sethostname() and setdomainname() notify userspace on failure (without
modifying uts_kern_table). Change things so that we only notify userspace
on success, when uts_kern_table was actually modified.
Signed-off-by: Sasikantha babu <sasikanth.v19@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: WANG Cong <amwang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This driver uses PCI_CLASS_REVISION instead of PCI_REVISION_ID, so it
wasn't converted by 44c10138fd ("PCI: Change all drivers to use
pci_device->revision").
In one case, it even reads PCI revision ID without using it -- that code
is now removed...
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
Acked-by: "Nandigama, Nagalakshmi" <Nagalakshmi.Nandigama@lsi.com>
Cc: Eric Moore <eric.moore@lsi.com>
Acked-by: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
In the comment of allocate_resource(), the explanation of parameter max
and min is not correct.
Actually, these two parameters are used to specify the range of the
resource that will be allocated, not the min/max size that will be
allocated.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
ULONG_MAX is often used to check for integer overflow when calculating
allocation size. While ULONG_MAX happens to work on most systems, there
is no guarantee that `size_t' must be the same size as `long'.
This patch introduces SIZE_MAX, the maximum value of `size_t', to improve
portability and readability for allocation size validation.
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alex Elder <elder@dreamhost.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Add the new kmalloc_array() to the list of general-purpose memory
allocators in chapter 14.
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Commit d065bd810b ("mm: retry page fault when blocking on disk
transfer") and commit 37b23e0525 ("x86,mm: make pagefault killable")
introduced changes into the x86 pagefault handler for making the page
fault handler retryable as well as killable.
These changes reduce the mmap_sem hold time, which is crucial during OOM
killer invocation.
Port these changes to um.
Signed-off-by: Kautuk Consul <consul.kautuk@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This allocation may be large. The code is probing to see if it will
succeed and if not, it falls back to vmalloc(). We should suppress any
page-allocation failure messages when the fallback happens.
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Whoops: first, I reimplemented the already-existing has_resources
without noticing; second, I got the test backwards. I did pick a better
name, though. Combine the two....
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
In the NFSv4.1 client-reboot case we're currently removing the client's
previous state in exchange_id. That's wrong--we should be waiting till
the confirming create_session.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
The comment is redundant, and if we really want dprintk's here they'd
probably be better in the common (check-slot_seqid) code.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
The client should ignore the returned sequence_id in the case where the
CONFIRMED flag is set on an exchange_id reply--and in the unconfirmed
case "1" is always the right response. So it shouldn't actually matter
what we return here.
We could continue returning 1 just to catch clients ignoring the spec
here, but I'd rather be generous. Other things equal, returning the
existing sequence_id seems more informative.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Otherwise nfsd4_set_ex_flags writes over the return flags.
Reported-by: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
This can't happen:
- cl_time is zeroed only by unhash_client_locked, which is only
ever called under both the state lock and the client lock.
- every caller of renew_client() should have looked up a
(non-expired) client and then called renew_client() all
without dropping the state lock.
- the only other caller of renew_client_locked() is
release_session_client(), which first checks under the
client_lock that the cl_time is nonzero.
So make it clear that this is a bug, not something we handle. I can't
quite bring myself to make this a BUG(), though, as there are a lot of
renew_client() callers, and returning here is probably safer than a
BUG().
We'll consider making it a BUG() after some more cleanup.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
The cases here divide into two main categories:
- if there's an uncomfirmed record with a matching verifier,
then this is a "normal", succesful case: we're either creating
a new client, or updating an existing one.
- otherwise, this is a weird case: a replay, or a server reboot.
Reordering to reflect that makes the code a bit more concise and the
logic a lot easier to understand.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Note CLID_INUSE is for the case where two clients are trying to use the
same client-provided long-form client identifiers. But what we're
looking at here is the server-returned shorthand client id--if those
clash there's a bug somewhere.
Fix the error return, pull the check out into common code, and do the
check unconditionally in all cases.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
New clients are created only by nfsd4_setclientid(), which always gives
any new client a unique clientid. The only exception is in the
"callback update" case, in which case it may create an unconfirmed
client with the same clientid as a confirmed client. In that case it
also checks that the confirmed client has the same credential.
Therefore, it is pointless for setclientid_confirm to check whether a
confirmed and unconfirmed client with the same clientid have matching
credentials--they're guaranteed to.
Instead, it should be checking whether the credential on the
setclientid_confirm matches either of those. Otherwise, it could be
anyone sending the setclientid_confirm. Granted, I can't see why anyone
would, but still it's probalby safer to check.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Move the rq_flavor into struct svc_cred, and use it in setclientid and
exchange_id comparisons as well.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
The typical setclientid or exchange_id will probably be performed with a
credential that maps to either root or nobody, so comparing just uid's
is unlikely to be useful. So, use everything else we can get our hands
on.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Instead of keeping the principal name associated with a request in a
structure that's private to auth_gss and using an accessor function,
move it to svc_cred.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
RFC 5661 actually says we should allow an exchange_id to remove a
matching client, even if the exchange_id comes from a different
principal, *if* the victim client lacks any state.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Following rfc 5661 section 2.4.1, we can permit a 4.1 client to remove
an established 4.0 client's state.
(But we don't allow updates.)
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
We mustn't allow a client to destroy another client with established
state unless it has the right credential.
And some minor cleanup.
(Note: our comparison of credentials is actually pretty bogus currently;
that will need to be fixed in another patch.)
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
debugfs read operations were returning the contents of an uninitialized u64.
Signed-off-by: Weston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Handle the st_deny_bmap in a similar fashion to the st_access_bmap. Add
accessor functions and use those instead of bare bitops.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Currently, we do this for the most part with "bare" bitops, but
eventually we'll need to expand the share mode code to handle access
and deny modes on other nodes.
In order to facilitate that code in the future, move to some generic
accessor functions. For now, these are mostly static inlines, but
eventually we'll want to move these to "real" functions that are
able to handle multi-node configurations or have a way to "swap in"
new operations to be done in lieu of or in conjunction with these
atomic bitops.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
All of the callers treat the return that way already.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
These functions are identical. Also, rename them to bmap_to_share_mode
to better reflect what they do, and have them just return the result
instead of passing in a pointer to the storage location.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
According to RFC 3530bis, the only items SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM processing
should be concerned with is the clientid, clientid verifier, and
principal. The client's IP address is not supposed to be interesting.
And, NFS4ERR_CLID_INUSE is meant only for principal mismatches.
I triggered this logic with a prototype UCS client -- one that
uses the same nfs_client_id4 string for all servers. The client
mounted our server via its IPv4, then via its IPv6 address.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
This is just a code move, which from my POV makes the code look better.
I.e. now on start we have 3 different stages:
1) Service creation.
2) Service per-net data allocation.
3) Service start.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
This function creates service if it doesn't exist, or increases usage
counter if it does, and returns a pointer to it. The usage counter will
be droppepd by svc_destroy() later in lockd_up().
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
This patch also replaces svc_rpcb_setup() with svc_bind().
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
There's little point in waiting until after we allocate all of the pages
to see if we're going to overrun the array. In the event that this
calculation is really off we could end up scribbling over a bunch of
memory and make it tougher to debug.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
The idea is to separate service destruction and per-net operations,
because these are two different things and the mix looks ugly.
Notes:
1) For NFS server this patch looks ugly (sorry for that). But these
place will be rewritten soon during NFSd containerization.
2) LockD per-net counter increase int lockd_up() was moved prior to
make_socks() to make lockd_down_net() call safe in case of error.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
This new routine is responsible for service registration in a specified
network context.
The idea is to separate service creation from per-net operations.
Note also: since registering service with svc_bind() can fail, the
service will be destroyed and during destruction it will try to
unregister itself from rpcbind. In this case unregistration has to be
skipped.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Sasikantha babu