Recent rework broke building LKDTM when CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK=n.
This patch fixes that breakage.
Prior to recent stackleak rework, the LKDTM STACKLEAK_ERASING code could
be built when the kernel was not built with stackleak support, and would
run a test that would almost certainly fail (or pass by sheer cosmic
coincidence), e.g.
| # echo STACKLEAK_ERASING > /sys/kernel/debug/provoke-crash/DIRECT
| lkdtm: Performing direct entry STACKLEAK_ERASING
| lkdtm: checking unused part of the thread stack (15560 bytes)...
| lkdtm: FAIL: the erased part is not found (checked 15560 bytes)
| lkdtm: FAIL: the thread stack is NOT properly erased!
| lkdtm: This is probably expected, since this kernel (5.18.0-rc2 aarch64) was built *without* CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK=y
The recent rework to the test made it more accurate by using helpers
which are only defined when CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK=y, and so when
building LKDTM when CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK=n, we get a build
failure:
| drivers/misc/lkdtm/stackleak.c: In function 'check_stackleak_irqoff':
| drivers/misc/lkdtm/stackleak.c:30:46: error: implicit declaration of function 'stackleak_task_low_bound' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
| 30 | const unsigned long task_stack_low = stackleak_task_low_bound(current);
| | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| drivers/misc/lkdtm/stackleak.c:31:47: error: implicit declaration of function 'stackleak_task_high_bound'; did you mean 'stackleak_task_init'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
| 31 | const unsigned long task_stack_high = stackleak_task_high_bound(current);
| | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| | stackleak_task_init
| drivers/misc/lkdtm/stackleak.c:33:48: error: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'lowest_stack'
| 33 | const unsigned long lowest_sp = current->lowest_stack;
| | ^~
| drivers/misc/lkdtm/stackleak.c:74:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'stackleak_find_top_of_poison' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
| 74 | poison_high = stackleak_find_top_of_poison(task_stack_low, untracked_high);
| | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This patch fixes the issue by not compiling the body of the test when
CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK=n, and replacing this with an unconditional
XFAIL message. This means the pr_expected_config() in
check_stackleak_irqoff() is redundant, and so it is removed.
Where an architecture does not support stackleak, the test will log:
| # echo STACKLEAK_ERASING > /sys/kernel/debug/provoke-crash/DIRECT
| lkdtm: Performing direct entry STACKLEAK_ERASING
| lkdtm: XFAIL: stackleak is not supported on this arch (HAVE_ARCH_STACKLEAK=n)
Where an architectures does support stackleak, but this has not been
compiled in, the test will log:
| # echo STACKLEAK_ERASING > /sys/kernel/debug/provoke-crash/DIRECT
| lkdtm: Performing direct entry STACKLEAK_ERASING
| lkdtm: XFAIL: stackleak is not enabled (CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK=n)
Where stackleak has been compiled in, the test behaves as usual:
| # echo STACKLEAK_ERASING > /sys/kernel/debug/provoke-crash/DIRECT
| lkdtm: Performing direct entry STACKLEAK_ERASING
| lkdtm: stackleak stack usage:
| high offset: 336 bytes
| current: 688 bytes
| lowest: 1232 bytes
| tracked: 1232 bytes
| untracked: 672 bytes
| poisoned: 14136 bytes
| low offset: 8 bytes
| lkdtm: OK: the rest of the thread stack is properly erased
Fixes: f4cfacd92972cc44 ("lkdtm/stackleak: rework boundary management")
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220506121145.1162908-1-mark.rutland@arm.com
8c6a490e40