mirror of https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs.git
Fix typo in RFC 1951: expanded_impl_trait
This commit is contained in:
parent
bc6c0249cd
commit
e72e508f6b
|
@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ that it (1) does not introduce a name for the existential type and (2) does not
|
|||
allow you to control the scope in which the underlying concrete type is known.
|
||||
|
||||
Moreover, some versions of the design (including in this RFC) impose further
|
||||
limitations on the power of the feature for the same of simplicity.
|
||||
limitations on the power of the feature for the sake of simplicity.
|
||||
|
||||
This is done under the assumption that we will eventually introduce a fully
|
||||
expressive, explicit syntax for existentials. Such a syntax is sketched in an
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue