221 lines
7.7 KiB
C
221 lines
7.7 KiB
C
/*P:600
|
|
* The x86 architecture has segments, which involve a table of descriptors
|
|
* which can be used to do funky things with virtual address interpretation.
|
|
* We originally used to use segments so the Guest couldn't alter the
|
|
* Guest<->Host Switcher, and then we had to trim Guest segments, and restore
|
|
* for userspace per-thread segments, but trim again for on userspace->kernel
|
|
* transitions... This nightmarish creation was contained within this file,
|
|
* where we knew not to tread without heavy armament and a change of underwear.
|
|
*
|
|
* In these modern times, the segment handling code consists of simple sanity
|
|
* checks, and the worst you'll experience reading this code is butterfly-rash
|
|
* from frolicking through its parklike serenity.
|
|
:*/
|
|
#include "lg.h"
|
|
|
|
/*H:600
|
|
* Segments & The Global Descriptor Table
|
|
*
|
|
* (That title sounds like a bad Nerdcore group. Not to suggest that there are
|
|
* any good Nerdcore groups, but in high school a friend of mine had a band
|
|
* called Joe Fish and the Chips, so there are definitely worse band names).
|
|
*
|
|
* To refresh: the GDT is a table of 8-byte values describing segments. Once
|
|
* set up, these segments can be loaded into one of the 6 "segment registers".
|
|
*
|
|
* GDT entries are passed around as "struct desc_struct"s, which like IDT
|
|
* entries are split into two 32-bit members, "a" and "b". One day, someone
|
|
* will clean that up, and be declared a Hero. (No pressure, I'm just saying).
|
|
*
|
|
* Anyway, the GDT entry contains a base (the start address of the segment), a
|
|
* limit (the size of the segment - 1), and some flags. Sounds simple, and it
|
|
* would be, except those zany Intel engineers decided that it was too boring
|
|
* to put the base at one end, the limit at the other, and the flags in
|
|
* between. They decided to shotgun the bits at random throughout the 8 bytes,
|
|
* like so:
|
|
*
|
|
* 0 16 40 48 52 56 63
|
|
* [ limit part 1 ][ base part 1 ][ flags ][li][fl][base ]
|
|
* mit ags part 2
|
|
* part 2
|
|
*
|
|
* As a result, this file contains a certain amount of magic numeracy. Let's
|
|
* begin.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* There are several entries we don't let the Guest set. The TSS entry is the
|
|
* "Task State Segment" which controls all kinds of delicate things. The
|
|
* LGUEST_CS and LGUEST_DS entries are reserved for the Switcher, and the
|
|
* the Guest can't be trusted to deal with double faults.
|
|
*/
|
|
static bool ignored_gdt(unsigned int num)
|
|
{
|
|
return (num == GDT_ENTRY_TSS
|
|
|| num == GDT_ENTRY_LGUEST_CS
|
|
|| num == GDT_ENTRY_LGUEST_DS
|
|
|| num == GDT_ENTRY_DOUBLEFAULT_TSS);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*H:630
|
|
* Once the Guest gave us new GDT entries, we fix them up a little. We
|
|
* don't care if they're invalid: the worst that can happen is a General
|
|
* Protection Fault in the Switcher when it restores a Guest segment register
|
|
* which tries to use that entry. Then we kill the Guest for causing such a
|
|
* mess: the message will be "unhandled trap 256".
|
|
*/
|
|
static void fixup_gdt_table(struct lg_cpu *cpu, unsigned start, unsigned end)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned int i;
|
|
|
|
for (i = start; i < end; i++) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* We never copy these ones to real GDT, so we don't care what
|
|
* they say
|
|
*/
|
|
if (ignored_gdt(i))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Segment descriptors contain a privilege level: the Guest is
|
|
* sometimes careless and leaves this as 0, even though it's
|
|
* running at privilege level 1. If so, we fix it here.
|
|
*/
|
|
if ((cpu->arch.gdt[i].b & 0x00006000) == 0)
|
|
cpu->arch.gdt[i].b |= (GUEST_PL << 13);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Each descriptor has an "accessed" bit. If we don't set it
|
|
* now, the CPU will try to set it when the Guest first loads
|
|
* that entry into a segment register. But the GDT isn't
|
|
* writable by the Guest, so bad things can happen.
|
|
*/
|
|
cpu->arch.gdt[i].b |= 0x00000100;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*H:610
|
|
* Like the IDT, we never simply use the GDT the Guest gives us. We keep
|
|
* a GDT for each CPU, and copy across the Guest's entries each time we want to
|
|
* run the Guest on that CPU.
|
|
*
|
|
* This routine is called at boot or modprobe time for each CPU to set up the
|
|
* constant GDT entries: the ones which are the same no matter what Guest we're
|
|
* running.
|
|
*/
|
|
void setup_default_gdt_entries(struct lguest_ro_state *state)
|
|
{
|
|
struct desc_struct *gdt = state->guest_gdt;
|
|
unsigned long tss = (unsigned long)&state->guest_tss;
|
|
|
|
/* The Switcher segments are full 0-4G segments, privilege level 0 */
|
|
gdt[GDT_ENTRY_LGUEST_CS] = FULL_EXEC_SEGMENT;
|
|
gdt[GDT_ENTRY_LGUEST_DS] = FULL_SEGMENT;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* The TSS segment refers to the TSS entry for this particular CPU.
|
|
* Forgive the magic flags: the 0x8900 means the entry is Present, it's
|
|
* privilege level 0 Available 386 TSS system segment, and the 0x67
|
|
* means Saturn is eclipsed by Mercury in the twelfth house.
|
|
*/
|
|
gdt[GDT_ENTRY_TSS].a = 0x00000067 | (tss << 16);
|
|
gdt[GDT_ENTRY_TSS].b = 0x00008900 | (tss & 0xFF000000)
|
|
| ((tss >> 16) & 0x000000FF);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* This routine sets up the initial Guest GDT for booting. All entries start
|
|
* as 0 (unusable).
|
|
*/
|
|
void setup_guest_gdt(struct lg_cpu *cpu)
|
|
{
|
|
/*
|
|
* Start with full 0-4G segments...except the Guest is allowed to use
|
|
* them, so set the privilege level appropriately in the flags.
|
|
*/
|
|
cpu->arch.gdt[GDT_ENTRY_KERNEL_CS] = FULL_EXEC_SEGMENT;
|
|
cpu->arch.gdt[GDT_ENTRY_KERNEL_DS] = FULL_SEGMENT;
|
|
cpu->arch.gdt[GDT_ENTRY_KERNEL_CS].b |= (GUEST_PL << 13);
|
|
cpu->arch.gdt[GDT_ENTRY_KERNEL_DS].b |= (GUEST_PL << 13);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*H:650
|
|
* An optimization of copy_gdt(), for just the three "thead-local storage"
|
|
* entries.
|
|
*/
|
|
void copy_gdt_tls(const struct lg_cpu *cpu, struct desc_struct *gdt)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned int i;
|
|
|
|
for (i = GDT_ENTRY_TLS_MIN; i <= GDT_ENTRY_TLS_MAX; i++)
|
|
gdt[i] = cpu->arch.gdt[i];
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*H:640
|
|
* When the Guest is run on a different CPU, or the GDT entries have changed,
|
|
* copy_gdt() is called to copy the Guest's GDT entries across to this CPU's
|
|
* GDT.
|
|
*/
|
|
void copy_gdt(const struct lg_cpu *cpu, struct desc_struct *gdt)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned int i;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* The default entries from setup_default_gdt_entries() are not
|
|
* replaced. See ignored_gdt() above.
|
|
*/
|
|
for (i = 0; i < GDT_ENTRIES; i++)
|
|
if (!ignored_gdt(i))
|
|
gdt[i] = cpu->arch.gdt[i];
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*H:620
|
|
* This is where the Guest asks us to load a new GDT entry
|
|
* (LHCALL_LOAD_GDT_ENTRY). We tweak the entry and copy it in.
|
|
*/
|
|
void load_guest_gdt_entry(struct lg_cpu *cpu, u32 num, u32 lo, u32 hi)
|
|
{
|
|
/*
|
|
* We assume the Guest has the same number of GDT entries as the
|
|
* Host, otherwise we'd have to dynamically allocate the Guest GDT.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (num >= ARRAY_SIZE(cpu->arch.gdt))
|
|
kill_guest(cpu, "too many gdt entries %i", num);
|
|
|
|
/* Set it up, then fix it. */
|
|
cpu->arch.gdt[num].a = lo;
|
|
cpu->arch.gdt[num].b = hi;
|
|
fixup_gdt_table(cpu, num, num+1);
|
|
/*
|
|
* Mark that the GDT changed so the core knows it has to copy it again,
|
|
* even if the Guest is run on the same CPU.
|
|
*/
|
|
cpu->changed |= CHANGED_GDT;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* This is the fast-track version for just changing the three TLS entries.
|
|
* Remember that this happens on every context switch, so it's worth
|
|
* optimizing. But wouldn't it be neater to have a single hypercall to cover
|
|
* both cases?
|
|
*/
|
|
void guest_load_tls(struct lg_cpu *cpu, unsigned long gtls)
|
|
{
|
|
struct desc_struct *tls = &cpu->arch.gdt[GDT_ENTRY_TLS_MIN];
|
|
|
|
__lgread(cpu, tls, gtls, sizeof(*tls)*GDT_ENTRY_TLS_ENTRIES);
|
|
fixup_gdt_table(cpu, GDT_ENTRY_TLS_MIN, GDT_ENTRY_TLS_MAX+1);
|
|
/* Note that just the TLS entries have changed. */
|
|
cpu->changed |= CHANGED_GDT_TLS;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*H:660
|
|
* With this, we have finished the Host.
|
|
*
|
|
* Five of the seven parts of our task are complete. You have made it through
|
|
* the Bit of Despair (I think that's somewhere in the page table code,
|
|
* myself).
|
|
*
|
|
* Next, we examine "make Switcher". It's short, but intense.
|
|
*/
|