2 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Fabio Estevam	11d4bb1bd0	ARM: 7907/1: lib: delay-loop: Add align directive to fix BogoMIPS calculation ... Currently mx53 (CortexA8) running at 1GHz reports: Calibrating delay loop... 663.55 BogoMIPS (lpj=3317760) Tom Evans verified that alignments of 0x0 and 0x8 run the two instructions of __loop_delay in one clock cycle (1 clock/loop), while alignments of 0x4 and 0xc take 3 clocks to run the loop twice. (1.5 clock/loop) The original object code looks like this: 00000010 <__loop_const_udelay>: 10: e3e01000 mvn r1, #0 14: e51f201c ldr r2, [pc, #-28] ; 0 <__loop_udelay-0x8> 18: e5922000 ldr r2, [r2] 1c: e0800921 add r0, r0, r1, lsr #18 20: e1a00720 lsr r0, r0, #14 24: e0822b21 add r2, r2, r1, lsr #22 28: e1a02522 lsr r2, r2, #10 2c: e0000092 mul r0, r2, r0 30: e0800d21 add r0, r0, r1, lsr #26 34: e1b00320 lsrs r0, r0, #6 38: 01a0f00e moveq pc, lr 0000003c <__loop_delay>: 3c: e2500001 subs r0, r0, #1 40: 8afffffe bhi 3c <__loop_delay> 44: e1a0f00e mov pc, lr After adding the 'align 3' directive to __loop_delay (align to 8 bytes): 00000010 <__loop_const_udelay>: 10: e3e01000 mvn r1, #0 14: e51f201c ldr r2, [pc, #-28] ; 0 <__loop_udelay-0x8> 18: e5922000 ldr r2, [r2] 1c: e0800921 add r0, r0, r1, lsr #18 20: e1a00720 lsr r0, r0, #14 24: e0822b21 add r2, r2, r1, lsr #22 28: e1a02522 lsr r2, r2, #10 2c: e0000092 mul r0, r2, r0 30: e0800d21 add r0, r0, r1, lsr #26 34: e1b00320 lsrs r0, r0, #6 38: 01a0f00e moveq pc, lr 3c: e320f000 nop {0} 00000040 <__loop_delay>: 40: e2500001 subs r0, r0, #1 44: 8afffffe bhi 40 <__loop_delay> 48: e1a0f00e mov pc, lr 4c: e320f000 nop {0} , which now reports: Calibrating delay loop... 996.14 BogoMIPS (lpj=4980736) Some more test results: On mx31 (ARM1136) running at 532 MHz, before the patch: Calibrating delay loop... 351.43 BogoMIPS (lpj=1757184) On mx31 (ARM1136) running at 532 MHz after the patch: Calibrating delay loop... 528.79 BogoMIPS (lpj=2643968) Also tested on mx6 (CortexA9) and on mx27 (ARM926), which shows the same BogoMIPS value before and after this patch. Reported-by: Tom Evans <tom_usenet@optusnet.com.au> Suggested-by: Tom Evans <tom_usenet@optusnet.com.au> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>	2013-11-30 22:21:03 +00:00
Will Deacon	d0a533b182	ARM: 7452/1: delay: allow timer-based delay implementation to be selected ... This patch allows a timer-based delay implementation to be selected by switching the delay routines over to use get_cycles, which is implemented in terms of read_current_timer. This further allows us to skip the loop calibration and have a consistent delay function in the face of core frequency scaling. To avoid the pain of dealing with memory-mapped counters, this implementation uses the co-processor interface to the architected timers when they are available. The previous loop-based implementation is kept around for CPUs without the architected timers and we retain both the maximum delay (2ms) and the corresponding conversion factors for determining the number of loops required for a given interval. Since the indirection of the timer routines will only work when called from C, the sa1100 sleep routines are modified to branch to the loop-based delay functions directly. Tested-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi.px@renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>	2012-07-09 17:42:23 +01:00