Rather than assuming an architecture defines prom_getchild and friends,
define an ops struct with hooks for the various prom functions that
pdt.c needs. This ops struct is filled in by the
arch-(and sometimes firmware-)specific code, and passed to
of_pdt_build_devicetree.
Update sparc code to define the ops struct as well.
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Clean up pdt.c:
- make build dependent upon config OF_PROMTREE
- #ifdef out the sparc-specific stuff
- create pdt-specific header
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Transitioning into making this useful for architectures other than sparc.
This is a verbatim copy of all functions/variables that've been moved.
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Rename is_root_node() to of_node_is_root() and make it available for
all archs to use, as it's not PROM-specific.
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Merge common function between powerpc, sparc and microblaze. Code is
identical for powerpc and microblaze, but adds a lock (and release) of
the devtree_lock on sparc.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
In struct device_node, the phandle is named 'linux_phandle' for PowerPC
and MicroBlaze, and 'node' for SPARC. There is no good reason for the
difference, it is just an artifact of the code diverging over a couple
of years. This patch renames both to simply .phandle.
Note: the .node also existed in PowerPC/MicroBlaze, but the only user
seems to be arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/pfunc_core.c. It doesn't
look like the assignment between .linux_phandle and .node is
significantly different enough to warrant the separate code paths
unless ibm,phandle properties actually appear in Apple device trees.
I think it is safe to eliminate the old .node property and use
phandle everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
The device is a AMBA bus if it is a child of prom node "ambapp" (AMBA
plug and play). Two functions
leon_trans_init() and leon_node_init() (defined in
sparc/kernel/leon_kernel.c) are called in the
prom_build_tree() path if CONFIG_SPARC_LEON is
defined. leon_node_init() will build up the device
tree using AMBA plug and play. Also: a extra check was addes to
prom_common.c:build_one_prop()
in case a rom-node is undefined which can happen for SPARC-LEON
because it creates only a minimum
nodes to emulate sparc behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Eisele <konrad@gaisler.com>
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
We need to split up the cpu present mask setup from the cpu_data
initialization, and this is a first step towards that.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
prom_nextprop() and prom_firstprop() have slightly different calling
conventions in 32 and 64 bit SPARC.
prom_common.c uses a ifdef guard to ensure that these functions are
called correctly.
Adjust code to eliminate this ifdef by using a calling convention that
is compatible with both 32 and 64 bit SPARC.
Signed-off-by: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This broke sparc64 in various ways.
Add an empty dummy hook in sparc32's prom_32.c so that we
can potentially handle things on that side similarly, and
in particular avoid a prom_common.c ifdef :-)
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Unfortunately there is some sparc32/sparc64 ifdef'ery in
here due to the difference in how the prom_firstprop()
and prom_nextprop() routines work.
This will be eliminated eventually.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This is where common code implementations will go as we unify
32-bit and 64-bit OF device tree code.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Andres Salomon