usb_hcd_pci_probe expects users to call this with driver_data set as
hc_driver, that limits the possibility of using the driver_data for
driver data.
Add hc_driver as argument to usb_hcd_pci_probe and modify the callers
ehci/ohci/xhci/uhci to pass hc_driver as argument and freeup the
driver_data used
Tested xhci driver on Dragon-board RB3, compile tested ehci, ohci and
uhci.
[For all but the xHCI parts]
[For the xhci part]
Suggested-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Acked-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200514122039.300417-2-vkoul@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The usb core is the only major place in the kernel that checks for
a non-NULL device dma_mask to see if a device is DMA capable. This
is generally a bad idea, as all major busses always set up a DMA mask,
even if the device is not DMA capable - in fact bus layers like PCI
can't even know if a device is DMA capable at enumeration time. This
leads to lots of workaround in HCD drivers, and also prevented us from
setting up a DMA mask for platform devices by default last time we
tried.
Replace this guess with an explicit HCD_DMA that is set by drivers that
appear to have DMA support.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190816062435.881-4-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.
How this work was done:
Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).
All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.
- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.
For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139
and resulted in the first patch in this series.
If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930
and resulted in the second patch in this series.
- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1
and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).
- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.
In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.
Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.
In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.
Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct
This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.
These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The run_wake flag in struct dev_pm_info is used to indicate whether
or not the device is capable of generating remote wakeup signals at
run time (or in the system working state), but the distinction
between runtime remote wakeup and system wakeup signaling has always
been rather artificial. The only practical reason for it to exist
at the core level was that ACPI and PCI treated those two cases
differently, but that's not the case any more after recent changes.
For this reason, get rid of the run_wake flag and, when applicable,
use device_set_wakeup_capable() and device_can_wakeup() instead of
device_set_run_wake() and device_run_wake(), respectively.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
The UHCI controllers in Intel chipsets rely on a platform-specific non-PME
mechanism for wakeup signalling. They can generate wakeup signals even
though they don't support PME.
We need to let the USB core know this so that it will enable runtime
suspend for UHCI controllers.
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Don't use DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro, because this macro
is not preferred.
Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
hcd-pci.c in usbcore contains a check for wakeup requests racing with
controller suspend. This check is going to be moved out of usbcore
and into the individual controller drivers, where it can apply to all
platforms, not just PCI.
This patch adds the check to uhci-hcd. Ironically, none of the
non-PCI platform drivers for uhci-hcd implement suspend/resume.
Nevertheless, this change is needed to accomodate the upcoming change
to usbcore.
The patch also removes an outdated check of the root hub state. For
one thing, the PM layer has long been quite reliable about suspending
root hubs before controllers. For another, virtually the same check
is also made in hcd-pci.c; there's no point in repeating it.
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
These aren't necessary after switch and if blocks.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Support for specifying soft dependencies in the modules themselves was
introduced in commit 7cb14ba.
In Arch we have always been shipping a module.d(5) fragment ordering ohci/uhci
after ehci. If this ordering is really necessary, it would be great to move it
to the kernel and getting the correct fragment generated by depmod.
Signed-off-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Since uhci-hcd, ehci-hcd, and xhci-hcd support runtime PM, the .pm
field in their pci_driver structures should be protected by CONFIG_PM
rather than CONFIG_PM_SLEEP. The corresponding change has already
been made for ohci-hcd.
Without this change, controllers won't do runtime suspend if system
suspend or hibernation isn't enabled.
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
CC: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch is part of a series that extend the UHCI HCD to support
non-PCI controllers.
This patch moves PCI specific functions to uhci-pci.c and includes
this file in uhci-hcd.c. It also renames the function uhci_init to
uhci_pci_init.
uhci_init/uhci_pci_init is modified so that the port-detection logic
is kept in a new separate function uhci_count_ports() in uhci-hcd.c.
Signed-off-by: Jan Andersson <jan@gaisler.com>
Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Vinod Koul