With commit a4e92ce8e4 ("powerpc/fadump: Reservationless firmware
assisted dump"), Linux kernel's Contiguous Memory Allocator (CMA) based
reservation was introduced in fadump. That change was aimed at using CMA
to let applications utilize the memory reserved for fadump while blocking
it from being used for kernel pages. The assumption was, even if CMA
activation fails for whatever reason, the memory still remains reserved to
avoid it from being used for kernel pages. But commit 072355c1cf
("mm/cma: expose all pages to the buddy if activation of an area fails")
breaks this assumption as it started exposing all pages to buddy allocator
on CMA activation failure. It led to warning messages like below while
running crash-utility on vmcore of a kernel having above two commits:
crash: seek error: kernel virtual address: <from reserved region>
To fix this problem, opt out from exposing pages to buddy allocator on CMA
activation failure for fadump reserved memory.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220117075246.36072-3-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "powerpc/fadump: handle CMA activation failure appropriately", v3.
Commit 072355c1cf ("mm/cma: expose all pages to the buddy if
activation of an area fails") started exposing all pages to buddy
allocator on CMA activation failure. But there can be CMA users that
want to handle the reserved memory differently on CMA allocation
failure.
Provide an option to opt out from exposing pages to buddy for such
cases.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220117075246.36072-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220117075246.36072-2-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Migration entries do not contribute to a page's reference count: move
__split_huge_pmd_locked()'s page_ref_add() into pmd_migration's else
block (along with the page_count() check - a page is quite likely to
have reference count frozen to 0 when a migration entry is found).
This will fix a very rare anonymous memory leak, after a
split_huge_pmd() raced with an anon split_huge_page() or an anon THP
migrate_pages(): since the wrongly raised refcount stopped the page
(perhaps small, perhaps huge, depending on when the race hit) from ever
being freed.
At first I thought there were worse risks, from prematurely unfreezing a
frozen page: but now think that would only affect page cache pages,
which do not come this way (except for anonymous pages in swap cache,
perhaps).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/84792468-f512-e48f-378c-e34c3641e97@google.com
Fixes: ec0abae6dc ("mm/thp: fix __split_huge_pmd_locked() for migration PMD")
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
When memory is tight, system may start to compact memory for large
continuous memory demands. If one process tries to lock a memory page
that is being locked and isolated for compaction, it may wait a long time
or even forever. This is because compaction will perform non-atomic
PG_Isolated clear while holding page lock, this may overwrite PG_waiters
set by the process that can't obtain the page lock and add itself to the
waiting queue to wait for the lock to be unlocked.
CPU1 CPU2
lock_page(page); (successful)
lock_page(); (failed)
__ClearPageIsolated(page); SetPageWaiters(page) (may be overwritten)
unlock_page(page);
The solution is to not perform non-atomic operation on page flags while
holding page lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220315030515.20263-1-andrew.yang@mediatek.com
Signed-off-by: andrew.yang <andrew.yang@mediatek.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: "Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: "William Kucharski" <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Nicholas Tang <nicholas.tang@mediatek.com>
Cc: Kuan-Ying Lee <Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
In commit ac16ec8353 ("mm: migrate: support multiple target nodes
demotion"), after the first demotion target node is found, we will
continue to check the next candidate obtained via find_next_best_node().
This is to find all demotion target nodes with same NUMA distance. But
one side effect of find_next_best_node() is that the candidate node
returned will be set in "used" parameter, even if the candidate node isn't
passed in the following NUMA distance checking, the candidate node will
not be used as demotion target node for the following nodes. For example,
for system as follows,
node distances:
node 0 1 2 3
0: 10 21 17 28
1: 21 10 28 17
2: 17 28 10 28
3: 28 17 28 10
when we establish demotion target node for node 0, in the first round node
2 is added to the demotion target node set. Then in the second round,
node 3 is checked and failed because distance(0, 3) > distance(0, 2). But
node 3 is set in "used" nodemask too. When we establish demotion target
node for node 1, there is no available node. This is wrong, node 3 should
be set as the demotion target of node 1.
To fix this, if the candidate node is failed to pass the distance
checking, it will be cleared in "used" nodemask. So that it can be used
for the following node.
The bug can be reproduced and fixed with this patch on a 2 socket server
machine with DRAM and PMEM.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220128055940.1792614-1-ying.huang@intel.com
Fixes: ac16ec8353 ("mm: migrate: support multiple target nodes demotion")
Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: zhongjiang-ali <zhongjiang-ali@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
oom_cpuset_eligible() is always called when !is_memcg_oom(). Remove this
unnecessary check.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220224115933.20154-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
v2.6.34 commit 9d8cebd4bc ("mm: fix mbind vma merge problem") introduced
vma_merge() to mbind_range(); but unlike madvise, mlock and mprotect, it
put a "continue" to next vma where its precedents go to update flags on
current vma before advancing: that left vma with the wrong setting in the
infamous vma_merge() case 8.
v3.10 commit 1444f92c84 ("mm: merging memory blocks resets mempolicy")
tried to fix that in vma_adjust(), without fully understanding the issue.
v3.11 commit 3964acd0db ("mm: mempolicy: fix mbind_range() &&
vma_adjust() interaction") reverted that, and went about the fix in the
right way, but chose to optimize out an unnecessary mpol_dup() with a
prior mpol_equal() test. But on tmpfs, that also pessimized out the vital
call to its ->set_policy(), leaving the new mbind unenforced.
The user visible effect was that the pages got allocated on the local
node (happened to be 0), after the mbind() caller had specifically
asked for them to be allocated on node 1. There was not any page
migration involved in the case reported: the pages simply got allocated
on the wrong node.
Just delete that optimization now (though it could be made conditional on
vma not having a set_policy). Also remove the "next" variable: it turned
out to be blameless, but also pointless.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/319e4db9-64ae-4bca-92f0-ade85d342ff@google.com
Fixes: 3964acd0db ("mm: mempolicy: fix mbind_range() && vma_adjust() interaction")
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
As Steven suggested [1], we should access the pointers from the trace
event to avoid dereferencing them to the tracepoint function when the
tracepoint is disabled.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/11/3/409
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/4cd393b4d57f8f01ed72c001509b28e3a3b1a8c1.1646985115.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Commit b518154e59 ("mm/vmscan: protect the workingset on anonymous
LRU") requires to look twice for both mapped anon/file pages are used
more than once to take the decission of reclaim or activation. Correct
the documentation accordingly.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1646925640-21324-1-git-send-email-quic_charante@quicinc.com
Signed-off-by: Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@quicinc.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Commit 68d48e6a2d ("mm: workingset: add vmstat counter for shadow
nodes") introduced an IRQ-off check to ensure that a lock is held which
also disabled interrupts. This does not work the same way on PREEMPT_RT
because none of the locks, that are held, disable interrupts.
Replace this check with a lockdep assert which ensures that the lock is
held.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220301122143.1521823-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
On systems that run FIFO:1 applications that busy loop, any SCHED_OTHER
task that attempts to execute on such a CPU (such as work threads) will
not be scheduled, which leads to system hangs.
Commit d479960e44 ("mm: disable LRU pagevec during the migration
temporarily") relies on queueing work items on all online CPUs to ensure
visibility of lru_disable_count.
To fix this, replace the usage of work items with synchronize_rcu,
which provides the same guarantees.
Readers of lru_disable_count are protected by either disabling
preemption or rcu_read_lock:
preempt_disable, local_irq_disable [bh_lru_lock()]
rcu_read_lock [rt_spin_lock CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT]
preempt_disable [local_lock !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT]
Since v5.1 kernel, synchronize_rcu() is guaranteed to wait on
preempt_disable() regions of code. So any CPU which sees
lru_disable_count = 0 will have exited the critical section when
synchronize_rcu() returns.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Yin7hDxdt0s/x+fp@fuller.cnet
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Since commit 2c80cd57c7 ("mm/list_lru.c: fix list_lru_count_node() to
be race free"), we are tracking the total number of lru entries in a
list_lru_node in its nr_items field.
In the case of memcg_reparent_list_lru_node(), there is nothing to be
done if nr_items is 0. We don't even need to take the nlru->lock as no
new lru entry could be added by a racing list_lru_add() to the draining
src_idx memcg at this point.
On systems that serve a lot of containers, it is possible that there can
be thousands of list_lru's present due to the fact that each container
may mount its own container specific filesystems. As a typical
container uses only a few cpus, it is likely that only the list_lru_node
that contains those cpus will be utilized while the rests may be empty.
In other words, there can be a lot of list_lru_node with 0 nr_items.
By skipping a lock/unlock operation and loading a cacheline from
memcg_lrus, a sizeable number of cpu cycles can be saved. That can be
substantial if we are talking about thousands of list_lru_node's with 0
nr_items.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220309144000.1470138-1-longman@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
__isolate_lru_page_prepare() conflates two unrelated functions, with the
flags to one disjoint from the flags to the other; and hides some of the
important checks outside of isolate_migratepages_block(), where the
sequence is better to be visible. It comes from the days of lumpy
reclaim, before compaction, when the combination made more sense.
Move what's needed by mm/compaction.c isolate_migratepages_block() inline
there, and what's needed by mm/vmscan.c isolate_lru_pages() inline there.
Shorten "isolate_mode" to "mode", so the sequence of conditions is easier
to read. Declare a "mapping" variable, to save one call to page_mapping()
(but not another: calling again after page is locked is necessary).
Simplify isolate_lru_pages() with a "move_to" list pointer.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/879d62a8-91cc-d3c6-fb3b-69768236df68@google.com
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
PF_SWAPWRITE has been redundant since v3.2 commit ee72886d8e ("mm:
vmscan: do not writeback filesystem pages in direct reclaim").
Coincidentally, NeilBrown's current patch "remove inode_congested()"
deletes may_write_to_inode(), which appeared to be the one function which
took notice of PF_SWAPWRITE. But if you study the old logic, and the
conditions under which may_write_to_inode() was called, you discover that
flag and function have been pointless for a decade.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/75e80e7-742d-e3bd-531-614db8961e4@google.com
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.de>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Fix following coccicheck warning:
tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c:556:23-24:
WARNING this kind of initialization is deprecated
`unsigned long page_nr = *(&page_nr)` has the same form of
uninitialized_var() macro. I remove the redundant assignement. It has
been tested with gcc (Debian 8.3.0-6) 8.3.0.
The patch which removed uninitialized_var() is:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20121028102007.GA7547@gmail.com/ And there is
very few "/* GCC */" comments in the Linux kernel code now.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220304082333.9252-1-guozhengkui@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Guo Zhengkui <guozhengkui@vivo.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Userfaultfd is supposed to provide the full address (i.e., unmasked) of
the faulting access back to userspace. However, that is not the case for
quite some time.
Even running "userfaultfd_demo" from the userfaultfd man page provides the
wrong output (and contradicts the man page). Notice that
"UFFD_EVENT_PAGEFAULT event" shows the masked address (7fc5e30b3000) and
not the first read address (0x7fc5e30b300f).
Address returned by mmap() = 0x7fc5e30b3000
fault_handler_thread():
poll() returns: nready = 1; POLLIN = 1; POLLERR = 0
UFFD_EVENT_PAGEFAULT event: flags = 0; address = 7fc5e30b3000
(uffdio_copy.copy returned 4096)
Read address 0x7fc5e30b300f in main(): A
Read address 0x7fc5e30b340f in main(): A
Read address 0x7fc5e30b380f in main(): A
Read address 0x7fc5e30b3c0f in main(): A
The exact address is useful for various reasons and specifically for
prefetching decisions. If it is known that the memory is populated by
certain objects whose size is not page-aligned, then based on the faulting
address, the uffd-monitor can decide whether to prefetch and prefault the
adjacent page.
This bug has been for quite some time in the kernel: since commit
1a29d85eb0 ("mm: use vmf->address instead of of vmf->virtual_address")
vmf->virtual_address"), which dates back to 2016. A concern has been
raised that existing userspace application might rely on the old/wrong
behavior in which the address is masked. Therefore, it was suggested to
provide the masked address unless the user explicitly asks for the exact
address.
Add a new userfaultfd feature UFFD_FEATURE_EXACT_ADDRESS to direct
userfaultfd to provide the exact address. Add a new "real_address" field
to vmf to hold the unmasked address. Provide the address to userspace
accordingly.
Initialize real_address in various code-paths to be consistent with
address, even when it is not used, to be on the safe side.
[namit@vmware.com: initialize real_address on all code paths, per Jan]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220226022655.350562-1-namit@vmware.com
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix typo in comment, per Jan]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220218041003.3508-1-namit@vmware.com
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We can pass FOLL_GET | FOLL_DUMP to follow_page directly to simplify the
code a bit in add_page_for_migration and split_huge_pages_pid.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220311072002.35575-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Export PageHeadHuge() - it's used by folio_test_hugetlb() and thence by
such as folio_file_page() and folio_contains(). Matthew suggested I use
the first of those instead of doing the same calculation manually - but I
can't call it from a module.
Kirill suggested rearranging things to put it in a header, but that
introduces header dependencies because of where constants are defined.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/EXPORT_SYMBOL/EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL/, per Christoph]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/2494562.1646054576@warthog.procyon.org.uk
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163707085314.3221130.14783857863702203440.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Use helper macro __ATTR_RW to define HSTATE_ATTR to make code more clear.
Minor readability improvement.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220222112731.33479-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Recently introduced code allows numa nodes to be specified on the kernel
command line for hugetlb allocations or CMA reservations. The node
values are user specified and used as indicies into arrays. This
generated the following smatch warnings:
mm/hugetlb.c:4170 hugepages_setup() warn: potential spectre issue 'default_hugepages_in_node' [w]
mm/hugetlb.c:4172 hugepages_setup() warn: potential spectre issue 'parsed_hstate->max_huge_pages_node' [w]
mm/hugetlb.c:6898 cmdline_parse_hugetlb_cma() warn: potential spectre issue 'hugetlb_cma_size_in_node' [w] (local cap)
Clean up by using array_index_nospec to sanitize array indicies.
The routine cmdline_parse_hugetlb_cma has the same overflow/truncation
issue addressed in [1]. That is also fixed with this change.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220209134018.8242-1-liuyuntao10@huawei.com/
As Michal pointed out, this is unlikely to be exploitable because it is
__init code. But the patch suppresses the warnings.
[mike.kravetz@oracle.com: v2]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220218212946.35441-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220217234218.192885-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Zhenguo Yao <yaozhenguo1@gmail.com>
Cc: Liu Yuntao <liuyuntao10@huawei.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETLB config has duplicate definitions on platforms
that subscribe it. Instead make it a generic config option which can be
selected on applicable platforms when required.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1643718465-4324-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The vmemmap_remap_free/alloc are relevant to HugeTLB, so move those
functiongs to the scope of CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211101031651.75851-6-songmuchun@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Cc: Bodeddula Balasubramaniam <bodeddub@amazon.com>
Cc: Chen Huang <chenhuang5@huawei.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Since the head vmemmap page frame associated with each HugeTLB page is
reused, we should hide the PG_head flag of tail struct page from the
user. Add a tese case to check whether it is work properly. The test
steps are as follows.
1) alloc 2MB hugeTLB
2) get each page frame
3) apply those APIs in each page frame
4) Those APIs work completely the same as before.
Reading the flags of a page by /proc/kpageflags is done in
stable_page_flags(), which has invoked PageHead(), PageTail(),
PageCompound() and compound_head().
If those APIs work properly, the head page must have 15 and 17 bits set.
And tail pages must have 16 and 17 bits set but 15 bit unset. Those
flags are checked in check_page_flags().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211101031651.75851-5-songmuchun@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Cc: Bodeddula Balasubramaniam <bodeddub@amazon.com>
Cc: Chen Huang <chenhuang5@huawei.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The init_mm.page_table_lock is used to protect kernel page tables, we
can use it to serialize splitting vmemmap PMD mappings instead of mmap
write lock, which can increase the concurrency of vmemmap_remap_free().
Actually, It increase the concurrency between allocations of HugeTLB
pages. But it is not the only benefit. There are a lot of users of
mmap read lock of init_mm. The mmap write lock is holding through
vmemmap_remap_free(), removing mmap write lock usage to make it does not
affect other users of mmap read lock. It is not making anything worse
and always a win to move.
Now the kernel page table walker does not hold the page_table_lock when
walking pmd entries. There may be consistency issue of a pmd entry,
because pmd entry might change from a huge pmd entry to a PTE page
table. There is only one user of kernel page table walker, namely
ptdump. The ptdump already considers the consistency, which use a local
variable to cache the value of pmd entry. But we also need to update
->action to ACTION_CONTINUE to make sure the walker does not walk every
pte entry again when concurrent thread has split the huge pmd.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211101031651.75851-4-songmuchun@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Cc: Bodeddula Balasubramaniam <bodeddub@amazon.com>
Cc: Chen Huang <chenhuang5@huawei.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The page_fixed_fake_head() is used throughout memory management and the
conditional check requires checking a global variable, although the
overhead of this check may be small, it increases when the memory cache
comes under pressure. Also, the global variable will not be modified
after system boot, so it is very appropriate to use static key machanism.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211101031651.75851-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Cc: Bodeddula Balasubramaniam <bodeddub@amazon.com>
Cc: Chen Huang <chenhuang5@huawei.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "Free the 2nd vmemmap page associated with each HugeTLB
page", v7.
This series can minimize the overhead of struct page for 2MB HugeTLB
pages significantly. It further reduces the overhead of struct page by
12.5% for a 2MB HugeTLB compared to the previous approach, which means
2GB per 1TB HugeTLB. It is a nice gain. Comments and reviews are
welcome. Thanks.
The main implementation and details can refer to the commit log of patch
1. In this series, I have changed the following four helpers, the
following table shows the impact of the overhead of those helpers.
+------------------+-----------------------+
| APIs | head page | tail page |
+------------------+-----------+-----------+
| PageHead() | Y | N |
+------------------+-----------+-----------+
| PageTail() | Y | N |
+------------------+-----------+-----------+
| PageCompound() | N | N |
+------------------+-----------+-----------+
| compound_head() | Y | N |
+------------------+-----------+-----------+
Y: Overhead is increased.
N: Overhead is _NOT_ increased.
It shows that the overhead of those helpers on a tail page don't change
between "hugetlb_free_vmemmap=on" and "hugetlb_free_vmemmap=off". But the
overhead on a head page will be increased when "hugetlb_free_vmemmap=on"
(except PageCompound()). So I believe that Matthew Wilcox's folio series
will help with this.
The users of PageHead() and PageTail() are much less than compound_head()
and most users of PageTail() are VM_BUG_ON(), so I have done some tests
about the overhead of compound_head() on head pages.
I have tested the overhead of calling compound_head() on a head page,
which is 2.11ns (Measure the call time of 10 million times
compound_head(), and then average).
For a head page whose address is not aligned with PAGE_SIZE or a
non-compound page, the overhead of compound_head() is 2.54ns which is
increased by 20%. For a head page whose address is aligned with
PAGE_SIZE, the overhead of compound_head() is 2.97ns which is increased by
40%. Most pages are the former. I do not think the overhead is
significant since the overhead of compound_head() itself is low.
This patch (of 5):
This patch minimizes the overhead of struct page for 2MB HugeTLB pages
significantly. It further reduces the overhead of struct page by 12.5%
for a 2MB HugeTLB compared to the previous approach, which means 2GB per
1TB HugeTLB (2MB type).
After the feature of "Free sonme vmemmap pages of HugeTLB page" is
enabled, the mapping of the vmemmap addresses associated with a 2MB
HugeTLB page becomes the figure below.
HugeTLB struct pages(8 pages) page frame(8 pages)
+-----------+ ---virt_to_page---> +-----------+ mapping to +-----------+---> PG_head
| | | 0 | -------------> | 0 |
| | +-----------+ +-----------+
| | | 1 | -------------> | 1 |
| | +-----------+ +-----------+
| | | 2 | ----------------^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
| | +-----------+ | | | | |
| | | 3 | ------------------+ | | | |
| | +-----------+ | | | |
| | | 4 | --------------------+ | | |
| 2MB | +-----------+ | | |
| | | 5 | ----------------------+ | |
| | +-----------+ | |
| | | 6 | ------------------------+ |
| | +-----------+ |
| | | 7 | --------------------------+
| | +-----------+
| |
| |
| |
+-----------+
As we can see, the 2nd vmemmap page frame (indexed by 1) is reused and
remaped. However, the 2nd vmemmap page frame is also can be freed to
the buddy allocator, then we can change the mapping from the figure
above to the figure below.
HugeTLB struct pages(8 pages) page frame(8 pages)
+-----------+ ---virt_to_page---> +-----------+ mapping to +-----------+---> PG_head
| | | 0 | -------------> | 0 |
| | +-----------+ +-----------+
| | | 1 | ---------------^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
| | +-----------+ | | | | | |
| | | 2 | -----------------+ | | | | |
| | +-----------+ | | | | |
| | | 3 | -------------------+ | | | |
| | +-----------+ | | | |
| | | 4 | ---------------------+ | | |
| 2MB | +-----------+ | | |
| | | 5 | -----------------------+ | |
| | +-----------+ | |
| | | 6 | -------------------------+ |
| | +-----------+ |
| | | 7 | ---------------------------+
| | +-----------+
| |
| |
| |
+-----------+
After we do this, all tail vmemmap pages (1-7) are mapped to the head
vmemmap page frame (0). In other words, there are more than one page
struct with PG_head associated with each HugeTLB page. We __know__ that
there is only one head page struct, the tail page structs with PG_head are
fake head page structs. We need an approach to distinguish between those
two different types of page structs so that compound_head(), PageHead()
and PageTail() can work properly if the parameter is the tail page struct
but with PG_head.
The following code snippet describes how to distinguish between real and
fake head page struct.
if (test_bit(PG_head, &page->flags)) {
unsigned long head = READ_ONCE(page[1].compound_head);
if (head & 1) {
if (head == (unsigned long)page + 1)
==> head page struct
else
==> tail page struct
} else
==> head page struct
}
We can safely access the field of the @page[1] with PG_head because the
@page is a compound page composed with at least two contiguous pages.
[songmuchun@bytedance.com: restore lost comment changes]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211101031651.75851-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211101031651.75851-2-songmuchun@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Chen Huang <chenhuang5@huawei.com>
Cc: Bodeddula Balasubramaniam <bodeddub@amazon.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com>
Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
user_shm_lock forgets to set allowed to 0 when get_ucounts fails. So
the later user_shm_unlock might do the extra dec_rlimit_ucounts. Fix
this by resetting allowed to 0.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220310132417.41189-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Fixes: d7c9e99aee ("Reimplement RLIMIT_MEMLOCK on top of ucounts")
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Herbert van den Bergh <herbert.van.den.bergh@oracle.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The mm/ directory can almost fully be built with W=1, which would help
in local development. One remaining issue is missing prototype for
should_fail_alloc_page(). Thus add it next to the should_failslab()
prototype.
Note the previous attempt by commit f717309003 ("mm/page_alloc: make
should_fail_alloc_page() static") had to be reverted by commit
54aa386661 as it caused an unresolved symbol error with
CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220314165724.16071-1-vbabka@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We can not really handle non-LRU movable pages in memory failure.
Typically they are balloon, zsmalloc, etc.
Assuming we run into a base (4K) non-LRU movable page, we could reach as
far as identify_page_state(), it should not fall into any category
except me_unknown.
For the non-LRU compound movable pages, they could be taken for
transhuge pages but it's unexpected to split non-LRU movable pages using
split_huge_page_to_list in memory_failure. So we could just simply make
non-LRU movable pages unhandlable to avoid these possible nasty cases.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220312074613.4798-4-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Since commit 042c4f32323b ("mm/truncate: Inline invalidate_complete_page()
into its one caller"), invalidate_inode_page() can invalidate the pages
in the swap cache because the check of page->mapping != mapping is
removed. But invalidate_inode_page() is not expected to deal with the
pages in swap cache. Also non-lru movable page can reach here too.
They're not page cache pages. Skip these pages by checking
PageSwapCache and PageLRU.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220312074613.4798-3-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "A few fixup patches for memory failure", v2.
This series contains a few patches to fix the race with changing page
compound page, make non-LRU movable pages unhandlable and so on. More
details can be found in the respective changelogs.
There is a race window where we got the compound_head, the hugetlb page
could be freed to buddy, or even changed to another compound page just
before we try to get hwpoison page. Think about the below race window:
CPU 1 CPU 2
memory_failure_hugetlb
struct page *head = compound_head(p);
hugetlb page might be freed to
buddy, or even changed to another
compound page.
get_hwpoison_page -- page is not what we want now...
If this race happens, just bail out. Also MF_MSG_DIFFERENT_PAGE_SIZE is
introduced to record this event.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: s@/**@/*@, per Naoya Horiguchi]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220312074613.4798-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220312074613.4798-2-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
After successfully obtaining the reference count of the huge page, it is
still necessary to call hwpoison_filter() to make a filter judgement,
otherwise the filter hugepage will be unmaped and the related process
may be killed.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220223082254.2769757-1-luofei@unicloud.com
Signed-off-by: luofei <luofei@unicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
When the hwpoison page meets the filter conditions, it should not be
regarded as successful memory_failure() processing for mce handler, but
should return a distinct value, otherwise mce handler regards the error
page has been identified and isolated, which may lead to calling
set_mce_nospec() to change page attribute, etc.
Here memory_failure() return -EOPNOTSUPP to indicate that the error
event is filtered, mce handler should not take any action for this
situation and hwpoison injector should treat as correct.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220223082135.2769649-1-luofei@unicloud.com
Signed-off-by: luofei <luofei@unicloud.com>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
memory_failure() can handle free buddy page. Support injecting hwpoison
to free page by adding is_free_buddy_page check when hwpoison filter is
disabled.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: export is_free_buddy_page() to modules]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220218092052.3853-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
When we reach here, we're guaranteed to have non-compound page as thp is
already splited. Remove this unnecessary PageTransTail check.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220218090118.1105-9-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Only for hugetlb pages in shared mappings, try_to_unmap should take
semaphore in write mode here. Rework the code to make it clear.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220218090118.1105-7-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Since commit 03e5ac2fc3 ("mm: fix crash when using XFS on loopback"),
page_mapping() can handle the Slab pages. So remove this unnecessary
PageSlab check and obsolete comment.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220218090118.1105-6-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We're only intended to deal with the non-Compound page after we split
thp in memory_failure. However, the page could have changed compound
pages due to race window. If this happens, we could retry once to
hopefully handle the page next round. Also remove unneeded orig_head.
It's always equal to the hpage. So we can use hpage directly and remove
this redundant one.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220218090118.1105-5-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
BUS_MCEERR_AR code is only sent when MF_ACTION_REQUIRED is set and the
target is current. Rework the code to make this clear.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220218090118.1105-4-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
It's unexpected to walk the page table when vma_address() return
-EFAULT. But dev_pagemap_mapping_shift() is called only when vma
associated to the error page is found already in
collect_procs_{file,anon}, so vma_address() should not return -EFAULT
except with some bug, as Naoya pointed out. We can use VM_BUG_ON_VMA()
to catch this bug here.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220218090118.1105-3-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "A few cleanup and fixup patches for memory failure", v3.
This series contains a few patches to simplify the code logic, remove
unneeded variable and remove obsolete comment. Also we fix race
changing page more robustly in memory_failure. More details can be
found in the respective changelogs.
This patch (of 8):
The flags always has MF_ACTION_REQUIRED and MF_MUST_KILL set. So we do
not need to check these flags again.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220218090118.1105-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220218090118.1105-2-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Sometimes the page offlining code can leave behind a hwpoisoned clean
page cache page. This can lead to programs being killed over and over
and over again as they fault in the hwpoisoned page, get killed, and
then get re-spawned by whatever wanted to run them.
This is particularly embarrassing when the page was offlined due to
having too many corrected memory errors. Now we are killing tasks due
to them trying to access memory that probably isn't even corrupted.
This problem can be avoided by invalidating the page from the page fault
handler, which already has a branch for dealing with these kinds of
pages. With this patch we simply pretend the page fault was successful
if the page was invalidated, return to userspace, incur another page
fault, read in the file from disk (to a new memory page), and then
everything works again.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220212213740.423efcea@imladris.surriel.com
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
When an uncorrected memory error is consumed there is a race between the
CMCI from the memory controller reporting an uncorrected error with a
UCNA signature, and the core reporting and SRAR signature machine check
when the data is about to be consumed.
If the CMCI wins that race, the page is marked poisoned when
uc_decode_notifier() calls memory_failure() and the machine check
processing code finds the page already poisoned. It calls
kill_accessing_process() to make sure a SIGBUS is sent. But returns the
wrong error code.
Console log looks like this:
mce: Uncorrected hardware memory error in user-access at 3710b3400
Memory failure: 0x3710b3: recovery action for dirty LRU page: Recovered
Memory failure: 0x3710b3: already hardware poisoned
Memory failure: 0x3710b3: Sending SIGBUS to einj_mem_uc:361438 due to hardware memory corruption
mce: Memory error not recovered
kill_accessing_process() is supposed to return -EHWPOISON to notify that
SIGBUS is already set to the process and kill_me_maybe() doesn't have to
send it again. But current code simply fails to do this, so fix it to
make sure to work as intended. This change avoids the noise message
"Memory error not recovered" and skips duplicate SIGBUSs.
[tony.luck@intel.com: reword some parts of commit message]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220113231117.1021405-1-naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev
Fixes: a3f5d80ea4 ("mm,hwpoison: send SIGBUS with error virutal address")
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Reported-by: Youquan Song <youquan.song@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
With the introduction of mf_mutex, most of memory error handling process
is mutually exclusive, so the in-line comment about subtlety about
double-checking PageHWPoison is no more correct. So remove it.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220125025601.3054511-1-naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Suggested-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Eric Dumazet pointed out that commit 44042b4498 ("mm/page_alloc: allow
high-order pages to be stored on the per-cpu lists") only checks the
head page during PCP refill and allocation operations. This was an
oversight and all pages should be checked. This will incur a small
performance penalty but it's necessary for correctness.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220310092456.GJ15701@techsingularity.net
Fixes: 44042b4498 ("mm/page_alloc: allow high-order pages to be stored on the per-cpu lists")
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
For high order pages not using pcp, rmqueue() is currently calling the
costly check_new_pages() while zone spinlock is held, and hard irqs
masked.
This is not needed, we can release the spinlock sooner to reduce zone
spinlock contention.
Note that after this patch, we call __mod_zone_freepage_state() before
deciding to leak the page because it is in bad state.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220304170215.1868106-1-eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
When page allocation in direct reclaim path fails, the system will make
one attempt to shrink per-cpu page lists and free pages from high alloc
reserves. Draining per-cpu pages into buddy allocator can be a very
slow operation because it's done using workqueues and the task in direct
reclaim waits for all of them to finish before proceeding. Currently
this time is not accounted as psi memory stall.
While testing mobile devices under extreme memory pressure, when
allocations are failing during direct reclaim, we notices that psi
events which would be expected in such conditions were not triggered.
After profiling these cases it was determined that the reason for
missing psi events was that a big chunk of time spent in direct reclaim
is not accounted as memory stall, therefore psi would not reach the
levels at which an event is generated. Further investigation revealed
that the bulk of that unaccounted time was spent inside drain_all_pages
call.
A typical captured case when drain_all_pages path gets activated:
__alloc_pages_slowpath took 44.644.613ns
__perform_reclaim took 751.668ns (1.7%)
drain_all_pages took 43.887.167ns (98.3%)
PSI in this case records the time spent in __perform_reclaim but ignores
drain_all_pages, IOW it misses 98.3% of the time spent in
__alloc_pages_slowpath.
Annotate __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim in its entirety so that delays
from handling page allocation failure in the direct reclaim path are
accounted as memory stall.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220223194812.1299646-1-surenb@google.com
Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Reported-by: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
On x86, prior to ("mm: handle uninitialized numa nodes gracecully"), NUMA
nodes could be allocated at three different places.
- numa_register_memblks
- init_cpu_to_node
- init_gi_nodes
All these calls happen at setup_arch, and have the following order:
setup_arch
...
x86_numa_init
numa_init
numa_register_memblks
...
init_cpu_to_node
init_memory_less_node
alloc_node_data
free_area_init_memoryless_node
init_gi_nodes
init_memory_less_node
alloc_node_data
free_area_init_memoryless_node
numa_register_memblks() is only interested in those nodes which have
memory, so it skips over any memoryless node it founds. Later on, when
we have read ACPI's SRAT table, we call init_cpu_to_node() and
init_gi_nodes(), which initialize any memoryless node we might have that
have either CPU or Initiator affinity, meaning we allocate pg_data_t
struct for them and we mark them as ONLINE.
So far so good, but the thing is that after ("mm: handle uninitialized
numa nodes gracefully"), we allocate all possible NUMA nodes in
free_area_init(), meaning we have a picture like the following:
setup_arch
x86_numa_init
numa_init
numa_register_memblks <-- allocate non-memoryless node
x86_init.paging.pagetable_init
...
free_area_init
free_area_init_memoryless <-- allocate memoryless node
init_cpu_to_node
alloc_node_data <-- allocate memoryless node with CPU
free_area_init_memoryless_node
init_gi_nodes
alloc_node_data <-- allocate memoryless node with Initiator
free_area_init_memoryless_node
free_area_init() already allocates all possible NUMA nodes, but
init_cpu_to_node() and init_gi_nodes() are clueless about that, so they
go ahead and allocate a new pg_data_t struct without checking anything,
meaning we end up allocating twice.
It should be mad clear that this only happens in the case where
memoryless NUMA node happens to have a CPU/Initiator affinity.
So get rid of init_memory_less_node() and just set the node online.
Note that setting the node online is needed, otherwise we choke down the
chain when bringup_nonboot_cpus() ends up calling
__try_online_node()->register_one_node()->... and we blow up in
bus_add_device(). As can be seen here:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000060
#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI
CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc4-1-default+ #45
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.0.0-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/4
RIP: 0010:bus_add_device+0x5a/0x140
Code: 8b 74 24 20 48 89 df e8 84 96 ff ff 85 c0 89 c5 75 38 48 8b 53 50 48 85 d2 0f 84 bb 00 004
RSP: 0000:ffffc9000022bd10 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888100987400 RCX: ffff8881003e4e19
RDX: ffff8881009a5e00 RSI: ffff888100987400 RDI: ffff888100987400
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffff8881003e4e18 R09: ffff8881003e4c98
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff888100402bc0 R12: ffffffff822ceba0
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff888100987400 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88853fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000000060 CR3: 000000000200a001 CR4: 00000000001706b0
Call Trace:
device_add+0x4c0/0x910
__register_one_node+0x97/0x2d0
__try_online_node+0x85/0xc0
try_online_node+0x25/0x40
cpu_up+0x4f/0x100
bringup_nonboot_cpus+0x4f/0x60
smp_init+0x26/0x79
kernel_init_freeable+0x130/0x2f1
kernel_init+0x17/0x150
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
The reason is simple, by the time bringup_nonboot_cpus() gets called, we
did not register the node_subsys bus yet, so we crash when
bus_add_device() tries to dereference bus()->p.
The following shows the order of the calls:
kernel_init_freeable
smp_init
bringup_nonboot_cpus
...
bus_add_device() <- we did not register node_subsys yet
do_basic_setup
do_initcalls
postcore_initcall(register_node_type);
register_node_type
subsys_system_register
subsys_register
bus_register <- register node_subsys bus
Why setting the node online saves us then? Well, simply because
__try_online_node() backs off when the node is online, meaning we do not
end up calling register_one_node() in the first place.
This is subtle, broken and deserves a deep analysis and thought about
how to put this into shape, but for now let us have this easy fix for
the leaking memory issue.
[osalvador@suse.de: add comments]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220221142649.3457-1-osalvador@suse.de
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220218224302.5282-2-osalvador@suse.de
Fixes: da4490c958ad ("mm: handle uninitialized numa nodes gracefully")
Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Rafael Aquini <raquini@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
free_pcppages_bulk() has taken two passes through the pcp lists since
commit 0a5f4e5b45 ("mm/free_pcppages_bulk: do not hold lock when
picking pages to free") due to deferring the cost of selecting PCP lists
until the zone lock is held.
As the list processing now takes place under the zone lock, it's less
clear that this will always benefit for two reasons.
1. There is a guaranteed cost to calculating the buddy which definitely
has to be calculated again. However, as the zone lock is held and
there is no deferring of buddy merging, there is no guarantee that the
prefetch will have completed when the second buddy calculation takes
place and buddies are being merged. With or without the prefetch, there
may be further stalls depending on how many pages get merged. In other
words, a stall due to merging is inevitable and at best only one stall
might be avoided at the cost of calculating the buddy location twice.
2. As the zone lock is held, prefetch_nr makes less sense as once
prefetch_nr expires, the cache lines of interest have already been
merged.
The main concern is that there is a definite cost to calculating the
buddy location early for the prefetch and it is a "maybe win" depending
on whether the CPU prefetch logic and memory is fast enough. Remove the
prefetch logic on the basis that reduced instructions in a path is
always a saving where as the prefetch might save one memory stall
depending on the CPU and memory.
In most cases, this has marginal benefit as the calculations are a small
part of the overall freeing of pages. However, it was detectable on at
least one machine.
5.17.0-rc3 5.17.0-rc3
mm-highpcplimit-v2r1 mm-noprefetch-v1r1
Min elapsed 630.00 ( 0.00%) 610.00 ( 3.17%)
Amean elapsed 639.00 ( 0.00%) 623.00 * 2.50%*
Max elapsed 660.00 ( 0.00%) 660.00 ( 0.00%)
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220221094119.15282-2-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Suggested-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Hari Bathini