Signed-off-by: Tony Cheng <tony.cheng@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
- also some clean up
Signed-off-by: Tony Cheng <tony.cheng@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Charlene Liu <Charlene.Liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Sun <yongqiang.sun@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Cheng <tony.cheng@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Anthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
1. Adding the ability to update the stream parameters during FULL_UPDATE type
Signed-off-by: Leon Elazar <leon.elazar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Problem]
VSR greyed out
[Root cause]
When converting fractions, we were using the integer function, which let to
a large display clock and the view was not supported
[Solution]
Change the integer to fraction functions
Signed-off-by: Logatharshan Thothiralingam <logatharshan.thothiralingam@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Elazar <leon.elazar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Jordan Lazare <Jordan.Lazare@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Jordan Lazare <Jordan.Lazare@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Charlene Liu <Charlene.Liu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Liu <charlene.liu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Krunoslav Kovac <Krunoslav.Kovac@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This wires DCE12 support into DC and enables it.
Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Viewport would be incorrectly adjusted when surface was used
for multiple displays
Signed-off-by: Dmytro Laktyushkin <Dmytro.Laktyushkin@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Jordan Lazare <Jordan.Lazare@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Charlene Liu <Charlene.Liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Zeyu Fan <Zeyu.Fan@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <Andrey.Grodzovsky@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Lazare <Jordan.Lazare@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Sun <yongqiang.sun@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Issue:
In case of two 4K@60 + one non-4k monitor, when unplug non-4k monitor,
the remain two 4k monitor don't work properly.
Reason:
In that case, two 4k use two pipes and no split, when unplug happens,
those two monitor will use 4 pipes and split, but on that time, frontend
is not programed properly.
Solution:
After programed backend, front end should be programmed as per new pipe
setting.
Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Sun <yongqiang.sun@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Liu <charlene.liu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Wenjing Liu <Wenjing.Liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Liu <charlene.liu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
1.current_context memory wasn't released at
dc_post_update_surfaces_to_stream during context swap.
Signed-off-by: Leon Elazar <leon.elazar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Liu <charlene.liu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Exposing DC Api dc_check_update_surfaces_for_stream
validation will return the answer which type of update is required,
so upper layers can is it safe to call the update API fro high IRQ yes/no.
Signed-off-by: Leon Elazar <leon.elazar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Liu <charlene.liu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Lazare <Jordan.Lazare@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Cheng <tony.cheng@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Charlene Liu <Charlene.Liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
always take update lock instead of using HW built in update
lock trigger with write to primary_addr_lo.
we will be a little more inefficient with the extra registers
write to lock, but this simplify code and make it always correct.
Will revisit locking optimization once update sequence mature
Signed-off-by: Tony Cheng <tony.cheng@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Charlene Liu <Charlene.Liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This function makes a lot of assumptions to try and deduce
tha an atomic_commit came from FLIP ioctl. Those assumptions
are not explicit contract with DRM API and might lead to wrong
result as the code changes. Instead use drm_atomic_state.allow_modeset
flag which explicitly is set to false only in atomic flip
helper function, otherwise this flag is always true.
P.S When we get to do actual atomic IOCTL this will have to be revised
with the atomic call behavior.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <Andrey.Grodzovsky@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Headless mode set needs to be synchronized against outstanding nonblocking
commits. This achieved by building atomic state and commiting it.
v2: rebase on 4.11
Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <Andrey.Grodzovsky@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Modify amdgpu_dm_atomic_comit to implement
atomic_comit_tail hook.
Unify Buffer objects allocation and dealocation
for surface updates and page flips.
Simplify wait for fences and target_vbank logic
for non blockiing commit.
Remove hacky update surface to page flip synchronization
we had and rely on atomic framework synchronization logic.
v2:
Add state->allow_modeset as indicator of page flip call.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <Andrey.Grodzovsky@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Liu <charlene.liu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Charlene Liu <Charlene.Liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Don't tell DRM otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Liu <charlene.liu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Lazare <Jordan.Lazare@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
No need to assign them dynamically. This is much more readable.
Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This doesn't show with gcc6
Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Tony Cheng