While cutting the lists we sometimes accidentally added a list_head from
the stack to the LRUs, effectively corrupting the list.
Remove the list cutting and use explicit list manipulation instead.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Tested-by: Mike Lothian <mike@fireburn.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Staring at the function for six hours, just to essentially move one line
of code. The problem was that the first list_cut_position call could result
in list2 pointing to la-la-land.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The first parameter of list_cut_position() must point to an initialized
list.
Noticed thanks to KASAN pointing out something's fishy here.
Fixes: "drm/ttm: add bulk move function on LRU"
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This function allow us to bulk move a group of BOs to the tail of their LRU.
The positions of group of BOs are stored on the (first, last) bulk_move_pos
structure.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Tested-by: Mike Lothian <mike@fireburn.co.uk>
Tested-by: Dieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>
Acked-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Junwei Zhang <Jerry.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
When move a BO to the end of LRU, it need remember the BO positions.
Make sure all moved bo in between "first" and "last". And they will be bulk
moving together.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Tested-by: Mike Lothian <mike@fireburn.co.uk>
Tested-by: Dieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>
Acked-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Junwei Zhang <Jerry.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
A call to ttm_bo_unref() clears the supplied pointer to NULL, while
ttm_bo_put() does not. None of the converted call sites requires the
pointer to become NULL, so the respective assign operations has been
left out from the patch.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <contact@tzimmermann.org>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The TTM buffer-object interface provides ttm_bo_reference() and
ttm_bo_unref() for managing reference counts. Replacing them with
ttm_bo_get() and ttm_bo_put() aligns the API with conventions used
throughout the Linux kernel.
The implementation of ttm_bo_unref() clears the supplied pointer
to NULL. This leads to workarounds where the caller saves the
pointer's value before de-referencing the BO. ttm_bo_put() does
not clear the supplied pointer.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <contact@tzimmermann.org>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Make use of the swap macro and remove unnecessary variable *tmp_mem*.
This makes the code easier to read and maintain. Also, reduces the
stack usage.
This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This is dual licensed under GPL-2.0 or MIT.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel (VMware) <dirk@hohndel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Then priority could be set before initialization.
By default, it requires to kzalloc ttm bo. In fact, we always do so.
Signed-off-by: Junwei Zhang <Jerry.Zhang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: David Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Allows us to gut a BO of it's backing store when the driver says that it
isn't needed any more.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Rename ttm_bo_add_ttm to ttm_tt_create and move it into ttm_tt.c.
v2: separate the cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Never used as parameter, the only driver actually using this is nouveau
and there it is initialized after the BO is initialized.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Only used by the AGP backend and there it can be easily accessed using
ttm->bdev->glob.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The pointer is available as bo->bdev->glob as well.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Because ttm_bo_force_list_clean() is only called on two occasions:
1. By ttm_bo_evict_mm() during suspend.
2. By ttm_bo_clean_mm() when the driver unloads.
On both cases we absolutely don't want any memory allocation failure.
Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
for saving memory and more bit flag can be used in future
Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
(v2): Remove stray ; noticed by Felix
Signed-off-by: Tom St Denis <tom.stdenis@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Correct indentation and {} brace style.
Signed-off-by: Tom St Denis <tom.stdenis@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This to allow drivers to choose to avoid OOM invocation and handle
page allocation failures instead.
v2:
Remove extra new lines.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Missed in the patche:
dc94777 drm/ttm: enable swapout for reserved BOs during allocation.
don't unreserve the BO if it is not reserved by itself.
Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
If ttm_bo_swapout doesn't own the lock, don't release it. Someone
else probably depends on it still being locked.
Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
A BO that's already swapped would be added back to the swap-LRU list
for example if its validation failed under high memory pressure. This
could later lead to swapping it out again and leaking previous swap
storage.
This commit adds a condition to prevent that from happening.
v2: Check page_flags instead of swap_storage
Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
if the bo shares same reservation object then not lock it again
at swapout time to make it possible to swap out.
v2: refine the commmit message
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chuming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
extract a function as ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable since eviction and
swapout can share same logic.
v2: modify commit message and add description in the code
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chuming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
forward the operation context to ttm_tt_bind as well,
and the ultimate goal is swapout enablement for reserved BOs.
v2: use common term rather than amd specific
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chuming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
forward the operation context to ttm_mem_global_alloc as well, and the
ultimate goal is swapout enablement for reserved BOs
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
remove the extra indirection because we have only one implementation anyway
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Thomas actually noticed that, but I didn't realized what he meant until
now.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Use pr_debug instead of TTM_DEBUG, fix the lockdep assert and remove the
unused constant.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Use the reservation wrapper for this.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
We only need to wait for the contended lock when the reservation object is
shared or when we want to remove everything. A trylock should be sufficient
in all other cases.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
include ttm_bo_move_memcpy and ttm_bo_move_ttm
Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
allow eviction of BOs reserved by the caller when they are
not part of the current working set.
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Add some statistics how many bytes we have moved.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Tested-by: Dieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Acked-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Instead of passing the parameters manually.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Tested-by: Dieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Acked-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Instead of passing down the parameters manually to every function.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Tested-by: Dieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Acked-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Instead of specifying interruptible and no_wait_gpu manually.
v2: rebase
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Tested-by: Dieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Acked-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Instead of specifying if sleeping should be interruptible.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Tested-by: Dieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Acked-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Give moving a BO into place an operation context to work with.
v2: rebased
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Tested-by: Dieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Acked-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Not used any more.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is no guarantee that the next entry on the ddelete list stays on
the list when we drop the locks.
Completely rework this mess by moving processed entries on a temporary
list.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The code path isn't hit at the moment, but we need to take the lock to
add the BO back to the LRU.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Roger He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Deleted BOs with the same reservation object can be reaped even if they
can't be reserved.
v2: rebase and we still need to remove/add the BO from/to the LRU.
v3: fix remove/add one more time, cleanup the logic a bit
v4: we should still check if the eviction is valuable
v5: add comment suggested by Michel
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Needed for the next patch.
v2: actually predicate all unlocks
v3: add some cleanups suggested by Michel.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Consistently use the reservation object wrappers instead of accessing
the ww_mutex directly.
Additional to that use the reservation object wrappers directly instead of
calling __ttm_bo_reserve with fixed parameters.
v2: fix typo
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Instead of having a confusing wrapper or call the underlying ww_mutex
function directly.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Needed for the next patch and makes the code quite a bit easier to
understand.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Fixes a use-after-free due to a race condition in
ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_and_unlock, which allows one task to reserve a BO
and destroy its ttm_resv while another task is waiting for it to signal
in reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu.
v2:
* Always initialize bo->ttm_resv in ttm_bo_init_reserved
(Christian König)
Fixes: 0d2bd2ae04 "drm/ttm: fix memory leak while individualizing BOs"
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com> # v1
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Christian König