Current error handling on snd_soc_dapm_add_route() has some wastes.
It indicates *own* error message *only* for sink or source,
and return error directly at (A). OTOH, it has similar error message at
(B) which indicates *both* sink/source.
And more, (A) is using dev_err(), (B) is using dev_warn().
(B) is caring prefix, but (A) is not.
(X) int snd_soc_dapm_add_route(...)
{
...
if (wsource == NULL) {
(A) dev_err(...);
return -ENODEV;
}
if (wsink == NULL) {
(A) dev_err(...);
return -ENODEV;
}
...
ret = snd_soc_dapm_add_path(...);
if (ret)
(B) goto err;
return 0;
err:
(B) dev_warn(...);
return ret;
}
Above snd_soc_dapm_add_route() (= X) is called from
snd_soc_dapm_add_routes() (= Y).
(X) will indicate error message by itself, but (Y) will indicate
own error message at (C). (C) is duplicated.
(Y) int snd_soc_dapm_add_routes(...)
{
...
for (...) {
(X) int r = snd_soc_dapm_add_route(...);
if (r < 0) {
(C) dev_err(...);
ret = r;
}
...
}
...
}
This patch (1) merges these error message (= A,B) into one,
(2) use dev_err(), (3) remove duplicate error message (= C) from
snd_soc_dapm_add_routes().
By this patch, it will indicate error message like this.
- error message with prefix
- not found widget will have "(*)" mark
- it indicates [control] if exists.
ex)
[if no sink with control]
ASoC: Failed to add route SOURCE -> [CTRL] -> SINK(*)
[if no source without control]
ASoC: Failed to add route SOURCE(*) -> SINK
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/878rlctzt5.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
f19a2ec7a3