4.7 KiB
- Feature Name: use_nested_groups
- Start Date: 2017-08-25
- RFC PR: rust-lang/rfcs#2128
- Rust Issue: rust-lang/rust#44494
Summary
Permit nested {}
groups in imports.
Permit *
in {}
groups in imports.
use syntax::{
tokenstream::TokenTree, // >1 segments
ext::base::{ExtCtxt, MacResult, DummyResult, MacEager}, // nested braces
ext::build::AstBuilder,
ext::quote::rt::Span,
};
use syntax::ast::{self, *}; // * in braces
use rustc::mir::{*, transform::{MirPass, MirSource}}; // both * and nested braces
Motivation
The motivation is ergonomics. Prefixes are often shared among imports, especially if many imports import names from the same crate. With this nested grouping it's more often possible to merge common import prefixes and write them once instead of writing them multiple times.
Guide-level explanation
Several use
items with common prefix can be merged into one use
item,
in which the prefix is written once and all the suffixes are listed inside
curly braces {}
.
All kinds of suffixes can be listed inside curly braces, including globs *
and
"subtrees" with their own curly braces.
// BEFORE
use syntax::tokenstream::TokenTree;
use syntax::ext::base::{ExtCtxt, MacResult, DummyResult, MacEager};
use syntax::ext::build::AstBuilder,
use syntax::ext::quote::rt::Span,
use syntax::ast;
use syntax::ast::*;
use rustc::mir::*;
use rustc::mir::transform::{MirPass, MirSource};
// AFTER
use syntax::{
// paths with >1 segments are permitted inside braces
tokenstream::TokenTree,
// nested braces are permitted as well
ext::base::{ExtCtxt, MacResult, DummyResult, MacEager},
ext::build::AstBuilder,
ext::quote::rt::Span,
};
// `*` can be listed in braces too
use syntax::ast::{self, *};
// both `*` and nested braces
use rustc::mir::{*, transform::{MirPass, MirSource}};
// the prefix can be empty
use {
syntax::ast::*;
rustc::mir::*;
};
// `pub` imports can use this syntax as well
pub use self::Visibility::{self, Public, Inherited};
A use
item with merged prefixes behaves identically to several use
items
with all the prefixes "unmerged".
Reference-level explanation
Syntax:
IMPORT = ATTRS VISIBILITY `use` [`::`] IMPORT_TREE `;`
IMPORT_TREE = `*` |
REL_MOD_PATH `::` `*` |
`{` IMPORT_TREE_LIST `}` |
REL_MOD_PATH `::` `{` IMPORT_TREE_LIST `}` |
REL_MOD_PATH [`as` IDENT]
IMPORT_TREE_LIST = Ø | (IMPORT_TREE `,`)* IMPORT_TREE [`,`]
REL_MOD_PATH = (IDENT `::`)* IDENT
Resolution:
First the import tree is prefixed with ::
, unless it already starts with
::
, self
or super
.
Then resolution is performed as if the whole import tree were flattened, except
that {self}
/{self as name}
are processed specially because a::b::self
is illegal.
use a::{
b::{self as s, c, d as e},
f::*,
g::h as i,
*,
};
=>
use ::a::b as s;
use ::a::b::c;
use ::a::b::d as e;
use ::a::f::*;
use ::a::g::h as i;
use ::a::*;
Various corner cases are resolved naturally through desugaring
use an::{*, *}; // Use an owl!
=>
use an::*;
use an::*; // Legal, but reported as unused by `unused_imports` lint.
Relationships with other proposal
This RFC is an incremental improvement largely independent from other import-related proposals, but it can have effect on some other RFCs.
Some RFCs propose new syntaxes for absolute paths in the current crate and paths from other crates. Some arguments in those proposals are based on usage statistics - "imports from other crates are more common" or "imports from the current crate are more common". More common imports are supposed to get less verbose syntax.
This RFC removes the these statistics from the equation by reducing verbosity
for all imports with common prefix.
For example, the difference in verbosity between A
, B
and
C
is minimal and doesn't depend on the number of imports.
// A
use extern::{
a::b::c,
d::e::f,
g::h::i,
};
// B
use crate::{
a::b::c,
d::e::f,
g::h::i,
};
// C
use {
a::b::c,
d::e::f,
g::h::i,
};
Drawbacks
The feature encourages (but not requires) multi-line formatting of a single import
use prefix::{
MyName,
x::YourName,
y::Surname,
};
With this formatting it becomes harder to grep for use.*MyName
.
Rationale and Alternatives
Status quo is always an alternative.
Unresolved questions
None so far.