scikit-learn/benchmarks/bench_kernel_pca_solvers_ti...

181 lines
5.3 KiB
Python

"""
=============================================================
Kernel PCA Solvers comparison benchmark: time vs n_components
=============================================================
This benchmark shows that the approximate solvers provided in Kernel PCA can
help significantly improve its execution speed when an approximate solution
(small `n_components`) is acceptable. In many real-world datasets a few
hundreds of principal components are indeed sufficient enough to capture the
underlying distribution.
Description:
------------
A fixed number of training (default: 2000) and test (default: 1000) samples
with 2 features is generated using the `make_circles` helper method.
KernelPCA models are trained on the training set with an increasing number of
principal components, between 1 and `max_n_compo` (default: 1999), with
`n_compo_grid_size` positions (default: 10). For each value of `n_components`
to try, KernelPCA models are trained for the various possible `eigen_solver`
values. The execution times are displayed in a plot at the end of the
experiment.
What you can observe:
---------------------
When the number of requested principal components is small, the dense solver
takes more time to complete, while the randomized method returns similar
results with shorter execution times.
Going further:
--------------
You can adjust `max_n_compo` and `n_compo_grid_size` if you wish to explore a
different range of values for `n_components`.
You can also set `arpack_all=True` to activate arpack solver for large number
of components (this takes more time).
"""
# Authors: Sylvain MARIE, Schneider Electric
import time
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from numpy.testing import assert_array_almost_equal
from sklearn.decomposition import KernelPCA
from sklearn.datasets import make_circles
print(__doc__)
# 1- Design the Experiment
# ------------------------
n_train, n_test = 2000, 1000 # the sample sizes to use
max_n_compo = 1999 # max n_components to try
n_compo_grid_size = 10 # nb of positions in the grid to try
# generate the grid
n_compo_range = [
np.round(np.exp((x / (n_compo_grid_size - 1)) * np.log(max_n_compo)))
for x in range(0, n_compo_grid_size)
]
n_iter = 3 # the number of times each experiment will be repeated
arpack_all = False # set to True if you wish to run arpack for all n_compo
# 2- Generate random data
# -----------------------
n_features = 2
X, y = make_circles(
n_samples=(n_train + n_test), factor=0.3, noise=0.05, random_state=0
)
X_train, X_test = X[:n_train, :], X[n_train:, :]
# 3- Benchmark
# ------------
# init
ref_time = np.empty((len(n_compo_range), n_iter)) * np.nan
a_time = np.empty((len(n_compo_range), n_iter)) * np.nan
r_time = np.empty((len(n_compo_range), n_iter)) * np.nan
# loop
for j, n_components in enumerate(n_compo_range):
n_components = int(n_components)
print("Performing kPCA with n_components = %i" % n_components)
# A- reference (dense)
print(" - dense solver")
for i in range(n_iter):
start_time = time.perf_counter()
ref_pred = (
KernelPCA(n_components, eigen_solver="dense").fit(X_train).transform(X_test)
)
ref_time[j, i] = time.perf_counter() - start_time
# B- arpack (for small number of components only, too slow otherwise)
if arpack_all or n_components < 100:
print(" - arpack solver")
for i in range(n_iter):
start_time = time.perf_counter()
a_pred = (
KernelPCA(n_components, eigen_solver="arpack")
.fit(X_train)
.transform(X_test)
)
a_time[j, i] = time.perf_counter() - start_time
# check that the result is still correct despite the approx
assert_array_almost_equal(np.abs(a_pred), np.abs(ref_pred))
# C- randomized
print(" - randomized solver")
for i in range(n_iter):
start_time = time.perf_counter()
r_pred = (
KernelPCA(n_components, eigen_solver="randomized")
.fit(X_train)
.transform(X_test)
)
r_time[j, i] = time.perf_counter() - start_time
# check that the result is still correct despite the approximation
assert_array_almost_equal(np.abs(r_pred), np.abs(ref_pred))
# Compute statistics for the 3 methods
avg_ref_time = ref_time.mean(axis=1)
std_ref_time = ref_time.std(axis=1)
avg_a_time = a_time.mean(axis=1)
std_a_time = a_time.std(axis=1)
avg_r_time = r_time.mean(axis=1)
std_r_time = r_time.std(axis=1)
# 4- Plots
# --------
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(12, 8))
# Display 1 plot with error bars per method
ax.errorbar(
n_compo_range,
avg_ref_time,
yerr=std_ref_time,
marker="x",
linestyle="",
color="r",
label="full",
)
ax.errorbar(
n_compo_range,
avg_a_time,
yerr=std_a_time,
marker="x",
linestyle="",
color="g",
label="arpack",
)
ax.errorbar(
n_compo_range,
avg_r_time,
yerr=std_r_time,
marker="x",
linestyle="",
color="b",
label="randomized",
)
ax.legend(loc="upper left")
# customize axes
ax.set_xscale("log")
ax.set_xlim(1, max(n_compo_range) * 1.1)
ax.set_ylabel("Execution time (s)")
ax.set_xlabel("n_components")
ax.set_title(
"kPCA Execution time comparison on %i samples with %i "
"features, according to the choice of `eigen_solver`"
"" % (n_train, n_features)
)
plt.show()