I just wanted to get rid of the rmw cycle for gen9, but this also
fixes some bugs we haven't carried over, like using recommended
precharge and timeout values.
Also I noticed that we don't set the fastwake sync length on skl, and
that's used by PSR2 selective updates. Fix that.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Cc: "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1463590036-17824-6-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
On bdw/hsw we have a separate psr dp aux registers to set up, but on
bdw it's shared with the main dp aux thing. Which means any subsequent
dp aux transaction will trample over it, and hence must be done
beforehand.
Also this means we can't do any dp aux transactions while PSR is
active, or at least we must restore the old state.
Probably need a psr disable/enable pair around dp aux transactions in
general.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Cc: "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1463590036-17824-5-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
This reverts
commit dfaf37baa0
Author: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Date: Mon Dec 7 14:45:20 2015 -0800
drm/i915: Fix idle_frames counter.
and
commit 97173eaf5f
Author: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Date: Tue Jul 7 16:28:55 2015 -0700
drm/i915: PSR: Increase idle_frames
and implements
commit d44b4dcbd1
Author: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Date: Fri Nov 14 08:52:31 2014 -0800
drm/i915: HSW/BDW PSR Set idle_frames = VBT + 1
without the hack to use 2 idle frames when VBT says 1. We keep the + 1
just for safety, although I haven't really figured out why that one
exists.
It's nonsense. idle_frames = number of frames where the screen is
entirely idle before we think about entering PSR.
idle_patter = part of link training, and we probably totally butchered
link training because we told the hw to entirely skip it. No wonder
PSR occasionally just fell over.
I suspect the reason we've increased idle frames is that it makes PSR
entry slightly less likely, and more likely to happen in a quite
system, which probably increased the changes the panel came back up
without link training. The proper fix is to implement link training
for PSR.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Cc: "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1463590036-17824-3-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
The default of 0 is 500us of link training, but that's not enough for
some platforms. Decoding this correctly means we're using 2.5ms of
link training on these platforms, which fixes flickering issues
associated with enabling PSR.
v2: Unbotch the math a bit.
v3: Drop debug hunk.
v4: Improve commit message.
Tested-by: Lyude <cpaul@redhat.com>
Cc: Lyude <cpaul@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95176
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Cc: "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: fritsch@kodi.tv
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1463590036-17824-2-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
dev_priv is what the macro works hard to extract, pass it directly.
> sed 's/\([A-Z].*(dev_priv\)->dev)/\1)/g'
v2:
- Include all wrapper macros too (Chris)
v3:
- Include sed cmdline (Chris)
v4:
- Break long line
- Rebase
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1460016485-8089-1-git-send-email-joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com
This is for callers who want micro-second precision but are not
waiting from the atomic context.
v2:
* Fix atomic waits. (Dave Gordon)
* Use USEC_PER_SEC and USEC_PER_MSEC. (Chris Wilson)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
With a reliable frontbuffer tracking and all instability corner cases
on Haswell and Broadwell solved let's re-enabled PSR by default on
these platforms.
In case a new issue is found and PSR is the main suspect, please check
if i915.enable_psr=0 really makes your problem go away. If this is the case
PSR is the culprit so after that please check if i915.enable_psr=2
or i915.enable_psr=3 solves your issue and please let us know.
There are many panels out there and not all implementations apparently
work as we would expect.
In case you needed to force it on standby or disabled or in case of any
PSR related bug please report it at bugs.freedesktop.org.
In a bugzilla entry for PSR is desirable:
- dmesg (drm.debug=0xe)
- output of /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_edp_psr_status
- Platform information. Vendor, model, id, pci id.
- Graphical environment: Gnome, KDE, openbox, etc...
- Details how to reproduce.
- Also good if you could run PSR test cases of Intel-gpu-tools
- Please mention if forcing main link standby or main link off helps you.
There are Intel-gpu-tools test cases that can be helpful to
determine if PSR is working as expected:
kms_psr_sink_crc and kms_psr_frontbuffer_tracking.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455278893-1307-2-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
With a reliable frontbuffer tracking and all instability corner cases
solved for this platform let's re-enabled PSR by default.
In case a new issue is found and PSR is the main suspect, please check
if i915.enable_psr=0 really makes your problem go away,
please report it at bugs.freedesktop.org.
In a bugzilla entry for PSR is desirable:
- dmesg (drm.debug=0xe)
- output of /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_edp_psr_status
- Platform information. Vendor, model, id, pci id.
- Graphical environment: Gnome, KDE, openbox, etc...
- Details how to reproduce.
- Also good if you could run PSR test cases of Intel-gpu-tools
- Please mention if forcing main link standby or main link off helps you.
There are Intel-gpu-tools test cases that can be helpful to
determine if PSR is working as expected:
kms_psr_sink_crc and kms_psr_frontbuffer_tracking.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This will give us flexibility to enable PSR by default independently so
issues and corner cases in one platform won't affect others were we have
it working properly.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Unfortunately we don't know all panels and platforms out there and we
found internal prototypes without VBT proper set but where only
link in standby worked well.
So, before enable PSR by default let's instrument the PSR parameter
in a way that we can identify different panels out there that might
require or work better with link standby mode.
It is also useful to say that for backward compatibility I'm not
changing the meaning of this flag. So "0" still means disabled
and "1" means enabled with full support and maximum power savings.
v2: Use positive value instead of negative for different operation mode
as suggested by Daniel.
v3: As Paulo suggested use 2 to force link standby and 3 to force link
fully on. Also split the link_standby introduction in a separated patch.
v4: Use DRM_ERROR for link off request on platforms that don't support and
Remove the quirk promise.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1454356928-19779-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Link standby support has been deprecated with 'commit 89251b177
("drm/i915: PSR: deprecate link_standby support for core platforms.")'
The reason for that is that main link in full off offers more power
savings and on HSW and BDW implementations on source side had known
bugs with link standby.
However that same HSD report only mentions BDW and HSW and tells that
a fix was going to new platforms. Since on Skylake link standby
didn't cause the bad blank flickering screens seen on HSW and BDW
let's respect VBT again for this and future platforms.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Current code not just block link_standby for non DDI platforms but also
block PSR from work on other ports B/C/D/E.
So, besides change any behaviour let's just fix the mess a bit here and
reuse HSW check to block the other ports and reduce the second if only to
link stadnby request.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
This bit is also reserved on Skylake. Actually the only
platform that supports this is Haswell, so let's fix
this logic and apply this link entry time only for the
platform that supports it, i.e. Haswell.
This also changes the style to let more clear platform
differences outside the reg write. We would probably catch
this case sooner if separated, or not...
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1449880291-21388-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
The cherryview device shares many characteristics with the valleyview
device. When support was added to the driver for cherryview, the
corresponding device info structure included .is_valleyview = 1.
This is not correct and leads to some confusion.
This patch changes .is_valleyview to .is_cherryview in the cherryview
device info structure and simplifies the IS_CHERRYVIEW macro.
Then where appropriate, instances of IS_VALLEYVIEW are replaced with
IS_VALLEYVIEW || IS_CHERRYVIEW or equivalent.
v2: Use IS_VALLEYVIEW || IS_CHERRYVIEW instead of defining a new macro.
Also add followup patches to fix issues discovered during the first
review. (Ville)
v3: Fix some style issues and one gen check. Remove CRT related changes
as CRT is not supported on CHV. (Imre, Ville)
v4: Make a few more optimizations. (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wayne Boyer <wayne.boyer@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1449692975-14803-1-git-send-email-wayne.boyer@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
'commit 97173eaf5 ("drm/i915: PSR: Increase idle_frames")' was a mistake.
The special case it tried to cover was already being covered by
the DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT. So this ended up duplicated.
So, instead of reverting that let's take this opportunity and unify
the idle_frame definition in a single place so we standardize the access
and avoid room for that same mistake again.
Few changes with this patch:
1. Instead of just respecting the VBT we set a
global minumum with max(). So we are sure that we will avoid corner cases
in case VBT is doing something we don't understand.
2. Instead of minimum 5 we use 6. When introducing the idle_frames += 4 case
we considered that minimum was 2. All because the off-by-one issue.
v2: Unified idle_frame definition.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1449528320-27655-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
It is not a bad idea to disable the PSR feature on Sink
when we are disabling on the Source.
v2: Move dpcd write inside mutex protected area as suggested by Sonika.
Cc: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
When we introduced PSR we let LPSP masked allowing us to get PSR
independently from the audio runtime PM. However in one of the
attempts to get PSR enabled by default one user reported one specific
case where he would miss screen updates if scrolling the firefox in a
Gnome environment when i915 runtime pm was enabled. So for
this specific case that (I could never create an i-g-t test case)
we decided to remove the LPSP mask and let HW tracking taking care of
this case. The mask got removed later by my
commit 09108b90f0 ("drm/i915: PSR: Remove Low Power HW tracking mask.")
So we started depending on audio driver again, what is bad.
With previous commit
"drm/i915: PSR: Let's rely more on frontbuffer tracking."
we transfered the PSR exit responsability totally to SW frontbuffer
tracking. So now can safelly shut off a bit the HW tracking, or
at least this case that makes us to depend on other drivers.
v2: Update commit message since this patch by itself doesn't solve
the bugzilla entries.
v3: Another attempt to improve commit message.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau damien.lespiau@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The ultimate goal here is to remove the dependency we
currently have on audio driver power to get PSR working.
Since with audio driver runtime PM disabled the Hardware tracking
believes graphics is fully active and prevent PSR Entry, or
in other words continuously exit PSR.
So, the idea is to transfer the PSR exit responsability
from the HW tracking to the SW tracking (frontbuffer tracking),
who is really mature right now.
However with LPSP masked out there might be cases where we could
miss exit from HW tracking since it can be relying on this,
like a specific case reported at our mailing list who
user reported he would miss screen updates if scrolling firefox
in a Gnome environment when i915 runtimepm was enabled.
So before masking out LPSP again to make us independent from
the audio driver we need to make sure that all our cases
are coverred from the frontbuffer tracking perspective,
where the flush means invalidate and flush.
Without this patch for HSW, BDW and SKL we just do the
invalidate part when the flush wasn't originated by a page flip
because we were trusting the HW tracking for the flip case.
So let's rely more on frontbuffer tracking and do the
invalidation regardless the origin as expected for all platforms.
v2: Improve commit message as suggested by Paulo.
v3: Another attempt to let commit message more clear.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau damien.lespiau@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Commit (89251b17) intended to remove this line and let only one
DP_PSR_EN_CFG set, but it was wrong and this call is now duplicated
at the code.
Also "& ~DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE" doesn't do anything at all. It
was like that since I introduced this call but probably the idea
was to be informative and make clear statement that we were not using
the link standby. So it is better to remove this one here and let
the code a bit cleaner.
v2: Improve commit message as requested by Paulo.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau damien.lespiau@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
On the commit 3301d40921 ("drm/i915: PSR: Fix DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT logic")'
we already had identified that DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT
doesn't mean we shouldn't send TPS patterns, however we start sending the
minimal TP1 as possible and no TP2.
For most of the panels this is ok, but we found a reported case where
this is not true and panel keeps frozen without updating the screen for a while.
We could just get this case after patch "PSR: Don't Skip aux handshake on
DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT." is applied since that one fix the
hard freeze on this kind of panels.
Reference: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91436#c19
Cc: Ivan Mitev <ivan.mitev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Since the beginning there is a confusion on the meaning of this bit.
A previous patch had identified this already and fixed it partially:
'commit 3301d409 ("drm/i915: PSR: Fix DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT logic")
DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT means the source doesn't need to do the
training, but it doesn't tell to avoid TP patterns or to skip
aux handshake.
This patch fixes the hard freeze reported.
Reference: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91436
Reference: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91437
Cc: Ivan Mitev <ivan.mitev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
With 'commit 30886c5a ("drm/i915: VLV/CHV PSR: Increase wait delay
time before active PSR.")' we fixed a blank screen when first
activation was happening immediately after PSR being enabled.
There we gave more time for idleness by increasing the delay
between re-activating sequences.
However, commit "drm/i915: Delay first PSR activation."
delay the first activation in a better way keeping a good PSR
residency. So, we can now reduce the delay on re-enable.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
When debuging the frozen screen caused by HW tracking with low
power state I noticed that if we keep moving the mouse non stop
you will miss the screen updates for a while. At least
until we stop moving the mouse for a small time and move again.
The actual enabling should happen immediately after
Display Port enabling sequence finished with links trained and
everything enabled. However we face many issues when enabling PSR
right after a modeset.
On VLV/CHV we face blank screens on this scenario and on HSW+
we face a recoverable frozen screen, at least until next
exit-activate sequence.
Another workaround for the same issue here would be to increase
re-enable idle time from 100 to 500 as we did for VLV/CHV.
However this patch workaround this issue in a better
way since it doesn't reduce PSR residency and also
allow us to reduce the delay time between re-enables at least
on VLV/CHV.
This is also important to make the sysfs toggle working properly.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register
offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had
with misplaced parens.
This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea
to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way
you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific
register access function.
The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd
just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike
before making it nice.
As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg.
looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change:
lea 0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d
mov $0x1,%edx
- movslq %r9d,%r9
- mov %r9,%rsi
- mov %r9,-0x58(%rbp)
- callq *0xd8(%rbx)
+ mov %r9d,%esi
+ mov %r9d,-0x48(%rbp)
callq *0xd8(%rbx)
So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and
decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be
mostly just minor shuffling of instructions.
v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added
s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines
mo more switch statements left to worry about
ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch
cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch
vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch
all other unrelated changes split out
v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc.
v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Drop the EDP_PSR_BASE() thing, and just stick the PSR register offset
under dev_priv, like we for DSI and GPIO for example.
TODO: could probably move a bunch of this kind of stuff into the device
info instead...
v2: Drop the spurious whitespace change (Jani)
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447266856-30249-7-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
v2: Keep some MISSING_CASE() stuff (Jani)
s/-1/-PIPE_B/ in the register macro
Fix typo in patch subject
v3: Use PORT_B registers for invalid ports in g4x_aux_ctl_reg() (Jani)
v4: Reorder patches (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> (v3)
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v3)
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447266856-30249-4-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Since active function on VLV immediately activate PSR let's give more
time for idleness. Different from core platforms where we have idle_frames
count.
Also kms_psr_sink_crc now is automated and always get this:
[drm:intel_enable_pipe] enabling pipe A
[drm:intel_edp_backlight_on]
[drm:intel_panel_enable_backlight] pipe
[drm:intel_panel_enable_backlight] pipe A
[drm:intel_panel_actually_set_backlight] set backlight PWM = 7812
PSR gets enabled somewhere here after backlight.
[drm:intel_get_hpd_pins] hotplug event received, stat 0x00000000, dig 0x0
[drm:vlv_pipe_set_fifo_size] Pipe A FIFO split 511 / 511 / 511
[drm:vlv_update_wm] Setting FIFO watermarks - A: plane=391, cursor=63, sp
PSR gets flushed around here by intel_atomic_commit
[drm:vlv_pipe_set_fifo_size] Pipe A FIFO split 511 / 511 / 511
[drm:vlv_update_wm] Setting FIFO watermarks - A: plane=391, cursor=63, sp
[drm:intel_set_memory_cxsr] memory self-refresh is enabled
[drm:intel_connector_check_state] [CONNECTOR:39:eDP-1]
[drm:check_encoder_state] [ENCODER:30:DAC-30]
[drm:check_encoder_state] [ENCODER:31:TMDS-31]
[drm:check_encoder_state] [ENCODER:36:TMDS-36]
[drm:check_encoder_state] [ENCODER:38:TMDS-38]
[drm:check_crtc_state] [CRTC:21]
[drm:check_crtc_state] [CRTC:26]
[drm:intel_psr_activate [i915]] *ERROR* PSR Active
[drm:intel_get_hpd_pins] hotplug event received, stat 0x00000000, dig 0x
[drm:intel_set_cpu_fifo_underrun_reporting [i915]] *ERROR* pipe A underrun
[drm:intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO
Underrun.
It is true that in a product we won't keep disabling and enabling planes so
frequently, but for safeness let's stay conservative.
It is also true that 500ms is an etternity. But PSR is anyway a power saving
feature for idle scenario. So if it is idle feature stays on and 500ms to get
it reanabled is not that insane.
v2: Rebase over intel_psr.c and fix typo.
v3: Revival: Manual tests indicated that this is needed. With a short delay
there is a huge risk of getting blank screens when planes are being enabled.
v4: Revival 2 with reasonable delay. 1/2 sec instead of 5. VBT is 10 sec but
actually time for link training what we aren't doing, but with only 100 sec
in some cases kms_psr_sink_crc manual was showing blank screen,
so let's use this for now. Also changed comment by a FIXME.
v5: Rebase after a long time, remove FIXME and update comment above.
v6: msecs_to_jiffies is already on delay. remove duplication.
v7: use msecs_to_jiffies on schedule_delayed_work call.
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com> (v4)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang.he@intel.com)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Idle frames the number of identical frames needed
before panel can enter PSR.
There are some panels that requires up to minimum of 4 idle
frames available on the market. For these cases usually
VBT should be used to configure the number of idle frames,
but unfortunately this isn't always true and VBT isn't being
set at all.
Let's trust VBT when it is set + 1 and use minimum of 4 + 1
when VBT isn't set. "+1" covers the "of-by-one" case.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
By Spec we should only mask memup and hotplug detection
for hardware tracking cases. However we always masked
LPSP because with power well always enabled on audio
PSR was never being activated and residency was always
zeroed.
Apparently audio driver is tying power well management
and runtime PM for some reason. But with audio runtime
PM working or with audio completely out of picture
we should remove this mask, otherwise we have a high
risk of miss screen updates as faced by Matthew.
WARNING: With this patch if snd_intel_hda driver is
running and not releasing power well properly PSR will
constant Exit and Performance Counter will be 0.
But the best thing of this patch is that with one more
HW tracking working the risks of missed blank screen
are minimized at most.
This affects just core platforms where PSR exit are also
helped by HW tracking: Haswell, Broadwell and Skylake
for now.
v2: Fix commit message explanation. It has nothing to do
with runtime PM on i915 as previously advertised.
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Since flush actually means invalidate + flush we need to force psr
exit on PSR flush.
On Core platforms there is no way to disable hw tracking and
do the pure sw tracking so we simulate it by fully disable psr and
reschedule a enable back.
So a good idea is to minimize sequential disable/enable in cases we
know that HW tracking like when flush has been originated by a flip.
Also flip had just invalidated it already.
It also uses origin to minimize the a bit the amount of
disable/enabled, mainly when flip already had invalidated.
With this patch in place it is possible to do a flush on dirty areas
properly in a following patch.
v2: Remove duplicated exit on HSW+Sprites as pointed out by Paulo.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The frontbuffer code gives us accurate information about activity,
let's use it. Again this should avoid unecessary updates when multiple
screens are on.
Also realign function paramaters, I couldn't resist that bit of OCD.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
The current code tracks business across all pipes, but we're only
really interested in the one pipe DRRS is enabled on. Fairly tiny
optimization, but something I noticed while reading the code. But it
might matter a bit when e.g. showing a video or something only on the
external screen, while the panel is kept static.
Also regroup the code slightly: First compute new bitmasks, then take
appropriate actions.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
According to spec: "In PSR HW or SW mode, SW set this bit before writing
registers for a flip. It will be self-clear when it gets to the PSR
active state."
Some versions of spec mention that this is needed when in
"Persistent mode" but define it as same as "SW mode". Since this
fix the page flip case let's assume this is exactly what we need.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
On Haswell and Broadwell with link in standby when exit event happens
between vblank and VSC packet, PSR exit on panel but DPA transmitter
still sends black pixel. When this condition hits, panel will intermittently
display black frame.
The known W/A for this case involve the of single_frame update
that isn't supported on Haswell and to be supported on Broadwell
3 other workarounds would be required. So it is better and safe to
just deprecate link_standby for now.
Also, link fully off saves more power than link_standby and afwk
no OEM is requesting link standby on VBT. There is no reason for that.
For Skylake let's just consider it behaves like Broadwell until
we prove otherwise.
v2: Fix commit message (Durga).
v3: Fix conflict with PSR2.
Reference: HSD: bdwgfx/1912559
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Since the beginning there is a missunderstanding on the meaning of this
dpcd bit.
This bit shouldn't indicate whether to use link standby or not, but just
be used to configure TP1, TP2 and TP3 times and tell hw aux should be skiped
since HW is the responsible one.
Even with help of frontbuffer tracking, HW is still fully responsible for
PSR exit logic with/without DP training.
DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT means the source doesn't need to do the training, but
it doesn't tell to avoid TP patterns, so we will send minimal TP1 and avoid
TP2. It also means that sink itself can take up to 5 idle frames for training.
6 in our case since we might be off by 1. So we also increment idle_frames by 4
here.
v2: Fix and improve commit message (Durga).
v3: Use minimal TP1 time avoiding TP2 and increase idle frame.
Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Cc: Arthur Runyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This wrong logic and useless define came from first versions and
came along with all rework. Just now I notice how ugly, wrong and
useless this is.
val is already defined as 0 anyway and logic is completelly wrong
and useless. So let's starting the link_standby fix with this
cleaning.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We make use of HW tracking for Selective update region and enable frame sync on
sink. We use hardware's hardcoded data values for frame sync and GTC.
v2: Add 3200x2000 resolution restriction with PSR2, move psr2_support to i915_psr
struct, add aux_frame_sync to independently control aux frame sync, rename the
TP2 TIME macro for 2500us (Rodrigo, Siva)
v3: Moving the resolution restriction to intel_psr_enable so that we check it
only once(Durga)
Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
BSpec recommends to keep the main link state consistent
between the source and the sink. As per that, update
the main link state in sink DPCD register to 'active',
for Valleyview based platforms.
Signed-off-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Tested-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
psr.active is being unset out of the if so this here is useless and
duplicated.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Mainly taking care of some register offsets, otherwise things are similar to
hsw. Also, programming ddi aux to use hardcoded values for psr data select.
v2: introduce EDP_PSR_AUX_BASE macro (Chris)
v3: Moving to HW tracking for SKL+ platforms, so activating source psr during
psr_enabling and then avoiding psr entries and exits for each frontbuffer
updates.
v4: Using SKL DDI AUX regs instead of changing PSR_AUX regs definition (Rodrigo)
Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
[danvet: Drop the hunks to short-circuit sw tracking: We'd need to
push this down one level, and I don't fully trust the test coverage
yet to do so. So much prefer we pick a whitelist approach for the
cases we know work correctly.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To match the semantics of drm_crtc->state, which this will eventually
become. The allocation of the memory for config will be fixed in a
followup patch. By adding the extra _config field to intel_crtc it was
possible to generate this entire patch with the cocci script below.
@@ @@
struct intel_crtc {
...
-struct intel_crtc_state config;
+struct intel_crtc_state _config;
+struct intel_crtc_state *config;
...
}
@@ struct intel_crtc *crtc; @@
-memset(&crtc->config, 0, sizeof(crtc->config));
+memset(crtc->config, 0, sizeof(*crtc->config));
@@ @@
__intel_set_mode(...) {
<...
-to_intel_crtc(crtc)->config = *pipe_config;
+(*(to_intel_crtc(crtc)->config)) = *pipe_config;
...>
}
@@ @@
intel_crtc_init(...) {
...
WARN_ON(drm_crtc_index(&intel_crtc->base) != intel_crtc->pipe);
+intel_crtc->config = &intel_crtc->_config;
return;
...
}
@@ struct intel_crtc *crtc; @@
-&crtc->config
+crtc->config
@@ struct intel_crtc *crtc; identifier member; @@
-crtc->config.member
+crtc->config->member
@@ expression E; @@
-&(to_intel_crtc(E)->config)
+to_intel_crtc(E)->config
@@ expression E; identifier member; @@
-to_intel_crtc(E)->config.member
+to_intel_crtc(E)->config->member
v2: Clarify manual changes by splitting them into another patch. (Matt)
Improve cocci script to generate even more of the changes. (Ander)
Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
No functional changes on this patch. Just grouping the link_standy decision
to avoid miss any change. Also making this info available everywhere
which will help to decide when to use vbt's tp time on following patch.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
[danvet: Slight editing of the commit message which was one huge
run-on sentence.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Let's respect vbt full_link (link_standby) on source side as well.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We have only two possible states with so many names and combinations that
might be confusing.
1 - Main link active / enabled / stand by / on
2 - Main link disabled / off / full off
Let's start organizing it by fixing a inverted logic when setting the sink bit.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
These conditions applies only to Haswell and we were also checking for them
on Valleyview/Cherryview.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
ON these platforms we don't have hardware tracking working for any case.
So we need to fake this on software by forcing psr to exit on every
flush.
Manual tests indicated this was needed.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Daniel Vetter