Thomas Gleixner 2ab516575f x86: vdso: Use seqcount instead of seqlock ... The update of the vdso data happens under xtime_lock, so adding a nested lock is pointless. Just use a seqcount to sync the readers. Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>		2012-03-15 18:17:58 -07:00
..
asm	x86: vdso: Use seqcount instead of seqlock	2012-03-15 18:17:58 -07:00