2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
# GIMP Coding Style
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document describes the preferred coding style for the GIMP source code.
|
2021-10-31 02:13:14 +08:00
|
|
|
It was originally inspired by [GNU's coding
|
|
|
|
style](https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#Writing-C) and
|
|
|
|
developed from there across the years.
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 02:13:14 +08:00
|
|
|
Coding style is completely arbitrary as it is a a matter of consistency,
|
|
|
|
readability and maintenance, not taste. Therefore it doesn't matter what
|
|
|
|
you prefer (we all have some part of the rules we would like different,
|
|
|
|
and we can apply these to our personal projects), just follow these
|
|
|
|
rules so that we can work together efficiently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document will use examples at the very least to provide
|
|
|
|
authoritative and consistent answers to common questions regarding the
|
|
|
|
coding style and will also try to identify the allowed exceptions.
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Table of contents
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 02:13:14 +08:00
|
|
|
[TOC]
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
## Dealing with the old code
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
__The new GIMP code should adhere to the style explained below.__ The existing
|
|
|
|
GIMP code largely follows these conventions, but there are some differences like
|
|
|
|
extra or missing whitespace, tabs instead of space, wrong formatting, etc.
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
__Our policy is to update the style of a code block or function if and only if
|
|
|
|
you happen to touch that code.__
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
Please don't waste your time and reviewers' time with merge requests or patches
|
|
|
|
with _only_ code style fixes unless you have push rights to the GIMP's
|
|
|
|
repository.
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
## Git usage
|
|
|
|
### Commit messages
|
2021-10-20 18:51:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commit messages should follow the following rules:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Always provide informative titles. No one-word commits saying nothing
|
|
|
|
like "bug fix", so that we can at least search through the git history
|
|
|
|
if needed. It can still be short messages for very simple fixes: for
|
|
|
|
instance "Fix typo" or "Fix small memory leak" are informative of the
|
|
|
|
type of fix.
|
|
|
|
- Prefix the title with the codebase section (i.e. the root folder
|
|
|
|
usually) which was changed. For instance: `libgimpbase: fix memory
|
|
|
|
leak` immediately tells us it was a memory leak fix in the
|
|
|
|
`libgimpbase` library. If several sections are touched, list them with
|
|
|
|
comma-separation.
|
|
|
|
- Alternatively, when the change is a response to a bug report, you may
|
|
|
|
prefix with `Issue #123:` (where `#123` is the report ID) instead.
|
|
|
|
- If the changed code itself is not self-explanatory enough, you can add
|
|
|
|
longer change description (2 lines after the title) to explain more.
|
|
|
|
It is not mandatory, but it is never unwelcome because old code
|
|
|
|
exploration to understand why things were done (possibly years before
|
|
|
|
by people long gone) is a real thing we do all the time. So if it's
|
|
|
|
not obvious, explain us.
|
|
|
|
- Explanations can also be made in the shape of links to a bug report
|
|
|
|
(ours, or a third-party project tracker, or some manual), even though
|
|
|
|
additional text explanations may still be useful (unfortunately URLs
|
|
|
|
may change or disappear). If the link is to our own bug tracker,
|
|
|
|
usually giving the ID is enough.
|
|
|
|
- Same [as for code](#line-width), wrap your commit message to
|
|
|
|
reasonable line widths, such as 72 or 80 maximum so that other
|
|
|
|
contributors don't have to scroll horizontally on narrow
|
|
|
|
vizualisation. There may be exceptions, for instance when pasting some
|
|
|
|
error messages which may end up confusing when wrapped. But other than
|
|
|
|
this, wrap your text (most `git` client would have a feature to do it
|
|
|
|
for you).
|
|
|
|
- If the title is too long because of the max-width settings, a common
|
|
|
|
format is to break it with '…' and to continue the title 2 lines below.
|
|
|
|
Then the description goes again 2 lines below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is an example of a well formatted fix in the `plug-ins/` section:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
plug-ins: fix file-gih.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We currently cannot call gimp_pdb_run_procedure() for procedures
|
|
|
|
containing arrays because this C-type doesn't contain the size
|
|
|
|
information (which is in a second parameter but since the rule is not
|
|
|
|
hard-coded, our API can't know this).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See issue #7369.
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is another as a response to a bug report and a long title:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Issue #6695: Wrong tab after JPG export because of "Show preview"…
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
… feature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using the new gimp_display_present() function in file-jpeg to make sure
|
|
|
|
the original display is back to the top.
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you want to see more good examples, this `git` command will list
|
|
|
|
commits whose messages are generally well formatted:
|
|
|
|
`git log --author="Jehan\|mitch\|Jacob Boerema"`
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
### Linear git log
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
Nearly all our repositories (`gimp-web` being the exception) have a
|
|
|
|
fully linear history. The "merge commit" workflow is definitely good and
|
|
|
|
useful in some projects' workflow, especially with bigger projects with
|
|
|
|
many contributors and subdivided maintenance roles (where the main tree
|
|
|
|
is mostly about merging public trees of several submaintainers' public
|
|
|
|
trees, who themselves applied contributed commits by individuals).
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
This doesn't work well with GIMP's current workflow and our number of
|
|
|
|
contributors. This is even worse with the completely useless merge
|
|
|
|
commits created by hosting tools which completely misused (or even
|
|
|
|
misunderstood) the merge concept.
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
This is why our Gitlab projects are configured to only push commits
|
|
|
|
linearly. This means that when a contributed tree is behind, you must
|
|
|
|
first rebase it through the "Rebase" button in the merge request (which
|
|
|
|
requires contributors to check the "*Allow commits from members who can
|
|
|
|
merge to the target branch*" option) or by rebasing in the tree then
|
|
|
|
force-pushing when Gitlab is unable to merge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you push directly (for contributors with push rights), you are also
|
|
|
|
expected to never push a merge commit.
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
## C code
|
|
|
|
### Line width
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The recommended line width for source files is _80 characters_ whenever possible.
|
|
|
|
Longer lines are usually an indication that you either need a function or a
|
|
|
|
pre-processor macro.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The point is to have clear code to read and not overly long lines. Don't break
|
|
|
|
code into ugly and choppy parts to blindly follow this rule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Function definitions in the function forward declaration block don't have to
|
|
|
|
obey the 80 characters limit. The only general rule for headers is to align the
|
|
|
|
function definitions vertically in three columns.
|
|
|
|
See more information in [Headers sections](#Headers)
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
### Whitespaces
|
|
|
|
#### Indentation
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each new level is indented 2 or more spaces than the previous level:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
if (condition)
|
|
|
|
single_statement ();
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use only __space characters__ to achieve this. Code indented with tabs will not
|
|
|
|
be accepted into the GIMP codebase.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even if two spaces for each indentation level allow deeper nesting, GIMP favors
|
|
|
|
self-documenting function names that can be quite long. For this reason, you
|
|
|
|
should avoid deeply nested code.
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
#### Vertical spaces (new lines)
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Except for one single newline at the end of the file, other empty lines (at the
|
|
|
|
beginning and the end) of a file are not allowed.
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
On the other hand, empty lines in the middle of code are very encouraged
|
|
|
|
for well-ventilated code. For instance gathering and separating code by
|
|
|
|
logical parts making it easy to read and understand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Horizontal spaces
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
Always put a space before an opening parenthesis but never after:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
/* valid */
|
|
|
|
if (condition)
|
|
|
|
do_my_things ();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* valid */
|
|
|
|
switch (condition)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* invalid */
|
|
|
|
if(condition)
|
|
|
|
do_my_things();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* invalid */
|
|
|
|
if ( condition )
|
|
|
|
do_my_things ( );
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do not eliminate whitespace and newlines just because something would
|
|
|
|
fit on 80 characters:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
/* invalid */
|
|
|
|
if (condition) foo (); else bar ();
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
#### Tab characters in strings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use `\t` instead of literal tab inside the source code strings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Braces
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### If-else
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't use curly braces for single statement blocks:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
/* valid */
|
|
|
|
if (condition)
|
|
|
|
single_statement ();
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
another_single_statement (arg1);
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the case of multiple statements, put curly braces on another indentation level:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
/* valid */
|
|
|
|
if (condition)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
statement_1 ();
|
|
|
|
statement_2 ();
|
|
|
|
statement_3 ();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* invalid */
|
|
|
|
if (condition) {
|
|
|
|
statement_1 ();
|
|
|
|
statement_2 ();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* invalid */
|
|
|
|
if (condition)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
statement_1 ();
|
|
|
|
statement_2 ();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "no block for single statements" rule has only three exceptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
① _Both sides of the if-else statement_ must have curly braces when
|
|
|
|
either side of this if-else statement has braces or when
|
|
|
|
the single statement covers multiple lines, and it's followed
|
|
|
|
by else or else if (e.g., for functions with many arguments).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
/* valid */
|
|
|
|
if (condition)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
a_single_statement_with_many_arguments (some_lengthy_argument,
|
|
|
|
another_lengthy_argument,
|
|
|
|
and_another_one,
|
|
|
|
plus_one);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
another_single_statement (arg1, arg2);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
② if the condition is composed of many lines:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
/* valid */
|
|
|
|
if (condition1 ||
|
|
|
|
(condition2 && condition3) ||
|
|
|
|
condition4 ||
|
|
|
|
(condition5 && (condition6 || condition7)))
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
a_single_statement ();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
③ In the case of nested if's, the block should be placed on the outermost if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
/* valid */
|
|
|
|
if (condition)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (another_condition)
|
|
|
|
single_statement ();
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
another_single_statement ();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* invalid */
|
|
|
|
if (condition)
|
|
|
|
if (another_condition)
|
|
|
|
single_statement ();
|
|
|
|
else if (yet_another_condition)
|
|
|
|
another_single_statement ();
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
#### Switch
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A `switch()` should open a block on a new indentation level, and each case
|
|
|
|
should start on the same indentation level as the curly braces, with the
|
|
|
|
case block on a new indentation level:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
/* valid */
|
|
|
|
switch (condition)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
case FOO:
|
|
|
|
do_foo ();
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case BAR:
|
|
|
|
do_bar ();
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* invalid */
|
|
|
|
switch (condition) {
|
|
|
|
case FOO: do_foo (); break;
|
|
|
|
case BAR: do_bar (); break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* invalid */
|
|
|
|
switch (condition)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
case FOO: do_foo ();
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case BAR: do_bar ();
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* invalid */
|
|
|
|
switch (condition)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
case FOO:
|
|
|
|
do_foo ();
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case BAR:
|
|
|
|
do_bar ();
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is preferable, though not mandatory, to separate the various cases with
|
|
|
|
a newline:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
switch (condition)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
case FOO:
|
|
|
|
do_foo ();
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case BAR:
|
|
|
|
do_bar ();
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
do_default ();
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a case block needs to declare new variables, the same rules as the inner
|
|
|
|
blocks (see above) apply; place the break statement outside of the inner block:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
switch (condition)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
case FOO:
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int foo;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
foo = do_foo ();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do not add `default:` case if your `switch ()` is supposed to handle _all cases_.
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
#### Random blocks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using blocks to group code is discouraged and must not be used in newly
|
|
|
|
written code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
int retval = 0;
|
|
|
|
gbool condition = retval >= 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
statement_1 ();
|
|
|
|
statement_2 ();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* discouraged in newly written code */
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int var1 = 42;
|
|
|
|
gboolean res = FALSE;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
res = statement_3 (var1);
|
|
|
|
retval = res ? -1 : 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Conditions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do not check boolean values for equality:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
/* valid */
|
|
|
|
if (another_condition)
|
|
|
|
do_bar ();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* invalid */
|
|
|
|
if (condition == TRUE)
|
|
|
|
do_foo ();
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even if C handles NULL equality like a boolean, be explicit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
/* valid */
|
|
|
|
if (some_pointer == NULL)
|
|
|
|
do_blah ();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* invalid */
|
|
|
|
if (some_other_pointer)
|
|
|
|
do_blurp ();
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When conditions split over multiple lines, the logical operators should always
|
|
|
|
go at the end of the line. Align the same level boolean operators to show
|
|
|
|
explicitly which are on the same level and which are not:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
/* valid */
|
|
|
|
if (condition1 &&
|
|
|
|
condition2 &&
|
|
|
|
(condition3 || (condition4 && condition5)))
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
do_blah ();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* invalid */
|
|
|
|
if (condition1
|
|
|
|
|| condition2
|
|
|
|
|| condition3)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
do_foo ();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
### Variables declaration and definition
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Place each variable on a new line. The variable name must be right-aligned,
|
|
|
|
taking into account pointers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
/* valid */
|
|
|
|
int first = 42;
|
|
|
|
gboolean second = TRUE;
|
|
|
|
GimpObject *third = NULL;
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blocks of variable declaration/initialization should align the variable names,
|
|
|
|
allowing quick skimming of the variable list.
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
### Functions
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Function header has the return type on one line; the name starting in the first
|
|
|
|
column of the following line. Prototype each parameter and place each on a
|
|
|
|
new line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In function names, each word must be lowercase and separated by an underscore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the function definition, place the return value on a separate line from the
|
|
|
|
function name:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
my_function (void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The parameters list must be broken into a new line for each parameter, with the
|
|
|
|
parameter names right-aligned, taking into account pointers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
my_function (some_type_t some_param,
|
|
|
|
another_type_t *a_pointer_param,
|
|
|
|
final_type_t final_param)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While curly braces for function definitions should rest on a new line they
|
|
|
|
should not add an indentation level:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
/* valid */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
my_function (int parameter)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
do_my_things ();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The alignment also holds when invoking a function:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
align_function_arguments (first_argument,
|
|
|
|
second_argument,
|
|
|
|
third_argument);
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If your function name is very long, it's always better to extract arguments into
|
|
|
|
separate variables to improve readability:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
/* valid */
|
|
|
|
first_a = argument_the_first;
|
|
|
|
second_a = argument_the_second;
|
|
|
|
a_very_long_function_name_with_long_arguments (first_a, second_a);
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keep the function name and the arguments on the same line. Otherwise, it will
|
|
|
|
hurt readability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
/* invalid */
|
|
|
|
a_very_long_function_name_with_long_arguments
|
|
|
|
(argument_the_first, argument_the_second);
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
### Macros
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Try to avoid private macros unless strictly necessary. Remember to `#undef`
|
|
|
|
them at the end of a block or a series of functions needing them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use inline functions instead of private macro definitions.
|
|
|
|
Do not use public macros unless they evaluate to a constant.
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
### Includes
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GIMP source files should never include the global `gimp.h` header, but instead
|
|
|
|
include the individual headers that are needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Includes must be in the following order:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0. `config.h` first;
|
|
|
|
0. System and third-party headers;
|
|
|
|
0. GIMP library headers (libgimp* headers);
|
|
|
|
0. GIMP core/app headers that it needs including its own;
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
Sort alphabetically the includes within the blocks.
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
/* valid */
|
|
|
|
#include "config.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <gegl.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <gtk/gtk.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "libgimpbase/gimpbase.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "libgimpcolor/gimpcolor.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "core/gimp.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "core/gimpcontainer.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "gimpcolorpanel.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "gimpcontainerentry.h"
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
### Structures
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When declaring a structure type use newlines to separate logical sections:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
/* preferred for new code*/
|
|
|
|
typedef struct
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
gint n_pages;
|
|
|
|
gint *pages;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gbool read_only;
|
|
|
|
} Pages;
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
### Memory management
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To dynamically allocate data on the heap, use `g_new()`. To allocate memory for
|
|
|
|
multiple small data structures, `g_slice_new()`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When possible, all public structure types should be returned fully initialized,
|
|
|
|
either explicitly for each member or by using g_new0() or g_slice_new0().
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a general programming rule, it is better to allocate and free data on the
|
|
|
|
same level. It is much easier to review code because you know that when you
|
|
|
|
allocate something there, then you also free it there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
GeglBuffer *buffer;
|
|
|
|
void *p;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*buffer = gegl_buffer_new (some, args);
|
|
|
|
*p = g_new (something, n);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* do stuff */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_object_unref (buffer);
|
|
|
|
g_free (p);
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When a transfer of ownership is unavoidable make it clear in the function
|
|
|
|
documentation.
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
### Comments
|
|
|
|
#### In-code explanation
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
The only allowed style is C-style comments `/* */`. In particular C++
|
|
|
|
comments `//` are strictly forbidden from our source.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are not asking contributors to over-comment their code, yet we highly
|
|
|
|
value quality comments to explain complicated algorithms or non-obvious
|
|
|
|
code. Just ask yourself this: what if someone sees my code 5 years later
|
|
|
|
(another contributor or even your future self)…
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- will one easily understand what you meant to do?
|
|
|
|
- In particular: if it needs to be removed later, won't one be scared to
|
|
|
|
delete now-useless code by fear of unexpected side-effects?
|
|
|
|
- Or oppositely: won't someone delete the code by mistake because it
|
|
|
|
looks useless while it was actually dealing with a very particular
|
|
|
|
(yet absolutely non-obvious) issue?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adding links which explain well a problem or the reason for some
|
|
|
|
non-obvious code is also permitted. For instance a link to a bug report
|
|
|
|
(ours or some other projects') can sometimes be a good complement to a
|
|
|
|
comment.
|
|
|
|
Nevertheless it should not be overdone and in particular not for links
|
|
|
|
likely to disappear (personal blog posts, forums, corporate websites
|
|
|
|
which often revamp their design, breaking URLs, etc.).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Public API Documentation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All public APIs (i.e. any function exported in a header inside
|
2021-11-29 02:36:07 +08:00
|
|
|
`libgimp*/` folders) **MUST** have proper GObject-introspection (GIR) comments.
|
|
|
|
For functions, these should be placed in the source file directly above.
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These annotations are also relevant for [GObject
|
|
|
|
Introspection](https://gi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/annotations/giannotations.html)
|
|
|
|
to generate bindings for other languages.
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
/* valid */
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gimp_object_set_name:
|
|
|
|
* @object: a #GimpObject
|
|
|
|
* @name: the @object's new name (transfer none)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Sets the @object's name. Takes care of freeing the old name and
|
|
|
|
* emitting the ::name_changed signal if the old and new name differ.
|
|
|
|
**/
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
gimp_object_set_name (GimpObject *object,
|
|
|
|
const gchar *name)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doc comments for macros, function types, class structs, etc., should be placed
|
|
|
|
next to the definitions, typically in headers.
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
#### Non-public API documentation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project-only code (for instance any code from the `app/` folder) can be
|
|
|
|
less documented. For instance when a function has obvious naming, not
|
|
|
|
explaining it is perfectly acceptable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevertheless adding documentation even for these private APIs is
|
|
|
|
welcome, especially when the usage is not as obvious as it looks, or
|
|
|
|
to make sure to advertize the proper memory handling (does it allocate
|
|
|
|
new memory? Which function to free it with? Or shouldn't the returned
|
|
|
|
memory be freed?), avoiding silly bugs and not wasting developer times
|
|
|
|
(when we have to look at the implementation to verify each time we use a
|
|
|
|
function).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In such a case, using gtk-docs syntax is still a nice idea as we will
|
|
|
|
understand it directly (even though we won't generate any docs from it).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Public API
|
|
|
|
#### No variables
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avoid exporting variables as public API since this is cumbersome on some
|
|
|
|
platforms. It is always preferable to add getters and setters instead.
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
#### Def files for Windows
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-26 10:49:54 +08:00
|
|
|
List all public functions alphabetically in the corresponding `.def` file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- `app/gimpcore.def`
|
|
|
|
- `libgimp/gimp.def`
|
|
|
|
- `libgimpbase/gimpbase.def`
|
|
|
|
- etc
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-11-30 22:11:41 +08:00
|
|
|
## Natural language text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Base rules
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Any text in GIMP source should follow these base rules:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Our base language is US English, both for historical reason and
|
|
|
|
because this is the usual expectation with `gettext`, the
|
|
|
|
localization tool used by GIMP. In particular when variants of words
|
|
|
|
or idioms exist in several native English countries, we should choose
|
|
|
|
the US variant. Other English variants can be used in specific locales
|
|
|
|
(such as `en_GB` or `en_CA`…).
|
|
|
|
- Text meant for technical people, such as API documentation (in-code
|
|
|
|
comments, in-repository documentation, or gtk-doc/docgen style
|
|
|
|
comments for generated docs…) usually does not need localization, and
|
|
|
|
therefore can just be written in US English.
|
|
|
|
- Text meant to be viewed by all users should be translatable. In
|
|
|
|
particular in GIMP source code, it means that we need to use `gettext`
|
|
|
|
API.
|
|
|
|
- Use gender-neutral terms, in particular not using words such as "she/he"
|
|
|
|
or "her/his" is better. We should not use over-complicated wording to
|
|
|
|
achieve this and should look for simpler writing if necessary.
|
|
|
|
- Be nice and open-minded in all text, even in code comments. Remember
|
|
|
|
these will be read by others and that we are here to have fun
|
|
|
|
together, not fight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### User-visible text in C code
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As explained, C code uses the gettext API. Any text which might appear
|
|
|
|
in front of people should be translatable, with the following
|
|
|
|
exceptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Error or warning output in `stderr` might often be untranslated
|
|
|
|
(because we assume these are mostly used for debugging and people who
|
|
|
|
will see these would be more comfortable with digging into issue
|
|
|
|
causes; also it makes debugging and searches in code easier).
|
|
|
|
- Technical error text in the graphical interface when it is made to be
|
|
|
|
reported to developers. Basically error messages meant for users
|
|
|
|
themselves should still be translatable. For instance, if one tries to
|
|
|
|
draw on a layer group, we'd display:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```C
|
|
|
|
_("Cannot modify the pixels of layer groups.")
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed this is an error message to give an information to the user.
|
|
|
|
It's not a bug.
|
|
|
|
Now when a crash happens, we add a translated header message to
|
|
|
|
explain a problem occured, but the core information stays in English
|
|
|
|
because we are not asking people to understand it, only report it to
|
|
|
|
us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The most common variant of gettext API is the underscore `_()` (alias of
|
|
|
|
`gettext()`) for simple text:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```C
|
|
|
|
frame = gimp_frame_new (_("Shadows"));
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When used in some widgets, we may want to add mnemonics for
|
|
|
|
accessibility. This is done with the underscore:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```C
|
|
|
|
label = gtk_label_new_with_mnemonic (_("_Width:"));
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that it is a good idea to not change well-known mnemonics, such as
|
|
|
|
`_("_OK")`, `_("_Cancel")` or `_("_Reset")`. Also you should avoid using
|
|
|
|
the same mnemonics in 2 widgets on the same interface (even though GTK
|
|
|
|
has some way to handle mnemonic duplicate, but it's not really
|
|
|
|
practical).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translators may (and often will) change mnemonics. It is therefore up to
|
|
|
|
them to take care of not having the same mnemonics on a same interface
|
|
|
|
in their specific locale.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When some messages cannot be translated at initialization, you must use
|
|
|
|
the no-op variant `N_()`. For instance, when we declare and initialize a
|
|
|
|
struct:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```C
|
|
|
|
static const struct
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
const gchar *name;
|
|
|
|
const gchar *description;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
babl_descriptions[] =
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
{ "RGB u8", N_("RGB") },
|
|
|
|
[…]
|
|
|
|
{ "Y u8", N_("Grayscale") },
|
|
|
|
[…]
|
|
|
|
{ "R u8", N_("Red component") },
|
|
|
|
[…]
|
|
|
|
{ "G u8", N_("Green component") },
|
|
|
|
[…]
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The normal gettext `_()` would not compile because you must initialize
|
|
|
|
struct elements with constants. `N_()` allows the gettext tools to
|
|
|
|
detect the strings which will need to go into the translator files.
|
|
|
|
Note though that these strings will still need to be translated when
|
|
|
|
used at runtime:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```C
|
|
|
|
g_hash_table_insert (babl_description_hash,
|
|
|
|
(gpointer) babl_descriptions[i].name,
|
|
|
|
gettext (babl_descriptions[i].description));
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally note that for any strings which depends on a variable number,
|
|
|
|
you must use the ngettext variant:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```C
|
|
|
|
desc = g_strdup_printf (ngettext ("Crop Layer to Selection",
|
|
|
|
"Crop %d Layers to Selection",
|
|
|
|
g_list_length (layers)),
|
|
|
|
g_list_length (layers));
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is important to use `ngettext()` even in cases where there will
|
|
|
|
always be a count bigger than 1. Say our indexed image do not support
|
|
|
|
the monochrome (1 color) case, and even less 0 colors, then this seems
|
|
|
|
useless because we will always use the second string only:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```C
|
|
|
|
g_snprintf (buf, sizeof (buf),
|
|
|
|
ngettext ("Indexed color (monochrome)",
|
|
|
|
"Indexed color (%d colors)",
|
|
|
|
gimp_image_get_colormap_size (image)),
|
|
|
|
gimp_image_get_colormap_size (image));
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yet it's actually not useless as it allows translators for languages
|
|
|
|
with more plural forms to translate GIMP correctly. For instance,
|
|
|
|
[gettext documentation](https://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/gettext.html#Plural-forms)
|
|
|
|
mentions the Polish language has different grammatical agreements for
|
|
|
|
2,3,4 and 5-21 or again 22-24 and so on. If we were to use solely
|
|
|
|
`_("Indexed color (%d colors)")`, Polish translators would not be able
|
|
|
|
to list all these cases (therefore GIMP would have a crappy Polish
|
|
|
|
localization), so we have to use `ngettext()` even if it feels useless
|
|
|
|
in English.
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-01 00:42:17 +08:00
|
|
|
Finally when you add translated strings in a file which had none until
|
|
|
|
now, for it to be processed by `gettext`, you need to add its path in
|
|
|
|
alphabetical order in `po/POTFILES.in` for core files (or other
|
|
|
|
`POTFILES.in`, for instance `po-plug-ins/POTFILES.in` for plug-ins). We
|
|
|
|
have a test checking this, so the `make distcheck` step will fail anyway
|
|
|
|
when you forgot to add a new file with translation. Yet as developers
|
|
|
|
don't always run this step locally, the bug may be discovered during CI
|
|
|
|
builds. It is obviously prefered to not forget it hence not push code
|
|
|
|
which breaks the CI (and localization).
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-31 03:57:12 +08:00
|
|
|
## Helping tools
|
|
|
|
### Git
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recommend enabling the default git pre-commit hook that detects trailing
|
|
|
|
whitespace and non-ASCII filenames for you and helps you to avoid corrupting
|
|
|
|
GIMP's tree with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the terminal, navigate into your GIMP source code folder. Then do that as
|
|
|
|
follows (one command at a time):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```shell
|
|
|
|
cp -v .git/hooks/pre-commit.sample .git/hooks/pre-commit
|
|
|
|
chmod a+x .git/hooks/pre-commit
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If any command above fails, visit your `.git/hooks/` folder and check for the
|
|
|
|
existence of `pre-commit.sample` or `pre-commit` files.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You might also find the `git-stripspace` utility helpful, which acts as a filter
|
|
|
|
to remove trailing whitespace as well as initial, final, and duplicate blank
|
|
|
|
lines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Code editor / Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GIMP's codebase is not tied to a specific editor or IDE. The whole build
|
|
|
|
can be performed from anywhere, and we don't care what you write your
|
|
|
|
code with (as long as it follows syntax rules from this document).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Several configuration files were contributed across the years to
|
|
|
|
configure your favorite software to follow our coding style.
|
|
|
|
You are very welcome to use them (or improve them and contribute the
|
|
|
|
change when they are not perfect):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- [.dir-locals.el](.dir-locals.el) for Emacs;
|
|
|
|
- [.kateconfig](.kateconfig) for Kate;
|
|
|
|
- [c.vim](devel-docs/c.vim) for Vim (check the top comments to see how
|
|
|
|
to enable it automatically when opening a file in the GIMP tree).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Note: the Kate and Emacs config file should work out-of-the-box, but
|
|
|
|
the Vim one needs to be enabled explicitly because it is too powerful,
|
|
|
|
hence is basically [unsafe](https://github.com/vim/vim/issues/1015).*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you use another software to write code, you are welcome to contribute
|
|
|
|
coding style files following our rules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Code Formatter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We don't use a code formatter to re-format code because it is unable to
|
|
|
|
handle special cases well as far as we know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevertheless we would be interested to use these to perform at least
|
|
|
|
some soft verification of contributed patches. A CI-performed check
|
|
|
|
could help new contributors to fix their basic newcomer coding style
|
|
|
|
mistakes and free up reviewing contributors' time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tool Clang-format has been mentionned as relevant, though nobody has
|
|
|
|
written syntax files for this tool yet (contribution welcome for this
|
|
|
|
too). See also #950.
|