308 lines
11 KiB
Plaintext
308 lines
11 KiB
Plaintext
=======================
|
||
INTEL POWERCLAMP DRIVER
|
||
=======================
|
||
By: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
|
||
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
|
||
|
||
Contents:
|
||
(*) Introduction
|
||
- Goals and Objectives
|
||
|
||
(*) Theory of Operation
|
||
- Idle Injection
|
||
- Calibration
|
||
|
||
(*) Performance Analysis
|
||
- Effectiveness and Limitations
|
||
- Power vs Performance
|
||
- Scalability
|
||
- Calibration
|
||
- Comparison with Alternative Techniques
|
||
|
||
(*) Usage and Interfaces
|
||
- Generic Thermal Layer (sysfs)
|
||
- Kernel APIs (TBD)
|
||
|
||
============
|
||
INTRODUCTION
|
||
============
|
||
|
||
Consider the situation where a system’s power consumption must be
|
||
reduced at runtime, due to power budget, thermal constraint, or noise
|
||
level, and where active cooling is not preferred. Software managed
|
||
passive power reduction must be performed to prevent the hardware
|
||
actions that are designed for catastrophic scenarios.
|
||
|
||
Currently, P-states, T-states (clock modulation), and CPU offlining
|
||
are used for CPU throttling.
|
||
|
||
On Intel CPUs, C-states provide effective power reduction, but so far
|
||
they’re only used opportunistically, based on workload. With the
|
||
development of intel_powerclamp driver, the method of synchronizing
|
||
idle injection across all online CPU threads was introduced. The goal
|
||
is to achieve forced and controllable C-state residency.
|
||
|
||
Test/Analysis has been made in the areas of power, performance,
|
||
scalability, and user experience. In many cases, clear advantage is
|
||
shown over taking the CPU offline or modulating the CPU clock.
|
||
|
||
|
||
===================
|
||
THEORY OF OPERATION
|
||
===================
|
||
|
||
Idle Injection
|
||
--------------
|
||
|
||
On modern Intel processors (Nehalem or later), package level C-state
|
||
residency is available in MSRs, thus also available to the kernel.
|
||
|
||
These MSRs are:
|
||
#define MSR_PKG_C2_RESIDENCY 0x60D
|
||
#define MSR_PKG_C3_RESIDENCY 0x3F8
|
||
#define MSR_PKG_C6_RESIDENCY 0x3F9
|
||
#define MSR_PKG_C7_RESIDENCY 0x3FA
|
||
|
||
If the kernel can also inject idle time to the system, then a
|
||
closed-loop control system can be established that manages package
|
||
level C-state. The intel_powerclamp driver is conceived as such a
|
||
control system, where the target set point is a user-selected idle
|
||
ratio (based on power reduction), and the error is the difference
|
||
between the actual package level C-state residency ratio and the target idle
|
||
ratio.
|
||
|
||
Injection is controlled by high priority kernel threads, spawned for
|
||
each online CPU.
|
||
|
||
These kernel threads, with SCHED_FIFO class, are created to perform
|
||
clamping actions of controlled duty ratio and duration. Each per-CPU
|
||
thread synchronizes its idle time and duration, based on the rounding
|
||
of jiffies, so accumulated errors can be prevented to avoid a jittery
|
||
effect. Threads are also bound to the CPU such that they cannot be
|
||
migrated, unless the CPU is taken offline. In this case, threads
|
||
belong to the offlined CPUs will be terminated immediately.
|
||
|
||
Running as SCHED_FIFO and relatively high priority, also allows such
|
||
scheme to work for both preemptable and non-preemptable kernels.
|
||
Alignment of idle time around jiffies ensures scalability for HZ
|
||
values. This effect can be better visualized using a Perf timechart.
|
||
The following diagram shows the behavior of kernel thread
|
||
kidle_inject/cpu. During idle injection, it runs monitor/mwait idle
|
||
for a given "duration", then relinquishes the CPU to other tasks,
|
||
until the next time interval.
|
||
|
||
The NOHZ schedule tick is disabled during idle time, but interrupts
|
||
are not masked. Tests show that the extra wakeups from scheduler tick
|
||
have a dramatic impact on the effectiveness of the powerclamp driver
|
||
on large scale systems (Westmere system with 80 processors).
|
||
|
||
CPU0
|
||
____________ ____________
|
||
kidle_inject/0 | sleep | mwait | sleep |
|
||
_________| |________| |_______
|
||
duration
|
||
CPU1
|
||
____________ ____________
|
||
kidle_inject/1 | sleep | mwait | sleep |
|
||
_________| |________| |_______
|
||
^
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
roundup(jiffies, interval)
|
||
|
||
Only one CPU is allowed to collect statistics and update global
|
||
control parameters. This CPU is referred to as the controlling CPU in
|
||
this document. The controlling CPU is elected at runtime, with a
|
||
policy that favors BSP, taking into account the possibility of a CPU
|
||
hot-plug.
|
||
|
||
In terms of dynamics of the idle control system, package level idle
|
||
time is considered largely as a non-causal system where its behavior
|
||
cannot be based on the past or current input. Therefore, the
|
||
intel_powerclamp driver attempts to enforce the desired idle time
|
||
instantly as given input (target idle ratio). After injection,
|
||
powerclamp monitors the actual idle for a given time window and adjust
|
||
the next injection accordingly to avoid over/under correction.
|
||
|
||
When used in a causal control system, such as a temperature control,
|
||
it is up to the user of this driver to implement algorithms where
|
||
past samples and outputs are included in the feedback. For example, a
|
||
PID-based thermal controller can use the powerclamp driver to
|
||
maintain a desired target temperature, based on integral and
|
||
derivative gains of the past samples.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Calibration
|
||
-----------
|
||
During scalability testing, it is observed that synchronized actions
|
||
among CPUs become challenging as the number of cores grows. This is
|
||
also true for the ability of a system to enter package level C-states.
|
||
|
||
To make sure the intel_powerclamp driver scales well, online
|
||
calibration is implemented. The goals for doing such a calibration
|
||
are:
|
||
|
||
a) determine the effective range of idle injection ratio
|
||
b) determine the amount of compensation needed at each target ratio
|
||
|
||
Compensation to each target ratio consists of two parts:
|
||
|
||
a) steady state error compensation
|
||
This is to offset the error occurring when the system can
|
||
enter idle without extra wakeups (such as external interrupts).
|
||
|
||
b) dynamic error compensation
|
||
When an excessive amount of wakeups occurs during idle, an
|
||
additional idle ratio can be added to quiet interrupts, by
|
||
slowing down CPU activities.
|
||
|
||
A debugfs file is provided for the user to examine compensation
|
||
progress and results, such as on a Westmere system.
|
||
[jacob@nex01 ~]$ cat
|
||
/sys/kernel/debug/intel_powerclamp/powerclamp_calib
|
||
controlling cpu: 0
|
||
pct confidence steady dynamic (compensation)
|
||
0 0 0 0
|
||
1 1 0 0
|
||
2 1 1 0
|
||
3 3 1 0
|
||
4 3 1 0
|
||
5 3 1 0
|
||
6 3 1 0
|
||
7 3 1 0
|
||
8 3 1 0
|
||
...
|
||
30 3 2 0
|
||
31 3 2 0
|
||
32 3 1 0
|
||
33 3 2 0
|
||
34 3 1 0
|
||
35 3 2 0
|
||
36 3 1 0
|
||
37 3 2 0
|
||
38 3 1 0
|
||
39 3 2 0
|
||
40 3 3 0
|
||
41 3 1 0
|
||
42 3 2 0
|
||
43 3 1 0
|
||
44 3 1 0
|
||
45 3 2 0
|
||
46 3 3 0
|
||
47 3 0 0
|
||
48 3 2 0
|
||
49 3 3 0
|
||
|
||
Calibration occurs during runtime. No offline method is available.
|
||
Steady state compensation is used only when confidence levels of all
|
||
adjacent ratios have reached satisfactory level. A confidence level
|
||
is accumulated based on clean data collected at runtime. Data
|
||
collected during a period without extra interrupts is considered
|
||
clean.
|
||
|
||
To compensate for excessive amounts of wakeup during idle, additional
|
||
idle time is injected when such a condition is detected. Currently,
|
||
we have a simple algorithm to double the injection ratio. A possible
|
||
enhancement might be to throttle the offending IRQ, such as delaying
|
||
EOI for level triggered interrupts. But it is a challenge to be
|
||
non-intrusive to the scheduler or the IRQ core code.
|
||
|
||
|
||
CPU Online/Offline
|
||
------------------
|
||
Per-CPU kernel threads are started/stopped upon receiving
|
||
notifications of CPU hotplug activities. The intel_powerclamp driver
|
||
keeps track of clamping kernel threads, even after they are migrated
|
||
to other CPUs, after a CPU offline event.
|
||
|
||
|
||
=====================
|
||
Performance Analysis
|
||
=====================
|
||
This section describes the general performance data collected on
|
||
multiple systems, including Westmere (80P) and Ivy Bridge (4P, 8P).
|
||
|
||
Effectiveness and Limitations
|
||
-----------------------------
|
||
The maximum range that idle injection is allowed is capped at 50
|
||
percent. As mentioned earlier, since interrupts are allowed during
|
||
forced idle time, excessive interrupts could result in less
|
||
effectiveness. The extreme case would be doing a ping -f to generated
|
||
flooded network interrupts without much CPU acknowledgement. In this
|
||
case, little can be done from the idle injection threads. In most
|
||
normal cases, such as scp a large file, applications can be throttled
|
||
by the powerclamp driver, since slowing down the CPU also slows down
|
||
network protocol processing, which in turn reduces interrupts.
|
||
|
||
When control parameters change at runtime by the controlling CPU, it
|
||
may take an additional period for the rest of the CPUs to catch up
|
||
with the changes. During this time, idle injection is out of sync,
|
||
thus not able to enter package C- states at the expected ratio. But
|
||
this effect is minor, in that in most cases change to the target
|
||
ratio is updated much less frequently than the idle injection
|
||
frequency.
|
||
|
||
Scalability
|
||
-----------
|
||
Tests also show a minor, but measurable, difference between the 4P/8P
|
||
Ivy Bridge system and the 80P Westmere server under 50% idle ratio.
|
||
More compensation is needed on Westmere for the same amount of
|
||
target idle ratio. The compensation also increases as the idle ratio
|
||
gets larger. The above reason constitutes the need for the
|
||
calibration code.
|
||
|
||
On the IVB 8P system, compared to an offline CPU, powerclamp can
|
||
achieve up to 40% better performance per watt. (measured by a spin
|
||
counter summed over per CPU counting threads spawned for all running
|
||
CPUs).
|
||
|
||
====================
|
||
Usage and Interfaces
|
||
====================
|
||
The powerclamp driver is registered to the generic thermal layer as a
|
||
cooling device. Currently, it’s not bound to any thermal zones.
|
||
|
||
jacob@chromoly:/sys/class/thermal/cooling_device14$ grep . *
|
||
cur_state:0
|
||
max_state:50
|
||
type:intel_powerclamp
|
||
|
||
Example usage:
|
||
- To inject 25% idle time
|
||
$ sudo sh -c "echo 25 > /sys/class/thermal/cooling_device80/cur_state
|
||
"
|
||
|
||
If the system is not busy and has more than 25% idle time already,
|
||
then the powerclamp driver will not start idle injection. Using Top
|
||
will not show idle injection kernel threads.
|
||
|
||
If the system is busy (spin test below) and has less than 25% natural
|
||
idle time, powerclamp kernel threads will do idle injection, which
|
||
appear running to the scheduler. But the overall system idle is still
|
||
reflected. In this example, 24.1% idle is shown. This helps the
|
||
system admin or user determine the cause of slowdown, when a
|
||
powerclamp driver is in action.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Tasks: 197 total, 1 running, 196 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
|
||
Cpu(s): 71.2%us, 4.7%sy, 0.0%ni, 24.1%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
|
||
Mem: 3943228k total, 1689632k used, 2253596k free, 74960k buffers
|
||
Swap: 4087804k total, 0k used, 4087804k free, 945336k cached
|
||
|
||
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
|
||
3352 jacob 20 0 262m 644 428 S 286 0.0 0:17.16 spin
|
||
3341 root -51 0 0 0 0 D 25 0.0 0:01.62 kidle_inject/0
|
||
3344 root -51 0 0 0 0 D 25 0.0 0:01.60 kidle_inject/3
|
||
3342 root -51 0 0 0 0 D 25 0.0 0:01.61 kidle_inject/1
|
||
3343 root -51 0 0 0 0 D 25 0.0 0:01.60 kidle_inject/2
|
||
2935 jacob 20 0 696m 125m 35m S 5 3.3 0:31.11 firefox
|
||
1546 root 20 0 158m 20m 6640 S 3 0.5 0:26.97 Xorg
|
||
2100 jacob 20 0 1223m 88m 30m S 3 2.3 0:23.68 compiz
|
||
|
||
Tests have shown that by using the powerclamp driver as a cooling
|
||
device, a PID based userspace thermal controller can manage to
|
||
control CPU temperature effectively, when no other thermal influence
|
||
is added. For example, a UltraBook user can compile the kernel under
|
||
certain temperature (below most active trip points).
|