2.4 KiB
- Feature Name: move_cell
- Start Date: 2016-06-15
- RFC PR: rust-lang/rfcs#1651
- Rust Issue: rust-lang/rust#39264
Summary
Extend Cell
to work with non-Copy
types.
Motivation
It allows safe inner-mutability of non-Copy
types without the overhead of RefCell
's reference counting.
The key idea of Cell
is to provide a primitive building block to safely support inner mutability. This must be done while maintaining Rust's aliasing requirements for mutable references. Unlike RefCell
which enforces this at runtime through reference counting, Cell
does this statically by disallowing any reference (mutable or immutable) to the data contained in the cell.
While the current implementation only supports Copy
types, this restriction isn't actually necessary to maintain Rust's aliasing invariants. The only affected API is the get
function which, by design, is only usable with Copy
types.
Detailed design
impl<T> Cell<T> {
fn set(&self, val: T);
fn replace(&self, val: T) -> T;
fn into_inner(self) -> T;
}
impl<T: Copy> Cell<T> {
fn get(&self) -> T;
}
impl<T: Default> Cell<T> {
fn take(&self) -> T;
}
The get
method is kept but is only available for T: Copy
.
The set
method is available for all T
. It will need to be implemented by calling replace
and dropping the returned value. Dropping the old value in-place is unsound since the Drop
impl will hold a mutable reference to the cell contents.
The into_inner
and replace
methods are added, which allow the value in a cell to be read even if T
is not Copy
. The get
method can't be used since the cell must always contain a valid value.
Finally, a take
method is added which is equivalent to self.replace(Default::default())
.
Drawbacks
It makes the Cell
type more complicated.
Cell
will only be able to derive traits like Eq
and Ord
for types that are Copy
, since there is no way to non-destructively read the contents of a non-Copy
Cell
.
Alternatives
The alternative is to use the MoveCell
type from crates.io which provides the same functionality.
Unresolved questions
None