If we enter i915_handle_error() a second time and a global reset is
already in progress, we can simply wait for completion of the first
reset. Currently we exit early prior to the actual reset being
performed -- the worst of both worlds!
v2: Plug into the existing reset_queue, and remember that kselftests is
playing games with I915_RESET_BACKOFF to prevent hangcheck from screwing
up.
v3: Rename to i915_reset_device to fit in better with i915_reset_engine
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170620095751.13127-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
As we now distinguish everywhere that can call
i915_gem_retire_requests() following a successful wait_for_idle, we can
remove the duplication by moving that call into i915_gem_wait_for_idle()
itself.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170330145041.9005-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
I915_RESET_IN_PROGRESS is being used for both signaling the requirement
to i915_mutex_lock_interruptible() to avoid taking the struct_mutex and
to instruct a waiter (already holding the struct_mutex) to perform the
reset. To allow for a little more coordination, split these two meaning
into a couple of distinct flags. I915_RESET_BACKOFF tells
i915_mutex_lock_interruptible() not to acquire the mutex and
I915_RESET_HANDOFF tells the waiter to call i915_reset().
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170316171305.12972-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Michel Thierry