` label: -T-libs +T-libs-api
Record mtime in bootstrap's LLVM linker script
As discovered in https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/.60ui.60.20tests.20re-running.3F the linker script added in #121967 can trigger rebuilds or new test executions, as it's more recent than some of the existing files themselves.
This PR copies the mtime to the linker script to prevent a second invocation of `./x test tests/ui` from rerunning all of the tests.
Matthias Krüger