312ec7e50c
1. namelen is declared "unsigned short" which hints for "maybe space savings". Indeed in 2.4 struct proc_dir_entry looked like: struct proc_dir_entry { unsigned short low_ino; unsigned short namelen; Now, low_ino is "unsigned int", all savings were gone for a long time. "struct proc_dir_entry" is not that countless to worry about it's size, anyway. 2. converting from unsigned short to int/unsigned int can only create problems, we better play it safe. Space is not really conserved, because of natural alignment for the next field. sizeof(struct proc_dir_entry) remains the same. Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
acpi | ||
asm-generic | ||
crypto | ||
drm | ||
keys | ||
linux | ||
math-emu | ||
media | ||
mtd | ||
net | ||
pcmcia | ||
rdma | ||
rxrpc | ||
scsi | ||
sound | ||
target | ||
trace | ||
video | ||
xen | ||
Kbuild |