When the number of partial slabs in each cache is the same (e.g., the
value are 0), the results of the `slabinfo -X -N5` and `slabinfo -P -N5`
are different.
/ # slabinfo -X -N5
...
Slabs sorted by number of partial slabs
---------------------------------------
Name Objects Objsize Space Slabs/Part/Cpu O/S O %Fr %Ef Flg
inode_cache 15180 392 6217728 758/0/1 20 1 0 95 a
kernfs_node_cache 22494 88 2002944 488/0/1 46 0 0 98
shmem_inode_cache 663 464 319488 38/0/1 17 1 0 96
biovec-max 50 3072 163840 4/0/1 10 3 0 93 A
dentry 19050 136 2600960 633/0/2 30 0 0 99 a
/ # slabinfo -P -N5
Name Objects Objsize Space Slabs/Part/Cpu O/S O %Fr %Ef Flg
bdev_cache 32 984 32.7K 1/0/1 16 2 0 96 Aa
ext4_inode_cache 42 752 32.7K 1/0/1 21 2 0 96 a
dentry 19050 136 2.6M 633/0/2 30 0 0 99 a
TCPv6 17 1840 32.7K 0/0/1 17 3 0 95 A
RAWv6 18 856 16.3K 0/0/1 18 2 0 94 A
This problem is caused by the sort_slabs(). So let's use alphabetic order
when two values are equal in the sort_slabs().
By the way, the content of the `slabinfo -h` is not aligned because the
`-P|--partial Sort by number of partial slabs`
uses tabs instead of spaces. So let's use spaces instead of tabs to fix
it.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220528063117.935158-1-songyuanzheng@huawei.com
Fixes: 1106b205a3 ("tools/vm/slabinfo: add partial slab listing to -X")
Signed-off-by: Yuanzheng Song <songyuanzheng@huawei.com>
Cc: "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
4f5ceb8851