124 lines
4.8 KiB
Python
124 lines
4.8 KiB
Python
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
=================================
|
||
|
|
Combine predictors using stacking
|
||
|
|
=================================
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Stacking refers to a method to blend estimators. In this strategy, some
|
||
|
|
estimators are individually fitted on some training data while a final
|
||
|
|
estimator is trained using the stacked predictions of these base estimators.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
In this example, we illustrate the use case in which different regressors are
|
||
|
|
stacked together and a final linear penalized regressor is used to output the
|
||
|
|
prediction. We compare the performance of each individual regressor with the
|
||
|
|
stacking strategy. Stacking slightly improves the overall performance.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
print(__doc__)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Authors: Guillaume Lemaitre <g.lemaitre58@gmail.com>
|
||
|
|
# License: BSD 3 clause
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###############################################################################
|
||
|
|
# The function ``plot_regression_results`` is used to plot the predicted and
|
||
|
|
# true targets.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def plot_regression_results(ax, y_true, y_pred, title, scores, elapsed_time):
|
||
|
|
"""Scatter plot of the predicted vs true targets."""
|
||
|
|
ax.plot([y_true.min(), y_true.max()],
|
||
|
|
[y_true.min(), y_true.max()],
|
||
|
|
'--r', linewidth=2)
|
||
|
|
ax.scatter(y_true, y_pred, alpha=0.2)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
ax.spines['top'].set_visible(False)
|
||
|
|
ax.spines['right'].set_visible(False)
|
||
|
|
ax.get_xaxis().tick_bottom()
|
||
|
|
ax.get_yaxis().tick_left()
|
||
|
|
ax.spines['left'].set_position(('outward', 10))
|
||
|
|
ax.spines['bottom'].set_position(('outward', 10))
|
||
|
|
ax.set_xlim([y_true.min(), y_true.max()])
|
||
|
|
ax.set_ylim([y_true.min(), y_true.max()])
|
||
|
|
ax.set_xlabel('Measured')
|
||
|
|
ax.set_ylabel('Predicted')
|
||
|
|
extra = plt.Rectangle((0, 0), 0, 0, fc="w", fill=False,
|
||
|
|
edgecolor='none', linewidth=0)
|
||
|
|
ax.legend([extra], [scores], loc='upper left')
|
||
|
|
title = title + '\n Evaluation in {:.2f} seconds'.format(elapsed_time)
|
||
|
|
ax.set_title(title)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###############################################################################
|
||
|
|
# Stack of predictors on a single data set
|
||
|
|
###############################################################################
|
||
|
|
# It is sometimes tedious to find the model which will best perform on a given
|
||
|
|
# dataset. Stacking provide an alternative by combining the outputs of several
|
||
|
|
# learners, without the need to choose a model specifically. The performance of
|
||
|
|
# stacking is usually close to the best model and sometimes it can outperform
|
||
|
|
# the prediction performance of each individual model.
|
||
|
|
#
|
||
|
|
# Here, we combine 3 learners (linear and non-linear) and use a ridge regressor
|
||
|
|
# to combine their outputs together.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
from sklearn.ensemble import StackingRegressor
|
||
|
|
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestRegressor
|
||
|
|
from sklearn.experimental import enable_hist_gradient_boosting # noqa
|
||
|
|
from sklearn.ensemble import HistGradientBoostingRegressor
|
||
|
|
from sklearn.linear_model import LassoCV
|
||
|
|
from sklearn.linear_model import RidgeCV
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
estimators = [
|
||
|
|
('Random Forest', RandomForestRegressor(random_state=42)),
|
||
|
|
('Lasso', LassoCV()),
|
||
|
|
('Gradient Boosting', HistGradientBoostingRegressor(random_state=0))
|
||
|
|
]
|
||
|
|
stacking_regressor = StackingRegressor(
|
||
|
|
estimators=estimators, final_estimator=RidgeCV()
|
||
|
|
)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###############################################################################
|
||
|
|
# We used the Boston data set (prediction of house prices). We check the
|
||
|
|
# performance of each individual predictor as well as the stack of the
|
||
|
|
# regressors.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
import time
|
||
|
|
import numpy as np
|
||
|
|
from sklearn.datasets import load_boston
|
||
|
|
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_validate, cross_val_predict
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
X, y = load_boston(return_X_y=True)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
fig, axs = plt.subplots(2, 2, figsize=(9, 7))
|
||
|
|
axs = np.ravel(axs)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
for ax, (name, est) in zip(axs, estimators + [('Stacking Regressor',
|
||
|
|
stacking_regressor)]):
|
||
|
|
start_time = time.time()
|
||
|
|
score = cross_validate(est, X, y,
|
||
|
|
scoring=['r2', 'neg_mean_absolute_error'],
|
||
|
|
n_jobs=-1, verbose=0)
|
||
|
|
elapsed_time = time.time() - time.time()
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
y_pred = cross_val_predict(est, X, y, n_jobs=-1, verbose=0)
|
||
|
|
plot_regression_results(
|
||
|
|
ax, y, y_pred,
|
||
|
|
name,
|
||
|
|
(r'$R^2={:.2f} \pm {:.2f}$' + '\n' + r'$MAE={:.2f} \pm {:.2f}$')
|
||
|
|
.format(np.mean(score['test_r2']),
|
||
|
|
np.std(score['test_r2']),
|
||
|
|
-np.mean(score['test_neg_mean_absolute_error']),
|
||
|
|
np.std(score['test_neg_mean_absolute_error'])),
|
||
|
|
elapsed_time)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
plt.suptitle('Single predictors versus stacked predictors')
|
||
|
|
plt.tight_layout()
|
||
|
|
plt.subplots_adjust(top=0.9)
|
||
|
|
plt.show()
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###############################################################################
|
||
|
|
# The stacked regressor will combine the strengths of the different regressors.
|
||
|
|
# However, we also see that training the stacked regressor is much more
|
||
|
|
# computationally expensive.
|