commit e3977e0609a07d86406029fceea0fd40d7849368 upstream.
This reverts commit dad3fb67ca1cbef87ce700e83a55835e5921ce8a.
The commit converted kernfs_idr_lock to an IRQ-safe raw_spinlock because it
could be acquired while holding an rq lock through bpf_cgroup_from_id().
However, kernfs_idr_lock is held while doing GPF_NOWAIT allocations which
involves acquiring an non-IRQ-safe and non-raw lock leading to the following
lockdep warning:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.7.0-rc5-kzm9g-00251-g655022a45b1c #578 Not tainted
-----------------------------
swapper/0/0 is trying to lock:
dfbcd488 (&c->lock){....}-{3:3}, at: local_lock_acquire+0x0/0xa4
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{5:5}
2 locks held by swapper/0/0:
#0: dfbc9c60 (lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: local_lock_acquire+0x0/0xa4
#1: c0c012a8 (kernfs_idr_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: __kernfs_new_node.constprop.0+0x68/0x258
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc5-kzm9g-00251-g655022a45b1c #578
Hardware name: Generic SH73A0 (Flattened Device Tree)
unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x90
dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x3cc/0x168c
__lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x274/0x30c
lock_acquire from local_lock_acquire+0x28/0xa4
local_lock_acquire from ___slab_alloc+0x234/0x8a8
___slab_alloc from __slab_alloc.constprop.0+0x30/0x44
__slab_alloc.constprop.0 from kmem_cache_alloc+0x7c/0x148
kmem_cache_alloc from radix_tree_node_alloc.constprop.0+0x44/0xdc
radix_tree_node_alloc.constprop.0 from idr_get_free+0x110/0x2b8
idr_get_free from idr_alloc_u32+0x9c/0x108
idr_alloc_u32 from idr_alloc_cyclic+0x50/0xb8
idr_alloc_cyclic from __kernfs_new_node.constprop.0+0x88/0x258
__kernfs_new_node.constprop.0 from kernfs_create_root+0xbc/0x154
kernfs_create_root from sysfs_init+0x18/0x5c
sysfs_init from mnt_init+0xc4/0x220
mnt_init from vfs_caches_init+0x6c/0x88
vfs_caches_init from start_kernel+0x474/0x528
start_kernel from 0x0
Let's rever the commit. It's undesirable to spread out raw spinlock usage
anyway and the problem can be solved by protecting the lookup path with RCU
instead.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAMuHMdV=AKt+mwY7svEq5gFPx41LoSQZ_USME5_MEdWQze13ww@mail.gmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240109214828.252092-2-tj@kernel.org
Tested-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
5f93225dc9