This series aims to improve the scalability of XFS transaction
commits on large CPU count machines. My 32p machine hits contention
limits in xlog_cil_commit() at about 700,000 transaction commits a
section. It hits this at 16 thread workloads, and 32 thread
workloads go no faster and just burn CPU on the CIL spinlocks.
This patchset gets rid of spinlocks and global serialisation points
in the xlog_cil_commit() path. It does this by moving to a
combination of per-cpu counters, unordered per-cpu lists and
post-ordered per-cpu lists.
This results in transaction commit rates exceeding 1.4 million
commits/s under unlink certain workloads, and while the log lock
contention is largely gone there is still significant lock
contention in the VFS (dentry cache, inode cache and security layers)
at >600,000 transactions/s that still limit scalability.
The changes to the CIL accounting and behaviour, combined with the
structural changes to xlog_write() in prior patchsets make the
per-cpu restructuring possible and sane. This allows us to move to
precalculated reservation requirements that allow for reservation
stealing to be accounted across multiple CPUs accurately.
That is, instead of trying to account for continuation log opheaders
on a "growth" basis, we pre-calculate how many iclogs we'll need to
write out a maximally sized CIL checkpoint and steal that reserveD
that space one commit at a time until the CIL has a full
reservation. If we ever run a commit when we are already at the hard
limit (because post-throttling) we simply take an extra reservation
from each commit that is run when over the limit. Hence we don't
need to do space usage math in the fast path and so never need to
sum the per-cpu counters in this fast path.
Similarly, per-cpu lists have the problem of ordering - we can't
remove an item from a per-cpu list if we want to move it forward in
the CIL. We solve this problem by using an atomic counter to give
every commit a sequence number that is copied into the log items in
that transaction. Hence relogging items just overwrites the sequence
number in the log item, and does not move it in the per-cpu lists.
Once we reaggregate the per-cpu lists back into a single list in the
CIL push work, we can run it through list-sort() and reorder it back
into a globally ordered list. This costs a bit of CPU time, but now
that the CIL can run multiple works and pipelines properly, this is
not a limiting factor for performance. It does increase fsync
latency when the CIL is full, but workloads issuing large numbers of
fsync()s or sync transactions end up with very small CILs and so the
latency impact or sorting is not measurable for such workloads.
OVerall, this pushes the transaction commit bottleneck out to the
lockless reservation grant head updates. These atomic updates don't
start to be a limiting fact until > 1.5 million transactions/s are
being run, at which point the accounting functions start to show up
in profiles as the highest CPU users. Still, this series doubles
transaction throughput without increasing CPU usage before we get
to that cacheline contention breakdown point...
`
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=vLZn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'xfs-cil-scale-5.20' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs into xfs-5.20-mergeA
xfs: improve CIL scalability
This series aims to improve the scalability of XFS transaction
commits on large CPU count machines. My 32p machine hits contention
limits in xlog_cil_commit() at about 700,000 transaction commits a
section. It hits this at 16 thread workloads, and 32 thread
workloads go no faster and just burn CPU on the CIL spinlocks.
This patchset gets rid of spinlocks and global serialisation points
in the xlog_cil_commit() path. It does this by moving to a
combination of per-cpu counters, unordered per-cpu lists and
post-ordered per-cpu lists.
This results in transaction commit rates exceeding 1.4 million
commits/s under unlink certain workloads, and while the log lock
contention is largely gone there is still significant lock
contention in the VFS (dentry cache, inode cache and security layers)
at >600,000 transactions/s that still limit scalability.
The changes to the CIL accounting and behaviour, combined with the
structural changes to xlog_write() in prior patchsets make the
per-cpu restructuring possible and sane. This allows us to move to
precalculated reservation requirements that allow for reservation
stealing to be accounted across multiple CPUs accurately.
That is, instead of trying to account for continuation log opheaders
on a "growth" basis, we pre-calculate how many iclogs we'll need to
write out a maximally sized CIL checkpoint and steal that reserveD
that space one commit at a time until the CIL has a full
reservation. If we ever run a commit when we are already at the hard
limit (because post-throttling) we simply take an extra reservation
from each commit that is run when over the limit. Hence we don't
need to do space usage math in the fast path and so never need to
sum the per-cpu counters in this fast path.
Similarly, per-cpu lists have the problem of ordering - we can't
remove an item from a per-cpu list if we want to move it forward in
the CIL. We solve this problem by using an atomic counter to give
every commit a sequence number that is copied into the log items in
that transaction. Hence relogging items just overwrites the sequence
number in the log item, and does not move it in the per-cpu lists.
Once we reaggregate the per-cpu lists back into a single list in the
CIL push work, we can run it through list-sort() and reorder it back
into a globally ordered list. This costs a bit of CPU time, but now
that the CIL can run multiple works and pipelines properly, this is
not a limiting factor for performance. It does increase fsync
latency when the CIL is full, but workloads issuing large numbers of
fsync()s or sync transactions end up with very small CILs and so the
latency impact or sorting is not measurable for such workloads.
OVerall, this pushes the transaction commit bottleneck out to the
lockless reservation grant head updates. These atomic updates don't
start to be a limiting fact until > 1.5 million transactions/s are
being run, at which point the accounting functions start to show up
in profiles as the highest CPU users. Still, this series doubles
transaction throughput without increasing CPU usage before we get
to that cacheline contention breakdown point...
`
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
* tag 'xfs-cil-scale-5.20' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs:
xfs: expanding delayed logging design with background material
xfs: xlog_sync() manually adjusts grant head space
xfs: avoid cil push lock if possible
xfs: move CIL ordering to the logvec chain
xfs: convert log vector chain to use list heads
xfs: convert CIL to unordered per cpu lists
xfs: Add order IDs to log items in CIL
xfs: convert CIL busy extents to per-cpu
xfs: track CIL ticket reservation in percpu structure
xfs: implement percpu cil space used calculation
xfs: introduce per-cpu CIL tracking structure
xfs: rework per-iclog header CIL reservation
xfs: lift init CIL reservation out of xc_cil_lock
xfs: use the CIL space used counter for emptiness checks