dnrops
/
rfcs
mirror of https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Tweak wording 

Co-authored-by: Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
This commit is contained in:
Esteban Kuber 2024-09-23 17:49:37 -07:00 committed by GitHub
parent 3148a9f9a6
commit 79e9f1b115
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
text/0000-default-field-values.md
View File

@ -1096,7 +1096,7 @@ Among the drawbacks are:
introducing `Foo { .. }` is essentially cost-free in terms of the complexity
budget. It is arguably even cost-negative.
+ By writing `Foo { .. }`, you have there is explicit indication that default
+ By writing `Foo { .. }`, there is explicit indication that default
values are being used; this enhances local reasoning further.
This RFC requires the `..` to get defaulted fields because it wants to continue