[ Upstream commit 883957bee580b723fd87d49ac73e0c84fc03a446 ]
On SA8295P and SA8540P gfx.lvl is not provdied by rpmh, but rather is
handled by an external regulator (max20411). Drop gfx.lvl from the list
of power-domains exposed on this platform.
Fixes: f68f1cb343 ("soc: qcom: rpmhpd: add sc8280xp & sa8540p rpmh power-domains")
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240125-sa8295p-gpu-v4-4-7011c2a63037@quicinc.com
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 2a93c6cbd5a703d44c414a3c3945a87ce11430ba upstream.
Commit 'e3e56c050ab6 ("soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Make power_on actually enable
the domain")' aimed to make sure that a power-domain that is being
enabled without any particular performance-state requested will at least
turn the rail on, to avoid filling DeviceTree with otherwise unnecessary
required-opps properties.
But in the event that aggregation happens on a disabled power-domain, with
an enabled peer without performance-state, both the local and peer
corner are 0. The peer's enabled_corner is not considered, with the
result that the underlying (shared) resource is disabled.
One case where this can be observed is when the display stack keeps mmcx
enabled (but without a particular performance-state vote) in order to
access registers and sync_state happens in the rpmhpd driver. As mmcx_ao
is flushed the state of the peer (mmcx) is not considered and mmcx_ao
ends up turning off "mmcx.lvl" underneath mmcx. This has been observed
several times, but has been painted over in DeviceTree by adding an
explicit vote for the lowest non-disabled performance-state.
Fixes: e3e56c050a ("soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Make power_on actually enable the domain")
Reported-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/ZdMwZa98L23mu3u6@hovoldconsulting.com/
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240226-rpmhpd-enable-corner-fix-v1-1-68c004cec48c@quicinc.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
It has been pointed out that naming a subsystem "genpd" isn't very
self-explanatory and the acronym itself that means Generic PM Domain, is
known only by a limited group of people.
In a way to improve the situation, let's rename the subsystem to pmdomain,
which ideally should indicate that this is about so called Power Domains or
"PM domains" as we often also use within the Linux Kernel terminology.
Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912221127.487327-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org
Bjorn Andersson