* Be more specific about logistic regression solver in examples
* Use early stopped SGD (faster) and plot cross-validated error for best models
* Fix LR solver in /plot_voting_probas.pyexamples/ensemble/plot_voting_probas.py
* Fix LR solver & scale data in plot_digits_classification_exercise.py
* Use saga solver in plot_logistic_l1_l2_sparsity.py
* Use LBFGS solver in plot_iris_logistic.py
* Use LBFGS in plot_logistic.py
* Use SAGA solver for Logistic Regression Path example
* Use LBFGS solver in plot_classifier_chain_yeast.py
* Use LBFGS solver in plot_rbm_logistic_classification.py
* typo
* typo
* Bump up pandas dependency to 0.17.1
* Bump up examples minimal deps to match pandas 0.17.1
* Fix figure layout for plot_digits_pipe.py
* Version numbers are not decimal numbers
* Set multinomial, no scaling to keep example simple, fix formatting of example doc
* Missing plt.tight_layout() in plot_voting_probas.py
* Missing plt.tight_layout() in plot_logistic.py
<!--
Thanks for contributing a pull request! Please ensure you have taken a look at
the contribution guidelines: https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pull-request-checklist
-->
#### Reference Issues/PRs
<!--
Example: Fixes#1234. See also #3456.
Please use keywords (e.g., Fixes) to create link to the issues or pull requests
you resolved, so that they will automatically be closed when your pull request
is merged. See https://github.com/blog/1506-closing-issues-via-pull-requests
-->
Fixes#11128.
#### What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
Issues deprecation warning message for the default n_estimators parameter for the forest classifiers. Test added for the warning message when the default parameter is used.
#### Any other comments?
<!--
Please be aware that we are a loose team of volunteers so patience is
necessary; assistance handling other issues is very welcome. We value
all user contributions, no matter how minor they are. If we are slow to
review, either the pull request needs some benchmarking, tinkering,
convincing, etc. or more likely the reviewers are simply busy. In either
case, we ask for your understanding during the review process.
For more information, see our FAQ on this topic:
http://scikit-learn.org/dev/faq.html#why-is-my-pull-request-not-getting-any-attention.
Thanks for contributing!
-->
Thomas J Fan