Commit Graph

35 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Paulo Zanoni 8a1874559f drm/i915: add initial Runtime PM functions
This patch adds the initial infrastructure to allow a Runtime PM
implementation that sets the device to its D3 state. The patch just
adds the necessary callbacks and the initial infrastructure.

We still don't have any platform that actually uses this
infrastructure, we still don't call get/put in all the places we need
to, and we don't have any function to save/restore the state of the
registers. This is not a problem since no platform uses the code added
by this patch. We have a few people simultaneously working on runtime
PM, so this initial code could help everybody make their plans.

V2: - Move some functions to intel_pm.c
    - Remove useless pm_runtime_allow() call at init
    - Remove useless pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() call at get
    - Use pm_runtime_get_sync() instead of 2 calls
    - Add a WARN to check if we're really awake

V3: - Rebase.

V4: - Don't need to call pci_{save,restore}_state and
      pci_set_power_sate, since they're already called by the PCI
      layer
    - Remove wrong pm_runtime_enable() call at init_runtime_pm

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-12-10 22:43:14 +01:00
Deepak S c461562e84 drm/i915: Remove duplicate intel_uncore_forcewake_reset.
Since early sanitize and uncore sanitize are called one after the other,
I think, we can remove second forcewake reset which was are calling
twice in both the functions.

Note that this is merge fallout between

commit ef46e0d247
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date:   Sat Nov 16 16:00:09 2013 +0100

    drm/i915: restore the early forcewake cleanup

and

commit 521198a2e7
Author: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri Aug 23 16:52:30 2013 +0300

    drm/i915: sanitize forcewake registers on reset

Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepak.s@intel.com>
[danvet: Explain how this came to be.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-12-09 09:25:14 +01:00
Daniel Vetter f7698ba75f Linux 3.13-rc3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iQEcBAABAgAGBQJSogqUAAoJEHm+PkMAQRiGM2MIAJrr5KEXEWuuAR4+JkkWBK7A
 +dVT4n1MM4wP/aCIyriSlq7kgT03Wxk4Q4wKsj2wZvDQkNgEQjrctgIihc75jqi5
 126nmT3YXJLwgDpFA3RHZUWve3j3vfUG53rRuk7K9Xx1sGWU3Ls7BuInvQZ//+QS
 6UB4UuEAalmose5U8ToXQfMqZhjwreZKeb64TEZwFvu2klv4cnka1L/zHbmQGgRg
 2Pfv+aUrjsYE8s9lkEKX8MIQsDn28Q5Lsv7XIEQwo2at4rYbJaxX6usuC1OI0MQ5
 BLUn1GgtvOidq6FzSg6kXiA/MJYH3J0S+p4uULWAprxA+KeJRbWNRroM94W1qAk=
 =1Wcq
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'v3.13-rc3' into drm-intel-next-queued

Linux 3.13-rc3

I need a backmerge for two reasons:
- For merging the ppgtt patches from Ben I need to pull in the bdw
  support.
- We now have duplicated calls to intel_uncore_forcewake_reset in the
  setup code to due 2 different patches merged into -next and 3.13.
  The conflict is silen so I need the merge to be able to apply
  Deepak's fixup patch.

Conflicts:
	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c

Trivial conflict, it doesn't even show up in the merge diff.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-12-09 09:19:14 +01:00
Deepak S 5135d64b7f drm/i915/vlv: Update Wait for FIFO and wait for 20 free entries. v3
On VLV, FIFO will be shared by both SW and HW. So, we read the
free entries through register and update dev_priv variable
and wait for only 20 entries to be free

From Deepak's follow-up mail explaining why vlv is special:

"On SB, Out of 64 FIFO Entries, 20 Entries will be used by HW and
remaining 44 will be used by the SW,. I think due to this reason, we
have a threshold of 20 Entries."

"On VLV, HW and SW can access all 64 fifo entries, I don't think
having a threshold of 20 Entries is mandatory on VLV. Also, since both
SW and HW can access all 64 Entries. I think on VLV, we need to update
the fifo_count before waiting for the FIFO."

v2: Apply mask when we read the number of free FIFO entries (Ville).

v3: Mask applied after reading the register (Deepak).

Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepak.s@intel.com>
[danvet: Add further explanation from Deepak to commit message.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-12-04 12:09:37 +01:00
Ville Syrjälä 0d9653014f drm/i915: Add REG_WRITE_FOOTER
Add a REG_WRITE_FOOTER macro as a counterpart to the REG_WRITE_HEADER.
The current code has the spin_lock() in the HEADER, but the
spin_unlock() is open coded, which looks rather confusing on the first
glance. A bit of additional symmetry might help.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-12-04 12:09:34 +01:00
Daniel Vetter 5bc0e85cc6 drm/i915: make sparse happy for the new vlv mmio read function
It doesn't like that we assign 0 to a pointer, it wants the real NULL.

On closer look that initialization is actually bogus, and the compiler
can easily see that we never use it unitialized. So let's just drop
this.

Cc: Deepak S <deepak.s@intel.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-11-28 08:31:48 +01:00
Daniel Vetter 084054fc05 drm/i915: drop the right force-wake engine in the vlv mmio funcs
This was fumbled in the conversion to per-engine forcewake.

Cc: Deepak S <deepak.s@intel.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-11-28 08:31:47 +01:00
Ville Syrjälä 46520e2baa drm/i915: Fix GT wake FIFO free entries for VLV
On VLV the GTFIFOCTL register has other bits besides the number of free
entries in the GT wake FIFO. Apply a mask when we read th register to
make sure we don't misinterpret the number of free FIFO entries.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
[danvet: There's some unclarity about hsw, but brushed off as todays'
Bspec just acting up a bit.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-11-28 08:31:47 +01:00
Ville Syrjälä 90f256b5bb drm/i915: Report all GTFIFODBG errors
On VLV GTFIFODBG has more bits. Just report them all.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-11-28 08:31:46 +01:00
Deepak S 940aece471 drm/i915/vlv: Valleyview support for forcewake Individual power wells.
Split vlv force wake routines to help individually control Media/Render
well based on the register access.

We've seen power savings in the lower sub-1W range on workloads that
only need on of the power wells, e.g. glbenchmark, media playback

Note: The same split isn't there for the forcewake queue, only the
forcwake domains are split.

Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepak.s@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
[danvet: Rebase on top of the removed forcewake hack in the ring irq
get/put code and add a note to add Deepak's answer to Chris question.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-11-28 08:31:45 +01:00
Deepak S c8d9a5905e drm/i915: Add power well arguments to force wake routines.
Added power well arguments to all the force wake routines
to help us individually control power well based on the
scenario.

Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepak.s@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
[danvet: Resolve conflict with the removed forcewake hack and drop one
spurious hunk Jesse noticed.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-11-28 08:31:22 +01:00
Daniel Vetter f671d117bc drm/i915: remove intel_uncore_clear_errors
This was forgotten in

commit 9d1cb9147d
Author: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Date:   Fri Nov 1 13:32:08 2013 -0200

    drm/i915: avoid unclaimed registers when capturing the error state

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-11-18 17:52:33 +01:00
Daniel Vetter ef46e0d247 drm/i915: restore the early forcewake cleanup
Some BIOS just leak the forcewak bits, which we clean up.
Unfortunately this has been broken in

commit 521198a2e7
Author: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri Aug 23 16:52:30 2013 +0300

    drm/i915: sanitize forcewake registers on reset

To make this work both for resets and for BIOS takeover just add the
forcewake clearing call back to intel_uncore_early_sanitize.

We need to clear the forcewake in early sanitize so that the forcewak
dance in intel_uncore_init (to figure out whether we have mt or legacy
forcewake on ivb) works. That cleanup fits in nicely with the general
topic of early_sanitize to prepare for the very first mmio ops.

Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reported-by: Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com>
Cc: Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com>
References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/16/40
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org (for 3.12 only)
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-11-17 20:39:51 +01:00
Daniel Vetter c09cd6e969 Merge branch 'backlight-rework' into drm-intel-next-queued
Pull in Jani's backlight rework branch. This was merged through a
separate branch to be able to sort out the Broadwell conflicts
properly before pulling it into the main development branch.

Conflicts:
	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-11-15 10:02:39 +01:00
Ben Widawsky 935e8de975 drm/i915/bdw: Do gen6 style reset for gen8
This patch existed before, but was lost over time.

Note that reset is still somewhat problematic in my limited testing (ie.
module_reload will not pass) but it can be disabled with a module
parameter, and support should be considered preliminary anyway.

Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-11-14 09:33:10 +01:00
Mika Kuoppala 661df0415e drm/i915: check i915_get_reset_stats_ioctl args
Insist that flags and pad fields are zero, so that
we can safely extend the interface in future.

Testcase: igt/gem_reset_stats/params

Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-11-13 11:51:49 +01:00
Mika Kuoppala b6359918b8 drm/i915: add i915_get_reset_stats_ioctl
This ioctl returns reset stats for specified context.

The struct returned contains context loss counters.

reset_count:    all resets across all contexts
batch_active:   active batches lost on resets
batch_pending:  pending batches lost on resets

v2: get rid of state tracking completely and deliver only counts. Idea
    from Chris Wilson.

v3: fix commit message

v4: default context handled inside i915_gem_context_get_hang_stats

v5: reset_count only for priviledged process

v6: ctx=0 needs CAP_SYS_ADMIN for batch_* counters (Chris Wilson)

v7: context hang stats never returns NULL

v8: rebased on top of reworked context hang stats
    DRM_RENDER_ALLOW for ioctl

v9: use DEFAULT_CONTEXT_ID. Improve comments for ioctl struct members

Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Cc: Ian Romanick <idr@freedesktop.org>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-11-12 14:15:48 +01:00
Ben Widawsky 0f161f7075 drm/i915/bdw: Don't wait for c0 threads on forcewake
It's no longer a required workaround on BDW.

Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
[danvet: Move compile fix from a later patch to this one.]
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-11-08 18:10:01 +01:00
Ben Widawsky 43d1b64728 drm/i915/bdw: Initialize BDW forcewake vfuncs
Somehow this got missed or dropped during development. The simulator
does not use forcewake, so it's entirely possible it never worked
correctly. After the mmio rework, this will end up in an OOPs, and the
system will not boot.

Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
[danvet: Use IS_GEN8 instead of IS_BROADWELL.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-11-08 18:08:46 +01:00
Ben Widawsky ab2aa47e4b drm/i915/bdw: Handle forcewake for writes on gen8
GEN8 removes the GT FIFO which we've all come to know and love. Instead
it offers a wider range of optimized registers which always keep a
shadowed copy, and are fed to the GPU when it wakes.

How this is implemented in hardware is still somewhat of a mystery. As
far as I can tell, the basic design is as follows:

If the register is not optimized, you must use the old forcewake
mechanism to bring the GT out of sleep. [1]

If register is in the optimized list the write will signal that the
GT should begin to come out of whatever sleep state it is in.

While the GT is coming out of sleep, the requested write will be stored
in an intermediate shadow register.

Do to the fact that the implementation details are not clear, I see
several risks:
1. Order is not preserved as it is with GT FIFO. If we issue multiple
writes to optimized registers, where order matters, we may need to
serialize it with forcewake.
2. The optimized registers have only 1 shadowed slot, meaning if we
issue multiple writes to the same register, and those values need to
reach the GPU in order, forcewake will be required.

[1] We could implement a SW queue the way the GT FIFO used to work if
desired.

NOTE: Compile tested only until we get real silicon.

v2:
- Use a default case to make future platforms also work.
- Get rid of IS_BROADWELL since that's not yet defined, but we want to
  MMIO as soon as possible.

v3: Apply suggestions from Mika's review:
- s/optimized/shadowed/
- invert the logic of the helper so that it does what it says (the
  code itself was correct, just confusing to read).

v4:
- Squash in lost break.

Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> (v1)
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-11-07 22:16:04 +01:00
Ben Widawsky ab484f8fd6 drm/i915: Remove gen specific checks in MMIO
Now that MMIO has been split up into gen specific functions it is
obvious when HAS_FPGA_DBG_UNCLAIMED, HAS_FORCE_WAKE are needed. As such,
we can remove this extraneous condition.

As a result of this, as well as previously existing function pointers
for forcewake, we no longer need the has_force_wake member in the device
specific data structure.

Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-10-10 12:47:10 +02:00
Ben Widawsky 4032ef4315 drm/i915: Create GEN specific write MMIO
Similar to the previous patch which implemented GEN specific reads; this
patch does the same for writes. Writes have a bit of adding complexity
due to the FPGA_DBG feature of HSW plus:

gen[2-4]: nothing special
gen5: ILK dummy write
gen[6-7]: forcewake shenanigans
gen[HSW}: forcewake shenanigans + FPGA_DBG

I was a bit torn about whether or not to combine 6-HSW as one function,
since the FPGA_DBG is cleanly separated, and it wouldn't make the 6-7
MMIO too messy. In the end, I chose the clearest possible solution which
splits out HSW.

Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-10-10 12:47:09 +02:00
Ben Widawsky 3967018ed6 drm/i915: Create GEN specific read MMIO
Extracting the MMIO read functionality makes per gen handling a bit
simpler, and the overall function a lot easier to read. The increasing
complexity of reads doesn't get too bad as the generation number
increases:

gen[2-4]: Nothing special
gen5: ILK dummy write workaround
gen6+: forcewake shenanigans

Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-10-10 12:47:09 +02:00
Ben Widawsky 5d73879596 drm/i915: Extract common MMIO lines
Just to make the churn and code duplication in upcoming patches a bit
less, turn code which is common to all GEN MMIO functions into a macro.

v2: Fix typo in subject

Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-10-10 12:47:08 +02:00
Ben Widawsky 0b27448141 drm/i915: Create MMIO virtual functions
In preparation for having per GEN MMIO functions, create, and start
using MMIO functions in our uncore data structure. This simply makes the
transition easier by allowing us to just plug in the per GEN stuff
later.

For simplicity, I moved the intel_uncore_init() function down since
those rely on static functions defined lower in the file. This is most
of the churn in this patch.

I made one unrelated change here by using off_t datatype for the offset
of the register to write. I like the clarity that this brings to the
code. If I did it as a separate patch, I am pretty certain it would get
bikeshedded to oblivion.

Requested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-10-10 12:47:08 +02:00
Ben Widawsky 18ce39943e drm/i915: Move edram detection early_sanitize
In order to be able to have virtual functions for the MMIO, we need to
use the raw access function. To keep things simple, just move this to
our early_sanitize code in uncore.

Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-10-10 12:47:07 +02:00
Daniel Vetter e252d07aff drm/i915: rip out gen2 reset code
At least on my i830M here it reliably results in hard system hangs
nowadays. This is much worse than falling back to software rendering,
so I think we should simply rip this out.

After all we don't have any gpu reset for gen3 either, and there are a
lot more of those still around.

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-10-10 12:47:06 +02:00
Chon Ming Lee 02f4c9e02a drm/i915/vlv: Turn off power gate for BIOS-less system.
During system boot up, by default, the power gate for render, media and
display well still power gated.  Normally, BIOS will turn off the power
gate.  In the BIOS-less system, the driver need to turn off the power
gate very early during driver load.

v2: Move this to intel_uncore_sanitize to allow it to get call during
resume path. (Daniel)
v3: Remove redundant write 0 to DPIO_CTL, and use DPIO_RESET instead of
just 0x1 (Ville)
    Add turn of power gate for display 2d/render well/media well.
v4: Remove toggle cmnreset in intel_uncore_sanitize.  Cmnreset should
toggle after CRI clock source has been selected.  Jesse DPIO reset patch
which toggle the cmnreset in intel_modeset_init_hw() should handle it.
(Ville)

Signed-off-by: Chon Ming Lee <chon.ming.lee@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-10-04 10:26:11 +02:00
Chris Wilson aec347ab19 drm/i915: Delay the release of the forcewake by a jiffie
Obtaining the forcwake requires expensive and time consuming
serialisation. And we often try to obtain the forcewake multiple times
in very quick succession. We can reduce the overhead of these sequences
by delaying the forcewake release, and so not hammer the hw quite so
hard.

I was hoping this would help with the spurious
[drm:__gen6_gt_force_wake_mt_get] *ERROR* Timed out waiting for forcewake old ack to clear.
found on Haswell. Alas not.

v2: Fix teardown ordering - unmap the regs after turning off forcewake,
and make sure we do turn off forcewake - both found by Ville.

v3: As we introduce intel_uncore_fini(), use it to make sure everything
is disabled before we hand back to the BIOS.

Note: I have no claims for improved performance, stablity or power
comsumption for this patch. We should not be hitting the registers often
enough for this to improve benchmarks, but given the nature of our hw it
is likely to improve long term stability.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-10-01 07:45:13 +02:00
Mika Kuoppala 521198a2e7 drm/i915: sanitize forcewake registers on reset
In reset we try to restore the forcewake state to
pre reset state, using forcewake_count. The reset
doesn't seem to clear the forcewake bits so we
get warn on forcewake ack register not clearing.

Use same mechanism as intel_uncore_sanitize() does
when loading driver to reset the forcewake bits, right
after the chip has been reset.

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-09-03 11:10:54 +02:00
Chris Wilson ed71f1b48e drm/i915: Convert the register access tracepoint to be conditional
The TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION is supposed to generate more efficient code
than if (cond) trace(), which is what we are currently using inside the
register access functions.

v2: Rebase onto uncore

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-07-25 15:22:07 +02:00
Chris Wilson a7f31ee0b0 drm/i915: Squash gen lookup through multiple indirections inside GT access
The INTEL_INFO() macro extracts the dev_private pointer from the device,
so passing in the dev_private->dev is a long winded circumlocution.

v2: rebase onto uncore

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-07-25 15:22:06 +02:00
Chris Wilson dba8e41f2b drm/i915: Use the common register access functions for NOTRACE variants
Detangle the confusion that NOTRACE variants of the register read/write
routines were directly using the raw register access. We need for those
routines to reuse the common code for serializing register access and
ensuring the correct register power states. This is only possible now
that the only routines that required raw access use their own API.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-07-25 15:22:06 +02:00
Chris Wilson 6af5d92f90 drm/i915: Use a private interface for register access within GT
The GT functions for enabling register access also need to occasionally
write to and read from registers. To avoid the potential recursion as we
modify the public interface to be stricter, introduce a private register
access API for the GT functions.

v2: Rebase
v3: Rebase onto uncore
v4: Use raw interfaces consistently so that we only use the low-level
    readN functions from a single location.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-07-25 15:22:05 +02:00
Chris Wilson 907b28c56e drm/i915: Colocate all GT access routines in the same file
Currently, the register access code is split between i915_drv.c and
intel_pm.c. It only bares a superficial resemblance to the reset of the
powermanagement code, so move it all into its own file. This is to ease
further patches to enforce serialised register access.

v2: Scan for random abuse of I915_WRITE_NOTRACE
v3: Take the opportunity to rename the GT functions as uncore. Uncore is
the term used by the hardware design (and bspec) for all functions
outside of the GPU (and CPU) cores in what is also known as the System
Agent.
v4: Rebase onto SNB rc6 fixes

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
[danvet: Wrestle patch into applying and inline
intel_uncore_early_sanitize (plus move the old comment to the new
function). Also keep the _santize postfix for intel_uncore_sanitize.]
[danvet: Squash in fixup spotted by Chris on irc: We need to call
intel_pm_init before intel_uncore_sanitize since the later will call
cancel_work on the delayed rps setup work the former initializes.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-07-25 15:21:50 +02:00