dnrops
/
rfcs
mirror of https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

threw on unresolved question about what rustfmt should do here

This commit is contained in:
Felix S. Klock II 2023-09-05 23:45:25 -04:00
parent ae955a867f
commit 57f1df9897
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
text/3399-cfg-attribute-in-where.md
View File

@ -148,11 +148,13 @@ but that's not the way I would expect Rust to provide this kind of functionality
# Unresolved questions
[unresolved-questions]: #unresolved-questions
In theory, I don't see any harm in cfg-attributes decorating individual bounds on the right hand side of the colon. Is it worth adding that
* In theory, I don't see any harm in cfg-attributes decorating individual bounds on the right hand side of the colon. Is it worth adding that
potential feature as well? Personally, I don't see it as being worth the added complexity given that you can have multiple individual bound
declarations for the same item. Doing so would also create an inconsistency, given that this isn't currently allowed in angle-bracketed
bounds either.
* rustfmt is supposed to be able to format the where clause somehow, do we expect it to (try to) put the attribute on the same line, or would it always prefer the attribute on separate lines?
# Future possibilities
[future-possibilities]: #future-possibilities