The outstanding_lazy_request is no longer used anywhere in the driver.
Everything that was looking at it now has a request explicitly passed in from on
high. Everything that was relying upon it behind the scenes is now explicitly
creating/passing/submitting its own private request. Thus the OLR can be
removed.
For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Now that the *_ring_begin() functions no longer call the request allocation
code, it is finally safe for the request allocation code to call *_ring_begin().
This is important to guarantee that the space reserved for the subsequent
i915_add_request() call does actually get reserved.
v2: Renamed functions according to review feedback (Tomas Elf).
For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Now that everything above has been converted to use requests, intel_ring_begin()
can be updated to take a request instead of a ring. This also means that it no
longer needs to lazily allocate a request if no-one happens to have done it
earlier.
For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Updated intel_ring_cacheline_align() to take a request instead of a ring.
For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Updated the various ring->signal() implementations to take a request instead of
a ring. This removes their reliance on the OLR to obtain the seqno value that
should be used for the signal.
For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Updated the ring->sync_to() implementations to take a request instead of a ring.
Also updated the tracer to include the request id.
For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
[danvet: Rebase since I didn't merge the patch which added ->uniq.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Updated the various ring->dispatch_execbuffer() implementations to take a
request instead of a ring.
For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Updated the various ring->add_request() implementations to take a request
instead of a ring. This removes their reliance on the OLR to obtain the seqno
value that the request should be tagged with.
For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Updated intel_emit_post_sync_nonzero_flush(), gen7_render_ring_cs_stall_wa() and
gen8_emit_pipe_control() to take requests instead of rings.
For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Updated the various ring->flush() functions to take a request instead of a ring.
Also updated the tracer to include the request id.
For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
[danvet: Rebase since I didn't merge the addition of req->uniq.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Updated the *_ring_flush_all_caches() functions to take requests instead of
rings or ringbuf/context pairs.
For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Updated the *_ring_workarounds_emit() functions to take requests instead of
ring/context pairs.
For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Updated *_ring_invalidate_all_caches(), i915_reset_gen7_sol_offsets() and
i915_emit_box() to take request structures instead of ring or ringbuf/context
pairs.
For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Now that all callers of i915_add_request() have a request pointer to hand, it is
possible to update the add request function to take a request pointer rather
than pulling it out of the OLR.
For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Updated the display page flip code to do explicit request creation and
submission rather than relying on the OLR and just hoping that the request
actually gets submitted at some random point.
The sequence is now to create a request, queue the work to the ring, assign the
known request to the flip queue work item then actually submit the work and post
the request.
Note that every single flip function used to finish with
'__intel_ring_advance(ring);'. However, immediately after they return there is
now an add request call which will do the advance anyway. Thus the many
duplicate advance calls have been removed.
v2: Updated commit message with comment about advance removal.
v3: The request can now be allocated by the _sync() code earlier on. Thus the
page flip path does not necessarily need to allocate a new request, it may be
able to re-use one.
For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Updated the two render_state_init() functions to take a request pointer instead
of a ring. This removes their reliance on the OLR.
v2: Rebased to newer tree.
For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Now that everything above has been converted to use requests, it is possible to
update init_context() to take a request pointer instead of a ring/context pair.
For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The alloc_request() function does not actually return the newly allocated
request. Instead, it must be pulled from ring->outstanding_lazy_request. This
patch fixes this so that code can create a request and start using it knowing
exactly which request it actually owns.
v2: Updated for new i915_gem_request_alloc() scheme.
For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The i915_add_request() function is called to keep track of work that has been
written to the ring buffer. It adds epilogue commands to track progress (seqno
updates and such), moves the request structure onto the right list and other
such house keeping tasks. However, the work itself has already been written to
the ring and will get executed whether or not the add request call succeeds. So
no matter what goes wrong, there isn't a whole lot of point in failing the call.
At the moment, this is fine(ish). If the add request does bail early on and not
do the housekeeping, the request will still float around in the
ring->outstanding_lazy_request field and be picked up next time. It means
multiple pieces of work will be tagged as the same request and driver can't
actually wait for the first piece of work until something else has been
submitted. But it all sort of hangs together.
This patch series is all about removing the OLR and guaranteeing that each piece
of work gets its own personal request. That means that there is no more
'hoovering up of forgotten requests'. If the request does not get tracked then
it will be leaked. Thus the add request call _must_ not fail. The previous patch
should have already ensured that it _will_ not fail by removing the potential
for running out of ring space. This patch enforces the rule by actually removing
the early exit paths and the return code.
Note that if something does manage to fail and the epilogue commands don't get
written to the ring, the driver will still hang together. The request will be
added to the tracking lists. And as in the old case, any subsequent work will
generate a new seqno which will suffice for marking the old one as complete.
v2: Improved WARNings (Tomas Elf review request).
For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
It is a bad idea for i915_add_request() to fail. The work will already have been
send to the ring and will be processed, but there will not be any tracking or
management of that work.
The only way the add request call can fail is if it can't write its epilogue
commands to the ring (cache flushing, seqno updates, interrupt signalling). The
reasons for that are mostly down to running out of ring buffer space and the
problems associated with trying to get some more. This patch prevents that
situation from happening in the first place.
When a request is created, it marks sufficient space as reserved for the
epilogue commands. Thus guaranteeing that by the time the epilogue is written,
there will be plenty of space for it. Note that a ring_begin() call is required
to actually reserve the space (and do any potential waiting). However, that is
not currently done at request creation time. This is because the ring_begin()
code can allocate a request. Hence calling begin() from the request allocation
code would lead to infinite recursion! Later patches in this series remove the
need for begin() to do the allocate. At that point, it becomes safe for the
allocate to call begin() and really reserve the space.
Until then, there is a potential for insufficient space to be available at the
point of calling i915_add_request(). However, that would only be in the case
where the request was created and immediately submitted without ever calling
ring_begin() and adding any work to that request. Which should never happen. And
even if it does, and if that request happens to fall down the tiny window of
opportunity for failing due to being out of ring space then does it really
matter because the request wasn't doing anything in the first place?
v2: Updated the 'reserved space too small' warning to include the offending
sizes. Added a 'cancel' operation to clean up when a request is abandoned. Added
re-initialisation of tracking state after a buffer wrap to keep the sanity
checks accurate.
v3: Incremented the reserved size to accommodate Ironlake (after finally
managing to run on an ILK system). Also fixed missing wrap code in LRC mode.
v4: Added extra comment and removed duplicate WARN (feedback from Tomas).
For: VIZ-5115
CC: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
MI_MODE is saved in the logical context so WaDisableAsyncFlipPerfMode
must be applied using LRIs on gen8.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
INSTPM is saved in the logical context so we should initialize it using
LRIs on gen8. It actually defaults to 1 starting from HSW, but let's
keep the write around anyway.
Also drop the INSTPM_FORCE_ORDERING setup entirely on gen9+ since it's
now a reserved bit.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
commit 65ca7514e2
Author: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Date: Mon Feb 9 19:33:22 2015 +0000
drm/i915/skl: Implement WaBarrierPerformanceFixDisable
got misapplied and the code landed in chv_init_workarounds() instead of
the intended skl_init_workarounds(). Move it over to the right place.
Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
GEN8_L3SQCREG1 isn't saved in the context (verified by going through
a context dump), and so we shouldn't be using the ring w/a code to
initialize it. Also Bspec explicitly talks about MMIO and writing it
with the CPU.
Additionally there's another w/a WaTempDisableDOPClkGating:bdw which
tells us to disable DOP clock gating around the GEN8_L3SQCREG1 write
to make sure everyone notices the change. So let's do that as well.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Currently, we only track the last request globally across all engines.
This prevents us from issuing concurrent read requests on e.g. the RCS
and BCS engines (or more likely the render and media engines). Without
semaphores, we incur costly stalls as we synchronise between rings -
greatly impacting the current performance of Broadwell versus Haswell in
certain workloads (like video decode). With the introduction of
reference counted requests, it is much easier to track the last request
per ring, as well as the last global write request so that we can
optimise inter-engine read read requests (as well as better optimise
certain CPU waits).
v2: Fix inverted readonly condition for nonblocking waits.
v3: Handle non-continguous engine array after waits
v4: Rebase, tidy, rewrite ring list debugging
v5: Use obj->active as a bitfield, it looks cool
v6: Micro-optimise, mostly involving moving code around
v7: Fix retire-requests-upto for execlists (and multiple rq->ringbuf)
v8: Rebase
v9: Refactor i915_gem_object_sync() to allow the compiler to better
optimise it.
Benchmark: igt/gem_read_read_speed
hsw:gt3e (with semaphores):
Before: Time to read-read 1024k: 275.794µs
After: Time to read-read 1024k: 123.260µs
hsw:gt3e (w/o semaphores):
Before: Time to read-read 1024k: 230.433µs
After: Time to read-read 1024k: 124.593µs
bdw-u (w/o semaphores): Before After
Time to read-read 1x1: 26.274µs 10.350µs
Time to read-read 128x128: 40.097µs 21.366µs
Time to read-read 256x256: 77.087µs 42.608µs
Time to read-read 512x512: 281.999µs 181.155µs
Time to read-read 1024x1024: 1196.141µs 1118.223µs
Time to read-read 2048x2048: 5639.072µs 5225.837µs
Time to read-read 4096x4096: 22401.662µs 21137.067µs
Time to read-read 8192x8192: 89617.735µs 85637.681µs
Testcase: igt/gem_concurrent_blit (read-read and friends)
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> [v8]
[danvet: s/\<rq\>/req/g]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
v2:
- set the override disable flag too on stepping F0 (mika)
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
On B0 and C0 steppings the workaround enable bit would be overriden by
default, so the overriding must be disabled.
The WA was added in
commit 83a24979c4
Author: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
Date: Fri Apr 10 13:12:26 2015 +0100
drm/i915/bxt: Add WaForceContextSaveRestoreNonCoherent
Spotted-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Also make the WA comment consistent with the rest, where the stepping
info is not shown.
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Note that we also need this for skl.
Signed-off-by: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
[danvet: Note that we also need this for skl, requested by Imre.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Note that we also need this for skl.
Signed-off-by: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
[danvet: Note that we also need this for skl, requested by Imre.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Separate topic branch for bxt didn't work out since we needed to
refactor the gmbus code a bit to make it look decent. So backmerge.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
requests are even more frequently allocated than objects and equally
benefit from having a dedicated slab.
v2: Rebase
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
After the removal of DRI1, all access to the rings are through requests
and so we can always be sure that there is a request to wait upon to
free up available space. The fallback code only existed so that we could
quiesce the GPU following unmediated access by DRI1.
v2: Rebase
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
I woke up one morning and found 50k objects sitting in the batch pool
and every search seemed to iterate the entire list... Painting the
screen in oils would provide a more fluid display.
One issue with the current design is that we only check for retirements
on the current ring when preparing to submit a new batch. This means
that we can have thousands of "active" batches on another ring that we
have to walk over. The simplest way to avoid that is to split the pools
per ring and then our LRU execution ordering will also ensure that the
inactive buffers remain at the front.
v2: execlists still requires duplicate code.
v3: execlists requires more duplicate code
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Adds framework for Broxton HW WAs
Signed-off-by: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Program the default initial value of the L3SqcReg1 on BDW for performance
v2: Default confirmed and using intel_ring_emit_wa as Mika pointed out.
v3: Spec shows now a different value. It tells us to set to 0x784000
instead the 0x610000 that is there already.
Also rebased after a long time so using WA_WRITE now.
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The legacy and LRC code paths have an almost identical procedure for waiting for
space in the ring buffer. They both search for a request in the free list that
will advance the tail to a point where sufficient space is available. They then
wait for that request, retire it and recalculate the free space value.
Unfortunately, a bug in the LRC side meant that the resulting free space might
not be as large as expected and indeed, might not be sufficient. This is because
it was testing against the value of request->tail not request->postfix. Whereas,
when a request is retired, ringbuf->tail is updated to req->postfix not
req->tail.
Another significant difference between the two is that the LRC one did not trust
the wait for request to work! It redid the is there enough space available test
and would fail the call if insufficient. Whereas, the legacy version just said
'return 0' - it assumed the preceeding code works. This difference meant that
the LRC version still worked even with the bug - it just fell back to the
polling wait path.
For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Daniel <thomas.daniel@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The request allocation code is largely duplicated between legacy mode and
execlist mode. The actual difference between the two versions of the code is
pretty minimal.
This patch moves the common code out into a separate function. This is then
called by the execution specific version prior to setting up the one different
value.
For: VIZ-5190
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
John Harrison