Commit:
d77698df39 ("x86/build: Specify stack alignment for clang")
intended to use the same stack alignment for clang as with gcc.
The two compilers use different options to configure the stack alignment
(gcc: -mpreferred-stack-boundary=n, clang: -mstack-alignment=n).
The above commit assumes that the clang option uses the same parameter
type as gcc, i.e. that the alignment is specified as 2^n. However clang
interprets the value of this option literally to use an alignment of n,
in consequence the stack remains misaligned.
Change the values used with -mstack-alignment to be the actual alignment
instead of a power of two.
cc-option isn't used here with the typical pattern of KBUILD_CFLAGS +=
$(call cc-option ...). The reason is that older gcc versions don't
support the -mpreferred-stack-boundary option, since cc-option doesn't
verify whether the alternative option is valid it would incorrectly
select the clang option -mstack-alignment..
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Bernhard.Rosenkranzer@linaro.org
Cc: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Michael Davidson <md@google.com>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephen Hines <srhines@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: dianders@chromium.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170817004740.170588-1-mka@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
8f91869766