dnrops
/
rfcs
mirror of https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix "higher kinded" -> "higher ranked" in RFC 3498 

In RFC 3498 "Lifetime Capture Rules 2024" we specify that lifetime
parameters from `for<..>` binders are captured under the rules.

Currently opaque types in Rust do not support capturing these.  In
early drafts of the document, we had called the missing feature
"higher ranked lifetime bounds on nested opaque types".  However, we
had then noticed that the relevant error message in `rustc` called
these "higher kinded" instead:

> error: higher kinded lifetime bounds on nested opaque types are not
> supported yet

We changed later drafts to follow that language.  But that language
was wrong.  These are definitely "higher ranked" lifetime bounds, not
"higher kinded" ones, whatever that might mean.  We've now fixed the
error message emitted by `rustc` in:

- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/122100

Correspondingly, let's now fix this error in the RFC.
This commit is contained in:
Travis Cross 2024-03-19 16:23:19 +00:00
parent 43e8e96724
commit e413085eca
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
text/3498-lifetime-capture-rules-2024.md
View File

@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ impl<T> Foo<T> {
### Capturing lifetimes from `for<..>` binders
Once higher kinded lifetime bounds on nested opaque types are supported in Rust (see [#104288][]), the following code will become legal:
Once higher ranked lifetime bounds on nested opaque types are supported in Rust (see [#104288][]), the following code will become legal:
```rust
trait Trait<'a> {
@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ fn foo() -> impl for<'a> Trait<'a, Assoc = impl Sized> {
That is, the `'a` lifetime parameter from the higher ranked trait bounds (HRTBs) `for<..>` binder is in scope for the `impl Sized` opaque type, so it is captured under the rules of this RFC.
Note that support for higher kinded lifetime bounds is not required by this RFC and is not a blocker to stabilizing the rules specified in this RFC.
Note that support for higher ranked lifetime bounds is not required by this RFC and is not a blocker to stabilizing the rules specified in this RFC.
[#104288]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104288