rewrite error-found-staticlib-instead-crate to rmake

src/tools/tidy/src/allowed_run_make_makefiles.txt

@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ run-make/emit-shared-files/Makefile
 run-make/emit-stack-sizes/Makefile
 run-make/emit-to-stdout/Makefile
 run-make/env-dep-info/Makefile
-run-make/error-found-staticlib-instead-crate/Makefile
 run-make/error-writing-dependencies/Makefile
 run-make/export-executable-symbols/Makefile
 run-make/extern-diff-internal-name/Makefile

tests/run-make/error-found-staticlib-instead-crate/Makefile

@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
-include ../tools.mk
-
-all:
-	$(RUSTC) foo.rs --crate-type staticlib
-	$(RUSTC) bar.rs 2>&1 | $(CGREP) "found staticlib"

tests/run-make/error-found-staticlib-instead-crate/rmake.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// When rustc is looking for a crate but is given a staticlib instead,
+// the error message should be helpful and indicate precisely the cause
+// of the compilation failure.
+// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/21978
+
+use run_make_support::rustc;
+
+fn main() {
+    rustc().input("foo.rs").crate_type("staticlib").run();
+    rustc().input("bar.rs").run_fail().assert_stderr_contains("found staticlib");
+}