Update README.md

README.md

@@ -140,35 +140,4 @@ Sure! Obviously the `view` macro is for generating DOM nodes but you can use the
 
 I've put together a [very simple GTK example](https://github.com/leptos-rs/leptos/blob/main/examples/gtk/src/main.rs) so you can see what I mean.
 
-### How is this different from Yew/Dioxus?
-
-On the surface level, these libraries may seem similar. Yew is, of course, the most mature Rust library for web UI development and has a huge ecosystem. Dioxus is similar in many ways, being heavily inspired by React. Here are some conceptual differences between Leptos and these frameworks:
-
-- **VDOM vs. fine-grained:** Yew is built on the virtual DOM (VDOM) model: state changes cause components to re-render, generating a new virtual DOM tree. Yew diffs this against the previous VDOM, and applies those patches to the actual DOM. Component functions rerun whenever state changes. Leptos takes an entirely different approach. Components run once, creating (and returning) actual DOM nodes and setting up a reactive system to update those DOM nodes.
-- **Performance:** This has huge performance implications: Leptos is simply much faster at both creating and updating the UI than Yew is. (Dioxus has made huge advances in performance with its recent 0.3 release, and is now roughly on par with Leptos.)
-- **Mental model:** Adopting fine-grained reactivity also tends to simplify the mental model. There are no surprising component re-renders because there are no re-renders. You can call functions, create timeouts, etc. within the body of your component functions because they won’t be re-run. You don’t need to think about manual dependency tracking for effects; fine-grained reactivity tracks dependencies automatically.
-
-### How is this different from Sycamore?
-
-Conceptually, these two frameworks are very similar: because both are built on fine-grained reactivity, most apps will end up looking very similar between the two, and Sycamore or Leptos apps will both look a lot like SolidJS apps, in the same way that Yew or Dioxus can look a lot like React.
-
-There are some practical differences that make a significant difference:
-
-- **Templating:** Leptos uses a JSX-like template format (built on [syn-rsx](https://github.com/stoically/syn-rsx)) for its `view` macro. Sycamore offers the choice of its own templating DSL or a builder syntax.
-- **Server integration:** Leptos provides primitives that encourage HTML streaming and allow for easy async integration and RPC calls, even without WASM enabled, making it easy to opt into integrations between your frontend and backend code without pushing you toward any particular metaframework patterns.
-- **Read-write segregation:** Leptos, like Solid, encourages read-write segregation between signal getters and setters, so you end up accessing signals with tuples like `let (count, set_count) = create_signal(0);` _(If you prefer or if it's more convenient for your API, you can use [`create_rw_signal`](https://docs.rs/leptos/latest/leptos/fn.create_rw_signal.html) to give a unified read/write signal.)_
-- **Signals are functions:** In Leptos, you can call a signal to access it rather than calling a specific method (so, `count()` instead of `count.get()`) This creates a more consistent mental model: accessing a reactive value is always a matter of calling a function. For example:
-
-  ```rust
-  let (count, set_count) = create_signal(0); // a signal
-  let double_count = move || count() * 2; // a derived signal
-  let memoized_count = create_memo(move |_| count() * 3); // a memo
-  // all are accessed by calling them
-  assert_eq!(count(), 0);
-  assert_eq!(double_count(), 0);
-  assert_eq!(memoized_count(), 0);
-  // this function can accept any of those signals
-  fn do_work_on_signal(my_signal: impl Fn() -> i32) { ... }
-  ```
-
-- **Signals and scopes are `'static`:** Both Leptos and Sycamore ease the pain of moving signals in closures (in particular, event listeners) by making them `Copy`, to avoid the `{ let count = count.clone(); move |_| ... }` that's very familiar in Rust UI code. Sycamore does this by using bump allocation to tie the lifetimes of its signals to its scopes: since references are `Copy`, `&'a Signal<T>` can be moved into a closure. Leptos does this by using arena allocation and passing around indices: types like `ReadSignal<T>`, `WriteSignal<T>`, and `Memo<T>` are actually wrappers for indices into an arena. This means that both scopes and signals are both `Copy` and `'static` in Leptos, which means that they can be moved easily into closures without adding lifetime complexity.
+The new rendering approach being developed for 0.7 supports “universal rendering,” i.e., it can use any rendering library that supports a small set of 6-8 functions. (This is intended as a layer over typical retained-mode, OOP-style GUI toolkits like the DOM, GTK, etc.) That future rendering work will allow creating native UI in a way that is much more similar to the declarative approach used by the web framework.