Create test suite called "kunit_current" to add test coverage for the use
of current->kunit_test, which returns the current KUnit test.
Add two test cases:
- kunit_current_test to test current->kunit_test and the method
kunit_get_current_test(), which utilizes current->kunit_test.
- kunit_current_fail_test to test the method
kunit_fail_current_test(), which utilizes current->kunit_test.
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix bug of the extra newline characters in debugfs logs. When a
line is added to debugfs with a newline character at the end,
an extra line appears in the debugfs log.
This is due to a discrepancy between how the lines are printed and how they
are added to the logs. Remove this discrepancy by checking if a newline
character is present before adding a newline character. This should closely
match the printk behavior.
Add kunit_log_newline_test to provide test coverage for this issue. (Also,
move kunit_log_test above suite definition to remove the unnecessary
declaration prior to the suite definition)
As an example, say we add these two lines to the log:
kunit_log(..., "KTAP version 1\n");
kunit_log(..., "1..1");
The debugfs log before this fix:
KTAP version 1
1..1
The debugfs log after this fix:
KTAP version 1
1..1
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix bug in debugfs logs that causes an incorrect order of lines in the
debugfs log.
Currently, the test counts lines that show the number of tests passed,
failed, and skipped, as well as any suite diagnostic lines,
appear prior to the individual results, which is a bug.
Ensure the order of printing for the debugfs log is correct. Additionally,
add a KTAP header to so the debugfs logs can be valid KTAP.
This is an example of a log prior to these fixes:
KTAP version 1
# Subtest: kunit_status
1..2
# kunit_status: pass:2 fail:0 skip:0 total:2
# Totals: pass:2 fail:0 skip:0 total:2
ok 1 kunit_status_set_failure_test
ok 2 kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
ok 1 kunit_status
Note the two lines with stats are out of order. This is the same debugfs
log after the fixes (in combination with the third patch to remove the
extra line):
KTAP version 1
1..1
KTAP version 1
# Subtest: kunit_status
1..2
ok 1 kunit_status_set_failure_test
ok 2 kunit_status_mark_skipped_test
# kunit_status: pass:2 fail:0 skip:0 total:2
# Totals: pass:2 fail:0 skip:0 total:2
ok 1 kunit_status
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix bug in debugfs logs that causes individual parameterized results to not
appear because the log is reinitialized (cleared) when each parameter is
run.
Ensure these results appear in the debugfs logs, increase log size to
allow for the size of parameterized results. As a result, append lines to
the log directly rather than using an intermediate variable that can cause
stack size warnings due to the increased log size.
Here is the debugfs log of ext4_inode_test which uses parameterized tests
before the fix:
KTAP version 1
# Subtest: ext4_inode_test
1..1
# Totals: pass:16 fail:0 skip:0 total:16
ok 1 ext4_inode_test
As you can see, this log does not include any of the individual
parametrized results.
After (in combination with the next two fixes to remove extra empty line
and ensure KTAP valid format):
KTAP version 1
1..1
KTAP version 1
# Subtest: ext4_inode_test
1..1
KTAP version 1
# Subtest: inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding
ok 1 1901-12-13 Lower bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits
... (the rest of the individual parameterized tests)
ok 16 2446-05-10 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp. All extra
# inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding: pass:16 fail:0 skip:0 total:16
ok 1 inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding
# Totals: pass:16 fail:0 skip:0 total:16
ok 1 ext4_inode_test
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
KUnit's 'hooks.o' file need to be built-in whenever KUnit is enabled
(even if CONFIG_KUNIT=m). We'd previously attemtped to do this by
adding 'kunit/hooks.o' to obj-y in lib/Makefile, but this caused hooks.c
to be rebuilt even when it was unchanged.
Instead, always recurse into lib/kunit using obj-y when KUnit is
enabled, and add the hooks there.
Fixes: 7170b7ed6a ("kunit: Add "hooks" to call into KUnit when it's built as a module").
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CAHk-=wiEf7irTKwPJ0jTMOF3CS-13UXmF6Fns3wuWpOZ_wGyZQ@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Add the gnu_printf (__printf()) attribute to the
kunit_fail_current_test() implementation in
__kunit_fail_current_test_impl(). While it's not actually useful here,
as this function is never called directly, it nevertheless was
triggering -Wsuggest-attribute=format warnings, so we should add it to
reduce the noise.
Fixes: cc3ed2fe5c93 ("kunit: Add "hooks" to call into KUnit when it's built as a module")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Add a simple way of redirecting calls to functions by including a
special prologue in the "real" function which checks to see if the
replacement function should be called (and, if so, calls it).
To redirect calls to a function, make the first (non-declaration) line
of the function:
KUNIT_STATIC_STUB_REDIRECT(function_name, [function arguments]);
(This will compile away to nothing if KUnit is not enabled, otherwise it
will check if a redirection is active, call the replacement function,
and return. This check is protected by a static branch, so has very
little overhead when there are no KUnit tests running.)
Calls to the real function can be redirected to a replacement using:
kunit_activate_static_stub(test, real_fn, replacement_fn);
The redirection will only affect calls made from within the kthread of
the current test, and will be automatically disabled when the test
completes. It can also be manually disabled with
kunit_deactivate_static_stub().
The 'example' KUnit test suite has a more complete example.
Co-developed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
KUnit has several macros and functions intended for use from non-test
code. These hooks, currently the kunit_get_current_test() and
kunit_fail_current_test() macros, didn't work when CONFIG_KUNIT=m.
In order to support this case, the required functions and static data
need to be available unconditionally, even when KUnit itself is not
built-in. The new 'hooks.c' file is therefore always included, and has
both the static key required for kunit_get_current_test(), and a table
of function pointers in struct kunit_hooks_table. This is filled in with
the real implementations by kunit_install_hooks(), which is kept in
hooks-impl.h and called when the kunit module is loaded.
This can be extended for future features which require similar
"hook" behaviour, such as static stubs, by simply adding new entries to
the struct, and the appropriate code to set them.
Fixed white-space errors during commit:
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Resolved merge conflicts with:
db105c37a4 ("kunit: Export kunit_running()")
This patch supersedes the above.
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
In KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ and KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMNEQ, add check if one of the
inputs is NULL and fail if this is the case.
Currently, the kernel crashes if one of the inputs is NULL. Instead,
fail the test and add an appropriate error message.
Fixes: b8a926bea8 ("kunit: Introduce KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ and KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMNEQ macros")
This was found by the kernel test robot:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/202212191448.D6EDPdOh-lkp@intel.com/
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Using kunit_fail_current_test() in a loadable module causes a link
error like:
ERROR: modpost: "kunit_running" [drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4.ko] undefined!
Export the symbol to allow using it from modules.
Fixes: da43ff045c ("drm/vc4: tests: Fail the current test if we access a register")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
When it fails to allocate fragment, it does not free and return error.
And check the pointer inappropriately.
Fixed merge conflicts with
commit 618887768b ("kunit: update NULL vs IS_ERR() tests")
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: YoungJun.park <her0gyugyu@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
This KUnit next update for Linux 6.2-rc1 consists of several enhancements,
fixes, clean-ups, documentation updates, improvements to logging and KTAP
compliance of KUnit test output:
- log numbers in decimal and hex
- parse KTAP compliant test output
- allow conditionally exposing static symbols to tests
when KUNIT is enabled
- make static symbols visible during kunit testing
- clean-ups to remove unused structure definition
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=UQNn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-next-6.2-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest
Pull KUnit updates from Shuah Khan:
"Several enhancements, fixes, clean-ups, documentation updates,
improvements to logging and KTAP compliance of KUnit test output:
- log numbers in decimal and hex
- parse KTAP compliant test output
- allow conditionally exposing static symbols to tests when KUNIT is
enabled
- make static symbols visible during kunit testing
- clean-ups to remove unused structure definition"
* tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-next-6.2-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest: (29 commits)
Documentation: dev-tools: Clarify requirements for result description
apparmor: test: make static symbols visible during kunit testing
kunit: add macro to allow conditionally exposing static symbols to tests
kunit: tool: make parser preserve whitespace when printing test log
Documentation: kunit: Fix "How Do I Use This" / "Next Steps" sections
kunit: tool: don't include KTAP headers and the like in the test log
kunit: improve KTAP compliance of KUnit test output
kunit: tool: parse KTAP compliant test output
mm: slub: test: Use the kunit_get_current_test() function
kunit: Use the static key when retrieving the current test
kunit: Provide a static key to check if KUnit is actively running tests
kunit: tool: make --json do nothing if --raw_ouput is set
kunit: tool: tweak error message when no KTAP found
kunit: remove KUNIT_INIT_MEM_ASSERTION macro
Documentation: kunit: Remove redundant 'tips.rst' page
Documentation: KUnit: reword description of assertions
Documentation: KUnit: make usage.rst a superset of tips.rst, remove duplication
kunit: eliminate KUNIT_INIT_*_ASSERT_STRUCT macros
kunit: tool: remove redundant file.close() call in unit test
kunit: tool: unit tests all check parser errors, standardize formatting a bit
...
Change KUnit test output to better comply with KTAP v1 specifications
found here: https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/ktap.html.
1) Use "KTAP version 1" instead of "TAP version 14" as test output header
2) Remove '-' between test number and test name on test result lines
2) Add KTAP version lines to each subtest header as well
Note that the new KUnit output still includes the “# Subtest” line now
located after the KTAP version line. This does not completely match the
KTAP v1 spec but since it is classified as a diagnostic line, it is not
expected to be disruptive or break any existing parsers. This
“# Subtest” line comes from the TAP 14 spec
(https://testanything.org/tap-version-14-specification.html) and it is
used to define the test name before the results.
Original output:
TAP version 14
1..1
# Subtest: kunit-test-suite
1..3
ok 1 - kunit_test_1
ok 2 - kunit_test_2
ok 3 - kunit_test_3
# kunit-test-suite: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
# Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
ok 1 - kunit-test-suite
New output:
KTAP version 1
1..1
KTAP version 1
# Subtest: kunit-test-suite
1..3
ok 1 kunit_test_1
ok 2 kunit_test_2
ok 3 kunit_test_3
# kunit-test-suite: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
# Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
ok 1 kunit-test-suite
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
KUnit does a few expensive things when enabled. This hasn't been a
problem because KUnit was only enabled on test kernels, but with a few
people enabling (but not _using_) KUnit on production systems, we need a
runtime way of handling this.
Provide a 'kunit_running' static key (defaulting to false), which allows
us to hide any KUnit code behind a static branch. This should reduce the
performance impact (on other code) of having KUnit enabled to a single
NOP when no tests are running.
Note that, while it looks unintuitive, tests always run entirely within
__kunit_test_suites_init(), so it's safe to decrement the static key at
the end of this function, rather than in __kunit_test_suites_exit(),
which is only there to clean up results in debugfs.
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Augment the example_all_expect_macros_test with the KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ
and KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMNEQ macros by creating a test with memory block
assertions.
Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently, in order to compare memory blocks in KUnit, the KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ
or KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE macros are used in conjunction with the memcmp
function, such as:
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, memcmp(foo, bar, size), 0);
Although this usage produces correct results for the test cases, when
the expectation fails, the error message is not very helpful,
indicating only the return of the memcmp function.
Therefore, create a new set of macros KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ and
KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMNEQ that compare memory blocks until a specified size.
In case of expectation failure, those macros print the hex dump of the
memory blocks, making it easier to debug test failures for memory blocks.
That said, the expectation
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, memcmp(foo, bar, size), 0);
would translate to the expectation
KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ(test, foo, bar, size);
Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
When KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ() or KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ() log a failure, they log the
two values being compared, with numerical values logged in decimal.
In some cases, decimal output is painful to consume, and hexadecimal
output would be more helpful. For example, this is the case for tests
I'm currently developing for the arm64 insn encoding/decoding code,
where comparing two 32-bit instruction opcodes results in output such
as:
| # test_insn_add_shifted_reg: EXPECTATION FAILED at arch/arm64/lib/test_insn.c:2791
| Expected obj_insn == gen_insn, but
| obj_insn == 2332164128
| gen_insn == 1258422304
To make this easier to consume, this patch logs the values in both
decimal and hexadecimal:
| # test_insn_add_shifted_reg: EXPECTATION FAILED at arch/arm64/lib/test_insn.c:2791
| Expected obj_insn == gen_insn, but
| obj_insn == 2332164128 (0x8b020020)
| gen_insn == 1258422304 (0x4b020020)
As can be seen from the example, having hexadecimal makes it
significantly easier for a human to spot which specific bits are
incorrect.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kunit-dev@googlegroups.com
Acked-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The alloc_string_stream() functions were changed from returning NULL on
error to returning error pointers so these caller needs to be updated
as well.
Fixes: 78b1c6584f ("kunit: string-stream: Simplify resource use")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Each calll to a KUNIT_EXPECT_*() macro creates a local variable which
contains a struct kunit_assert.
Normally, we'd hope the compiler would be able to optimize this away,
but we've seen cases where it hasn't, see
https://groups.google.com/g/kunit-dev/c/i3fZXgvBrfA/m/GbrMNej2BAAJ.
In changes like commit 21957f90b2 ("kunit: split out part of
kunit_assert into a static const"), we've moved more and more parts out
of struct kunit_assert and its children types (kunit_binary_assert).
This patch removes the final field and gets us to:
sizeof(struct kunit_assert) == 0
sizeof(struct kunit_binary_assert) == 24 (on UML x86_64).
This also reduces the amount of macro plumbing going on at the cost of
passing in one more arg to the base KUNIT_ASSERTION macro and
kunit_do_failed_assertion().
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The real kfree() function will silently return when given a NULL.
So a user might reasonably think they can write the following code:
char *buffer = NULL;
if (param->use_buffer) buffer = kunit_kzalloc(test, 10, GFP_KERNEL);
...
kunit_kfree(test, buffer);
As-is, kunit_kfree() will mark the test as FAILED when buffer is NULL.
(And in earlier times, it would segfault).
Let's match the semantics of kfree().
Suggested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
kunit_kfree() can only work on data ("resources") allocated by KUnit.
Currently for code like this,
> void *ptr = kmalloc(4, GFP_KERNEL);
> kunit_kfree(test, ptr);
kunit_kfree() will segfault.
It'll try and look up the kunit_resource associated with `ptr` and get a
NULL back, but it won't check for this. This means we also segfault if
you double-free.
Change kunit_kfree() so it'll notice these invalid pointers and respond
by failing the test.
Implementation: kunit_destroy_resource() does what kunit_kfree() does,
but is more generic and returns -ENOENT when it can't find the resource.
Sadly, unlike just letting it crash, this means we don't get a stack
trace. But kunit_kfree() is so infrequently used it shouldn't be hard to
track down the bad callsite anyways.
After this change, the above code gives:
> # example_simple_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/kunit/test.c:702
> kunit_kfree: 00000000626ec200 already freed or not allocated by kunit
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
kunit_kfree() exists to clean up allocations from kunit_kmalloc() and
friends early instead of waiting for this to happen automatically at the
end of the test.
But it can be used on *anything* registered with the kunit resource API.
E.g. the last 2 statements are equivalent:
struct kunit_resource *res = something();
kfree(res->data);
kunit_put_resource(res);
The problem is that there could be multiple resources that point to the
same `data`.
E.g. you can have a named resource acting as a pseudo-global variable in
a test. If you point it to data allocated with kunit_kmalloc(), then
calling `kunit_kfree(ptr)` has the chance to delete either the named
resource or to kfree `ptr`.
Which one it does depends on the order the resources are registered as
kunit_kfree() will delete resources in LIFO order.
So this patch restricts kunit_kfree() to only working on resources
created by kunit_kmalloc(). Calling it is therefore guaranteed to free
the memory, not do anything else.
Note: kunit_resource_instance_match() wasn't used outside of KUnit, so
it should be safe to remove from the public interface. It's also
generally dangerous, as shown above, and shouldn't be used.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
We already store the `struct kunit *test` in the string_stream object
itself, so we need don't need to store a copy of this pointer in every
fragment in the stream.
Drop it, getting string_stream_fragment down the bare minimum: a
list_head and the `char *` with the actual fragment.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently, KUnit's string streams are themselves "KUnit resources".
This is redundant since the stream itself is already allocated with
kunit_kzalloc() and will thus be freed automatically at the end of the
test.
string-stream is only used internally within KUnit, and isn't using the
extra features that resources provide like reference counting, being
able to locate them dynamically as "test-local variables", etc.
Indeed, the resource's refcount is never incremented when the
pointer is returned. The fact that it's always manually destroyed is
more evidence that the reference counting is unused.
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch adds the kunit.enable module parameter that will need to be
set to true in addition to KUNIT being enabled for KUnit tests to run.
The default value is true giving backwards compatibility. However, for
the production+testing use case the new config option
KUNIT_DEFAULT_ENABLED can be set to N requiring the tester to opt-in
by passing kunit.enable=1 to the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Joe Fradley <joefradley@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
It's possible that memory allocation for 'filtered' will fail, but for the
copy of the suite to succeed. In this case, the copy could be leaked.
Properly free 'copy' in the error case for the allocation of 'filtered'
failing.
Note that there may also have been a similar issue in
kunit_filter_subsuites, before it was removed in "kunit: flatten
kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites".
This was reported by clang-analyzer via the kernel test robot, here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/c8073b8e-7b9e-0830-4177-87c12f16349c@intel.com/
And by smatch via Dan Carpenter and the kernel test robot:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/202207101328.ASjx88yj-lkp@intel.com/
Fixes: a02353f491 ("kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker if OOM")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
We currently store kunit suites in the .kunit_test_suites ELF section as
a `struct kunit_suite***` (modulo some `const`s).
For every test file, we store a struct kunit_suite** NULL-terminated array.
This adds quite a bit of complexity to the test filtering code in the
executor.
Instead, let's just make the .kunit_test_suites section contain a single
giant array of struct kunit_suite pointers, which can then be directly
manipulated. This array is not NULL-terminated, and so none of the test
filtering code needs to NULL-terminate anything.
Tested-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently, KUnit runs built-in tests and tests loaded from modules
differently. For built-in tests, the kunit_test_suite{,s}() macro adds a
list of suites in the .kunit_test_suites linker section. However, for
kernel modules, a module_init() function is used to run the test suites.
This causes problems if tests are included in a module which already
defines module_init/exit_module functions, as they'll conflict with the
kunit-provided ones.
This change removes the kunit-defined module inits, and instead parses
the kunit tests from their own section in the module. After module init,
we call __kunit_test_suites_init() on the contents of that section,
which prepares and runs the suite.
This essentially unifies the module- and non-module kunit init formats.
Tested-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@codeconstruct.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
kmemdup() is easier than kmalloc() + memcpy(), per lkp bot.
Also make the input `suite` as const since we're now always making
copies after commit a127b154a8 ("kunit: tool: allow filtering test
cases via glob").
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Make KUnit trigger the new TAINT_TEST taint when any KUnit test is run.
Due to KUnit tests not being intended to run on production systems, and
potentially causing problems (or security issues like leaking kernel
addresses), the kernel's state should not be considered safe for
production use after KUnit tests are run.
This both marks KUnit modules as test modules using MODULE_INFO() and
manually taints the kernel when tests are run (which catches builtin
tests).
Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Tested-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The existing logic happens to work fine on UML, but is not correct when
running on other arches.
1. We didn't initialize `int err`, and kunit_filter_suites() doesn't
explicitly set it to 0 on success. So we had false "failures".
Note: it doesn't happen on UML, causing this to get overlooked.
2. If we error out, we do not call kunit_handle_shutdown().
This makes kunit.py timeout when using a non-UML arch, since the QEMU
process doesn't ever exit.
Fixes: a02353f491 ("kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker if OOM")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The `kunit_do_failed_assertion` function passes its
`struct kunit_assert` argument to `kunit_fail`. This one,
in turn, calls its `format` field passing the assert again
as a `const` pointer.
Therefore, the whole chain may be made `const`.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
When filtering what tests to run (suites and/or cases) via
kunit.filter_glob (e.g. kunit.py run <glob>), we allocate copies of
suites.
These allocations can fail, and we largely don't handle that.
Note: realistically, this probably doesn't matter much.
We're not allocating much memory and this happens early in boot, so if
we can't do that, then there's likely far bigger problems.
This patch makes us immediately bail out from the top-level function
(kunit_filter_suites) with -ENOMEM if any of the underlying kmalloc()
calls return NULL.
Implementation note: we used to return NULL pointers from some functions
to indicate either that all suites/tests were filtered out or there was
an error allocating the new array.
We'll log a short error in this case and not run any tests or print a
TAP header. From a kunit.py user's perspective, they'll get a message
about missing/invalid TAP output and have to dig into the test.log to
see it. Since hitting this error seems so unlikely, it's probably fine
to not invent a way to plumb this error message more visibly.
See also: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220329103919.2376818-1-lv.ruyi@zte.com.cn/
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Reported-by: Lv Ruyi <lv.ruyi@zte.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
KUnit's test-managed resources can be created in two ways:
- Using the kunit_add_resource() family of functions, which accept a
struct kunit_resource pointer, typically allocated statically or on
the stack during the test.
- Using the kunit_alloc_resource() family of functions, which allocate a
struct kunit_resource using kzalloc() behind the scenes.
Both of these families of functions accept a 'free' function to be
called when the resource is finally disposed of.
At present, KUnit will kfree() the resource if this 'free' function is
specified, and will not if it is NULL. However, this can lead
kunit_alloc_resource() to leak memory (if no 'free' function is passed
in), or kunit_add_resource() to incorrectly kfree() memory which was
allocated by some other means (on the stack, as part of a larger
allocation, etc), if a 'free' function is provided.
Instead, always kfree() if the resource was allocated with
kunit_alloc_resource(), and never kfree() if it was passed into
kunit_add_resource() by the user. (If the user of kunit_add_resource()
wishes the resource be kfree()ed, they can call kfree() on the resource
from within the 'free' function.
This is implemented by adding a 'should_free' member to
struct kunit_resource and setting it appropriately. To facilitate this,
the various resource add/alloc functions have been refactored somewhat,
making them all call a __kunit_add_resource() helper after setting the
'should_free' member appropriately. In the process, all other functions
have been made static inline functions.
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Commit 6d2426b2f2 ("kunit: Support skipped tests") switched to using
`enum kunit_status` to track the result of running a test/suite since we
now have more than just pass/fail.
This callsite wasn't updated, silently converting to enum to a bool and
then back.
Fixes: 6d2426b2f2 ("kunit: Support skipped tests")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
KUnit has support for setup/cleanup logic for each test case in a suite.
But it lacks the ability to specify setup/cleanup for the entire suite
itself.
This can be used to do setup that is too expensive or cumbersome to do
for each test.
Or it can be used to do simpler things like log debug information after
the suite completes.
It's a fairly common feature, so the lack of it is noticeable.
Some examples in other frameworks and languages:
* https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html#setupclass-and-teardownclass
* https://google.github.io/googletest/reference/testing.html#Test::SetUpTestSuite
Meta:
This is very similar to this patch here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210805043503.20252-3-bvanassche@acm.org/
The changes from that patch:
* pass in `struct kunit *` so users can do stuff like
`kunit_info(suite, "debug message")`
* makes sure the init failure is bubbled up as a failure
* updates kunit-example-test.c to use a suite init
* Updates kunit/usage.rst to mention the new support
* some minor cosmetic things
* use `suite_{init,exit}` instead of `{init/exit}_suite`
* make suite init error message more consistent w/ test init
* etc.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
These names sound more general than they are.
The _end() function increments a `static int kunit_suite_counter`, so it
can only safely be called on suites, aka top-level subtests.
It would need to have a separate counter for each level of subtest to be
generic enough.
So rename it to make it clear it's only appropriate for suites.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The kunit_remove_resource() function is used to unlink a resource from
the list of resources in the test, making it no longer show up in
kunit_find_resource().
However, this could lead to a race condition if two threads called
kunit_remove_resource() on the same resource at the same time: the
resource would be removed from the list twice (causing a crash at the
second list_del()), and the refcount for the resource would be
decremented twice (instead of once, for the reference held by the
resource list).
Fix both problems, the first by using list_del_init(), and the second by
checking if the resource has already been removed using list_empty(),
and only decrementing its refcount if it has not.
Also add a KUnit test for the kunit_remove_resource() function which
tests this behaviour.
Reported-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
We've split out the declarations from include/kunit/test.h into
resource.h.
This patch splits out the definitions as well for consistency.
A side effect of this is git blame won't properly track history by
default, users need to run
$ git blame -L ,1 -C13 lib/kunit/resource.c
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Replace the NULL checks with the more specific and idiomatic NULL macros.
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
This KUnit update for Linux 5.18-rc1 consists of:
- changes to decrease macro layering string, integer, EQ/NE asserts
- remove unused macros
- several cleanups and fixes
- new list tests for list_del_init_careful(), list_is_head() and
list_entry_is_head()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEPZKym/RZuOCGeA/kCwJExA0NQxwFAmI5KcsACgkQCwJExA0N
Qxy37BAA4NKkZHOpIk3P+aHbqE/S+Utg+gHsFOS7srp8wTeM1nSVMCP7MYefBiRs
4+R6RViCAvd5skK5/4UkYp53KePOww4Qo5zZKfN5J+479juMk+8CJtk3QwgY0IAu
jaI3nZlvo+WW+2OdIXdYNNScLR5mKHVSxpoLs1KtJZXm62RQgycoGCrIEtiAKYTk
w2mMUxG4X0upIF08xTfb5UDQyyMjqWMZJZ0l65xsJr4bgU+It0HoYCmPzqufpGza
ZgTWac8Iai1sEzxPXaTMLCM6V3QlbESIaIB6J13BWS+OvKs7cbcIADnG79Nvh7eH
v8v9fXTojlS6vSNJUqxA8S0f2kGJ2mVmePg11ZeOh2oqaF6l1bs7iFJQPc3PidRl
/dobIMBGlEI2yi9vaRz6/roDp44K56OlbthtSlaEc1NLyI/+nGuG7hzXuXkmoNiX
LloMfTmcCtrWGUnZH80K18l03T1swEiKzLuYMlzNvVz7jiIoZhXw4YG8H2FHJrpf
9LOJFEJgVcCp5JmDTk19HwN1OogH8TcbaJkQE0EthxExb2LW5BfO9cXzQ/n+uapl
QoN+5ig1x2ozyplVOhz/6VbmKxf7EDEOiYr1F1Kbc5qdSm1kdRQQTrMaWJkQ+KzT
bo+yWr/2zkAqrCns5lbUERfhBSx9jZqcnmUPcdcXLd7qse0cnKc=
=e1/u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-5.18-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest
Pull KUnit updates from Shuah Khan:
- changes to decrease macro layering string, integer, EQ/NE asserts
- remove unused macros
- several cleanups and fixes
- new list tests for list_del_init_careful(), list_is_head() and
list_entry_is_head()
* tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-5.18-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest:
list: test: Add a test for list_entry_is_head()
list: test: Add a test for list_is_head()
list: test: Add test for list_del_init_careful()
kunit: cleanup assertion macro internal variables
kunit: factor out str constants from binary assertion structs
kunit: consolidate KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT macros
kunit: remove va_format from kunit_assert
kunit: tool: drop mostly unused KunitResult.result field
kunit: decrease macro layering for EQ/NE asserts
kunit: decrease macro layering for integer asserts
kunit: reduce layering in string assertion macros
kunit: drop unused intermediate macros for ptr inequality checks
kunit: make KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ() use KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(), etc.
kunit: drop unused assert_type from kunit_assert and clean up macros
kunit: split out part of kunit_assert into a static const
kunit: factor out kunit_base_assert_format() call into kunit_fail()
kunit: drop unused kunit* field in kunit_assert
kunit: move check if assertion passed into the macros
kunit: add example test case showing off all the expect macros
In function kunit_test_timeout, it is declared "300 * MSEC_PER_SEC"
represent 5min. However, it is wrong when dealing with arm64 whose
default HZ = 250, or some other situations. Use msecs_to_jiffies to fix
this, and kunit_test_timeout will work as desired.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220309083753.1561921-3-liupeng256@huawei.com
Fixes: 5f3e062089 ("kunit: test: add support for test abort")
Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Wang Kefeng <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "kunit: fix a UAF bug and do some optimization", v2.
This series is to fix UAF (use after free) when running kfence test case
test_gfpzero, which is time costly. This UAF bug can be easily triggered
by setting CONFIG_KFENCE_NUM_OBJECTS = 65535. Furthermore, some
optimization for kunit tests has been done.
This patch (of 3):
Kunit will create a new thread to run an actual test case, and the main
process will wait for the completion of the actual test thread until
overtime. The variable "struct kunit test" has local property in function
kunit_try_catch_run, and will be used in the test case thread. Task
kunit_try_catch_run will free "struct kunit test" when kunit runs
overtime, but the actual test case is still run and an UAF bug will be
triggered.
The above problem has been both observed in a physical machine and qemu
platform when running kfence kunit tests. The problem can be triggered
when setting CONFIG_KFENCE_NUM_OBJECTS = 65535. Under this setting, the
test case test_gfpzero will cost hours and kunit will run to overtime.
The follows show the panic log.
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffff82d882e9
Call Trace:
kunit_log_append+0x58/0xd0
...
test_alloc.constprop.0.cold+0x6b/0x8a [kfence_test]
test_gfpzero.cold+0x61/0x8ab [kfence_test]
kunit_try_run_case+0x4c/0x70
kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x11/0x20
kthread+0x166/0x190
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
To solve this problem, the test case thread should be stopped when the
kunit frame runs overtime. The stop signal will send in function
kunit_try_catch_run, and test_gfpzero will handle it.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220309083753.1561921-1-liupeng256@huawei.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220309083753.1561921-2-liupeng256@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Wang Kefeng <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
If the compiler doesn't optimize them away, each kunit assertion (use of
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ, etc.) can use 88 bytes of stack space in the worst and
most common case. This has led to compiler warnings and a suggestion
from Linus to move data from the structs into static const's where
possible [1].
This builds upon [2] which did so for the base struct kunit_assert type.
That only reduced sizeof(struct kunit_binary_assert) from 88 to 64.
Given these are by far the most commonly used asserts, this patch
factors out the textual representations of the operands and comparator
into another static const, saving 16 more bytes.
In detail, KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 2 + 2, 5) yields the following struct
(struct kunit_binary_assert) {
.assert = <struct kunit_assert>,
.operation = "==",
.left_text = "2 + 2",
.left_value = 4,
.right_text = "5",
.right_value = 5,
}
After this change
static const struct kunit_binary_assert_text __text = {
.operation = "==",
.left_text = "2 + 2",
.right_text = "5",
};
(struct kunit_binary_assert) {
.assert = <struct kunit_assert>,
.text = &__text,
.left_value = 4,
.right_value = 5,
}
This also DRYs the code a bit more since these str fields were repeated
for the string and pointer versions of kunit_binary_assert.
Note: we could name the kunit_binary_assert_text fields left/right
instead of left_text/right_text. But that would require changing the
macros a bit since they have args called "left" and "right" which would
be substituted in `.left = #left` as `.2 + 2 = \"2 + 2\"`.
[1] https://groups.google.com/g/kunit-dev/c/i3fZXgvBrfA/m/VULQg1z6BAAJ
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220113165931.451305-6-dlatypov@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The concern is that having a lot of redundant fields in kunit_assert can
blow up stack usage if the compiler doesn't optimize them away [1].
The comment on this field implies that it was meant to be initialized
when the expect/assert was declared, but this only happens when we run
kunit_do_failed_assertion().
We don't need to access it outside of that function, so move it out of
the struct and make it a local variable there.
This change also takes the chance to reduce the number of macros by
inlining the now simplified KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT_STRUCT() macro.
[1] https://groups.google.com/g/kunit-dev/c/i3fZXgvBrfA/m/VULQg1z6BAAJ
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
This is per Linus's suggestion in [1].
The issue there is that every KUNIT_EXPECT/KUNIT_ASSERT puts a
kunit_assert object onto the stack. Normally we rely on compilers to
elide this, but when that doesn't work out, this blows up the stack
usage of kunit test functions.
We can move some data off the stack by making it static.
This change introduces a new `struct kunit_loc` to hold the file and
line number and then just passing assert_type (EXPECT or ASSERT) as an
argument.
In [1], it was suggested to also move out the format string as well, but
users could theoretically craft a format string at runtime, so we can't.
This change leaves a copy of `assert_type` in kunit_assert for now
because cleaning up all the macros to not pass it around is a bit more
involved.
Here's an example of the expanded code for KUNIT_FAIL():
if (__builtin_expect(!!(!(false)), 0)) {
static const struct kunit_loc loc = { .file = ... };
struct kunit_fail_assert __assertion = { .assert = { .type ... };
kunit_do_failed_assertion(test, &loc, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, &__assertion.assert, ...);
};
[1] https://groups.google.com/g/kunit-dev/c/i3fZXgvBrfA/m/VULQg1z6BAAJ
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
We call this function first thing for all the assertion `format()`
functions.
This is the part that prints the file and line number and assertion type
(EXPECTATION, ASSERTION).
Having it as part of the format functions lets us have the flexibility
to not print that information (or print it differently) for new
assertion types, but I think this we don't need that.
And in the future, we'd like to consider factoring that data (file,
line#, type) out of the kunit_assert struct and into a `static`
variable, as Linus suggested [1], so we'd need to extract it anyways.
[1] https://groups.google.com/g/kunit-dev/c/i3fZXgvBrfA/m/VULQg1z6BAAJ
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently the code always calls kunit_do_assertion() even though it does
nothing when `pass` is true.
This change moves the `if(!(pass))` check into the macro instead
and renames the function to kunit_do_failed_assertion().
I feel this a bit easier to read and understand.
This has the potential upside of avoiding a function call that does
nothing most of the time (assuming your tests are passing) but comes
with the downside of generating a bit more code and branches. We try to
mitigate the branches by tagging them with `unlikely()`.
This also means we don't have to initialize structs that we don't need,
which will become a tiny bit more expensive if we switch over to using
static variables to try and reduce stack usage. (There's runtime code
to check if the variable has been initialized yet or not).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently, these macros are only really documented near the bottom of
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.html#c.KUNIT_FAIL.
E.g. it's likely someone might just not realize that
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ() exists and instead use KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(strcmp())
or similar.
This can also serve as a basic smoketest that the KUnit assert machinery
still works for all the macros.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Rae Moar