d5c3eb26d9
With the error message I added in "libfc: sanity check cpu number extracted from xid" I didn't account for the fact that fc_exch_find is called with FC_XID_UNKNOWN at the start of a new exchange if we are the responder. It doesn't come up with the initiator much, but that's basically every exchange for a target. By checking the xid for FC_XID_UNKNOWN first, we not only prevent the erroneous error message, but skip the unnecessary lookup attempt as well. [mkp: applied by hand due to conflict with Hannes' libfc patch series] Signed-off-by: Chris Leech <cleech@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
Makefile | ||
fc_disc.c | ||
fc_elsct.c | ||
fc_exch.c | ||
fc_fcp.c | ||
fc_frame.c | ||
fc_libfc.c | ||
fc_libfc.h | ||
fc_lport.c | ||
fc_npiv.c | ||
fc_rport.c |