Back when this was first written, dma_supported() was somewhat of a
murky mess, with subtly different interpretations being relied upon in
various places. The "does device X support DMA to address range Y?"
uses assuming Y to be physical addresses, which motivated the current
iommu_dma_supported() implementation and are alluded to in the comment
therein, have since been cleaned up, leaving only the far less ambiguous
"can device X drive address bits Y" usage internal to DMA API mask
setting. As such, there is no reason to keep a slightly misleading
callback which does nothing but duplicate the current default behaviour;
we already constrain IOVA allocations to the iommu_domain aperture where
necessary, so let's leave DMA mask business to architecture-specific
code where it belongs.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
IOMMU domain users such as VFIO face a similar problem to DMA API ops
with regard to mapping MSI messages in systems where the MSI write is
subject to IOMMU translation. With the relevant infrastructure now in
place for managed DMA domains, it's actually really simple for other
users to piggyback off that and reap the benefits without giving up
their own IOVA management, and without having to reinvent their own
wheel in the MSI layer.
Allow such users to opt into automatic MSI remapping by dedicating a
region of their IOVA space to a managed cookie, and extend the mapping
routine to implement a trivial linear allocator in such cases, to avoid
the needless overhead of a full-blown IOVA domain.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@caviumnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@caviumnetworks.com>
Tested-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
The newly added DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED is useful for creating mappings that
are only accessible to privileged DMA engines. Implement it in
dma-iommu.c so that the ARM64 DMA IOMMU mapper can make use of it.
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Tested-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mitchel Humpherys <mitchelh@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
With the new dma_{map,unmap}_resource() functions added to the DMA API
for the benefit of cases like slave DMA, add suitable implementations to
the arsenal of our generic layer. Since cache maintenance should not be
a concern, these can both be standalone callback implementations without
the need for arch code wrappers.
CC: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
With our DMA ops enabled for PCI devices, we should avoid allocating
IOVAs which a host bridge might misinterpret as peer-to-peer DMA and
lead to faults, corruption or other badness. To be safe, punch out holes
for all of the relevant host bridge's windows when initialising a DMA
domain for a PCI device.
CC: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
CC: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Reported-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
When an MSI doorbell is located downstream of an IOMMU, attaching
devices to a DMA ops domain and switching on translation leads to a rude
shock when their attempt to write to the physical address returned by
the irqchip driver faults (or worse, writes into some already-mapped
buffer) and no interrupt is forthcoming.
Address this by adding a hook for relevant irqchip drivers to call from
their compose_msi_msg() callback, to swizzle the physical address with
an appropriatly-mapped IOVA for any device attached to one of our DMA
ops domains.
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
The dma-mapping core and the implementations do not change the DMA
attributes passed by pointer. Thus the pointer can point to const data.
However the attributes do not have to be a bitfield. Instead unsigned
long will do fine:
1. This is just simpler. Both in terms of reading the code and setting
attributes. Instead of initializing local attributes on the stack
and passing pointer to it to dma_set_attr(), just set the bits.
2. It brings safeness and checking for const correctness because the
attributes are passed by value.
Semantic patches for this change (at least most of them):
virtual patch
virtual context
@r@
identifier f, attrs;
@@
f(...,
- struct dma_attrs *attrs
+ unsigned long attrs
, ...)
{
...
}
@@
identifier r.f;
@@
f(...,
- NULL
+ 0
)
and
// Options: --all-includes
virtual patch
virtual context
@r@
identifier f, attrs;
type t;
@@
t f(..., struct dma_attrs *attrs);
@@
identifier r.f;
@@
f(...,
- NULL
+ 0
)
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1468399300-5399-2-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Acked-by: Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> [c6x]
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> [cris]
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> [drm]
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> [iommu]
Acked-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@st.com> [bdisp]
Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> [vb2-core]
Acked-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> [xen]
Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> [xen swiotlb]
Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> [iommu]
Acked-by: Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org> [hexagon]
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> [m68k]
Acked-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com> [s390]
Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> [avr32]
Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> [arc]
Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> [arm64 and dma-iommu]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Now that we know exactly which page sizes our caller wants to use in the
given domain, we can restrict higher-order allocation attempts to just
those sizes, if any, and avoid wasting any time or effort on other sizes
which offer no benefit. In the same vein, this also lets us accommodate
a minimum order greater than 0 for special cases.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Tested-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Taking inspiration from the existing arch/arm code, break out some
generic functions to interface the DMA-API to the IOMMU-API. This will
do the bulk of the heavy lifting for IOMMU-backed dma-mapping.
Since associating an IOVA allocator with an IOMMU domain is a fairly
common need, rather than introduce yet another private structure just to
do this for ourselves, extend the top-level struct iommu_domain with the
notion. A simple opaque cookie allows reuse by other IOMMU API users
with their various different incompatible allocator types.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Robin Murphy